clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

2018-2019 Spurs player reviews: Chimezie Metu

New, comments

The Spurs’ 2018 2nd round draft pick spent the majority of the season playing in the G-League for the Austin Spurs.

San Antonio Spurs v Orlando Magic Photo by Sam Greenwood/Getty Images

Welcome to the 2018-19 season player reviews, where we will be rehashing the performance of 13 Spurs from this season (excluding Dejounte Murray, Pau Gasol, Donatas Motiejunas, and two-way players Drew Eubanks and Ben Moore) and looking towards the future. Kicking off the series is Chimezie Metu.

Roger Ebert once talked about how every movie he rated was independent of all the others. He didn’t believe that two movies receiving four stars were always of the same quality. Instead, he believed that both movies were equal in achieving their respective goals and expectations. These reviews will take the same approach when providing grades, so two players receiving the same grade does not necessarily mean they had the same impact on the team.


Personal

Birthday: March 22nd, 1997 (22 years old)

Height: 6’11”

Position: Forward

Contract details: $1,416,852 in 2019-2020, $1,663,861 in 2020-2021 (non-guaranteed)

Introduction

Selected 49th overall by the San Antonio Spurs in the 2018 NBA Draft, Metu signed a three year deal with the Spurs on August 30, 2018. As expected, Metu spent the majority of the 2018-2019 season playing for the Austin Spurs of the G-League.

Metu only appeared in 29 games for the San Antonio Spurs this season, with the majority of those minutes coming in garbage time. Because making judgements off such a small sample size is difficult, this article will grade him based on both his time in the NBA and G-League.

2018-2019 Traditional Statistics

League GP MIN PTS FG% 3P% FT% REB AST STL BLK TOV
League GP MIN PTS FG% 3P% FT% REB AST STL BLK TOV
G-League 26 27.3 14 49 21.1 67 7.4 2.3 0.7 1.3 3.1
NBA 29 5 1.8 32.8 0 76.5 1.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.5

2018-2019 Advanced Statistics

League OFFRTG DEFRTG NETRTG OBPM DBPM BPM AST/TO WS/48 VORP
League OFFRTG DEFRTG NETRTG OBPM DBPM BPM AST/TO WS/48 VORP
G-League 99.5 106.9 -7.4 -3.7 0.5 -3.2 0.76 0.022 -0.3
NBA 98.1 99.7 -1.5 -9 -0.2 -9.2 0.87 -0.099 -0.3

Metu has the makings of a prototypical modern big. He can handle the ball and create plays for others, his jumper looks relatively smooth, and he has the ability to defend on the perimeter. Most of that is hypothetical at this point, as his potential has yet to translate on the court.

The Austin Spurs were not better with Metu on the court. His Box Plus/Minus (BPM) of -3.2, Win Shares Per 48 (WS/48) of 0.022, and Value Over Replacement Player (VORP) of -0.3 were some of the worst numbers on the Austin Spurs, and those numbers did not improve in the games he played for San Antonio. For comparison, Eubanks had a BPM of +4, WS/48 of 0.22, and a VORP of 2.0. Ben Moore had a BPM of +3.5, WS/48 of .158, and VORP of 2.9. If Metu continues to be outperformed by players on two-way contracts, he will never see regular minutes in San Antonio.

Offensively, Metu did the majority of his damage from inside the restricted area, where he shot a fantastic 70.8% on 106 shots in the G-League. He was only 41.2% from the restricted area in the NBA, but that was over a small sample size of 17 shots. He showed the ability to get above the rim when necessary but also has the fundamentals to play from below the rim. He doesn’t yet have the size to back down opponents, so he prefers to face up and use shot fakes and jukes to get past his opponent from the post. From there he has a good pop-a-shot and right-handed hook shot. He also loves to pull up from just inside the free throw line.

Though Metu’s jumper looks decent, his percentages outside the restricted area were not good. In the G-League he connected on only 41.2% of his paint shots from outside the restricted area, 37% of his mid-range shots, and 21% of his 3-pointers. In the NBA, he shot only 2 for 19 from mid-range and failed to connect on either of the two 3-point attempts he took.

Defensively is where Metu has the most promise, but even that didn’t translate last season. He averaged 1.7 blocks in the G-League, but opponents shot a high percentage from all areas of the floor with him as the primary defender.

Looking Forward

Metu is a work-in-progress. He has the requisite skillset but is going to need to become more consistent on both sides of the ball before he makes the jump to the NBA. His contract is guaranteed next season, but I expect him to continue spending the majority of his time in the G-League.

Top Performance

December 4th, 2018 vs Utah Jazz: 10 points, 1 rebound, 2 assists, 2 steals in 13 minutes

(You can also click here and here for some G-League highlights)

Final Grade: C-

His NBA grade would definitely be an Incomplete, but his time in the G-League was not great, even as a rookie. Derrick White’s play in the G-League last year hinted at a player who was too good for the G-League and was ready to make the leap to the NBA. The fact that Metu was constantly outplayed by both Drew Eubanks and Ben Moore does not help his cause. Both players play a similar position and are a similar age as Metu, and both were signed to two-way contracts. The Spurs signed Metu to an NBA contract, so his expectations are higher than those two players. If Metu does not show improvement in nearly all facets of his game next season, the Spurs will likely move on from him sooner rather than later.


Up next: Derrick White