Spurs vs Mavs: Playoff Preview
Another playoff run for the Spurs, another showdown with the Mavericks. After last year's destruction that saw Dallas easily win the series in five games, revenge would definitely be sweet.
Unfortunately, revenge won't be easy. Outside of the Lakers, no other team in the Western Conference boasts as many challenging matchups for San Antonio -- as has been seen the last two times the Spurs took on the Mavs in the playoffs. Even worse, the Mavs seem to be the world's most comfortable basketball team within the confines of the AT&T Center.
Compared to last postseason's squad, this Spurs team is more talented, deeper, more explosive and, most importantly, healthier. That said, a number of issues have plagued San Antonio this season, most prominently chemistry and consistency on both ends of the court. Truthfully, the Spurs are still a work in progress.
How can the Spurs get their revenge? Here are my top ten keys.
10. George Hill's Health
George Hill has become an indispensable part of this team. He's the starting point guard and easily the fourth best player on the Spurs. As the season progressed and Hill's role grew, he flourished while illustrating an exciting amount of potential.
But after stepping on a cameraman and tweaking his injured ankle on the last day of the regular season, Hill enters the playoffs with a limp. If he's not able to perform near 100%, that would be a crippling blow for the Spurs. His ability to guard multiple positions, run the floor, attack weak defenders and hit three-pointers has allowed those around him to thrive -- especially Manu Ginobili.
9. Tony Parker vs. Jason Terry
Both teams have quality bench players but the battle of the benches basically comes down to Tony Parker and Jason Terry. Parker is the better player on paper but it's been a difficult season for the French point guard due to injuries, a lack of cohesion with his new teammates, and sloppy and sometimes unfocused play. Additionally, Parker's role as the bench x-factor is in its infancy.
On the other hand, Terry knows how to perform off the bench. He seemingly always drains the big shot when facing off against San Antonio. Even though Dallas has a stacked starting lineup, don't be surprised if it's Terry who takes the most important shots.
8. Tim Duncan and Foul Trouble
Though he's coming off the least foul-prone regular season of his career, you can throw out that statistic when Tim Duncan goes up against the Mavs. Simply put, the Mavs are constructed perfectly to get Duncan in foul trouble. They have a pair of bruising centers to be physical with Duncan. Their offense, which is built around isolation plays and pick-and-roll plays, puts Duncan in awkward positions on the court. Oh and that Dirk Nowitzki guy isn't exactly an easy opponent for Duncan to defend.
7. Shooters Stepping Up
Since the beginning of the Tim Duncan Era, the front office has made it a point to surround Duncan with three-point shooters. Currently, however, outside shooting isn't something the Spurs can rely on going into the playoffs.
Hill is probably the team's best three-point shooter right now … but he's hurting. Ginobili is a good three-point shooter but he is classified more as "streaky" than "dead-eye". Matt Bonner and Roger Mason, Jr. can shoot but they both monumentally struggled last year against the Mavs in the playoffs (and they just finished going a combined 0-for-8 from three-point range against Dallas on Wednesday). Richard Jefferson shot 22.8% on three-pointers after the All-Star break and Keith Bogans is Keith Bogans.
To win this series, the Spurs need at least two or three shooters to step up and knock down shots from deep. We'll see if that is too much to ask.
6. Transition Defense
Just like the Spurs, the Mavs are different than the team from last year's playoffs. With the additions of Shawn Marion, Caron Butler and Roddy Beaubois, Dallas can get out and run. Add the ageless Jason Kidd to the mix, who just might be the best fast-breaking point guard of all-time, and there's little doubt that the coaching staff will make transition defense a top priority.
Transition defense is especially important with regard to Marion. As the Spurs have witnessed firsthand, stout transition defense can keep Marion under control.
5. Limiting Turnovers
Turnovers have been an unexpected bugaboo for the Spurs this season. Last year, the Spurs turned it over fewer times than any team in the NBA. This year, nine teams had fewer turnovers. Since the All-Star break, the Spurs have only lost one time in games in which they've finished with less turnovers than their opponent.
The previous key makes this key even more vital. If the Spurs can limit their turnovers, that will go a long ways toward making sure the Mavs don't get easy buckets in transition.
4. Make Dirk Work
Teams that have had success against the Mavs in the playoffs have done so in large part due to taking Dirk Nowitzki out of his comfort zones. He's not going to be stopped completely but the Mavs are most dangerous when Nowitzki is free to do what he wants.
The bad news is the Spurs still lack anything resembling a Dirk stopper. Antonio McDyess has too many miles on the odometer, DeJuan Blair lacks size and is foul prone, Matt Bonner isn't athletic enough, Richard Jefferson tends to be undisciplined and soft, Keith Bogans is way too small and Tim Duncan is too immobile. The coaching staff is going to have to be inventive with gimmicky schemes to overcome the gaping hole in the personnel.
3. Pop and Common Sense
In 2006 and 2009, Pop made glaring mistakes in the playoffs against the Mavs. Too much small ball doomed the Spurs in 2006; Pop overreacted to the mismatches and had the Spurs playing a then uncharted brand of basketball. Last postseason, Pop inexplicably buried Hill on the bench to begin the series. Additionally, Pop's rotations neglected the defensive end of the court until it was too late.
The teams are too evenly matched for Pop to author another blunder and the Spurs come out on top. Rather than trying to be the hero, Pop needs to rely on common sense. Don't try to fit a square peg (a struggling player) into a round hole (playing time). Don't overreact to matchups that don't favor the Spurs (See: Nowitzki, Dirk). Don't be afraid to play those who have performed well all season (See: Blair, DeJuan). In other words, don't out-think things.
2. Rebounding
The one overriding aspect that has tipped the balance of power in Dallas' favor in recent years is rebounding. In the 2006 series, the Mavs outrebounded the Spurs in all seven games. The 2009 series saw the Mavs outrebound the Spurs in every game except for one: Game 2, the sole contest the Spurs won.
Small ball is the most obvious culprit, though the Mavs having superior rebounders at the swingman positions has also been a leading reason. This year, the Spurs can contend on the glass -- but the coaching staff must resist small ball as much as possible, find minutes for Blair and urge each and every player to gang rebound. (By the way, if Jefferson is searching for an area where he can most help, rebounding is the answer.)
1. Manu Ginobili
Without question the absolute top key for the Spurs in this forthcoming series against the Mavs is the play of Manu Ginobili. Since the All-Star break, the Spurs have been Ginobili's team. If he can be at the top of his game, the Spurs will be a difficult out in the playoffs -- for any team in the league.
Ginobili's importance is magnified against Dallas. First of all, the Mavs have the post-defenders and help-defenders to slow Duncan in the low block. Secondly, Parker is still rounding into form following his hand injury. Last but not least is the fact that the Mavs don't truly have a defender who should have much success against Ginobili. It just so happens that Dallas' biggest weakness defensively plays right into Ginobili's hands. Hopefully he's ready to take advantage and coldly serve the revenge.
48 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting perspective. I’m not sure how much you’ve watch Dampier play Duncan. Outside of some limited success here and there, Duncan has owned Damps. To my knowledge Haywood and Duncan haven’t played one another since Haywood’s been in Dallas. That will be an interesting match up to be sure. I’m just not convinced that Dallas matches up with Duncan as well as you are claiming they do.
That being said, the Spurs match up against Dirk is not good, and it never has been. I’m also worried about the Spurs being able to contain the French kid, I can never remember his name. I’ll be interested to see how the Spurs handle him.
Beaubois… Tony can guard him if he puts in the effort.
Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek
I know Dampier can not stop Duncan, but Dampier can play Duncan straight up without a double team. Then you add Haywood, who is an even better post defender. Those two will make Duncan work for his points. That’s my biggest concern if they were meet in the postseason.
Four years ago they had a younger Damp plus Diop to use up fouls on Duncan. With Diop’s size I think those two were tougher for Duncan. That either can play Duncan without a double does not mean that it will work, especially in the 4th quarter. If the Mavs need a stop and don’t double Duncan, that’s their loss. If they trail they’re more likely to have neither on the floor, meaning Dirk guards TD which demands a double or triple team.
The ability to make Dirk and Kidd work on defense will be huge differences this series from last year (if and when it happens). The Spurs having more offensive options means the Mavs will more likely suffer from having Damp or Haywood on the floor as it makes their offense a bit easier to defend. And don’t forget that Howard is no longer there. He saved his all-star performances for when he played the Spurs. I’d rather deal with Butler.
Appreciate your doing some research and broaching the topic.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
You said what I just said and more.
"I like the fact that he’s a man." – Hubie Brown on Blair
by Manu ex Machina on Apr 13, 2010 3:03 PM CDT up reply actions
plus if they triple or double td,who is one of the best big man passer-he can kick it to someone open that would lead to a bucket(and by this hopefully spurs offense won’t suck,by any means hopefully that guy could swish that ball.) and so if i were carlisle, td would just have one on one’s rather than doubling him,yes we don’t have that much three point shooters unlike years before but we can have rj manu and hill on the floor in the 4th plus if i were pop i’ll play temple(if we’ll go small ball)or dice rather than parker in the 4th.All the players mentioned should play 10-12 mins in the fourth…cuz seriosuly we might collapse definively again and so suckness is next to it then as a result losing.
Ginobelieve!!!!!!!!
----That is Matt Bonner straight down the lane with the dunk,I repeat Matt Bonner down the lane with the dunk!LoL---NBA guy that recaps the games on NBA.com(Spurs-T'Wolves recap)
I don’t see them getting much play together, though, because that means there’s no Dirk in the game, sacrificing too much offensively to simply try to contain Timmy while we still have many other players to defer to offensively. Wednesday should offer us a good preview, conveniently enough.
"I like the fact that he’s a man." – Hubie Brown on Blair
by Manu ex Machina on Apr 13, 2010 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions
Beubois has the tools to be a terrific player in the next two years, but remember he is just a rookie. He hasn’t been getting consistent minutes all year long. Beaubois is not a great shooter, and is turnover prone.
Yeah, I don’t see our defense having much trouble with him. Barea, however, has been a bit of a pest against us. Hill should be able to handle either of them, though.
"I like the fact that he’s a man." – Hubie Brown on Blair
by Manu ex Machina on Apr 13, 2010 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions
Hill has the length to neutralize Barea. Unfortunately it took Pop until game 4 last year to figure this out. He killed us last year.
by Chris9_20_21 on Apr 13, 2010 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions
Barea blows by George, who then tries to block his layup from behind. And sometimes succeeds.
by doggydogworld on Apr 13, 2010 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions
but as i said above if u watch roddy play-he creates problems for as—-he and jj creates problems for us,and everybody here knows that.—-if u dnt play defense on him he will score 40.plus if kidd retires in a mavs uniform surely french fry will be the next pg and jj its back up…small guys that can score and pass—-but unlike kidd beaubois is a score pass type of pg not a kidd-nash pass then score pg.
and so to defend roddy/barea put hill on him cuz he plays great defense unlike tony who plays decent to bad defense…and tony is still rusty so that might add another hill minute.
Ginobelieve!!!!!!!!
----That is Matt Bonner straight down the lane with the dunk,I repeat Matt Bonner down the lane with the dunk!LoL---NBA guy that recaps the games on NBA.com(Spurs-T'Wolves recap)
I think Marion crashing the boards (offensive) will be a huge weakness that RJ will have to handle for us, even if he just blocks him out so Dice and Duncan can do their work.
Marion has the second best Offensive rebounding rate of all SF’s.
Haywood is 4th and Dampier is 16th for centers. We have to control the defensive glass and the match up isn’t scary at all.
Yep. Lots of stops ended with Dallas getting the ball back. Having Dyce, a fresher Timmy, a more aggressive Bonner and the Blair man should fix that.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
blair scored a career high of rebs against them but that was until today when playoff starts blair would ave 8 and 8 for 14-20 mins and he can’t exceed 21 mins cause even if blair has talent pop won’t use him cuz his a rook like what he did with hill..i surely hope that if blair is on the court and pop sees some advantage which we had a preview today,he would play blair to take advantage of it.
plus pop is becoming sane now
at last after 82 games.
Ginobelieve!!!!!!!!
----That is Matt Bonner straight down the lane with the dunk,I repeat Matt Bonner down the lane with the dunk!LoL---NBA guy that recaps the games on NBA.com(Spurs-T'Wolves recap)
Duncan over Haywood/Dampier
RJ over Marion
Tony over Kidd
Manu over Terry
Hill over Barea
The biggest problem is Dirk. I would probably try Bonner on him and see if he can handle it. I don’t think Dice is a good match up against Dirk, may be RJ, Hairston and Manu can help. Basically, I would throw everything to Dirk and see who gives him more problems. Or we just dominate the boards and outscore them.
I am here to state the obvious.
i guess consistent offense and great defense will help us win
and by today,even if we lost i can say that bonner did a really good job against dirk
for 25 mins bon bon just scored 2 but then he gave dirk hell…dirk was 8-20 for 40%,surely below dirk’s ave fg%-0.48%
even if dirk was +8 on his +/- you can see that bon bon gave him work.as i’ve observed in the game dirk,hit 2 or 3 wide open shot and when bonner covers him bonner did a great job.so i guess if bonner can cover dirk,then give the job to bonner.maybe i should create my rotation playoff preview post after this.
Ginobelieve!!!!!!!!
----That is Matt Bonner straight down the lane with the dunk,I repeat Matt Bonner down the lane with the dunk!LoL---NBA guy that recaps the games on NBA.com(Spurs-T'Wolves recap)
the Mavs have an advantage over the Spurs in the frontcourt
Is that so? I doubt that. Haywood and Dampier are both OK, but none is a match for TD.
I am here to state the obvious.
The Mavs have an advantage in the frontcourt because they are bigger and have more length.Haywood and Dampier can block and alter shots in the lane. they can also play TD straight up, this is huge because that allows the Mavs to stay with shooters.
by Chris9_20_21 on Apr 13, 2010 7:17 PM CDT up reply actions
i agree…only if td thinks this is an orlando game where he goes 1-9 then i guess just another day at hell for him…but when td is on for playoff mode,you know what he can brings
Ginobelieve!!!!!!!!
----That is Matt Bonner straight down the lane with the dunk,I repeat Matt Bonner down the lane with the dunk!LoL---NBA guy that recaps the games on NBA.com(Spurs-T'Wolves recap)
Of course I think it will be a close series. Last year we didnt have Manu frickin Ginobili. And we have gotten better (even if the record doesnt show it). But the Mavs have gotten better too, so I think they have the upper hand
"Rock and Roll angels bring that HardRock Hallelujah"
its fine but we are a better spurs—-even if parker is not in it, seriously we were 12-5 without him
but lets not blame him,i got what i wanted—bench him.
and so i guess if everybody would step up and do what they did to those contenders,blowing them out-except a 7 pt win against cle,so as a point or two,thanks to j-rich for blowing his dunk then we can do this.
Ginobelieve!!!!!!!!
----That is Matt Bonner straight down the lane with the dunk,I repeat Matt Bonner down the lane with the dunk!LoL---NBA guy that recaps the games on NBA.com(Spurs-T'Wolves recap)
You keep mentioning Haywood’s post D presence like it’s something to be feared. Haywood is actually very lazy on D. Right now the Mavs are frustrated because of his lack of awareness. He doesn’t play 4 quarters of basketball and its obvious.
Haywood did a nice job filling in for Damp when Damp went down but now the cracks are now starting to show. Dallas’ D has been sub par here at the end of the season, especially for a team sitting in 2nd place. Wait till they have to play the same team 4 consecutive times and watch what happens to their D.
You mention that you feel that the Mavs will win this series because they are better equipped to stop Duncan. 1. I respectfully disagree. Tim will get his, just as he did last year against the Mavs. 2. Even if they are able to lock down Tim, the Spurs now have Manu 2.0, Tony, Hill and even RJ who will slice and dice their defense. Our speed to the basket is going to kill them.
My only concern is how well we shoot the 3 ball. If Bonner, Manu and Hill keep knocking them down, this series will be over faster than we know it.
Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed.
by CMoney on Apr 14, 2010 12:08 AM CDT reply actions 6 recs
Dallas sports writer Tim Cowlishaw backs me up on this.
Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed.
they’re a better team with Eddie Najera running around and hustling than they were with their 7-foot centers.
Wow, I suspected it might be the case, but I am surprised to hear it from Dallas’s guy. That much for their dominance inside. So, how would they plan to win against us? Their best strategy might be to tank the Spurs game and hope that Utah would take care of us.
I am here to state the obvious.
You may be right. They could tank it thinking, if they still play the Spurs then nothing was lost by playing reserves, and if Utah moves up then they get the Blazers without Roy while the Jazz and spurs go at it. The only downside for them is losing potential h/c in the 2nd round to Utah. They actually think they’ll advance so that may mean something to them. If that’s the case, they’ll try to defeat the Spurs, leave a mark and hold onto their #2 seed. But if they play to win and get beat, the mark will be on them.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Sort of backfires if Utah somehow loses to Dallas in Utah (although that to me is very unlikely), but Boozer might sit just to play it safe.
They won’t know since the Utah game starts when the Spurs-Mavs game ends. But Utah has huge motivation: division winner and #3 seed with possible #2 and thus h/c in the first two rounds. Boozer or not they’re going to play all out to win whereas Phoenix has h/c in the first round, thus a little less to play for on the road.
I will be interested to see how those two teams match up with each other.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Though 3 point shooting is a nice bonus, we have enough offensive weapons inside this year. I hope that we could have 5-6 people in double figures and score above 100 points against them.
I am here to state the obvious.
our biggest problem
we love to collapse in the third quarter,we love to blow up leads
i really love if the spurs were at least down by 6 as long as not double digits cuz in the 4th we play like we want to win,idk if the guys rely sometimes that they have the lead—-cuz we always blow it up
we could have won that 1st cle game—-were we could have won the series 2-0 instead of tying it,anyways tying is not really bad,we could have won our other 2 l.a. game and that dallas at s.a. game where dallas explode for a 42 pt 4th q—-this are examples that we love to collapse even if at the other 2 or 3 q’s we have the leAd by double digits.we shouldn’t look back and go on to have the lead after the 4th q says 0:00.
our defense are sometimes great to sub par and bad.so i guess with the new spurs all healthy,hopefully by the weekend hill would be,i look forward for us to win this
S.A leads4-2 Dallas
cuz i hate espn analyst saying we would bring the game hard and fight for it but we can’t win and bring an upset,
right now butler wins over duke in this nba playoofs.
Ginobelieve!!!!!!!!
----That is Matt Bonner straight down the lane with the dunk,I repeat Matt Bonner down the lane with the dunk!LoL---NBA guy that recaps the games on NBA.com(Spurs-T'Wolves recap)
Damn, C$. I rec’d you softly.
Just cause we're crippled, don't mean we gotta take the crumbs.
by silverandblack_davis on Apr 14, 2010 4:31 AM CDT up reply actions
This years team (at least the one playing well since March) is a lot more dynamic than the team that played Dallas earlier this year. That’s not to say the Spurs will win the series, but it is much different.
Also, RJ in their last matchup did a solid job on Dirk. As solid as any player can do.
not only that our bench players rallied back to lose 89-96 instead of a possible 79-96.
plus td and manu didn’t play
add their defense and ave you could have won it
90-104
Ginobelieve!!!!!!!!
----That is Matt Bonner straight down the lane with the dunk,I repeat Matt Bonner down the lane with the dunk!LoL---NBA guy that recaps the games on NBA.com(Spurs-T'Wolves recap)
Hate to tell you guys, but unless the refs get whistle happy (never know with them) Dice plays very good defense on irk (no D get it?) he makes the guy uncomfortable and makes him work very hard

by 

































