Game Thread # 35 -- vs. Minnesota
I've said some dumb things on this (or other incarnations of this) blog. For example, back in 2005:
My bad. Then there's that other thing that Stampler never lets me forget. Well Stampler, it's pay back time. I'm not sure I could ever top this:
Wow. Just wow. I think you're pretty ok neato stampler, but your Kevin Garnett bias manages to eclipse my Ray Allen bias by a wide margin. He's been lambasted for never taking his team to the finals despite never having a team good enough to make the finals. My God, do you realize before this year he's never played with a teammate as good as Ray Allen? Ray fucking Allen, Mr. One Dimensional Volume Scorer Extraordinaire!
Now Minnesota is 5-30 and on pace to have the worst season in recent NBA history and the Celtics are on the exact other end of the spectrum. But Garnett doesn't take the shot at the end of the games, so fuck him, right? Dude, like, whatever.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Game Thread # 35 -- vs. Minnesota
Spurs 107
T-Wolves 84
Re: Game Thread # 35 -- vs. Minnesota
Wolves 82
Imagine what'd happen to the Celtics if Garnett got injured? Regardless of what Big Baby's been up to, I still don't buy that "it seems the supporting cast at Boston wasn't so bad after all" angle everyone's pushing right now. They're a thin team, and their starters play a lot of minutes.
And Jefferson's a good player.
Re: Game Thread # 35 -- vs. Minnesota
Re: Game Thread # 35 -- vs. Minnesota
Re: Game Thread # 35 -- vs. Minnesota
by mikewells on Jan 13, 2008 2:58 AM CST reply actions
Re: Game Thread # 35 -- vs. Minnesota
Re: Game Thread # 35 -- vs. Minnesota
As far as I'm concerned basketball-wise you can't prove it's a great trade unless Boston wins the ring with it.
I think Jefferson-Allen-Pierce etc. would've been a pretty decent team too. More offensive less defensive maybe, but a playoff team nonetheless.
If Garnett goes ringless in Boston, and Jefferson still has seven more good years in him by the time KG hangs it up, it'll look bad.
P.S. Somebody posted your "I'm not happy with Pop" post on Spurstalk and TimVP and the gang are tearing you a new one. PtR is officially recognized there now, I guess, although no one is admitting to being a fan of it on the record.
Re: Game Thread # 35 -- vs. Minnesota
Ooh ooh ooh!!!! Has somebody said something mindlessly trite and finished it off with "'nuff said" yet???? 'Cause that's my favorite part.
I'm not going to bother reading their thoughts because:
A) I don't give a shit.
B) They're pretty much all morans and I am like way smrter than them when it comes to the Spurs. And everything else, for that matter.
And yes, you can post that over there.
Re: Game Thread # 35 -- vs. Minnesota
Surround that same cast with Garnett and what's their record? 9-26? Congrats.
What's Boston's record with the same team but Jefferson for KG? 25-10.
This first season is the maximum chance for Boston to look great in this trade and Minny to look stupid. The rest of the way the Celtics will get worse and the T-Pups will improve with those 1st rounders and young players.
Re: Game Thread # 35 -- vs. Minnesota
Dude. You keep digging yourself a bigger hole. You basically just said the addition of Ray Allen made the Celtics go from a 0.293 team (24-58 in 06-07) to a .714 team (25-10).
Just admit you're totally irrational when it comes to Kevin Garnett. It's ok. I feel the same way about Miranda Otto.
Re: Game Thread # 35 -- vs. Minnesota
This whole Boston getting KG thing was just random luck. They could've gotten one of the top two picks and been mired in rebuilding mode like Seattle right now.
Boston pretty much threw their season last year for the draft lottery. They weren't nearly as bad as their record. Don't tell me a team with a healthy Pierce and Jefferson couldn't compete in a crappy Eastern conference.
by Aaronstampler on Jan 14, 2008 5:33 PM CST up reply actions
Re: Game Thread # 35 -- vs. Minnesota
And yes you're right, the Spurstalk community are basically a horde of idiots. But they don't have the context of your post or anything. People at PtR know we occasionally bitch about Pop but it's not like we want him shitcanned or anything. Over there they don't know where you're coming from, so you sound like some new-comer lunatic who's calling for his head. Pop is a sacred cow over there, and so is Tim for that matter so unless TimVP is the one to rip them, they cannot be ripped.
by Aaronstampler on Jan 14, 2008 5:39 PM CST up reply actions
Re: Game Thread # 35 -- vs. Minnesota
I'm with you. Plus, the Pistons / Spurs would be boringer than shit.
EXACTLY. I know they don't realize the context, but I don't think it's worth my time to clue them in.
A) I don't care what they think. Two years ago I would have, but others' opinions of my thoughts / writing on the Spurs no longer concerns me. (Which may explain why my writing has sucked of late.)
B) They want to disagree with me. People enjoy disagreeing with others because it involves feeling like you're right. I could give them a scientific proof of Pop's shortcomings and it wouldn't make a difference.
Re: Game Thread # 35 -- vs. Minnesota
This is a salient point.

by 



























