Dissecting Pop's Brain: The Art of Losing
If there is one thing Pop realized after last season's early exit, it is that he can't fully pin our playoffs hopes entirely on our veteran core to bring us to promised land, particularly in clutch situations... not when Tim Duncan's knees are failing him... not when Manu's elbow or whichever part of his brittle anatomy sustains another injury... not when Tony struggles to score... not when RJamnesty plays hide-and-seek, never to be found again. Pop finally realizes that he needs everybody, down to the last man on the bench, to be ready when "the moment" comes.
Truth be told that the playoffs is where great players thrive. Those mentioned above aptly fit that category (including RJamnesty to a much lesser extent, perhaps). Our big three are three of the most mentally tough players in the league. Their clutch reputation should be more than enough proof of that. A huge part of our playoff success will undoubtedly depend on their performance... but not in its entirety, most especially now that age has become more and more of a factor, particularly with Duncan (and also Manu with his seemingly reduced bone-calcium concentration). We need somebody else to step up when these great players' bodies are failing them... and consequently failing the entire team as well.
This brings us to the topic I want to discuss with you, Spurnatics. We might be used to having our top vets on the floor during clutch situations. Pop rarely fields in youngsters six minutes left in the fourth quarter of a tightly fought contest. But don't look now, that seems to be a thing of the past already... at least in this early part of the elimination round. Last season, a W had more value in Pop's mind, reason why with the exception of Gary Neal and George Hill, both guys proving to be mentally tough players themselves, he would normally field in the Tony-Manu-RJ-Timmeh-Dice five to close out games, regardless of whichever bench player was playing exceptionally well earlier in the ballgame.
Last season, Pop far valued W over E... E as in experience. When Manu's effectiveness suffered, Parker's shot not falling, and Timmeh's knees crumbling, all else failed, too. Now, Pop seems to understand that and he all the more seems so intent on risking games just to provide our neophytes the needed E they could acquire to prepare them for the truest of all true tests: the NBA playoffs. He wants them to feel the unbearable pain of losing games like the close ones we've lost, thus far... and he also wants them to feel the overwhelming joy of closing out games to earn a W. It sure is a slow and painful process, especially if we lose games we could have won easily had we fielded in our veteran core in the clutch. Pop is trying to mold them like a blacksmith hardens steel, putting them into the fire, just as he did to Tony and Manu in their younger years.
It's easy to fret and blame Pop for what one might consider as a coaching mistake, especially if the loss is as painful as the ones we recently had. Nevertheless, fact of the matter is that he isn't looking for playoff positioning as much as he did last season. He might not publicly admit it, but I know he feels like I do - that we have what it takes -talent and personnel- to bring home the bacon. I've been one of the very few guys here who think that we don't NEED a trade. That has been my stand even before the season went underway. The top seed that we had last season, even with Tiago's very limited minutes, and Tim's and Manu's injuries should mean something and shouldn't count for nothing. Many people continue to overlook that.
We can win this all the way... but that has to come with a few growing pains before we go to the next plateau. That is how I think Pop's brain works. He sees the beauty in the art of losing sometimes.
via cuzoogle.com
17 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You have to make it to the playoffs in order to be able to play the bench in the playoffs.
A man gets the eye of a Tiger, but a Tiger gets the eye of a Manu.
I knew someone would say that… thought of including it in the writeup, but decided against it, as it somehow deviates from its true intention, not to mention that it could rile up some of the hardcore fans here (lol). There are a couple of scenarios that could play out this season. One is if we could reverse our fortunes post LWM and LWF, where we get a much deeper team with two of our best play-makers back in the fold. Another is when Pop decides against popular notion, like he always does, to play our bench all the way, regardless of us making the playoffs or not. This could then mean two things: We make the playoffs or we don’t. Either way, Pop could see it as a win-win situation. If we make the playoffs, then we can make a legitimate run for it, with our healthy veteran core and a mentally tough supporting cast. Another scenario is if we don’t make the playoffs, and position ourselves for the lottery. I’ve heard rumors that there are quite a lot of potential in this year’s draft, as many college players opted to postpone their enlistment to the NBA draft because of the lockout. Well, it’s hard to imagine the latter case, but it’s also not too farfetched either.
It's better to be silent and be thought of as a fool... than open your mouth and remove all doubts.
Pop ruined the comeback when he substituted BonBon with Kawhi for 1.1 seconds. BonBon lost his confidence. Pop jinxed it.
A casual diehard Spurs fan.
I don’t think that’s fair—Kawhi was purely a defensive substitution, for one play. Therefore, Bonner goes back out at the end when we need shooters.
"Sometimes I think I lost something really important to me, and it turns out I already ate it."
by DrumsInTheDeep on Jan 30, 2012 2:41 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
You’re actually trying to combat cries of “Jinx” with logic?
The 2012 season: the Spurs have a chance, but only if Manu can be Manu in the playoffs. - CapHill
Pounding the Rock
Well…
"Sometimes I think I lost something really important to me, and it turns out I already ate it."
by DrumsInTheDeep on Jan 30, 2012 5:44 PM CST up reply actions
BAH! Rationality.
Cinnamon and sugary as softly spoken lies, you never know just how you look through other peoples' eyes
by SpursfanSteve on Jan 30, 2012 6:31 PM CST up reply actions
Danny Green won that game
I know he won’t get official credit, but I would be surprised if the coaches had not showed him that the clock should have had .6 seconds left. Imagine they let it run long in Dallas, yes they did. My point is that the kids won that game even if the final result did not show that. I am proud of the Spurs second team.
dave mcnulla
spurs fan
I agree completely. And i’m sure Green knows that as well, he and Neal played we the chip on their shoulders and the only reason i’m sad about the loss, is that we missed on all the chaos on the Mavs side following their collapse.
I don’t like it either. But it’s likely one of the things we have to give up for having auto-updating threads.
The 2012 season: the Spurs have a chance, but only if Manu can be Manu in the playoffs. - CapHill
Pounding the Rock
After last night, the whole basketball world is talking and some are writing about how Pop stayed with “the bench”. If what you said works out to be true then Pop truly has wisdom and not simply intelligence. But if this turns out to be a mid-winters dream and he falls back into the comfortable security mode, the team can not expand anymore than it is now. Last night the men played with purpose. They ran plays. They hit the open man. They were not scared of messing up or Pop’s wrath. They had their own rhythm and flow. They executed Pop’s plan of motion for the future and after last night, it looks pretty good.
In an article from a month or so, Abbot talks about those insane minutes guys like Griffin or Deng are playing and then he says: "Here’s a guess as to why coaches play their best players such long minutes: Because they’re scared. Scared of lots of things. Scared of losing, scared of looking dumb and — in an industry where the average job lasts just a few years — scared of getting fired. The reality is that almost every coach in the NBA is on the hot seat every year. (A notable exception: Popovich.) "
While I appreciate what Pop has done, the fact remains that he is probably the ONLY coach in the NBA who can allow himself to do such a thing. It’s not the first time Pop has sent his bench on blowout, and none of the other times it worked. So while it an utterly amazing game to watch this was bound to happen at least once because we have a good bench. If there is another something that should be taken out of this game is how psychologically challenged, unmotivated and lost the mavs looked[aside from JET] during those minutes.

by 

































