Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Grading the Position: Small Forward

Now we get to a position that's not quite as cut and dry as the guard spots.  The Small Forward spot has been a question mark for the Spurs since the departure of Bruce Bowen and the decline of Michael Finley.  We've all wanted the elusive defender that Bowen was and we've all missed the shooting that Finley provided.  This year the Spurs took their chances with a revamped RJ, much to my consternation.

The SF is the most occupied position on San Antonio's roster, but is there anything worth having amongst all those players? Join me as we take a gander and grades all those SF's racked up.

Star-divide

See here for the grades of the Point Guards

See here for the grades of the Shooting Guards

Spurs-jefferson-032910jpg-9240ecfa15c21e8e_medium

via media.oregonlive.com

At least he's trying

Richard Jefferson - Grades:  Season B-, Playoffs D+

RJ 2.0 was better than last year.  He hustled on defense, he shot his 3's pretty well and most importantly he didn't look too lost.  That was the way the year started.  Slowly as the year wore on Jefferson's shots stopped falling and his agression ebbed and wained.  Don't get me wrong, he was way way better than last year all year, but he couldn't keep up the same level of play throughout the year and certainly didn't provide the scoring or defense punch we all had hoped of before the 2009-2010 season.  Credit should be given to Jefferson.  He worked hard in the off-season and it paid off.  A "B-" grade was pretty much unthinkable at the end of last season.

The playoffs looked a lot like the regular season for Rage.  He started off pretty well, but faded.  He faded so much that he only played 10 minutes in Game 6.  He wasn't effective against the quicker Memphis team and his confidence,  much like his offensive game, was shot.  The Small Forward spot killed us against the Grizz and RJ bares the vast majority of that blame.

Going forward it's hard to see how Jefferson fits in on this team.  He no longer provides strong athleticism at his position, he costs a lot of money and he pretty ineffectual when he is on the floor.  I can live with limited ability on the offensive end if there's a defensive presence brought to guarding the opponents best wing player.  Problem with Princess Peanut is he brings neither.  However, unless the Spurs pull of some sort of crazy trade or somehow buyout Jefferson (neither of which is likely), I foresee Jefferson being in San Antonio for the remainder of his contract.  I think his role will diminish, but probably not as quickly as his play will.  3 more years of ineptitude at between 8 and 11 million bucks remain, so we have that to look forward to. 

 

 

James-anderson-1022-306x509_medium

via blog.mysanantonio.com

James Anderson - Grades: Season C, Playoffs N/A

Talk about a tease.  Anderson came out of the gate and played really well for this team.  His pre-injury game gave all of use hope that if Jefferson didn't improve we had somebody that could really fill in well.  Then the injury bug found Anderson and bit him hard.  Anderson ended up only playing in 26 games as a rookie and all the games after his injury early in the year were hardly encouraging.  It seemed like the former Cowboy was doomed to have a season that will easily be forgotten.

Anderson was clearly not ready for the playoffs and didn't play a lick in them.

Going forward Anderson still has great potential.  He should be able to play either the 2 or 3 spot and be effective at either.  His scoring touch will be a welcome addition to the Small Forward position, so he'll probably be moved over to the SG spot.  Anderson's got the potential, but at this point that's all it is.  We saw glimpses of more, but until he can put together and good season worth of play and prove that the fact he came back from the injury woefully out of shape is an anomaly, we won't know what the Spurs have in him.

 

10257-danny_green_bio_spurs_medium

via www.browsebiography.com

Danny Green - Grades: Season C, Playoffs C

Green's season and playoffs didn't amount to much.  I probably shouldn't even grade him on either, but considering he played, I guess I should.  Green did a fine job, but didn't really stand out and thus the passing grade.  

In my opinion, of the players we've seen at this position play, Green has the most potential to stick at the SF spot for the Spurs.  He's got really nice size (bulk not that he's short on height) and he's athletic enough to guard the position as well as guard a lot of SG's.  I'll be very interested to see how Pop uses Green in the future, assuming of course that he sticks with the team.  I like what I've seen of Green and I hope the Spurs give him a chance going forward.


Gyi0060076276_medium

via cdn0.sbnation.com

Da`Sean Butler - Grades: N/A

Butler is an enigma, wrapped in a mystery.  He was signed late in the year after being drafted by Miami and recovering from an injury suffered in college.  Butler was sent to Austin in late March and I really have no idea how he looked while there.  R.C. Buford told the SA Express News that signing Butler wasn't about the 2010-2011.  Butler is 6-7 and 230 pounds.  He's got really nice size and you hear nothing but good stuff about him from people around West Virginia.  Let's hope that the low risk signing of Butler turns in the high reward on the court.  I'm looking forward to seeing what he brings to the table.

Need:

The Spurs need a more athletic more talented version of Richard Jefferson.  They've got several guys on the roster that could fit that description, but we don't know for sure.  I have a feeling the Spurs will hold on to what they have at the SF position and wait to see if any of the young guys pan out to be the SF of the future.

Want:

I want to trade Richard Jefferson.  I am probably too hard on Rage, but he just doesn't get it done for me.  I had expected him to come in a be a difference maker, but instead he's been a very highly paid non-difference maker.  Frankly, I don't think the Spurs improved by getting him and cutting Michael Finley or trading Bruce Bowen.  At least you knew those guys were going to hit their open looks from downtown.  I would trade Jefferson for almost anything that would help this team, but ideally I'd like to get a defensive minded SF that can help as the young guns develop.

Overall Position Grade:

C

Poll
How do you grade the SF position?
A - They weren't that bad
6 votes
B - It could have been worse
39 votes
C - Yeah, not good
138 votes
F - Trade RJ...please
281 votes

464 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 83 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Rec’d

"He was just a young skinny guy who looked like a winner. We didn’t know he was going to be as good as he is."
—Popovich on Manu Ginobili

by spursfan87 on May 11, 2011 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

nope, not at all – what bothers me the most about RJ is his total lack of B-Ball IQ – talk about zombies……..no, not you Finley, get back to your crypt

"Everybody thought he was going to be gone forever, including me, and the foie gras and truffle treatment worked really well." Pop on Tony's Injury 3/4/11

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gilmoar01.html

by Joe deLarios on May 12, 2011 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

 I would trade Jefferson for almost anything that would help this team, but ideally I’d like to get a defensive minded SF that can help as the young guns develop.

Defense win championships … thats a fact

But at some point .. I think that the spurs fail in the playoffs … just like they fail the last year ..
>Last year .. The Spurs didnt have enough scoring options .. the bench of phoenix kill us
>This year… The Grizzlies play a hard defense … and the spurs didnt have enough scoring options

by cuentaluis1 on May 11, 2011 12:22 AM CDT reply actions  

Actually, last season Spurs had improved defense numbers from their 3 spot in the last few years… It certainly wasn’t because of Neal playing the 3 position.

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 11, 2011 1:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

I would like to see how Mr. Butler fares with our team. I want to comment “The Butler did it.” in the game threads every time he plays.

Yo, I’m 6-11, but I just want to dribble through my legs and shoot jumpshots like a guard. - Marc Blucas on Tim Duncan

by TDzilla! on May 11, 2011 2:44 AM CDT reply actions  

Da`Sean Butler is a cool name. How about ‘The Sean’?

"My wife and I were happy for twenty years. Then we met."
-Rodney Dangerfield

by Ayatollah on May 11, 2011 3:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yo, I’m 6-11, but I just want to dribble through my legs and shoot jumpshots like a guard. - Marc Blucas on Tim Duncan

by TDzilla! on May 11, 2011 5:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

I like RJ. I think when we had arguably the greatest wing defender to ever play this game, we’re a little spoiled. RJ had a good year, not so good in the playoffs. What really hurt this position IMO is that we didn’t have a true backup for RJ. Manu is great but having him play backup SF at this point in his career I just believe was a mistake and not fair. Manu should play his position SG maybe a little PG and that’s it. Same goes for Neal SG, PG. I think if there had been a true SF pushing RJ threatening RJ for starting min. the competition would have brought out the best in RJ. I know RJ still didn’t perform up to his contract this year but the way Pop was doing the rotation Neal starting and Manu and Hill backing up Neal if RJ had gone down for the year. I think RJ would have been a lot more appreciated by all. This position IMO is C+. Our weak link in the chain is PF and C. This should be our biggest concern if we are to compete next year in what might be Timmy’s last year.

by spurlover on May 11, 2011 3:42 AM CDT reply actions  

Agreed we need a better back up for RJ and possibly one of the young guys will be able to fill that role next year. However to say that we needed a better back up to push RJ and threaten him for playing time bugs me a bit. I’d like to think that these guys are all pro’s and are going to give it there best effort no matter who plays behind them.

That is the Spurs’ reason for getting up in the morning.
Metaphorically speaking, they can sleep when they are dead, and they aren’t dead yet.

by NotDeadYet on May 11, 2011 8:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

their not there

That is the Spurs’ reason for getting up in the morning.
Metaphorically speaking, they can sleep when they are dead, and they aren’t dead yet.

by NotDeadYet on May 11, 2011 8:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think RJ’s initial problem was that he chose to wear No. 24. Rage, until you prove us wrong, you’re No. 6. No one should blatantly try to double No. 12’s production.
heh.

can't forget Matty, if you did you'd feel gyped
like your sandwich ain't a sandwich without Miracle Whip

by Iullaby on May 11, 2011 9:52 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Well done. Rec’d.

by Big50 on May 11, 2011 10:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ha, nice

"He was just a young skinny guy who looked like a winner. We didn’t know he was going to be as good as he is."
—Popovich on Manu Ginobili

by spursfan87 on May 11, 2011 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think we release Green. Butler and Anderson can back up the SF spot quite well. I don’t think RJ was THAT bad this year (even during the playoffs) but the SF spot in general was horrible. We were a flawed team that had to run out on 3 guard lineups if RJ got in trouble at all.

I look forward to Butler though, I’ve wanted him on the Spurs all year.

"If the NBA season is a marathon, Gregg Popovich is a full-blooded Kenyan."

-Timothy Varner 48MoH

by Jordan Leithart on May 11, 2011 10:39 AM CDT reply actions  

That is less RJ’s fault and more on the Spurs for not getting the right 3s. Neal at 3 is a joke and always made the defense sucky.

See, that’s the thing about Green. He’d be great to keep because Spurs always helped from the 3 spot because usually a solid defender in Hill or RJ was there.

If they can shore up the other spots with more D, then the help can come elsewhere depending on the matchups.

Honestly, that’s the problem though. The wings are all similarly sized except RJ and Butler. But then I think Anderson will see a lot of time at the 3 as well.

Who knows. good thing to have, but Green seemed to do everything they wanted. In some ways, if they wanted to move some guys, packing Hill might be their best move to get the best return if they moved Bonner’s contract or RJ’s (if they did move him).

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 11, 2011 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed the only thing I would add is if we make any trades we must throw Blair in it. Of all the players on the team he is our worst defender by far.

by spurlover on May 11, 2011 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

We “must” as in we should or no one would take RJ without Blair

"If the NBA season is a marathon, Gregg Popovich is a full-blooded Kenyan."

-Timothy Varner 48MoH

by Jordan Leithart on May 11, 2011 5:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Blair with who ever we trade. I just want him gone.

by spurlover on May 11, 2011 6:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

We have a very productive player for 1.2 million over 3 years (I don’t know the true amount). That seems pretty much perfect.

"If the NBA season is a marathon, Gregg Popovich is a full-blooded Kenyan."

-Timothy Varner 48MoH

by Jordan Leithart on May 12, 2011 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

It depends. it’s still money to waste if he’s not going to improve. He’s a better trade asset if they don’t think he can cover what they need him to. His getting lazy/weight gain in the middle of the season was a little bit concerning.

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 12, 2011 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

I must have missed it… when did he get lazy/gain weight?

"If the NBA season is a marathon, Gregg Popovich is a full-blooded Kenyan."

-Timothy Varner 48MoH

by Jordan Leithart on May 12, 2011 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

There was an articles about it toward the 3/4 point in the season on mysa.

Link

He also looked bigger just visually.

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 12, 2011 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’d bet Hill would be the guy thrown in since the Spurs have a plethora of guards and he is pretty attractive for his contract/talent.

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 12, 2011 1:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Also, Green is a known defender as opposed to Anderson who shows he’s pretty good, but he still has work to put in. Oh and Spurs need young, athletic guys. I think that’s been proven.

I love Hill, but he gives a little of a lot of things, but hasn’t done one thing really well. His shooting has dropped off from behind the arc for example and he doesn’t stay aggressive (ala TP-like game).

He plays D, but Green has high potential to do that and shoot. That’s one reason why having Green around is nice. Also, this idea of one defender is a bad one. Memphis is a good example of having multiple defenders.

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 11, 2011 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

I like Hill, too. One thing he has done really well is keep his shoulders very sharp for his shooting & it should make him meaner more aggressive soon cuz he just doesn’t wear that TP attitude so it may take time.

by cojones2thewall on May 11, 2011 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

I believe RJ was not that bad. His shot was really good, he finished the season with 43%(?) on 3pts for FSM sake! Most of us would have kill if you would promise he was going to shoot like that at the start of the season. Almost no one had a good shooting series against a good defensive Memphis team and more often than not he was guarded by the best defenders himself (Battier, Allen).

I think he was better than most think but like a lot of people in this team, they look worse playing the role we are asking them to fill and the players they play with. Like Duncan now, but on a lower level of course, RJ is only a good defender being asked to be great while surround with teammates that are average defenders at best. Something similar happens on offense. RJ has gone from excelling on quick offenses (Nets) or being used to be a primary weapon (Bucks) to settle as a 4th or even 5th option on the floor on a execution based offense that asks him to stand on the corner. He was very good at the start of the year mostly because the Spurs played at a very high pace, or at least, one that included a lot of fastbreaks, quick shots and movement. The Spurs slowly went away from that and so did RJ’s involvement and confidence.

A casual diehard Spurs fan.

by Sh!fty on May 11, 2011 11:22 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

I agree its really not fair all the criticism he’s gotten this year. Again I think you have the MJ of wing defenders in Bruce Bowen and RJ can’t compete with that. So everyone thinks he wasn’t that good this year when actually he was a very solid SF for us this year. I think when Tim retires Tiago is going to get his share`of unfair criticism. Don’t get me wrong I think Tiago is going to be a very good player but you can not compare him to Tim its just not fair.

by spurlover on May 11, 2011 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with Shifty and spurlover. Historically, we haven’t asked our SFs to do too much except defend and nail threes, and that’s exactly what we’ve been getting with RJ.

If Pop and the staff wants more out of him, they gotta involve him more instead of just letting him hang around the corners or facilitate swing passes from the wings. I think they only set screens for him once or twice every game and that’s not really helpful for his offense. The coaching staff needs to get more creative, like run him on pick-and-roll plays as the screener/roll guy since he’s big enough to do that and good with just one dribble to attack the basket. I never saw something like that run for him, and it’s a damn waste of his athletic ability.

"A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It’s what happens while you wait for moments that will never come." - Lester Freamon, The Wire

by silverandblack_davis on May 11, 2011 7:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with this assessment, I think RJ has been under utilized. We’ve been grading players but what about our coaching staff? Instead of developing Splitter the whole season, they stuck with Blair and Bonner even though it has always been our problem to protect the rim. And almost all the play-off teams have solid big frontline except maybe Denver. And to think they under estimated Memphis, putting Bonner and Blair againts Gasol and Randolph only to realize after being down that both those players are solid rebounders and scorers and have size.

by 21td on May 12, 2011 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

The problem was even though they had issues in the regular season with Memphis, they never had those many problems. The coaching staff underestimated the team. Their success was actually their demise. Go figure.

However, even if Splitter had played a little bit more, Spurs would still be in trouble. They have too many issues at multiple positions. Their offense struggled to get easy baskets, unfortunately.

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 12, 2011 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think &erson deserves an “Incomplete”, not a C. He showed great promise before his injury. But it’s quite possible I’m slightly biased.

The biggest question in my mind about RJ is his confidence. We saw more glimpses of it this year, but it’s still a bit fragile. I wonder if he can find that this summer. If he play hard (and grab more boards) the entire time he’s on the floor, I’ll be happy. I do think the coaching staff needs to develop some RJ-specific offensive plays this offseason. He’s a more aggressive player when he gets early looks.

I do not want people to be agreeable, as it saves me the trouble of liking them. - Jane Austen

by CapHill on May 11, 2011 11:51 AM CDT reply actions  

I think that’s a great point Cap and I agree with you about RJ. I do think he’s one of those players that gets lost in the flow of the game if he isnt’ involved early. When he makes some early shots from outside or is able to get a couple of quick 2’s, his intensity and overall performance seems to pick up. It seems the majority of the Spurs plays are run with the Big 3 in mind, but I do feel, like you do, that the coaching staff is going to have to get RJ more involved offensively next season.

by GMac14 on May 11, 2011 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

RJ has had a tendency to stop giving his best effort when the team ignores him. It’s not good for the team to ignore him on offense, but it’s even worse for him to essentially quit on them. When he’s involved, he’s a completely different player.

Time to build a new dynasty from the ashes of the old one.

by Tim C. on May 11, 2011 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed completely, it’s all about confidence, when they go to him early and he doesn´t deliver they ignore him and then he just doesn´t try anymore, but when he is making his shots form the beginning and they keep feeding him it´s when he elevates his play and when he’s slashing and cutting and making plays

In case of doubt set something on fire -Stewie Griffin

by RobertoDR on May 11, 2011 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

This is true, but it is almost like the team quits on him if you think about it. They give him the ball at times, but when the 3pt shot got shut down for the most part, they rarely gave him the ball to do something with it or if they did, it was a low percentage opp.

He shoudln’t quit, but I’m not going to say it’s all on RJ in this case.

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 11, 2011 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Kinda right there with you grego. And it could be a lot worse with RJ. He’s a stand up guy and doesn’t do dumb shit. He’s just doesn’t know how to make himself involved if others aren’t involving him.

I still hope we trade him not because I think he sucks but because he doesn’t fit well in the Spurs system. The SF, whoever it is, is only going to get a certain amount of touches so long as Tim Tony and Manu are there.

Tiago Splitter > Matt Bonner

by Manuwar on May 11, 2011 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

True. From what the Spurs usually ask out of their SFs, we’re better off with a lockdown defender at that spot for a much lower salary.

"A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It’s what happens while you wait for moments that will never come." - Lester Freamon, The Wire

by silverandblack_davis on May 11, 2011 7:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

That’s the thing though. The team should move away from their old ways. Duncan obviously isn’t the way to stay. They need to run more stuff beyond the pick and roll and some 4 Down if they want the offense to become more dynamic though.

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 12, 2011 1:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Two plays he does well with that the coaches need to do more of.

-Post with the matchup in his favor.
-That midrange off the screen from a guy like Duncan. Gives him the option to drive if he has a lane with his guy picked or pull up.

He also passes pretty well to open guys if he has nothing

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 11, 2011 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’ve said it a few times before, but I’m a big Danny Green fan. I am a UNC fan, so I watched him during his entire college career. And the year the Tarheels won the NC, Green was a huge part of that team. He was their 6th man who brought energy, hustle, toughness, and a swagger that they needed. He was very good defensively and has the ability to make the open jumper. I really hope the Spurs keep him and see what he can do. You’ve gotta believe that between he and Butler, the Spurs could find a SF that could provide some toughness and scoring. (I do think the Spurs have been lacking in the toughness department ever since Bowen left).

by GMac14 on May 11, 2011 12:07 PM CDT reply actions  

I think you are being too hard on RJ. He started the season well because, as Sh!fty said, the offense was predicated on finding fastbreak opportunities and moving the ball. Jefferson got a few fastbreak points and was asked to hit the open shot and he did that just fine. On defense he was asked to guard big SFs and he wasn’t bad at that either. He didn’t look as lost and his effort level was a lot higher.

Then as the year went on and specially in the playoffs, the offense got stale. A lot of P&R that had him spacing the floor on a corner. Not enough ball movement. A slower pace. He wasn’t going to thrive on that situation.

On defense, he just didn’t have anyone to guard. Memphis SF rotation was Young, Battier and Allen and they almost never went small at PF. He wasn’t going to make an impact defensively on that series and the Spurs were not going to give him the kind of ISO heavy offense he enjoyed on the Bucks to get him going offensively when open shots weren’t there.

I agree with you that he doesn’t fit with the P&R heavy, Tony and Manu one-on-one kind of ball the Spurs played later on the season, but we already knew that from watching him last season. I think he tried his best to adjust to the Spurs offense; the Spurs offense didn’t adjust to him, and on a series were he didn’t have a great offensive player to limit on D of course his contribution wasn’t going to be great.

"Deep down we all know that swagger comes hand in hand with insecurity. We strut not to convince competitors of our dominance; we strut to convince ourselves."
Matthew Powell

by Edg5 on May 11, 2011 12:13 PM CDT reply actions  

Agreed I think the ghost of Bowen is a hard one to shake for everyone. RJ is a good player, every one has to understand their is never going to be another #12.

by spurlover on May 11, 2011 5:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rj was great at the beginning of the year. He had great balance between shooting the 3 and driving to the basket and getting to the FT line. But I think his great early season success from 3 was bad for him. He started to shoot more and more 3s and he stopped being aggressive and driving to the basket. But the thing I dont like about RJ is how soft he is and his low BBIQ. He takes himself out of the ball game when things are not going his way, he lacks confidence. Take Neal for example, even when he’s struggling his confidence still is very high, and he remains aggressive, but it is not the same thing with RJ, he takes himself out of the ball game.

"He was just a young skinny guy who looked like a winner. We didn’t know he was going to be as good as he is."
—Popovich on Manu Ginobili

by spursfan87 on May 11, 2011 12:16 PM CDT reply actions  

Actually, the Spurs late struggle in the season was partly because Neal started to struggle. I’d say that was an epidemic throughout the team, including RJ. There’s a reason why (especially) Neal and Hill were near the bottom of the +/-.

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 11, 2011 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also Popovich blame the injuries

by cuentaluis1 on May 11, 2011 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Definitely Anderson was a big blow even though it helped Neal’s growth. In the end it actually weakened the bigger wings.

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 11, 2011 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

It seems to me that more and more SF’s are getting to be 6’9" and taller, where the Spurs are mainly stuck at 6’7" or smaller. I suppose that Steve Novak might be a SF (is he being graded as a PF?), but he doesn’t seem to have sufficient lateral quickness to cover the LeBron’s and Durants.

I’d prefer to see Anderson moved to SG, and Green used as both a b/u 2-3.
Butler could be a nice backup (for the time being) at SF. I don’t have any big complaints about RJ, as I tend to think the team hasn’t adjusted to him as much as he hasn’t adjusted to the team, but he’d likely be the one I’d trade to get bigger at the SF position. I don’t have anyone specific in mind, but someone that could capably play either forward position.

by Alamo on May 11, 2011 1:33 PM CDT reply actions  

If the spurs were samurais .. RJ should make the Harakiri

by cuentaluis1 on May 11, 2011 2:25 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

 I’m not going to admonish Richard, what I will say though, he is no longer quick enough to make the limited plays asked of him. Just watch any game where he takes it to the basket, he usually commits an offensive foul. He doesn’t exactly set the court on fire on a fast break either. He can still jump, but he simply does not possess the foot speed to finish alot of the plays asked of him.

Surely there is someone else on the roster or on the cheap that can shoot corner threes and has a quicker first step. Maybe Green, who knows.

A man gets the eye of a Tiger, but a Tiger gets the eye of a Manu.

by alamobro on May 11, 2011 2:50 PM CDT reply actions  

It’s tough to judge Anderson. He didn’t look so hot after he came back from his injury. I wasn’t impressed with his athleticism or his defense, but I guess Pop and Co will find out what he really has next season.

A man gets the eye of a Tiger, but a Tiger gets the eye of a Manu.

by alamobro on May 11, 2011 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

His D was pretty good pre-injury. I think post-injury was more confidence than anything since he was able to still score in the D-League. I think he just couldn’t get past that Neal surpassed him so greatly. Honestly, this is probably one of the worst injuries the Spurs could have had in hindsight. His potential athleticism could have helped in the Memphis series when Neal was getting toasted at the 3 position.

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 11, 2011 3:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

he was never in basketball shape after his injury. But I think he’s going to come back strong next season.

"He was just a young skinny guy who looked like a winner. We didn’t know he was going to be as good as he is."
—Popovich on Manu Ginobili

by spursfan87 on May 11, 2011 6:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

RJ has always been a straight to the basket player. He never had the left/right Manu/Parker driving style. The only difference is he could jump over just about anyone back then.

When he doesn’t commit the foul, he rarely turns it over and is generally good about finding the open man. Now it’s up to the other guys to hit the shot and many times they didn’t, especially towards the end of the season.

In RJ’s defense, he still did very well in games 1 and 2 in just about all areas of the game. In game 3 he was aggressive, but then rarely saw the ball.

People were so high on this trade, but RJ had his limitations always. It’s just they are shown more often in a more half court offense. I think for what he was asked for, he did it. The problem is that people thought he was more than that.

And yes, Green is your answer, but he should be an addition, not a replacement. Honestly, Spurs need to improve their 3/4/5 positions with more depth. Neal and Hill at the 3 is what killed the Spurs more than anything on D. Hill at the 2 with a quality 3 is a different story. Or even Neal at the 1/2 and a real 3 playing. Manu at the 3 isn’t a good lineup defensively either…

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 11, 2011 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Love it, love it. Agree 100%

by spurlover on May 11, 2011 6:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yup.

"A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It’s what happens while you wait for moments that will never come." - Lester Freamon, The Wire

by silverandblack_davis on May 11, 2011 7:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

well – you can argue it was defense but I would say it was more about not hitting their shots

"Everybody thought he was going to be gone forever, including me, and the foie gras and truffle treatment worked really well." Pop on Tony's Injury 3/4/11

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gilmoar01.html

by Joe deLarios on May 12, 2011 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

He hit shots that he was given. I’m not shocked when he didn’t get a lot of touches that his shooting percentage dropped.

The biggest problem was Parker and Manu couldn’t get to the hole often and dish since they covered the 3pt line. See, that’s a big problem with the way of utilizing RJ. If the open shots aren’t there, he’s not going to get touches.

That’s a problem with the offense if you cannot utilize a player.

That doesn’t mean RJ is free of any problems, but it is a sign that there are other factors in play.

I do remember in Bowen’s last years he was criticized hard on both ends as well.

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 12, 2011 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

When I was watching, it looked like the few times RJ drove to the basket he drew the foul. The few times we ran plays for him he usually executed. And the many times he set up for an open 3 I was usually off the couch with my arms in the air before he even shot it, usually with a justifiable result. The main thing he didn’t do well was being new on a team with 3 other legitimate stars and massive expectations. Within the Spurs system very few SF’s are going to be dominant scorers every night like RJ was for the first couple weeks of the season. I think he should try to continue to improve his defense, maintain his EXCELLENT 3 point shooting from this season, and be willing to take it to the rim more and he’ll be fine. If we can trade him for someone that fits us better, I’m not going to cry about it (and I think RJ’s numbers would be better on almost any other team) but I’m not going to be disappointed if we keep him.

"I know everthang they is to know about the shrimpin bidness."

by SleepCrack on May 11, 2011 3:30 PM CDT reply actions  

I like the excellent 3-point shooting percentage as well, but it doesn’t do anybody any good if he’s not being agressive and taking those shots….which he didn’t for a lot of the year.

by Big50 on May 12, 2011 11:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Off With His Peanut Head!

"You and I have unfinished business." - Beatrix Kiddo

by MikeyKosa on May 11, 2011 3:40 PM CDT reply actions  

There aren’t very many trade options for RJ, but maybe Pop and RC can coax Avery into a straight up RJ for Outlaw trade. The NJ years were RJ’s best, so playing with DWill and being back in NJ may allow him to flourish again, while the Spurs get a younger, longer SF who can hit the 3 at a decent pct and has the potential to be a defensive stopper. RJ’s 3 yr and $30M contract will be hard to move, but since Outlaw still has 4 yrs and $28M remaining on his, this trade may be possible and could bode well for both players and teams.

by MG99 on May 11, 2011 5:54 PM CDT reply actions  

They’d probably ask us to take back more salary, but playing alongside D-Will could resurrect RJ’s career.

Time to build a new dynasty from the ashes of the old one.

by Tim C. on May 11, 2011 6:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would be more than happy to take B.Lopez salary from them :)

"He was just a young skinny guy who looked like a winner. We didn’t know he was going to be as good as he is."
—Popovich on Manu Ginobili

by spursfan87 on May 11, 2011 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

won’t happen for sideshow bob’s brother…..

"Everybody thought he was going to be gone forever, including me, and the foie gras and truffle treatment worked really well." Pop on Tony's Injury 3/4/11

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gilmoar01.html

by Joe deLarios on May 12, 2011 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

I haven’t really watched the Nets that much, but if the opinion of most of the guys over at Nets Daily is any indication of Outlaw’s performance in New Jersey, the Nets would be more than happy to get rid of him. According to everything I read over there during the season, Outlaw was nothing short of awful.

The stats back that up. He scored 11.5 pts. and grabbed 5 boards per 36 minutes, while shooting .302 from 3 and .375 overall. Jefferson score 13 pts and grabbed 4.5 boards while shooting .440 from 3 and .474 overall. Jefferson’s defensive rating was 109 and Outlaw’s 112. I get that you argued that a change of scenery could make both players some good but let’s not be too hasty to get rid of a guy that we know is limited but productive (in the rights circumstances) for another who could potentially be better but isn’t right now.

"Deep down we all know that swagger comes hand in hand with insecurity. We strut not to convince competitors of our dominance; we strut to convince ourselves."
Matthew Powell

by Edg5 on May 11, 2011 10:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Before Outlaw went to New Jersey he played in Portland. While he was in Portland he was in the top 10 (maybe top 5) of clutch shooting percentages for the league. Right behind Manu. I wanted him over RJ, but he doesn’t seem to have his head screwed on right currently.

"If the NBA season is a marathon, Gregg Popovich is a full-blooded Kenyan."

-Timothy Varner 48MoH

by Jordan Leithart on May 12, 2011 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

He was, but once he got paid, he stopped playing hard. The problem is he got paid. The motivation now is uncertain these days.

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 12, 2011 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

I follow Portland and Outlaw was a really bad player in the sense that all the good stuff he would do would be cancelled by dumb plays and no defense. On the offensive end, he was kind of a blackhole.

by biolb on May 16, 2011 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

I didn’t know that. Nice to be informed about someone who watches closer than me. Thanks!

"If the NBA season is a marathon, Gregg Popovich is a full-blooded Kenyan."

-Timothy Varner 48MoH

by Jordan Leithart on May 17, 2011 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Big50, I’m loving this series. Thanks for putting it together.

I do not want people to be agreeable, as it saves me the trouble of liking them. - Jane Austen

by CapHill on May 11, 2011 7:31 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

You bet. Glad you’re enjoying it.

by Big50 on May 11, 2011 8:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

unfortunately, with RJ’s contract having quite a few years left, nobody will really take him in a deal, especially making about 9 million per year… its a lame contract we gave him. we got a gift from the heavens when he opted out last year, but instead we gave him a 4 year deal… pathetic

by raiderrocker18 on May 11, 2011 8:07 PM CDT reply actions  

But that was part of the agreement. Opt out and make the money back over years. Imagine if RJ opted out and Spurs were without a 3…. Yeah..

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 12, 2011 1:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Popovich need to make some plays for RJ ..
He is not that old …. the problem is that he seems to depend on a assist maker

The only play I can remember is that classic alley oop with tony

by cuentaluis1 on May 12, 2011 3:12 PM CDT reply actions  

The whole team depends on assists from TP/Manu. That pretty much is the problem. Hill not so much but he doesn’t stay aggressive.

They say every time Pop smiles, an angel is told to stop being so fu--ing lazy and play some defense. -Hipuks 2/3/11

by grego21 on May 12, 2011 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

No fourth option requires play, except when you are Kevin Garnett.

by biolb on May 16, 2011 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

biolb makes an appearance.

A man gets the eye of a Tiger, but a Tiger gets the eye of a Manu.

by alamobro on May 17, 2011 1:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Now even though I always put RJ in the scapegoat spot. Do you think it’s HIS fault for not being aggressive enough or more of the coach/guards’ fault for not getting him more involved in the offense?

by Lamar K. Johnson on May 23, 2011 2:23 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the San Antonio Spurs.

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Manucrazy_small
Game 3 Thoughts...
Manucrazy_small
Game 2 Thoughts (Rinse, Lather, Repeat)
Manucrazy_small
I wrote a thing
Supergino_small
The Media And The Pursuit of Symmetry
Manucrazy_small
Game 1 Thoughts

Recent FanPosts

100_1519_small
Maybe the Heat have been watching the Spurs
Covera_small
Which one's Bruce, and which one's Kawhi?
6868_small
Thursday Not Quite The Same Loser Thread.
82128_spurs_nets_basketball_small
I was in Middle School when Timmy was Drafted, I am 27 now.
Small
How did I became a Spurs Fan??
Small
Touches
6868_small
Wednesday Blueberry Banana Nut Oatmeal Loser Thread.
Pop-pyramids-av_small
PtR Playoff Prediction Contest: 2012 Conference Finals
82128_spurs_nets_basketball_small
Patty Mills or Jeremy Lin, who do you sign?
Small
The Heat scare me.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Who will the Spurs face in the second round?
Memphis Grizzlies
28 votes
Los Angeles Clippers
60 votes

88 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

San Antonio Sweepers in action!
SI: Tim Duncan is the most successful player of his generation.
The San Antonio Spurs aren't boring
My birthday cupcake from my lovely wife ;)
NBA BIG commercial

Recent FanShots

Why I am rooting for the Spurs - Mavs Moneyball
Grind Hard
Kevin Durant is tired of hearing about the Spurs
The unthinking brilliance of Tim Duncan
Watching ton of video of SAS vs OKC reminds me that, sometimes, League...
James Harden vs. Manu Ginobili - Comparison
The Spurs may want to give Chris Kaman another look
Misleading Headline? "Parker says Westbrook hasn't faced PG like him yet"
Danny Green on CBS
The Genius of The San Antonio Spurs

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


G.M.

Jrw_small J.R. Wilco

Coach

D-rob1_small Big50

Oberto_fab_small silverandblack_davis

Nerf_reactor_small CapHill

Screen_shot_2011-12-02_at_4 Josh Guyer (completely deck)

Player

08playoffshappybench_medium_small Justin Biehle

Kawhi_small Edg5

Duncan_small SpursfanSteve

Manu_the_grey_small DrumsInTheDeep

376094_10100544199117568_16706926_51964808_1200814736_n_small MatthewTynan

Ref

Halloween_06_028_small alamobro

Spursshirt_small Trey Felder