clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Should the Spurs be looking for a Center?

There are still a few interesting prospects available.

NBA: Milwaukee Bucks at San Antonio Spurs Soobum Im-USA TODAY Sports

It’s been a strange offseason for Spurs fans, to say the least. To recap, here is where the Spurs stand thus far:

At the guard position, the Spurs have Dejounte Murray, Patty Mills, Derrick White, Brandon Paul, newly-drafted Lonnie Walker IV and until we hear differently, Manu Ginobili. Danny Green opted in to the final year of his contract and Bryn Forbes has reportedly been offered a two-year deal that will keep him in San Antonio. Marco Belinelli has also agreed to return to the team where he won his lone NBA Championship. For these purposes, we’ll list him as a guard, but in small ball, he gets tagged as a swingman.

As for forwards, Kawhi Leonard remains on the roster for the time being. Rudy Gay re-upped with a one-year/$10M deal. The Spurs have also retained Davis Bertans with a two-year/$14.5M contract. And although LaMarcus Aldridge is sometimes treated as a center during times of small ball, he prefers his PF status. Aldridge signed an extension last season adding another three years to his tenure with the Silver & Black.

Pau Gasol is the lone center on the roster after Joffrey Lauvergne opted out of his contract. (Did anyone have money on Lauvergne being the first player to jump ship when the Kawhi Leonard dumpster fire first lit? You know you didn’t.)

So far, that is 14 contracts leaving one roster spot available. Two if the Spurs don’t guarantee Brandon Paul. Three if Manu Ginobili decides to retire. And of course there has yet to be closure for those concerned with the status of Kawhi Leonard. For now, he’s a Spur.

So, it is safe to say the Spurs need some length. I made an argument for the Spurs offering Cory Jefferson a two-way contract. After watching the rest of Summer League, I think a similar argument could be assessed to Amida Brimah or even Drew Eubanks. Youth and athleticism (and a developing 3-ball courtesy of Chip Engelland) would best serve the 2018-19 Spurs roster.

But do they need another full-time center on the bench?

There are many still available in free agency. Here are a few thoughts on three:

  1. Dewayne Dedmon- I know: been there, done that. But perhaps the seven footer is over himself enough to know that he won’t have many huge contracts coming his way and he better suit up with a winner. Dedmon started in place of Pau Gasol two seasons ago when Pau broke his finger and retained the spot after Gasol returned playing most of the rest of the season alongside Aldridge and Leonard. He then chased the money and ended up on an Atlanta Hawks team where he saw more playing time and his highest season in scoring (10 ppg), rebounds (7.9), and assist (1.5). A starting spot with Aldridge, Murray, Green, and Leonard, could be even more impressive as Dedmon shown some promise stretching the floor. I have never thought the Spurs would bring old players back, but with Belinelli returning, anything is possible.
  2. Greg Monroe- Monroe needs a home. Once one of the most physical big men on the court, he has been shuffled through various teams and line-ups. More of a traditional center, he would best serve the Spurs coming off the bench. Assuming the Spurs start with Aldridge and Gasol, a substitution involving Bertans and Monroe would maintain the 3-point threat while adding necessary rebounding to the second string. Monroe will also plug the lane better, masking some of the size lost by playing Bertans at the four.
  3. Jahlil Okafor- For no reason in particular, I have always like Okafor and thought he should be playing much better than he has. He is a player with potential who has not matured and could invariably be elevated by working with the San Antonio Spurs. In the same respect, the Spurs need a “win”. PATFO’s reputation has been questioned in the wake of the Kawhi Leonard saga. Free agents could avoid the 5-time champions if Leonard leaves and the team is left without a viable superstar. It is already well documented, the Alamo City is not a destination. BUT, players continue to come here, develop, and have a renaissance of sorts (see David Lee, Marco Belinelli, or Rudy Gay). Developing Okafor will remind players whose careers have slipped over time that the Spurs are still the best team to cultivate their game. And that alone makes bringing Okafor in a worthwhile consideration.

So what do you think? Do the Spurs need a roster spot dedicated to a true center or a stretch-5? Or should the 2-way contracts be used so that the Spurs can maintain a small ball presence in the modern NBA? Do you think Alex Len, Tarik Black, or Lucas Nogueira would be better options than listed?

Welcome to The Thread. Join in the conversation, start your own discussion, and share your thoughts. This is the Spurs community, your Spurs community. Thanks for being here.

Our community guidelines apply which should remind everyone to be cool, avoid personal attacks, not to troll and to watch the language.