San Antonio Spurs 96, Oklahoma City Thunder 108 -- Game Recap
Coming off an emotional win against the Nuggets the night before, I'm not sure if we should have expected anything other than what the Spurs gave Sunday night. When both teams have games the night before, it's clearly to the younger team's benefit, and the Oklahoma City Thunder took full advantage of the Spurs.
The Spurs played a competitive first half. At the end of the first quarter, the Spurs only trailed by two points, 22 - 24. But you got the sense that the Spurs were fortunate to not be down more. At the half, the Spurs trailed by 6, but again it felt as if the teams were playing at different levels than the score indicated.
The Spurs simply looked flat. Shots that had been falling previous nights rimmed out. The hustle, while still present, seemed a step slow. And to make matters worse, the officials seemed to call a disproportionate number of touch fouls on the Spurs. Those momentum killing ticky-tacks had an impact on our already desperate team.
But to be fair, the aggressor gets the calls, and the Thunder were truly the agressors last night. They looked sharp and we looked tired. Very tired. And OKC, who was completing their first ever Triple Lindy, looked fresh ready to keep on playing. The game slipped away after halftime, when the dreaded TQC resurfaced as though it was 2009 all over again, and it was Manu's right ankle (and not the fifth metacarpal of his lefty) that was keeping him out of the game. Both Tony Parker and DeJuan Blair sustained injuries in the third and did not return, although both seemed fine after the game and shouldn't be expected to miss any games. The athleticism and youth of the Thunder allowed them to punish our road weary team.
The good news is that it was a game that we were supposed to lose, according to my FSGOS, "Fred's Scariness-of-Game Score." Our two toughest games so far, as dictated by our schedule, have been the game we lost at Houston and this blowout in Oklahoma. Both of those had a FSOGS of 5. I say it's good news because we only have 16 games with a rank of 4 or higher this year (with the worst being the 3/17 game in Dallas, the Triple Lindy landing in Sacramento on 4/18, and the game just prior to that, in LA against the Lakers -- hope you have fun at that one, Mr. Wilco!).
|
Game # |
Date |
Opp |
FSOGS |
W/L |
|
Game # |
Date |
Opp |
FSOGS |
W/L |
|
1 |
12/26/2011 |
mem |
3 |
W |
34 |
2/23/2012 |
@ den |
0 |
||
|
2 |
12/28/2011 |
lac |
2 |
W |
35 |
2/29/2012 |
chi |
3 |
||
|
3 |
12/29/2011 |
@ hou |
5 |
L |
36 |
3/2/2012 |
cha |
0 |
||
|
4 |
12/31/2011 |
uth |
1 |
W |
37 |
3/4/2012 |
den |
2 |
||
|
5 |
1/2/2012 |
@ min |
1 |
L |
38 |
3/7/2012 |
nyk |
-2 |
||
|
6 |
1/4/2012 |
gsw |
1 |
W |
39 |
3/9/2012 |
lac |
2 |
||
|
7 |
1/5/2012 |
dal |
2 |
W |
40 |
3/12/2012 |
was |
0 |
||
|
8 |
1/7/2012 |
den |
-1 |
W |
41 |
3/14/2012 |
orl |
-1 |
||
|
9 |
1/8/2012 |
@ okc |
5 |
L |
42 |
3/16/2012 |
@ okc |
2 |
||
|
10 |
1/10/2012 |
@ mil |
2 |
43 |
3/17/2012 |
@ dal |
10 |
|||
|
11 |
1/11/2012 |
hou |
1 |
44 |
3/21/2012 |
min |
1 |
|||
|
12 |
1/13/2012 |
por |
2 |
45 |
3/23/2012 |
dal |
2 |
|||
|
13 |
1/15/2012 |
pho |
1 |
46 |
3/24/2012 |
@ nor |
5 |
|||
|
14 |
1/17/2012 |
@ mia |
6 |
47 |
3/25/2012 |
phi |
6 |
|||
|
15 |
1/18/2012 |
@ orl |
11 |
48 |
3/27/2012 |
@ pho |
3 |
|||
|
16 |
1/20/2012 |
sac |
0 |
49 |
3/28/2012 |
@ sac |
5 |
|||
|
17 |
1/21/2012 |
@ hou |
3 |
50 |
3/31/2012 |
ind |
2 |
|||
|
18 |
1/23/2012 |
@ nor |
3 |
51 |
4/3/2012 |
@ cle |
2 |
|||
|
19 |
1/25/2012 |
atl |
2 |
52 |
4/4/2012 |
@ bos |
7 |
|||
|
20 |
1/27/2012 |
@ min |
3 |
53 |
4/6/2012 |
nor |
1 |
|||
|
21 |
1/29/2012 |
@ dal |
4 |
54 |
4/8/2012 |
uth |
1 |
|||
|
22 |
1/30/2012 |
@ mem |
9 |
55 |
4/9/2012 |
@ uth |
-1 |
|||
|
23 |
2/1/2012 |
hou |
1 |
56 |
4/11/2012 |
lal |
2 |
|||
|
24 |
2/2/2012 |
nor |
1 |
57 |
4/12/2012 |
mem |
4 |
|||
|
25 |
2/4/2012 |
okc |
1 |
58 |
4/14/2012 |
pho |
-2 |
|||
|
26 |
2/6/2012 |
@ mem |
0 |
59 |
4/16/2012 |
@ gsw |
3 |
|||
|
27 |
2/8/2012 |
@ phi |
2 |
60 |
4/17/2012 |
@ lal |
7 |
|||
|
28 |
2/11/2012 |
@ njn |
0 |
61 |
4/18/2012 |
@ sac |
9 |
|||
|
29 |
2/14/2012 |
@ det |
2 |
62 |
4/20/2012 |
lal |
2 |
|||
|
30 |
2/15/2012 |
@ tor |
2 |
63 |
4/22/2012 |
cle |
0 |
|||
|
31 |
2/18/2012 |
@ lac |
4 |
64 |
4/23/2012 |
por |
2 |
|||
|
32 |
2/20/2012 |
@ uth |
0 |
65 |
4/25/2012 |
@ pho |
0 |
|||
|
33 |
2/21/2012 |
@ por |
3 |
66 |
4/26/2012 |
@ gsw |
6 |
If we lost all of these difficult games, that would give us a record of 49 - 17. That's not too bad at all. I know that the Spurs will not lose all of the difficult games and win the easy ones, we already have a Minnesota example for that, I'm just pointing out that our schedule is not impossible. In addition, the second half of the year is when our schedule gets really brutal, and that just happens to be when we should be getting our best player back.

The Levitator
via whoznext.biz
So, let's not hit the panic button just yet. I know our road record is awful, but it's only been three games. Our schedule made the Houston and OKC games extremely difficult, and we lost our best player in Minnesota, which definitley changed the complexion of that game.
Your Three Stars Silver Linings
3.) Kawhi Leonard
In extended minutes, Kawhi managed to record his first double-double with 13 points and 10 rebounds. He's looking more and more comfortable on the court and that can only be beneficial for the Spurs.
2.) Gary Neal
Gary Neal led the Spurs in scoring with 18 points making an efficient 7 of 12 shots, 2 of 3 from behind the arc.
1.) Minutes Played
Tim, Tony, and RJ played 23, 25, and 19 minutes, respectively. Kawhi, Neal, Green, and Anderson played 34, 28, 21, and 17 minutes, respectively. If the Spurs are going to lose, I would much prefer a blowout so that Pop has the option of resting the guys that need rest and playing the guys that need playing time. A loss stings, but the minutes played lessens the blow.
48 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Malcolm Thomas from the LA defenders has been signed by the Spurs. He is a former teammate of Leonard. Anyone see him play? I don’t know anything about him does he have a good chance of sticking with the team?
by spurlover on Jan 9, 2012 6:31 PM CST via mobile reply actions
From Spurs Nation blog on Malcolm Thomas
He then transferred to San Diego State, where along with Leonard he helped the Aztecs become a breakthrough team under Coach Steve Fisher. In his senior season last year, he was named to the All-Mountain West Conference defensive team and finished second in the conference in rebounding and blocked shots. He finished his two-year career with the Aztecs as the school’s second leading career shot blocker and ranked eighth in rebound average and field goal percentage.
His addition will add more depth to the Spurs’ biggest weakness inside. Scouts like his determination, hustle and willingness to do the dirty work inside.
<++ If Dejuan Blair had ACLs, nobody would ever get a rebound ++>
I like the 3 silver linings. This was a tough game for us. I also like your game ratings. I’m sure we’ll drop some easy ones, but I also aticipate a few W’s in the hard games.
Thanks for this. It’s funny they mention how he’d be guarding players like Bonner and others.
"He's the ultimate zone buster." – Bill Land on Gary Neal
"I like the fact that he’s a man." – Hubie Brown on DeJuan Blair
by Manu ex Machina on Jan 9, 2012 11:22 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks. He sounds like the PF we have been looking for. I know we have a lot of Blair fans on PTR but he is everything Blair isn’t. He likes doing the dirty work plays D blocks shots and what Blair never does block out his man so a teammate can grab a rebound.
by spurlover on Jan 10, 2012 12:17 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Honestly, I’m hoping Spurs can just put more guys in there so that the team can sit Duncan more and more. This will help a lot.
Winter is coming
Yes but a guy who is all about doing the dirty work is definitely a plus. Someone who is willing to do all the little things not to make himself look good but to make the team better is definitely appealing to have on the roster.
by spurlover on Jan 10, 2012 12:32 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
He comes from a solid system that Leonard was part of, so I can’t be mad with that. It’s a step up in my mind to Ike.
Winter is coming
You gotta love it when you get a guy who just gets his lunch pale and just goes to work. Willing to block out so Leonard, Tim, teammates can gobble up rebounds and pad their stats.
by spurlover on Jan 10, 2012 12:44 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Box out his man is what I meant to say not block out his man, though that is another thing he doesn’t do is block shots.
by spurlover on Jan 10, 2012 12:26 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Great rating system
"got him at 42……Chad Ford can’t keep up with RC ‘Bargin Basement’ Buford."
Spurs Yoda on Draft Night 2011
by Joe deLarios on Jan 9, 2012 9:02 PM CST via mobile reply actions
While I would normally be voting for Spurs for the All-Star Game, I’m trying to decide if I should vote for anyone but Spurs to let them rest this year. I was thinking I’d vote for players from their next opponent after the game, though that is the Bulls and the Bobcats. I suppose there should be at least 4 Bulls in the All-Star game.
Chris Daniels > Malcom Thomas
Do or do not! There is no try!
by Spurs Yoda on Jan 9, 2012 10:36 PM CST via mobile reply actions
“When both teams have games the night before, it’s clearly to the younger team’s benefit, and the Oklahoma City Thunder took full advantage of the Spurs.”
Pardon me but doesn’t this walk right up to the line of calling the Spurs old? Kind of surprising given all the new young additions the last couple of seasons – at least to me.
"Hey if repeating as champions were that easy even the Spurs could do it." olf
Our key players are old. We have young additions, but we rely heavily on Tony, RJ and Tim, 29, 31, and 35, respectively. The team that relies on Durant, Westbrook and Harden, (23, 23, & 22) has the youth advantage in back to backs. It’s not close.
"GINOBILI!" -- Sir Charles
That said, their youngins have more experience like a Nick Collison, Nazr or Cook as well. Would say Maynor, but he got injured the game before.
Winter is coming
I just derived the Spurs and Thunder’s weighted average age by minutes played so far this season. Ours is 27.6. OKC is at 25.01. This is a huge difference as far as the weighted average age goes. In addition, their best 3 are younger than their average, while ours are older. So, like grego21 just pointed out, their lesser players actually increase their age, while ours serve to lower the average.
"GINOBILI!" -- Sir Charles
Once we are 20 or so games deep, I’m going to derive it for the entire league, as I did last year, and dedicate a article to it. Wow, turns out I wrote that in 2009. Time flies.
"GINOBILI!" -- Sir Charles
We have become significantly younger since 2009. We were at 29.7 back then. How counterintuitive.
"GINOBILI!" -- Sir Charles
Here’s an article from Hoopism that tracks the true age of all the teams in the NBA based on playing time. There’s ten teams older than the Spurs. Maybe it could help with your article.
"Deep down we all know that swagger comes hand in hand with insecurity. We strut not to convince competitors of our dominance; we strut to convince ourselves."
Matthew Powell
Fair enough. It’s just unusual to see the point that the Spurs are ‘un-young’ made around here.
Anyway, those ages kinda reminded me of something I just read about back in the day. “. . .Wilt had 24 points, 29 rebounds and 10 blocks in Game5 of the 1972 NBA Finals, at age 35 while leading the Lakers to the title despite a fractured wrist.”
"Hey if repeating as champions were that easy even the Spurs could do it." olf
I don’t think anybody around here claims that the Spurs are “young”. The point is just made that they are not old as all the pundits love to claim they are.
You said it right the first time. “Our key players are old. We have young additions, but we rely heavily on Tony, RJ and Tim, 29, 31, and 35, respectively.”
Hey, here’s a question for you. I see Tony, Tim & Manu on this year’s all-star ballot. In your estimation which one of the younger Spurs (<29 yr old) is most likely to make it onto a future all-star ballot? Just curious what you think.
"Hey if repeating as champions were that easy even the Spurs could do it." olf
Realizing that it’s an extremely small sample size, it has to be Danny Green. I know Dale is working on a Danny Green article right now that will be a great read. He has the complete game. He can hit the three, he’s shown an intermediate game, and he can score at the rim. He’s an excellent defender with a Manu/Rodman sixth sense. He even rebounds. I think he’ll be putting up double doubles, pts/rebs, on a semi-consistent basis in the coming years. Oh, and he’s only 25, with no mileage. He should hit his prime in 2 to 4 years. I think everyone here is excited to watch this guy blossom. And like everyone else here, I’m going to claim to be the first to recognize his talent. You hear that, THE FIRST!
"GINOBILI!" -- Sir Charles
Hmm. Thanks I’ll keep a wary eye on him.
Just for that, here’s another interesting Laker fact for ya (No need to thank me.): “Kobe was named Western Conference Player of the Week despite injured wrist ligament. In Dec 2009, he was Player of the Month with broken finger.”
"Hey if repeating as champions were that easy even the Spurs could do it." olf
He was impressive. But, without him I’m not sure what happens. And every time he plays they show about 42 close ups of him wincing in pain as he massages it. So, unless he’s milking it, how long can he play with this injury? Seems like this brutal schedule might take him out. Or are you confident he’ll give you 60+ games?
"GINOBILI!" -- Sir Charles
Oh I don’t have high expectations for this season at all. And I can’t see how Kobe’s wrist lasts all season. It looks nasty – of course I thought that about his broken finger too.
But even before Kobe got hurt the Lakers were already in a transition, Phil’s gone and Mike Brown is implementing his amazing “LeBron and a bunch of suck” Cavs offense in LA. So far we’ve only mastered the “bunch of suck” part. Man we sure look old un-young and slow un-fast.
Bynum & Pau are playing OK but all you have to do is crowd them in the lane since we have no one who can make even a wide open jumper. It looks pretty ugly and not much practice or rest time on the horizon which means it is unlikely to improve soon.
So I am preparing to be satisfied with those recent Finals trips and Championships. But hey, at least I get to watch Clipper games at no extra charge.
"Hey if repeating as champions were that easy even the Spurs could do it." olf
TO be that bold? I think Steve, myself and others mentioned him early too!
I don’t think he’ll be a double-double player. I think he can bolster what he has to be like a better defensive/more athletic version of Rip Hamilton/Ray Allen cross. His shot is not as quick as Ray or even Neal though.
With his defense, he’ll definitely keep a job with a top team that cares about that like a Spurs, OKC, etc.
Winter is coming
I was just trying to stir up a little trouble. I do not see the Rip/Ray analogy at all. To me, while great, those are one-dimensional players. Green already has more junk in his game, offensively and defensively, than they ever had.
I think Danny has more of a Sean Elliott game. A little slasher, a dash of intermediate game, and the ability to hit the three. Green’s a more mobile defender, though.
"GINOBILI!" -- Sir Charles
They did shoot very well. I do think they are one dimensional, but Allen had a little bit of a drive game in his younger days.
I think Green is more mobile, but I think he doesn’t have that body strength that Elliot had. It might be better in this day and age of bball though. Too soon to say.
Even though JA has hit a slump, I still think he is going to be something. as well
Winter is coming
I couldn’t watch the game. How did Green do guarding OKC players?
by LionZion on Jan 10, 2012 8:32 AM CST via iPhone app reply actions
His defense was there, 5 rebs, 1 block, 1 steal in 21 minutes. He was active, with 4 dimes on top of that. The problem was that his shot was off. He was 0 for 5 until the final 1:30 of the game. He made two garbage time threes right at the end.
"GINOBILI!" -- Sir Charles
Ah. Not bad. I was afraid he might get carried away a little and start throwing up wild shots on O. Having a bad night is ok.
Good to know his D is consistent.
by LionZion on Jan 10, 2012 9:07 AM CST via iPhone app up reply actions
He got lost in trying to do too much on offense. Pop pulled him because of that. His game of heat check was unsuccessful. The OKC long arms helped stop a lot of his drives and everyone else, including Ford.
Winter is coming
This. He was trying to force things too much on offense, instead of going with the flow. The team as a whole did not pass the ball like we saw against Denver.

by 






























