SOOOOOOOO...RJ Opted Out
Color me surprised. In my defense, I will say that I had thought it a possibility all along. I recall during the drive back from a post xmas and pre new year game that I told Graydon I thought he could opt out. Graydon told me I was full of it. I gave him my logic for thinking it was possible. Graydon told me I was full of it. I concurred.
Yet, here we are and RJ has opted out for the very reasons I thought he might. Wait. Honestly, I'm not sure why he opted out. It could be for a couple of reasons.
WHY Little 8 oz Baby Jesus?
(That's a reference to the little 8 lb baby Jesus part of Ricky Bobby. But, I somehow twisted it into ounces when I told it to Mrs ATS and it cracked -- and cracks -- her up.)
I think RJ opting out comes down to two possible explanations. One, he and his agent think he can secure a multi-year deal at $8-10M per year. Something like 5 years at $8M. And, he wants to make a grab at locking up this contract before the lockout next summer. THAT is a reasonable guess. I'm a bit skeptical that he can command that type of contract, but Rudy Gay is getting $16M/year for 5 years. WHAT? Yeah, that's the report. Drew Gooden 5 years and $32M. John Salmons 5 years and $40M.
Given those numbers, I guess 4 years at $32M is really not unreasonable for RJ. Additionally, a contract like that would justify his opting out. It's like adding a 3 year deal for $17M after next year. That might be more than he could get after the lockout.
ORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR....he hates playing with the Spurs. Hate is a strong word. Let's just say maybe he was unhappy. I'm on the record saying he looked unhappy. I'm on the record saying Tim looked unhappy with him. Maybe it was too frustrating and a this is a way for him to grab onto some happiness for himself. I'd respect that.
Trade Bait?
Um, no. RJ opting out pretty much ends any chances the Spurs can trade him. I suppose there is a remote chance they could sign-and-trade him. But, if they sign him, nobody is going to trade for him. Moderately productive guys in the first year of long-term deals aren't exactly a commodity.
The Truth Will Be Told
If RJ hadn't opted out, we would have had constant rumors all season about whether he will be traded. Well, constant right up until the time it happened. We would have speculated on how he was fitting into the system. We would have kept a close eye on the whole "second year" progress. We would have analyzed all Pop's comments to see if he was happy with RJ. Not now. Now, we'll know up front. If the Spurs re-sign RJ it is because they want him. If they don't, well, it's because it wasn't a good fit.
Yep, we'll know soon enough. For better or for worse, RJ opting out will end the mystery and forces the parties to declare their intent. And frankly, that's a good thing.
130 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Let the guy walk! We shouldn’t over pay for this guy because he doesn’t fit the system and like you stated Wayne somebody sure as hell will over pay for his services now that he is out there. I see him getting paid well while playing for the sorry Knicks
One thing i can do...................is FINGER ROLL.
Sign and trade?
Rumor: RJ wants to head back up state, out of the Spurs system.
Enter: Knicks and Mike D’Antoni run and gun system
RJ gets long term security in new contract and Knicks have a history of overspending.
Knicks missing out on LeBron and Joe Johnson. They have, I believe, 2(two) players under contract. (11 Mil. for 1 (one) player that doesn’t even play Snicker..)
Prediction: Spurs hold onto their cards, let everyone else bid themselves over the cap flooding the market with big dollars. When the tide rescedes, some nice fish might be available for cheap.
You Ese! You Ese! You Ese!
You can’t really sign and trade with a team way under the salary cap. They can just sign. The only reason the Knicks would have to sign and trade for RJ is if they were trying to give him a max deal. Something in the 5-year, $100M range.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Jul 1, 2010 11:20 PM CDT up reply actions
Knicks are not going to be able to sign any of the big name guys. I just have a feeling that all that losing and getting rid of decent players is going to back fire something serious. I think Jefferson is looking a little smart by opting out of his deal because instead of the owners being more frugal with there money they are spending like there is no tomorrow. I just can’t believe the deals that have been reported so far for the amount of coin. The people getting signed aren’t even top tier guys either which is just plain insane.
One thing i can do...................is FINGER ROLL.
by gunnin' gervin on Jul 1, 2010 11:32 PM CDT up reply actions
It doesn’t cost anything for the Knicks to agree to sign-and-trade for a protected 2nd round pick or something. We throw in a little cash and get a large traded player exception.
by doggydogworld on Jul 2, 2010 1:01 AM CDT up reply actions
And we would be left with 0 small forwards on the team capable of starting. It sucks but that’s sorta the advantage that RJ has in terms of asking price
"I've got Tim (Duncan) and you don't. That's the difference." -Gregg Popovich
And it doesn’t help that a number of wings are already off the market. Things are starting to get interesting.
hah hah hah
"Yes, it's important that I have good numbers, and I'm well-respected as a player. But I think it's more important that I'm respected as a man." - Some Tall Guy Who Wore #50
Financially it’s a huge gamble. I wonder how much of it is about personal pride and hating how he got hammered by the coaching staff last year.
For all the negativity surrounding his performance I was impressed with how he stood up and took it. No tantrums really.
If that is the case and he just doesn’t want to have to go through it again I can live with that.
"When you go in for a job interview, I think a good thing to ask is if they ever press charges."
Who wouldn’t want to be called a “dog”.
by titansfan4ever on Jul 2, 2010 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions
Certainly not Finnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnndooooooooooooooooooooooooooooog.
If you don’t need ACL’s to make it big, you don’t need pinky fingers. - completely deck
It would have been better if he would have said they played like cats….cats are soooooooo ninja-like.
by titansfan4ever on Jul 3, 2010 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions
hammered by the coaching staff
Not just the coaching staff. The press, fansites like this one, the janitor, lolcats. It got out of hand once he started getting hatemail from his mother.
'What color do you want?" (Tim Duncan)
by swgeek on Jul 2, 2010 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions 5 recs
LOL!
Hate mail from his mother? damn! LOL!
One thing i can do...................is FINGER ROLL.
by gunnin' gervin on Jul 2, 2010 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions
Nobody wants to be a free agent at this time next year. Being a player on the wrong side of 30 and facing a lockout with no contract is not an ideal situation. I wonder if there’s a gentleman’s agreement between RJ and Spurs brass. You give us a little lux tax relief and we’ll give you a multi-year deal. It did make this summer a little more interesting for Spurs fans.
The gentlemen’s agreement is pretty likely, IMHO. The Spurs use 2010-11 lux tax savings to pay most of his salary from 2011-13.
by doggydogworld on Jul 2, 2010 1:03 AM CDT up reply actions
SAEN is reporting that word is the Spurs and RJ have agreed on the frame work on a new deal somewhere in the 3 yr 30 mil to 5 yr 45 mil range. Jeff McDonald also included this interesting tidbit in the article…“
there are signs Jefferson would welcome a return to San Antonio. He has spent much of his summer in the Spurs’ practice gym, working out personally with head coach Gregg Popovich. Before the season ended, Jefferson spoke often about looking forward to a second season in San Antonio, allowing him to feel more comfortable with the system.”
can you imagine a drunk Pop conducting a workout with RJ…
"It's Manuway or the Highway" - tlo
by Manuwar on Jul 2, 2010 1:18 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I would pay to watch that
"He was just a young skinny guy who looked like a winner. We didn’t know he was going to be as good as he is."
—Popovich on Manu Ginobili
by spursfan87 on Jul 2, 2010 1:32 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
RJ leaves practice with Pop passed out on the lawn, wine bottle in hand, and comes back the next morning to Pop passed out on the lawn, wine bottle in hand.
"We suck on 'D. Both individually and team-wise, we suck. We're pretty consistent that way. I don't know if I have an answer to that. If I did, we wouldn't suck quite so bad." - Popovich
by Aaron "Hirschof" Preine on Jul 2, 2010 7:27 AM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
hq!
"We'll see how our character is," guard Tony Parker said. "We don't have time to be sad. Nobody cares. It's just us. We're the only ones who can help each other."
by Josh Guyer (completely deck) on Jul 2, 2010 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions
+1. This seems to be the most likely scenario, especially after RJ said pretty much this exact thing in his interview. In all likelihood, FO liked his idea and told him that they would give him a multi-year deal if he opts out.
"We lost so many games that we shouldn't have lost," - Ginobili, May 2010
right well thats long enough on topic
found this fantastic and damning assessment of the t wolves by Kelly Dwyer
They entered last week with three draft picks in the first round including a lottery selection, and potentially over $15 million in cap space including all the cap holds, and so far they’ve procured Martell Webster, Lazar Hayward, Wesley Johnson, Hamady N’Diaye, Darko Milicic (same guy), and Nikola Pekovic. Five million in cap space left.
"When you go in for a job interview, I think a good thing to ask is if they ever press charges."
Yay.
"Yes, it's important that I have good numbers, and I'm well-respected as a player. But I think it's more important that I'm respected as a man." - Some Tall Guy Who Wore #50
by theonlyromeo on Jul 2, 2010 12:59 AM CDT up reply actions
No.
"We suck on 'D. Both individually and team-wise, we suck. We're pretty consistent that way. I don't know if I have an answer to that. If I did, we wouldn't suck quite so bad." - Popovich
by Aaron "Hirschof" Preine on Jul 2, 2010 7:30 AM CDT up reply actions
Frankly if he leaves I kinda respect him for it. I was once stuck in a job that was a lousy fit for me but needed the money and the job market was lousy. I grew a bad attitude, messed up my reputation and hated that time – if I had to do it all over again I would have grown a pair and quit right away. The money is already spent and forgotten, but those years will burn in my memory forever.
And I did not even have the worst part that RJ has: every time he goes to a fan site or a newspaper they rag on him and talk about what a lousy deal he was.
'What color do you want?" (Tim Duncan)
Hey, swgeek… he’s being paid millions. And he’s playing a game for a living.
Kinda different situation.
I smell death... everywhere.
Didn’t you tell me that even when you do what you love there are days that just suck? RJ loves basketball (I hope) but it doesn’t mean his working conditions are misserable for him.
I don’t think he feels this way but if he does I can understand.
"It's Manuway or the Highway" - tlo
Pssst. …Manuwar…. …miserable…
If you don’t need ACL’s to make it big, you don’t need pinky fingers. - completely deck
by J.R. Wilco on Jul 2, 2010 9:05 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
he’s being paid millions
He will get millions even if he leaves for a situation where he would be happy or at least less miserable. If it was a choice between a decent situation paying minimum wage or a miserable job paying millions that is one thing, but he is making enough happy money no matter what, so why not go for the better situation.
'What color do you want?" (Tim Duncan)
You’d think that millions upon millions would be enough, whether it’s 15 or 10. But that’s not the case, as countless examples prove.
I smell death... everywhere.
And I did not even have the worst part that RJ has: every time he goes to a fan site or a newspaper they rag on him and talk about what a lousy deal he was.
Doesn’t happen here.
"Yes, it's important that I have good numbers, and I'm well-respected as a player. But I think it's more important that I'm respected as a man." - Some Tall Guy Who Wore #50
by theonlyromeo on Jul 3, 2010 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions
He opted out simply for making sure he got the best quality contract for the long term before the new CBA. It definitely is not going to be as player friendly as it has in years past. This is why everyone is opting out and locking in right now.
Rudy Gay is definitely worth more money. Gooden is not though.
Isn’t Memphis just the farm team for the Lakers?
"The evolution has been good, and I am much more tranquil now in the face of what comes next,"--Manu Ginobili
by VWolf on Jul 2, 2010 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
RJ is a smart, class-act Spur. I hope he stays with us and I hope he shows us everything we thought he would when we traded for him. Part of me thinks that if I were in his shoes, knowing I didn’t have a good first season in SA, but Pop still believed in me, I would take the challenge. He’s proved he can be a run and gun princeton offense player. Now, he can show he can be a team player in an orchestrated championship system.
There was some quote from RJ in the regular season about how Pop coaches yells at him a few times a game, but you don’t worry about it unless he stops yelling at you.
Take the challenge? What did RJ do last year that made you think he had that kind of personality. If the challenge was to hide, miss wide open threes, and play matador defense, I guess he took the challenge last year. Are you skewing the stats on me, BlaseE?
"GINOBILI!" -- Sir Charles
"I mean, Dartmouth really sucks and Cornell only beat us by 18. Temple will beat the hell out of Cornell. Promise." -- Me
he looked more lost and confused than bored and lazy….personal opinion
and from listening to him speak and reading about him off the court, I think he is a pretty smart guy
if you play 12 years straight in one type of offense, I think you are going to develop habits that are conducive with that style of play…it doesn’t mean you can’t break those habits and learn to play another
That, and the point is to act, and not react. In order to really excel, you need to see what’s happening as (or even before) it’s happening — and start on your task, without having to think about what the offense requires you to do.
If you don’t need ACL’s to make it big, you don’t need pinky fingers. - completely deck
completely agree with both your comments. and every summer he’s usually bumping around san diego at the race tracks or beaches hanging with luke walton and their other buddies. I haven’t seen or heard anything about him around here this summer. None of my friends have either which is rare.
"It's Manuway or the Highway" - tlo
he looked more lost and confused than bored and lazy…
that makes it worse. If he was being lazy then at least we could use that as an excuse for his poor play. If he is lost and confused but tried hard then there is little upside to his playing.
"Rock and Roll angels bring that HardRock Hallelujah"
It’s easier to teach someone something when they have the desire to learn. If someone is just lazy there is no way to guarantee that he won’t always be lazy.
"I've got Tim (Duncan) and you don't. That's the difference." -Gregg Popovich
by bj1der on Jul 2, 2010 5:55 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Hollinger has an article on ESPN about how there are more teams with big cap room than there are BIG name free agents. So he thinks that bidding will get way out of hand for 2nd tier players – especially if LeBron or Wade, etc. re-sign with their current teams.
But the reason I posted it here is what he said about RJ:
And we seem almost certain to see Richard Jefferson recoup the $15.2 million he forewent by opting out of the final year of his contract. In last year’s market, it would have been a long shot. This year? Heck, he might double or triple it.
Hey if repeating as champions were that easy even the Spurs could do it.
thank FSM the spurs signed Manu before this…..he would get a 20 million per from new york at this rate
by BlaseE on Jul 2, 2010 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I was thinking the same thing about the Lakers locking up Bynum last year. Lots of Laker fans bitched & moaned about the amount they paid back then. But I think he would have pulled way more in this free agent market than the Lakers spent.
(I noticed Hollinger left the Lakers GM off his “smartest GM in the room” list though.)
Hey if repeating as champions were that easy even the Spurs could do it.
Makes one wonder what in the world is James or Bosch going to get??
by titansfan4ever on Jul 2, 2010 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions
Oh those two are both max-contract guys – so whatever that is. It would be interesting to see what Lbj got if there was no max.
And I know Bosh won’t stay in Toronto but Lbj can get an extra year from Cle than from any other team.
Hey if repeating as champions were that easy even the Spurs could do it.
by olf on Jul 2, 2010 4:43 PM CDT up reply actions
Names of players, please.
If you don’t need ACL’s to make it big, you don’t need pinky fingers. - completely deck
ha ha ha ha
seriously though who would you suggest
RJ is an average starting SF I look at the other guys on the list and I see players who HOPE to someday be average
This past week-end I found a Bowen jersey at Burlington Coat Factory for 12 dollars. Only spurs related product there. When I put it on later that day I felt my defensive XP go up by 12 percent.
I love that you went into the Burlington store (presumably to purchase something else), saw the Bruce jersey and couldn’t say no.
by greyberger on Jul 2, 2010 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
My Bowen jersey is in the closet.. preventing dust from reaching the floor.
"We suck on 'D. Both individually and team-wise, we suck. We're pretty consistent that way. I don't know if I have an answer to that. If I did, we wouldn't suck quite so bad." - Popovich
by Aaron "Hirschof" Preine on Jul 2, 2010 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions 9 recs
WOW
One thing i can do...................is FINGER ROLL.
by gunnin' gervin on Jul 2, 2010 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Also, the Quotes pages has been updated to reference your recent awesomeness.
If you don’t need ACL’s to make it big, you don’t need pinky fingers. - completely deck
sweet
"We suck on 'D. Both individually and team-wise, we suck. We're pretty consistent that way. I don't know if I have an answer to that. If I did, we wouldn't suck quite so bad." - Popovich
by Aaron "Hirschof" Preine on Jul 2, 2010 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions
We can spend more money on RJ than we could on the open market because we have his bird rights which means we can exceed the salary cap by signing him. On free agents we’d be limited to probably the BAE since we’re assuming we’ll use the MLE on Splitter. But lets just assume we don’t use the MLE on Splitter.
Who do you think we could get that is better than RJ for $5.5 million?
"It's Manuway or the Highway" - tlo
I just have a long depressing history with buyer’s remorse. That’s why I can never get a tattoo.
So, I don’t know who else, but I just don’t think the product is worth the cash. Like when I bought a Creative Zen in 2005 instead of an ipod because my cousin who works at best buy hates apple. I’m not sure who Apple is in this metaphor, but I simply believe he exists.
Yeah but what if you already have a Creative Zen and all you need to do is change the battery? Considering that the Spurs don’t have the money right now to just go out and buy an Ipod, maybe sticking to the Creative Zen is the best way to keep listening to music before they go deaf due to old age. Unless changing the battery turned out to be too expensive, jeopardizing their chances to get an Ipod in the future.
Wow that metaphor turned out weird.
"Deep down we all know that swagger comes hand in hand with insecurity. We strut not to convince competitors of our dominance; we strut to convince ourselves."
Matthew Powell
And to keep expanding on this weird, weird metaphor, bringing back Bruce would be the Spurs way of saying “fuck new technology, I’ll just start using my discman again”.
"Deep down we all know that swagger comes hand in hand with insecurity. We strut not to convince competitors of our dominance; we strut to convince ourselves."
Matthew Powell
I loved the Zen. It just didn’t fit in to my lifestyle with the hunting up weird music services to use it with, the downloading illegally, and the constant firmware updates needed for it just to turn on.
But the ipod just fits right into my life seamlessly. I’m listening to some REK right now. We need to find the ipod.
Fair enough. I’m all for trying to find the Ipod, especially considering that there are always bargains out there since people often don’t know the difference between an Ipod and a Zen.
"Deep down we all know that swagger comes hand in hand with insecurity. We strut not to convince competitors of our dominance; we strut to convince ourselves."
Matthew Powell
The question you have to ask yourself is….did anyone ever win an NBA title using a Zen?….Besides the Zen-Master, that is.
by titansfan4ever on Jul 2, 2010 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions
And don’t forget, when we’re talking about all this money being made by average NBA players in this economic climate :“We make a lot of money but we spend a lot too.”
I love that line. Was that Sprewell?
If you don’t need ACL’s to make it big, you don’t need pinky fingers. - completely deck
And this is why the players will lose, when the 2011 lockout enters its third or fourth month.
...!!
The players may lose a lot but they win a lot too.
If you don’t need ACL’s to make it big, you don’t need pinky fingers. - completely deck
I think the players in all sports get way over paid. In what other business’ do employees and owners have close to a 50-50 split of revenue?
"It's Manuway or the Highway" - tlo
shouldn’t the LLE be something like 3 or 4 million? I mean if the average player makes 5.2 and the MLE is at 5.8 or so, you’re targeting a slightly better than average player with the MLE. The LLE is closer to the veteran minimum than the average. It should split the difference.
The LLE exists to spare certain players from the ignominy of signing for the vet min.
by doggydogworld on Jul 2, 2010 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions
Dog..What do you see after the CBA. The players seem to see a reduction. If this is true, should the owners just “get by” this year and then be agressive next year?
by indiancharlie on Jul 2, 2010 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions
I don’t know what to expect. The owners aren’t completely united. Super-rich owners and high-revenue franchises like the Lakers want to keep the advantage they get from being able to outspend everyone else. Small market owners who aren’t billionaires tend to want a hard cap. Owners with smart front offices want a complex system, like the current one, so they can continue to capitalize on the stupidity of others.
Of course the owners are united in wanting to share less revenue with players, but. I don’t see the cap going from 57m to 35m or anything. I think the players are over-reacting when they give up money just to extend their contract.
by doggydogworld on Jul 2, 2010 6:29 PM CDT up reply actions
if we forget last year, and say that we have a chance to sign RJ at a lower price and he already has the first year jitters out of the way, I think the front office sees this as a win win
by bigtee34 on Jul 2, 2010 1:20 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
I’m going to take a zen approach to the whole RJ thing.
If he resigns then I’ll be excited to see how much a year in the system would improve his production.
If he doesn’t resign, replacing his production from last year shouldn’t be that hard to do, be it by one player or by commitee.
The reality is he doesn’t deserve a 5 yr 45 million dolllars contract after the last couple of years, but if the FO thinks he could improve enough to earn it in the next couple of years, I’m fine with it.
"Deep down we all know that swagger comes hand in hand with insecurity. We strut not to convince competitors of our dominance; we strut to convince ourselves."
Matthew Powell
by Edg5 on Jul 2, 2010 1:26 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
that’s a great way to think of it….in the FO, I trust
by BlaseE on Jul 2, 2010 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’d like to know how this whole ’replace RJ by committee" thing is going to work.
PTR isn’t the place where I see this idea floated the most, but you just reminded me how often I see it.
What’s important is not replacing RJ’s Numbers or production but replacing his contribution to the offense and defense in the minutes we gave him.
Hairston might be a good defender. Gee might be a good shooter. Of course we need both, at the same time – one skill without the other is a real step down from RJ, who was average in all aspects, a jack of all trades but master of none.
Tim Duncan is no longer dominant enough on either offense or defense that we can surround him with one-way role players.
We quickly got frustrated with RJ because it seemed like he didn’t do anything well. Also remember he doesn’t have any huge weaknesses in his game and is not as much as a gamble as signing over the minutes to a project like Hairston or Gee and hoping they polish the missing parts of their game would be.
by greyberger on Jul 2, 2010 3:12 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
I agree with you to an extent. I’m not pulling for RJ to be replaced, just paid less. If TD can take a cut for the betterment of the team, as he did in 07 I think, then RJ needs to as well. Or play for someone else.
I wasn’t necessarily talking about Gee and Hairston. I think they could help but I believe that the Spurs will need to sign someone with SF size.
The thing with RJ last season was that he wasn’t consistently making significant contributions on both ends of the floor on most games. Some times he would be on offensively. Some times he played good man defense. Sometimes he rebounded well. But he almost never did all those things at the same time. That’s why I think that he could be replaced by more system-friendly players that could be plugged in when the team needs a particular skill set on the court.
The reality is I’d rather keep RJ, since I’m trying not to focus on what he did last season, but on what he can do next season with a full year with the team. He will understand the system better and I’m confident the coaching stuff will also have a better understanding on how to maximize his talents.
"Deep down we all know that swagger comes hand in hand with insecurity. We strut not to convince competitors of our dominance; we strut to convince ourselves."
Matthew Powell
The thing I like about RJ is his humble roots….and not too many people know this, but his parents are The Jeffersons…cuz it looks like if he gets his way….he’s gonna be “MOVING ON UP…..TO THE EAST SIDE…..TO THAT BIG DELUXE APT IN THE SKY”!!!
by titansfan4ever on Jul 3, 2010 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions
Haven’t been reminded of this epic in quite a while.
Hope you enjoy it as much as I do.
If you don’t need ACL’s to make it big, you don’t need pinky fingers. - completely deck
Ricky Bobby, eh?
I can appreciate finding a way to sneak him into Spurs basketball. LOL
At to the point, sure you can make a trade with a team that boasts plenty of cap room. Only you’re not looking to get a player but an asset. A trade exception. I gave an example of one here in a post entitled: That Just Happened (which I now know you can appreciate).
Could Jefferson still be traded?
Absolutely. Let’s say a team like New Jersey was interested in bringing back Jefferson, only this time at a much more reasonable rate. Say, 4-years and $32 million. The Spurs could then do a sign-and-trade with New Jersey for a conditional second-round pick and an $8 million dollar trade exception. That trade exception could then be used to acquire a player from a team looking to shed payroll or simply unload a player. If New Jersey needed some prodding and maybe a bit of a sweetener, the Spurs could take back Kris Humphries — 1-year and $3 million — and receive a trade exception for $5 million dollars.
For you sick puppies, I went ahead and broke down the financial ramifications (i.e. savings) in a little more detail to explain my previous post, so if you’re interested in the capology of the opt-out, give it a look-see. I tried to simplify it as best I could.
Follow us @ReigningBlack
No spin
And I ain’t Bill O’Reilly.
RJ opting out has the potential to be a really good thing to the bottom line, all things considered. That’s just a fact — Holt will net savings in the range of $15-25 million depending on how they fill the void left by RJ financially. That is a good thing business-wise.
My partner over at Reigning Black, Eric, is a bigger believer in RJ then myself and thinks the Spurs are going to be considerably worse off if they lose RJ for nothing. I’m not nearly as concerned with filling his void on the court — most likely a lesser player will take his place and there’s an argument to be made that the Spurs will be worse off without him, but there’s also the argument that the move could be lateral or better with a player that simply can defend and/or shoot the three at a high level (the two most important things for a small forward in the Spurs’ offense — neither of which RJ excels at).
If the Spurs lose RJ for nothing, there’s a good chance they’re worse off. It’s not a forgone conclusion but there’s a good chance.
If the Spurs re-sign him at a more palatable rate, than they’re better off than they were before because they’ve got the same talent while netting much of the savings I alluded to earlier.
If the Spurs can get a sign-and-trade, this could be the best thing possible. The Spurs could then go out and kick the tires on plenty of players that would be much better fits than RJ and see which team is willing to part with their services for some very useful cap space in form of a trade exception — say the Rockets were willing to part with Ariza or Battier or the Timberwolves were willing to part with Webster or Brewer.
There are a multitude of options and scenarios but that’s how this opt-out could actually turn into quite the blessing.
No spin.
Follow us @ReigningBlack
by ReigningBlack on Jul 2, 2010 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions
I was talking to Wayne, ReigningBlack. My replies to a comment you make will be nested beneath it.
Still, thanks for the explanation. The complexities of the salary cap and the luxury tax are beyond me, and usually bore me to tears. So thanks for digesting all that. and giving us a quick run down.
If we do lose RJ for nothing, then in my opinion we’re clearly worse off. We have no one good at that position. A serviceable vets seem a commodity this off-season.
I smell death... everywhere.
All good, LatinD.
You’ll have to excuse me, this board and how everything works takes some getting used to and my computer illiteracy doesn’t help matters.
As to the point, in all likelihood the Spurs are worse for the wear if they lose RJ without compensation (i.e. player or preferably a trade exception). But in my view, this team needs more than just the addition of Tiago and Anderson. So if the Spurs lose Jefferson and have some falloff, I don’t believe it’s appreciable enough to feel adamantly about his presence on the team — If they were second-round fodder with RJ and they’re first or second-round fodder without him, it’s just not that much to lose sleep over. That’s if you’re coming at this from a similar viewpoint.
I honestly believe the Spurs could find themselves in much the same position they would’ve been with RJ — in relation to where their league standing resides — with a lesser talent who’s just a better fit. A player that can shoot the three and/or defend at a high level. The Spurs will lose in talent, almost no doubt about that, but they could very easily get the same productivity and a better piece to the puzzle that bolsters their half-court spacing and/or defense.
When you boil it down, RJ’s strength is in his ability to score the ball. But in this offense and on this team, he’s become the fifth scorer — he’s an open court player being asked to spot up for jumpers and play off the ball; he should be, though, given the players ahead of him: Duncan, Parker, Ginobili and now, Hill.
They were paying $15.2M for an offensive player that didn’t fit and was a fifth option (while being a defensive liability on the other end).
So if the Spurs go out and get a Wright, Barnes, Butler or end up with a trade exception that could net them Ariza, Battier, Webster, Brewer or someone of that ilk, they could very well end up in a better spot — but specifically if they net a trade exception.
Whatever the case, this offseason definitely became more interesting with RJ’s opt-out, and what the Spurs are capable of doing with this situation is anyone’s guess; and the fate of No. 5 is completely dependent on what they’re able to get done.
Follow us @ReigningBlack
by ReigningBlack on Jul 2, 2010 11:30 PM CDT up reply actions
Straight from Brain on Funk lol

"When you go in for a job interview, I think a good thing to ask is if they ever press charges."
by Bushka on Jul 2, 2010 6:44 PM CDT reply actions 3 recs
Wow, Bushka, BoF just killed it with their Day One coverage. Nearly every single one was hilarious.
If you don’t need ACL’s to make it big, you don’t need pinky fingers. - completely deck
Floved the Joe Johnson and Jordan Farmar ones. ::blairlol::
...!!
by transgojobot on Jul 2, 2010 11:48 PM CDT up reply actions
So, right now I have it here, under mashups. You let me know if I need to move it into the section for misspellings.
If you don’t need ACL’s to make it big, you don’t need pinky fingers. - completely deck

by 































