Our ‘Ifs’ > Their ‘Ifs’
One for the thumb? Five in '10? It's tough odds, that's for sure. We know we’re a long shot to win it all this year – we need for so much to go right that could so easily go wrong, we need to be lucky on so many counts. These are the facts, and they are undeniable. Any sentence that starts "The Spurs are title contenders this year" must inevitably continue with the word ‘if’.
Sure, we can win...
- IF Duncan’s got something left in the tank.
- IF Ginobili can stay healthy.
- IF Parker and Hill can come back from injury.
- IF RJ and McDyess can step it up and show some pride and aggression.
- IF Bonner, Bogans and RMJ can hit their threes and not screw up too much.
- IF the San Antonio Spurs, who have been too old and washed up ever since they won their second ring, can pull it together for one more push.
All true. All these ‘ifs’ are legitimate concerns. If Lady Luck frowns on any of these counts (and she very well could) the Spurs aren’t gonna do it this year. What we forget, however – and everybody does seem to forget this – is that every team has ‘ifs’ of its own. I don’t mean wild, long-shot considerations like ‘The Cavs will contend if LeBron isn’t savaged by weasels’. I'm talking about real, serious concerns that are well within the realm of possibility and entirely outside each team's control. Let’s look at the teams whose contendership doesn’t always get the "if" treatment:
LAKERS
Sure, the Lakeshow can win it all…
- IF Kobe’s injuries aren’t catching up to him and/or have healed by the playoffs, and he can return to top form.
- IF Bynum comes back with full athleticism and minimal rust.
- IF Fisher has enough veteran savvy in him to avoid being an insuperable liability on both ends of the floor.
- IF Gasol, Walton, and the other oft-injured role players can stay healthy.
- IF Artest doesn’t lose his rag and disrupt the team on or off the court.
- IF this Lakers squad has the heart , the will, and the determination to grind out what will inevitably be a challenging run to the ring.
CAVS
Will we witness the King Without a Ring finally live up to at least a fraction of the hype? Maybe…
- IF LeBron can be the guy from the ads.
- IF their bigs can stand up to opposing squads.
- IF they can get past Orlando.
- IF the squad has an extra gear, and their regular-season intensity isn’t their ceiling.
MAGIC
They went to the Finals last year, and they sure give our boys fits. They could hoist their first trophy…
- IF Dwight Howard can play smart, have heart, and stay out of foul trouble.
- IF they can get reliable, high-level production from Vince Carter.
- IF their injury-prone guys can stay healthy.
- IF they can hit from the outside the way they have been.
***
So really, everybody has "ifs" of their own. But ... well ... when I look at our own personal list of uncertainties, I don’t feel that bad about it. Sure, there’s no certainty to be had here, but to finish out these thoughts: we might just win this thing…
- IF Duncan’s got something left in the tank – and may I remind you of how he was playing earlier this season, and in the last few weeks? Not to mention that, if there are two things that everybody thinks they know about Duncan, it’s that 1) he’s infinitely reliable, and 2) he always saves up for the playoffs?
- IF Ginobili can stay healthy – sure, that’s always a concern with El Contusion. His body could fall apart completely tomorrow, Raiders of the Lost Ark style, and that would be that. But that’s always been true, and that fact is scant comfort to the former owners of the many scalps he’s tucked into his belt over the past few weeks.
- IF Parker and Hill can come back from injury – by which I mean the Parker whose first reaction to Hill’s injury was "Great! Maybe now Pop will have to let me play!". Parker seems to be less worried about his obviously-recuperated hand and more worried about the Spurs deciding they don’t need him after all – and, per the MRIs, it looks like Hill should be fine. He’ll miss a couple of games, and that’s a shame. But he’ll be fine come playoff time.
- IF RJ and McDyess can step it up and show some pride and aggression – and really, is there anybody who’d seriously want to bet against them doing just that? RJ’s taken his sweet time figuring out the Spurs system, but he’s been doing a pretty nice job lately, and you may recall that he’s no stranger to the NBA’s biggest stage. He sure stepped it up against our boys back in 2003. As for McDyess, here’s a guy who is famous – bordering on notorious – for holding everything back until the postseason, then making life hell for certain greatest-of-all-time power forwards. He came to San Antonio, when he could have gone anywhere, because he wanted a ring. I think he still wants it, don’t you?
- IF Bonner, Bogans and RMJ can hit their threes and not screw up too much – and why shouldn’t they? These aren’t rookies; all three are veterans, all three know the system, and all three have shown that they can come up big in the clutch.
- IF the San Antonio Spurs, who have been too old and washed up ever since they won their second ring, can pull it together for one more push – just like every year. Just like in 2005, except we’re actually a younger team now than we were then.
All our "ifs" are real. But so is my confidence that, although none can be counted on, all are not only possible but probable. What about the other, less-disclaimered contenders?
LAKERS
Might there be a little room opening up on this bandwagon? After all, their only chance to repeat is…
- IF Kobe’s injuries aren’t catching up to him / have healed by the playoffs and he can return to top form – and why would we expect that to happen? He’s just deteriorated over the course of the season, and even though he obviously wants badly to get back to form, it just doesn’t seem to be happening. He’s getting pissed, he’s playing in pain, and he’s not producing the way he’ll need to if he wants another ring. Sure, he might get better between now and the playoffs. But why would you expect that to happen?
- IF Bynum comes back with full athleticism and minimal rust – and what are the odds that a guy who’s already notorious for getting hurt, and whose current injury is taking an unusually long time to rehab, is going to be suddenly at 100% in a few weeks? And even if he is, do you really think that a young guy who’s never been the most high-BIQ player is going to go from a long hiatus to suddenly fitting into his first high-pressure playoff push?
- IF Fisher has enough veteran savvy in him to avoid being an insuperable liability on both ends of the floor – and if Tony can’t dominate him. Which, let’s be honest, he can. And will.
- IF Gasol, Walton, and the other oft-injured role players can stay healthy – always an "if," and no less so for the Lakeshow than for anybody else.
- IF Artest doesn’t lose his rag and disrupt the team on or off the court – and hey, it’s not as if he always, always ends up doing that, right? It’s not like he’s already started jacking up dumb shots and picking up dumb technicals, right? Right?
- IF this Lakers squad has the heart, the will, and the determination to grind out what will inevitably be a challenging run to the ring – except any signs that this might be the case have evaporated over the course of the season. Last year Bryant was running on rage; he’d been humiliated the year before, so he drove his squad out of a weak and injury-plagued Western conference and beat a young and frankly mediocre Orlando squad. Where’s that motivation this year? Where’s that fire? Can you honestly say that this team doesn’t look more like the pre-’09 squads that did okay right up to the point where they met a team that wanted it more?
CAVS
Everybody is dead certain that LeBroom – ahem, I mean Le-has-been-in-the-league-for-seven-seasons-now-and-has-never-won-a-single-Finals-game – will invariably end up challenging Jordan’s lifetime ring collection. The problem is, he’ll only have a prayer of getting started this year…
- IF LeBron can be the guy from the ads – which he never, ever has been.
- IF their bigs can stand up to opposing squads – so J.J. Hickson has to find a BIQ somewhere, Jamison needs to learn the system and stop sucking in a matter of days, and Ilgauskas needs to find a way of not looking washed up other than in comparison to the Tragicomedy Formerly Known as Shaq. I would like for Mr. O’Neal’s new nickname to be ‘The Irrelephant’, and invite you to join me in making it happen.
- IF they can get past Orlando – which they couldn’t last year, and for my money Orlando did a better job of improving than the Cavs did since then.
- IF the squad has an extra gear, and their regular-season intensity isn’t their ceiling – unlike every single year of the LeBron era.
MAGIC
I’m scared of these guys, and that’s no lie. But you know what? If we meet them in the Finals, they’ll only be able to beat us…
- IF Dwight Howard can play smart, have heart, and stay out of foul trouble – which I don’t think anybody would bet on.
- IF they can get reliable, high-level production from Vince Carter – which would require somebody introducing Carter to the concept of 'reliability'.
- IF their injury-prone guys can stay healthy – the difference being that our big injury concerns are gutty, proven winners, whereas Orlando’s are something called a Mickael Pietrus and Vince Carter, who has been known to quit on teams just out of respect for tradition.
- IF they can hit from the outside the way they have been – they do tend to live and die by the trey. Which is fine, except against the best perimeter defense in the league.
In summary, this is what I have to say about the 09-10 Spurs: they can win it all. I won't bet the house on it – a lot of things could happen to wreck our hopes. But that’s true for every squad that ever stepped onto the hardcourt, and as far as I’m concerned our liabilities are less daunting than those of our probable opponents. I’ll put it in the simplest possible terms:
The Magic will only win if they do something they’ve never shown they can do.
The Cavs will only win if they’re something they’ve never shown themselves to be.
The Lakers will only win if they’ve got something they appear to have lost.
The Spurs will only win if they do what they’ve always done. In this life, everybody takes their chances – I’ll take ours.
72 comments
|
14 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
There are so many good one-liners in this post, Rand, it’s a jrw smorgasbord! And I will join you in calling Shaq “Mr. Irrelephant”. In fact, I’ll add it to the Nickname Dictionary without even a vote, it’s that brillian.
Rand, this is a truly excellent post. As Cap said above, I was in heaven while reading it. I knew there was a reason why I ignored the other 30 things going on right now to click on this link when I saw your name as the author. It’s well reasoned, and your arguments are sound, but what I like most is the way you made your points.
Here are my favorite selections from your post:
savaged by weasels
minimal rust
insuperable liability
lose his rag
Never heard this one before? Here you go.
And finally:
that fact is scant comfort to the former owners of the many scalps he’s tucked into his belt over the past few weeks.
Absolutely gorgeous writing. You don’t post often, but when you do, you really deliver.
Have a rec, and a JTU, and a standing O.
Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie
I knew you would love “savaged by weasels”.
It’s not a problem, per se, but Rand did manage to misspell Vinc Carte several times. ;-)
I still think the mavs are a serious title contender. I think they are up to the magic to me (with the cavs and lakers being the favorites)
"Rock and Roll angels bring that HardRock Hallelujah"
Have to disagree
The Mavericks have never been the same since they traded Devin Harris and though their acquisitions of Butler and Heywood are nice, I don’t think they are enough.
by The Augustus on Apr 13, 2010 12:30 AM CDT up reply actions
Kidd makes them tougher. They beat us easily last year, and they are better this year.
I am here to state the obvious.
Spurs are better this year too. They have a bench and don’t have to depend on Roger Mason jr.
-RJ also played Dirk as well as anyone could in their last match up.
-Manu is playing out of his mind
-Duncan with rest shows he’s a completely different player
-Parker looks like the months rest did him wonders to rid himself of the plantar and hip flexor
Of course, we are better as well. But they are not pushovers, and they have a home court. It’s a tough match up both for us and for them.
I am here to state the obvious.
They aren’t. No one said that. They aren’t the ideal 1st round match up. But Spurs are playing their best basketball of the year and if they stay healthy like this, they have a solid team that has depth.
I am scared of Dallas. I hope we can beat them but I don’t know. And I don’t know how hard we should try to beat them tomorrow.
I am here to state the obvious.
I know what you mean
I’m a little scared of Dallas because at times, no matter how much they under-perform against other teams, they manage to play their best against yours truly, the San Antonio Spurs (a familiar theme right?). They will certainly bring it and with home-court, it makes “stealing” the series that much more difficult.
However, we have Manu. Yes they have Heywood and Butler but…we have Manu. If he continues to play his game, I don’t see how the Spurs can be stopped because Manu cannot be stopped. The additions of RJ and Blair, the surprise of Hill and Temple, and the somewhat-steady performance of Bonner make this team formidable in the playoffs. Parker is starting to get back into shape and if he remains on the bench, I think he can be particularly volatile against the Ponies’ bench. Duncan will be Duncan as always!
This team seems to be playing with a stronger passion of late, getting statement wins against contenders and pretenders alike-Celtics, Lakers, Magic, Cavs, and Nuggets. This performance should continue during the playoffs as the Spurs seem to be peaking at the right time. Dallas will be difficult but they are not unbeatable. They have many weaknesses and the Spurs can exploit them as long as they are focused.
by The Augustus on Apr 13, 2010 10:46 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
I heart you, man. And here’s a rec.
Just cause we're crippled, don't mean we gotta take the crumbs.
by silverandblack_davis on Apr 14, 2010 8:56 PM CDT up reply actions
Nice one!
You shall have no other Manu before me.
by day_late_friend on Apr 16, 2010 2:43 AM CDT up reply actions
Have you considered getting a job as a political spin master? Karl Rove would be proud.
IF Bonner, Bogans and RMJ can hit their threes and not screw up too much – and why shouldn’t they? These aren’t rookies; all three are veterans, all three know the system, and all three have shown that they can come up big in the clutch.
Yeah, why wouldn’t we expect a big playoff performance from Matty? I can remember him underper…Oh that’s right.
Great stuff though, these playoffs are nothing if not interesting.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
Difference between Bonner then and Bonner now?
MUCH improved defense, and what i call the “Bonner bomb”, his running teardrop/"jump"hook that he’s gotten so good at even when his 3’s arent on target.
Genibus Nitito Canus
by SpursfanSteve on Apr 6, 2010 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Oh no doubt about that. But he was shooting the three ball pretty well last year when he completely disappeared. At least with Mason we know he’s gonna suck. With Bonner we are actually expecting things from him. We will see if past performance does not indicate future failure.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
His past failures were in my opinion a part of too much being expected of him. We expected him last year to more or less be a part of our big 3. This year, he doesnt really need to step it up any more than he already has.
Genibus Nitito Canus
by SpursfanSteve on Apr 6, 2010 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions
As long he does what he continues doing, it’s cool. But I won’t give him the benefit of the doubt until he shows he’s not a choker. The Hipuks does not forget.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
Haha, thanks guys
Glad you liked it – it was a lot more fun than most of the stuff I have to write about. And, also unlike much of that other stuff, I actually believe it; every year we tell ourselves not to judge San Antonio until the P’offs start, and every year we forget. Sorry for the mis-spell on Mr. Carte. If he pulled a Cassius Clay/Lew Alcindor and adopted a Muslim monicker, could he be Allah Carte?
Hipuks: Everybody says that playoff experience is super-important; now the Red Rocket and Romaju haz it. With the (vastly) greater volume of interior threats we’ve got this year, hopefully they can just play their roles. With luck, the bile I’ll be spitting at my TV whenever Mase takes an off-balance super-trey with seventeen seconds left on the shot clock will be neutralized by the pure, sweet goodness of Bonner driving the lane like baby Bambi and throwing it down while opposing coaches weep inconsolably.
Also, maybe I have lived in DC too long. I’m not quite Rovian yet though – Karl would be pointing out how the Lakers lack playoff experience, the Magic need a true big man, and the Cavs need a true superstar before they can really contend.
Loved the post, Rand, especially how you ended it. Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
Just cause we're crippled, don't mean we gotta take the crumbs.
by silverandblack_davis on Apr 6, 2010 7:40 PM CDT reply actions
Nice post, thank you. Would be nice to hear about Utah, Dallas, Denver, Phoenix, OKC and Portland. None of these teams looks like an overwhelming favorite, but every one has a legit chance imo. Some of these teams would have a home court at least for some rounds. And when a competition seems to be pretty equally matched, home court can make all the difference. In 2008 the West had 9 or 10 good teams, with very few games separating the 1st from the 8th seed. So what happened during the playoffs? Home court team won every series except the 3rd seeded Spurs won against 2nd seeded NO in the 7th game of the second round. This season looks similar except that the Lakers have a safe lead. It is very hard to win one series against almost equal opposition on their court, it is close to impossible to win four series. I would add for the Spurs that they can win it all “if they are seeded 2nd or 3rd in the West”. Your optimism is contagious though.
Next season doesn't exist. Only today exists. So say we all.
I am trying to catch up and don’t have time to read this post and all the comments so let me just comment on the title.
Your ‘Ifs’ may be grater than our ‘Ifs’ but rumor has it that you’re buts are bigger too. I’m just saying. (I don’t have to be nice do I since you guys killed us on Sunday, right?)
Hey if repeating as champions were that easy even the Spurs could do it.
Oh you’d have to ask ‘Rand’. I was just responding to his title for this post:
Our ‘Ifs’ > Their ‘Ifs’
But fresh grated Parmesan is indeed much better than store bought.
Hey if repeating as champions were that easy even the Spurs could do it.
by olf on Apr 7, 2010 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Parmesan smells like feet. Why anyone would want to eat something that smells like feet, is beyond me.
Crappy teams fear us !
Olf, you only had time to read five words, and coincidentally I only had time to read the first five words of your comment. You say that you’re “trying to catch” – and since I’d rather have you explain what you mean than actually read what you wrote originally, I’ll assume that you’re trying to catch either:
- The roadrunner from the Coyote & Roadrunner cartoons
- The golden snitch from Harry Potter
- Gonorrhea from a Vietnamese tranny hooker
My advice, accordingly, is as follows:
- Give it up. All the ACME-brand gear in the world will do nothing more than hasten your pitiful, comical demise.
- Give it up. Why would you even participate in such an utterly broken game in the first place? Seriously, the ‘Seekers’ are the only two out of however-many players that ever have any meaningful impact on the game, and if the others ever actually did make a difference the result would be to force one of the Seekers to NOT do his job or else instantly cost his team the game. BS.
- Just keep trying, you’ll get there.
by Rand on Apr 7, 2010 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions 10 recs
Thirded.
Just cause we're crippled, don't mean we gotta take the crumbs.
by silverandblack_davis on Apr 7, 2010 8:01 PM CDT up reply actions
Man you guys win a few games and you bring out the mean. It was when I pointed out that you not only have > ‘ifs’ but you also have well you know . . . right? Or maybe last week when I mentioned how the Spurs have that “old team smell”.
But I yield to your obvious superior knowledge of gonorrhea and tranny hookers, not to mention Harry Potter or cartoons. I am far from the expert you are in those areas.
Hey if repeating as champions were that easy even the Spurs could do it.
by olf on Apr 7, 2010 9:26 PM CDT up reply actions
:yawns:
You shall have no other Manu before me.
by day_late_friend on Apr 10, 2010 10:20 PM CDT up reply actions
Love the post, but like Kondor stated above, I think there are several teams that could end up coming out of the West, including LA, Utah, Dallas, Den, and SA. I think a lot of this could depend on the match ups teams get in the playoffs. I definitely think the Spurs are peaking at the right time and have a shot, but I’d like to see just how the playoff match ups shake out before making any bold prediction. I would speculate based on how the standings are today, but everyone is so bunched up that everything could be completely different by the time playoffs start, so I’ll just wait till the end of the season.
GO SPURS GO!
5 IN '10!
I’m generally the one calling for the judicious application of a little realism, but I’ve got so much optimism pent up from an entire season of waiting for something positive to happen, that I just can’t resist anymore.
WillyD, you’re absolutely correct, but I’m letting myself be carried away nonetheless.
Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie
by J.R. Wilco on Apr 7, 2010 7:53 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs




































