Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Sixers Vs. Celtics: Countdown To Game Seven

How to (not) Trade Tony Parker

Tony Parker is a great player. But when you consider what we pay him, he rises from the realms of just great, and enters the stratosphere where only truly exceptional players dwell.

I say the above in order to explain why I'm posting this:

If you are going to call for Tony to be traded, then you need to mention a SPECIFIC player you want in return, and not just a TYPE of player that we should get for him.

Tony_celebrates_medium

JRW is defending me? Woo hoo!

Otherwise, you begin a mostly fruitless argument. See, it's easy to look at what we need and think, "We should be able to get someone like that for Tony. Because Tony's great!" It's true. He is. But when you consider a) the Spurs' salary cap situation, b) Tony's contract and c) the contract of anyone that we would want to get in return, then the list starts to shrink to a very, very small group of players. To all of this, you must to add consideration of whether that list contains a Spurs-type player who could fit into San Antonio's system and excel on our team, and you start to understand the logistics of why RC and Pop haven't been shopping Parker around (not to mention things like loyalty, the desire to maintain some continuity with the roster, and not shopping someone just because they have a couple of bad games.)

So, can we agree to this? I know that it will take these talks out of the hypothetical and put it into the real world, but that's a good thing, right?

Finally, if you don't want to talk real-world, that's fine. Just say that you're speaking hypothetically, and we'll understand. Please take the advice of one who's tread on this particular snake before. I know whereof I speak.

Comment 169 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I dont think Parker should be traded.

  But I never considered the fact that his modest salary would actually make him MORE attractive for specific types of deals. For example, those containing draft picks.

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Apr 10, 2010 7:58 PM CDT reply actions  

I would oppose any deal that sent Parker away for draft pick(s). He’s a proven, reliable, battle-tested NBA player. You don’t give that away for potential. End of story.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 10, 2010 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Only bad teams who want to give their fans false hope trade for draft picks.

by doggydogworld on Apr 11, 2010 10:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

True dat, ddw.

Doesn’t sound like the kind of team I wanna support.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 11, 2010 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just to clarify, I would not trade Parker away solely for draft picks.

That why I mentioned Parkers contract would be more attractive for specific types of deals, like those containing draft picks. Not those consisting solely of draft picks. (Jesus, I dont hate Parker like some people in here do)

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Apr 11, 2010 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Aha.

For example, those containing draft picks.

I’ve got you now. Deals that contain picks, are not necessarily deals that consist solely of pics. Thanks for cleaning that up.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 11, 2010 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with this I think people are being a bit childish saying Parker is gone. I hear them complaing saying we are 1-2 with parker back when those people fail to realize we just lost Hill when we got Parker back. Plus he is going to be rusty but come playoff time they will jump back ont he badwagon once he is back to himself. Hill will improve this team much more to once he come backs. This spurs team healty is a real threat to any one team out west and east.

GO SPURS GO
SPURS 2010 NBA Champions (if team is healty LoL)

by Manu-20 on Apr 10, 2010 7:59 PM CDT reply actions  

I DO however, have to get this off my chest. Why is it that Manu and Parker do not seem to play well together?

Since I’m unwilling to speculate that there is friction diminishing their chemistry on the court (although this could very well be the case) I think it has mostly to do with their skill sets.

I will be the first to admit that Tony needs to become a better passer. I think this is within the realm of his capabilities. If Jason Kidd of all people can start hitting threes in the twilight of his career, then Tony can certainly become a better passer. Just last year, Tony averaged a career high 7 assists per game, so we know Tony is actually still improving as a basketball player. People tend to forget this important factor.

He has already become a much improved mid range shooter. (Although it doesn’t seem he has been hitting it this year, and if I’m remembering correctly, he didn’t hit it with great frequency last year either.) But about two years ago, he was absolutely deadly with that mid range shot.

I would like to see him start hitting that mid range again with great accuracy and become a better passer. He is capable of doing both.

As for his defense, Tony only plays hard defense when he has to. It’s not like he’s simply a hopeless defender.

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Apr 10, 2010 8:12 PM CDT reply actions  

First, I think Tony conserves energy on the offensive end. He exerts himself when the game demands it, or when Pop yells at him,

Second, I’d love for Tony to become a better passer, but I feel like his skills are good enough. It’s his willingness to pass and his creativity (playmaking, if you will) that I’d like to see improve. But maybe that’s what you meant.

Third, his mid-range shot was quite deadly last year. 2008-2009 was his career year stats-wise; including the non-three-point jumper.

Last, it might be time to change that sig. We’ve been blowing games against the dregs recently.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 10, 2010 8:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

They both dominate the ball. It’s as simple as that – having two players that dominate the ball that much play together limits how effective they can each be. That said, I’d still want them both on the court at the end of games.

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Apr 10, 2010 10:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

I disagree with this. If you go back to 2008, which was the last time each of them were healthy for extended time together, they played awesome. Especially in the first 2 rounds of the playoffs. Yes they both dominate the ball but it gives each of them a break on offense when the other gets going.

"It's Manuway or the Highway" - tlo

by Manuwar on Apr 11, 2010 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’m not saying it isn’t good for the team, just that they don’t look as good individually when they both play together.

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Apr 11, 2010 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

From a numbers perspective alone, I absolutely agree, Tim.

When examining whether they’re exerting more in a game, or a stretch of games, than they would have to if they were playing together, then what Manuwar is saying applies.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 11, 2010 3:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

The numbers would probably also show that Manu and Tony don’t play as well with Duncan.

What I mean is, when a star player goes out, who averages a significant amount of points then those points have to be made up somewhere. And the slack is hopefully picked up by another star, in which Manu does.

So from a numbers perspective alone things are misleading. The same way it’s misleading when a good players average great numbers on shitty teams.

"It's Manuway or the Highway" - tlo

by Manuwar on Apr 11, 2010 5:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why should we do the oppossing team a favor by only playing one of them at a time? Wouldn’t it be better if they have more players they have to pay attention to? It isn’t that Manu is less effective with Parker, it’s just that he is more versatile that to even be more effective he has to let Parker have the ball. When Parker is out, then he takes over his role. Anyway, during end games, more often than not, it is Manu who takes point.

by TD21 on Apr 11, 2010 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Devin Harris

He is 90% Parker but without the selfishness. And 5 million cheaper.

Harris / Hill / Temple —> What a Super combo Guard Core

by CarBahia on Apr 10, 2010 8:14 PM CDT reply actions  

  If you would seriously entertain trading Parker for Devin Harris, you must harbor a considerable dislike for the Spurs starting point.

Tony shoots a much higher percentage, he’s proven himself on the highest level of pro basketball and gets as many assists as Devin Harris. Tony has also consistently improved his game. All for about 2 more million per year than Devin Harris.

  Devin is having a statistically superior year to Tony only because Tony has been hurt all season. I don’t see how Harris is more unselfish than Tony…

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Apr 10, 2010 8:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

And don’t forget, Devin is playing for the lowly Nets. Oh wait, you mean that Nets team that beat us this season? Oops.

Just cause we're crippled, don't mean we gotta take the crumbs.

by silverandblack_davis on Apr 11, 2010 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Car B, my bad. Devin does indeed make 4.2 million less than Parker per year.

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Apr 10, 2010 8:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

CB, I’ve got a Mavs fan who sits next to me at work and every time I bring up Harris, and how he kills the Spurs, he quotes me chapter and verse on why Dallas was right to dump him. Mainly, he disapears so often that me makes Jefferson look downright dependable. He regularly takes entire games off and only really plays when there’s a matchup against another PG that he’s interested in beating.

I’ll take Tony over Harris every time.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 10, 2010 8:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

ROFL @ Devin Harris not being selfish. You must not have seen much of him since he got traded to NJ.

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Apr 10, 2010 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

maybe harris has tp’s ability,but will he fit spurs system?and i want deron if i could.but harris and nj is the only place that i can say might be interested in tp though unlike utah or NO.but then id rather have tp than harris,harris is like tp sometimes they’re on passing mode and sometimes on scoring mode,i can understand harris’ situation bcuz his in nj,no one outside of him and lopez could score 30 others might chip in 10 or 12 but after that no one else.

San Antonio,Thunder,Bulls,Memphis,Denver
GoSpuRsGo
Cleveland Sucks

by tp_09 on Apr 10, 2010 11:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Truthfully, I’ve never given much stock to the “Trade Parker” discussions because he and Hill were a LARGE reason why 2008-09 didn’t become the embarrassment it could have. That, and Tony’s been debilitated by an injury (re: plutonic fashionista) that, IRC, turned Tim Duncan into a one-legged, pogo-ing postman in 2007-08.

And Parker won’t get any better, unless he sits his ass down for the summer. Yes. No World Championships. The minute he plays for the French national team, you might as well start a pool on the number of games he’ll miss in the 2010-11 season.

...!!

by transgojobot on Apr 10, 2010 8:18 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

I hope Tony rests this summer.

BTW, I think I’ve just posted more pro-Parker arguments today than I have in the previous 3 years.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 10, 2010 8:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

And a nice post it is , JRW – and I have a signature now, after everyone else stole my original ones!

"Ginobili. . .He's weaving, he's throwing up triple axels in sneakers, he's willing the ball into the basket. It's Cirque du Soleil with refs." Dan Oshinsky / KENS 5

by janieannie on Apr 10, 2010 9:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

I like it!

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 10, 2010 11:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

very nice.

I don’t know if anyone has ever seen Iggy Pop in concert, but Manu reminds me a bit of his stage performance. The one time I saw Iggy, I turned to a friend and said “He’s like a deranged ballerina on stage… his performance is so unorthodox it’s disturbingly beautiful.”

Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney

by bellasa on Apr 12, 2010 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

plutonic fashionista

That just killed me.

Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney

by bellasa on Apr 12, 2010 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ok, that’s it. We have a certified meme now. And since they’re all spelled differently, it’ll be a bear to find them all.

So here’s my request, if you’ve made a joke with the spelling of plantar fasciitis, or if you have a favorite, please email it to me so I can include it in the Lexicon — which will be completed later this week.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 12, 2010 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Mine was plantain fascination.

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Apr 12, 2010 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

We could call it the P-Funk and it could have it’s own theme song.

Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney

by bellasa on Apr 12, 2010 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Is it possible that someone out there is as gifted with a midi as transgo is with his chops?

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 12, 2010 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Got it, thanks.

Anybody else?

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 12, 2010 5:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’m not sure if I believe this. ;-) If you prefer, we could also add an “Inanimate Objects” section to the Nickname Dictionary.

by CapHill on Apr 12, 2010 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Your quips no longer rankle, because I don’t feel guilty for continually stringing everybody along indefinitely anymore. The end is in sight and it’s a fabulous view.

Maybe instead of “Inanimate Objects” you could have a section for “Imaginary Beings” and the first listing could be a creature who still believes that the Lexicon is a myth.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 12, 2010 5:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ouch. ;-) So I’m going to have to figure out something else to give you crap about? Hmm.

by CapHill on Apr 12, 2010 6:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Very nice. Thanks for posting this jrw.

by swgeek on Apr 10, 2010 10:48 PM CDT reply actions  

Glad you enjoyed it.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 10, 2010 11:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

And, a thank you from me as well. Enjoyed this.

by Cedarpark on Apr 12, 2010 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nice post, jrw. I really can’t believe it’s come to this – you and I defending Frenchie? Impossible, I say!

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Apr 10, 2010 10:53 PM CDT reply actions  

Thanks Tim.

I’m reconciling it internally by convincing myself that I’m not really defending good ‘ol 36, but that I am, instead, pointing out the difficulty the team would have in getting equal value back for him should they actually follow my sometimes heart’s desire and trade him.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 10, 2010 11:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

How are you coming to terms with it?

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 10, 2010 11:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I just remember last season, and think: what happens when that guy torches us while playing for someone else?

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Apr 10, 2010 11:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Derek Fisher is getting old, and Eva + Tony would probably like living in tinseltown. What do you think?

by swgeek on Apr 11, 2010 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

lalalalala I CAN’T HEAR YOU lalalalala

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Apr 11, 2010 12:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Tony ($12.6M) to La-La Land for Lamar Odom ($7.5M) and Luke Walton ($4.8M)

Next season doesn't exist. Only today exists. So say we all.

by Kondor on Apr 11, 2010 12:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

No thank you. We already complain about Bonner. So we bring in someone who’s less useful and more expensive (Walton)? Plus, I don’t think Odom is Pop’s type of player.

by CapHill on Apr 11, 2010 2:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

Come on Cap, you know Pop loves players with lots of potential but no desire to switch it on. That’s why he hates players like Bonner – not athletic but make it up with desire.

by swgeek on Apr 11, 2010 2:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

I thought Pop’s type of player was old as hell.

I did a lot of soul searching. I didn't find anything.

by Hipuks on Apr 11, 2010 2:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

So did I, but then this year, young’uns like Hill, Blair, and lately, Temple, have gotten playing time. It’s all very confusing. So un-Poplike. I don’t know what to think anymore. Very disconcerting.

by CapHill on Apr 11, 2010 2:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Pop’s type of player (and gameplan) is whatever will confuse us the most.

by swgeek on Apr 11, 2010 2:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Then, he’s a successful coach, and not just with the W-L record.

by CapHill on Apr 11, 2010 2:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

People say the Spurs are predictable. Think again!

by grego21 on Apr 11, 2010 2:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

Odom would be good, but gosh, Lakers weakness at the PG would be eliminated in one fell swoop. That would be a great deal!

by grego21 on Apr 11, 2010 2:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

I thought having a great PG wasn’t as important when you’re using the triangle offense.

I did a lot of soul searching. I didn't find anything.

by Hipuks on Apr 11, 2010 2:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

It isn’t necessarily. They have no quick guys right now. They have the size and versatility right now with Odom/Gasol/Bynum. That would be weakened with the loss of Odom. But with Parker, they’d have a guy who could get to the basket with ease. He’s not exactly easy to stop.

by grego21 on Apr 11, 2010 2:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

No, not Odom. We don’t need another inconsistent player. We already have RJ filling that role.

Just cause we're crippled, don't mean we gotta take the crumbs.

by silverandblack_davis on Apr 11, 2010 8:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Odom makes the Lakers a great team rather than a good team when he is playing well. I would love to have him in the Spurs uniform. Except, Walton looks to me like Pop’s type of player.

Next season doesn't exist. Only today exists. So say we all.

by Kondor on Apr 11, 2010 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

when he is playing well

There is, as they say, the rub.

Lakers fans will tell you that he’s incapable of bringing it every night and they’re enraged by his potential that’s never realized for more than a game or two at a time.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 11, 2010 10:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

We already complain about Bonner

I don’t complain about Bonner. I think, a good Bonner is very good for the Spurs. Luke Walton seems to be a Pop’s type of a player. van Gundy said that he had “an emormous BBIQ”. Odom is bigger and better than RJ.

Next season doesn't exist. Only today exists. So say we all.

by Kondor on Apr 11, 2010 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Luke Walton? Luke Walton. Luke Walton?

by Cedarpark on Apr 12, 2010 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah. I’m not sure Hill would have much success keeping Tony in front of him if they played for different teams.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 11, 2010 12:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

if we could just get deron for tp salary wise but loyalty wise for both sides that’s impossible.deron is better than tp,his a passer can play P&r with tim his big and strong plus he shoots threes.i still love tp if he’ll come off the bench and play 22-26 mins rather than 30+mins(cuz id give it to hairston and manu and george those kind of time for defense)
but then we can’t do any trade right now for teams that has players like tony who are slightly or way better than him.

San Antonio,Thunder,Bulls,Memphis,Denver
GoSpuRsGo
Cleveland Sucks

by tp_09 on Apr 10, 2010 11:09 PM CDT reply actions  

Tony ($12.6M) to Atlanta for Josh Smith($10.8M)

Next season doesn't exist. Only today exists. So say we all.

by Kondor on Apr 11, 2010 12:00 AM CDT reply actions  

ugh, no. That’s definitely NOT equal value.

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Apr 11, 2010 12:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

You mean Josh Smith is much better?

Next season doesn't exist. Only today exists. So say we all.

by Kondor on Apr 11, 2010 12:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

No. Josh Smith’s talent is not enough.

by grego21 on Apr 11, 2010 12:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

A big like him would help us against many western bigs (Odom/Gasol, Martin/Anderson/Anthony, Boozer, Aldridge, Stoudamire/Amundsen, even Durant).

Next season doesn't exist. Only today exists. So say we all.

by Kondor on Apr 11, 2010 1:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Only if you get some more stuff aside from Smith. Him alone is not enough.

by grego21 on Apr 11, 2010 1:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well, I see a lot of value in Smith, an athletic all-star-level big. I think, Hollinger actually gave us +1 win for this trade.

Next season doesn't exist. Only today exists. So say we all.

by Kondor on Apr 11, 2010 1:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

i would love that or joe johnson or jamal crawford(pg/sg)

San Antonio,Thunder,Bulls,Memphis,Denver
GoSpuRsGo
Cleveland Sucks

by tp_09 on Apr 11, 2010 12:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nor is Jamal Crawford for Parker.

by grego21 on Apr 11, 2010 12:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

I’m not sure about Crawford, but both Smith or Johnson would help us more than Parker right now, IMO. Development of Hill and Temple makes Tony expendable.

Next season doesn't exist. Only today exists. So say we all.

by Kondor on Apr 11, 2010 12:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well if we are talking Johnson, then I’d do that in a hearth beat. Johnson for Parker is the only straight up deal you can do in terms of getting back relative value. All the other guys alone is not enough.

by grego21 on Apr 11, 2010 1:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Johnson is going to get a max contract. Get realistic.
Jamal Crawford is a chucker like the world has rarely seen. He has been tamed this year but don’t defend much and I still wouldn’t trust him.
Josh Smith is good and could be a good trade, even if I think that we overrate Hill right now, because of the Cinderella story, the underdog who plays defense.

by biolb on Apr 11, 2010 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

I am. I don’t think Parker for Johnson would happen. I was just saying, the talent Parker deserves to get back is more similar to Johnson than Crawford or Josh Smith.

I wouldn’t want Jamal Crawford. He was overrated and overpaid in NY. I think he can come in and score, but if his shot isn’t going that’s it.

Josh Smith alone is still not enough for Parker. You have to get extra above average pieces if still send Smith.

by grego21 on Apr 11, 2010 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rj is the Jamal of San Antonio
LoL

Magic Johnson on Ginobili:His list is his list(to kenny),You are the most exciting European player that I've seen, period. So forget about his list.His the most exciting,the most exciting.Who you seen dunk like this man right here?
Ginobelieve!!!!!!!!

by tp_09 on Apr 12, 2010 12:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not really in the the playing sense though.

by grego21 on Apr 12, 2010 12:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Tony ($12.6M) to Portland for A.Miller ($6.7M) and M.Webster ($4.3M)

Next season doesn't exist. Only today exists. So say we all.

by Kondor on Apr 11, 2010 12:09 AM CDT reply actions  

Webster is good only when he starts, if not he is useless. No way that he would do that for the Spurs.
Miller is good, a good playmaker, is old (Pop likes this).
Doesn’t look as such a bad trade. And then you think about the Blazers with TP, and for me that’s a resounding no.

by biolb on Apr 11, 2010 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Out of all the talent on Portland, that’s a bad combo of players to get for Parker.

by grego21 on Apr 11, 2010 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Love the sensibility you’ve been bringing lately, jolly.

As for Parker, I don’t think he’ll ever hit 100% this season. He’s still struggling with that plantar faschmitis and you can see it in how he penetrates. He’s having a hard time doing that paint move of his, that sudden-stop and turn using his pivot foot to fake the defender. You always see that move in his highlights.

Right now, when he attacks the basket he just lowers his head and charges like a bull. He always draws 2 or 3 defenders that way but he can’t put on the brakes as easily and thus gets crowded. With his vision for passing lanes often being blocked, he has a harder time kicking out to the shooters or making drop passes.

But if his jumpshot is on for maybe even a game or two during a series, it can spell a really big difference to the Spurs’ chances of winning a round.

By the way, I’m no basketball expert. Just a fan who doesn’t have 20-20 vision but refuses to wear his eyeglasses because he’s still in denial that his eyesight has gotten blurry.

Just cause we're crippled, don't mean we gotta take the crumbs.

by silverandblack_davis on Apr 11, 2010 8:43 AM CDT reply actions  

Vanity, thy nickname is Davis.

I smell death... everywhere.

by LatinD on Apr 11, 2010 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Situation with Parker is definitely tough. He’s in that weird zone where he has enough concerns that makes us want to trade him, but just enough talent to where most realistic trades are clearly taking 70-80 cents on the dollar for him.

So the most likely scenario is that we just keep him and make it work. By all means we could have a worse situation, given that he has no real character issues. The only case where it would be prudent to trade him then, would be if a situation arose where a superstar was about to bolt or trying to force his way out of somewhere and we could use Tony as trade bait.

The only realistic scenario I could see would be Bosh telling Toronto he doesn’t want to return and the Spurs working a sign and trade so Toronto gets something in return. That would immediately solve our center problem and Manu-Hill have proven they can hold down the 1-2 positions. Given that Bosh will get a max contract, unless RJ goes with Parker, this deal isn’t likely to happen. I thus don’t see it likely.

by Neuwaldegg on Apr 11, 2010 10:01 AM CDT reply actions  

I like your thinking, Neuwaldegg, but I must interject that I must resist any ideas of giving max contracts to guys who fall apart in crunch time. Bosh is a poster-child for this.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 11, 2010 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Really? I by no means see Bosh as clutch but I don’t see him as a choker either. I don’t watch that many Raptors games though so maybe he is.

"It's Manuway or the Highway" - tlo

by Manuwar on Apr 11, 2010 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also, keep in mind that the Raptors don’t have Manu.

by Neuwaldegg on Apr 11, 2010 6:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

But they wish they did.
=]

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 11, 2010 9:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

If he’s not a certified choker, then he’s as far away from clutch as you can be without crossing the line.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 11, 2010 9:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1. Yes, he is. I was very impressed with his last play in the last game he played to the end (he got injured in the next one). Bosh had a game-winning layup/dunk and he completely blew it. If this is not anti-clutch, then I don’t know what is.

Next season doesn't exist. Only today exists. So say we all.

by Kondor on Apr 11, 2010 9:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

That was just one game. He also had a game this season when he hit a winning step-back jumper.

He’s not at the level of Melo or Wade in terms of clutch, but he’s far from being anti-clutch.

Just cause we're crippled, don't mean we gotta take the crumbs.

by silverandblack_davis on Apr 11, 2010 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

To me this one game just confirmed his anti-clutch reputation. It doesn’t help much his case that he usually starts seasons very well, even sometimes in the MVP discussion, and then he is disappearing as the season progresses. He just seems to be overrated and not a good leader.

Next season doesn't exist. Only today exists. So say we all.

by Kondor on Apr 11, 2010 10:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

davis, I’m glad he had a game winner.

As far as I know, that’s the exception that proves the rule.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 12, 2010 1:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

What bothers me with the TP criticism is that is it is based on a season during which he has been injured (many injuries) and that without him the Spurs had a relatively lackluster season compared to years past ( even last year was better with also nice victories against Boston, the Lakers….). Why don’t you cut him some slack like you did with Manu who was useless (a little bit of hyperbole) for two years and a half ?

Once this has been said, I think that, in the Spurs best interest, they should consider trading him, because I think that once his contract expires, he will leave. The problem is that not so many viable options exist.

by biolb on Apr 11, 2010 10:04 AM CDT reply actions  

So, what the FO is likely to do is extend Tony before his contract comes up — just like they did with Manu.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 11, 2010 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

right now i dnt want to trade tony,unless it is february,but i understand him being hurt,so i just want to bench this guy,but this guys is not a real pg pass first,but then if we let go of him with much experience and talent in 2011 other available pg’s are not better than him. Stuckey,Brooks,mo-all scorers and i can say they are like parker,and i would rather have tony.unless we let go of parker and this time 4 yr and 3 yr development of hill and temple might give us something(where i wish pop would play them 82 games.and then is it possible to sign carmelo anthony?well tha’s a big q,we need money.do we have money by that time,and idk if the league would change their salary cap thing.its like if rj opt out would it change something?cuz right now rj is just the 4th opt,a guy that is performing ave,then that means if parker is well and he doesn’t play much mins with rj then i can say why not let rj stay,but then we need money,we need cheap guys that plays better d and some efficient and enough offense.plus less salary cap

Magic Johnson on Ginobili:His list is his list(to kenny),You are the most exciting European player that I've seen, period. So forget about his list.His the most exciting,the most exciting.Who you seen dunk like this man right here?
Ginobelieve!!!!!!!!

by tp_09 on Apr 12, 2010 12:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

I wonder if I’m the only romantic that wants the Big Three to finish their career in the Spurs, regardless of convenience. Fandoms can be too cutthroat sometimes.

I smell death... everywhere.

by LatinD on Apr 11, 2010 12:46 PM CDT reply actions  

I agree with you, LD. Timmeh WILL retire a Spur. With Manu’s new contract, I think it’s very likely he will too. It’s hard to know with Tony, since he’s younger.

by CapHill on Apr 11, 2010 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

And more frenchier

"It's Manuway or the Highway" - tlo

by Manuwar on Apr 11, 2010 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Very true, Manuwar. Tony’s frenchiness far exceeds that of either Manu or Duncan.

Wonder why that is? Oh, well. Some mysteries are better left unsolved.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 11, 2010 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, Tony’s the only one not locked up at this point. It’ll be interesting to see if the Spurs extend him this summer – if they don’t lock him up once they have the option, he may not be as willing to sit back down and negotiate as Manu was.

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Apr 11, 2010 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

You’re right. Good thing he’s not hurt and giving the FO a reason to doubt him when they should be extending him.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 11, 2010 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

That is a great point. Tony was really pissed off when the Spurs FO made him come back from international play and do a double check on his ankle. If that made him mad then I can’t see him putting his pride aside if he wasn’t extended (and wanted to be).

"It's Manuway or the Highway" - tlo

by Manuwar on Apr 11, 2010 5:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

If he plays this summer, he’s definitely hurting his chances.

by grego21 on Apr 11, 2010 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

One underrated factor is Parker as a sales point. He seems to own both the middle age women and teenage girl demographics in terms of merchandise sales.

by Neuwaldegg on Apr 11, 2010 7:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hate to break it to you Neu, but there are alot more Ginobili and Duncan jersey’s in SA than Parker’s.

Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney

by bellasa on Apr 12, 2010 4:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

there are alot more Ginobili and Duncan jersey’s in SA than Parker’s.

by swgeek on Apr 12, 2010 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

As a romantic I want Pop, Timmeh and Manu to retire as Spurs together. Tony may be better off going to Hollywood though.

Next season doesn't exist. Only today exists. So say we all.

by Kondor on Apr 11, 2010 4:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Parker was a key part of 3 championships just like Manu. He should be a Spur for the rest of his career and never should be a Laker. If he’s traded, he’s traded but it won’t happen unless they get the perfect offer, which likely won’t happen.

by grego21 on Apr 11, 2010 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Tony is younger than Manu and has a wife in Hollywood. He is too young to retire with Tim and Manu, he is not good enough to rebuild around him, and I’m not sure it’s fair to ask him being a part of a grueling rebuilding process. Of course, the situation would be different if we got Durant, but it is what it is.

Next season doesn't exist. Only today exists. So say we all.

by Kondor on Apr 11, 2010 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

His wife is from SA though, even if she is an actress.

We’ll see when the time comes. There are still a few years until that time comes, but the Spurs could have pulled in key pieces to at least become a playoff team while transitioning Duncan/Manu out. Too soon to tell.

by grego21 on Apr 11, 2010 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Other than marrying an actress, who is from SA, has he ever given any indication that he wants to play for a bigger market? I mean, every interview i’ve seen with him and Eva has them loving the SA area. Also, where does this shit about him having an ego come from? He’s an efficient scorer and a guy who passes the ball well when he drives. I like him on the Spurs, and i hope he stays so that Hill can continue to grow and play off the ball, which he is incredibly good at. Parker-Hill-Manu is a backcourt to be reckoned with. Hill-Mason-Manu…not so much. With our cap situation, we’d have to get a good PG back in a trade. there arent any good ones on the market.

Genibus Nitito Canus

by SpursfanSteve on Apr 11, 2010 7:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

He seems to say all of the right things (the Spurs-type things) when he’s interviewed here in the states, but when he gives interviews for newspapers and magazines back home in France, we get translations back (yes, there are PtRockers in France) that show a pretty good bit of ego.

That, and the way he plays as well. Don’t tell me that you haven’t seen him drive to the bucket through a double team (or worse) while ignoring TD, or Manu (or someone else) who’s in scoring position and ready for the pass that never comes. A lot of us would attribute that to ego.

It’s not that he isn’t capable of playing team ball (or doesn’t ever) it’s just that it seems that he always thinks that he’s the best option, even when there’s a play that would result in a higher percentage shot, if he’d just give up the ball.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 11, 2010 10:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wouldn’t necessarily attribute what Tony does to ego. He is just more talented scorer than passer. His passing game is solid but not superb, his drives are really amazing. I also think that his specific talents have been better match for defensive-oriented half-court balling Spurs. Now we have more offensive weapons, and less D. Manu is both more talented passer and better defender, and his talents fit this Spurs-2010 team better IMO. It just looks that more natural position for Tony on this team is to provide the spark from the bench. But Tony may see it as a demotion, of course.

Next season doesn't exist. Only today exists. So say we all.

by Kondor on Apr 11, 2010 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

you mean like all the interviews Manu gives to Argentine newspapers?

Genibus Nitito Canus

by SpursfanSteve on Apr 12, 2010 11:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Assuming you’re serious here.

I’ve never read one of those that Manu’s quotes have made him come off as an over-confident jerk.

Have you?

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 13, 2010 1:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

I dont see much of a difference, but then i havent heard many of Tony’s.

Genibus Nitito Canus

by SpursfanSteve on Apr 13, 2010 6:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

The ones I’m talking about will mostly be in the Fanshots section during the off-season.

5 in 10
o;—-)

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 14, 2010 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

I didn’t know Eva was from SA. Of course, it probably makes it easier for Tony to stay. Forget about Mason. Manu-Tony-Hill-Temple looks as a very good backcourt to me, as good as any in the league. But I am not sure how well Tony fits into what this new Manu’s team is trying to do. He probably shouldn’t start for this team, but rather come from the bench. And he might not be happy about it.

Next season doesn't exist. Only today exists. So say we all.

by Kondor on Apr 11, 2010 11:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Eva is from Corpus Christi. She has said she and Tony will retire to France when she finishes acting (might just be PR to keep the French hate mail down).

In a Sports Illustrated article a while back Tony mentioned how things would work better if he played nearer to Eva’s workplace.

by doggydogworld on Apr 11, 2010 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

I won’t be surprised to see Tony in Lakers’ uniform in a couple of years.

I am here to state the obvious.

by Kondor on Apr 11, 2010 11:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

i wont be either, because its probably not going to happen. Spurs will re-sign him just like they did Manu, as long as he continues to do what he’s done in the past.

Genibus Nitito Canus

by SpursfanSteve on Apr 13, 2010 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes, just because Eva works in Hollywood means he’ll be a Laker…..

by grego21 on Apr 13, 2010 12:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

I like when people make up comments and try to pass them off as the truth.

“Manu hates playing with Tony.”

“Manu think Tony is way too selfish.”

“Tony hates being in SA and wants to play in a bigger market.”

“RJ has been a big disappointment and Mace cant’ shoot.” – ok, that one is true….

When healthy, we’ve got a top 10 PG in Tony, a top 10 SG in Manu, a top 10 PF in Timmy. If RJ opts in, he will hopefully be a little better and more acclimated to the system. So let’s get a few big men in the offseason (hopefully Splitter and draft a big guy), keep most of the young guys and reload. Not rebuild.

I’m not Tony’s biggest fan, but I am a little disheartened at how quickly most people on here have turned on him, especially since he’s been hurt and trying to play through it. But hey, that’s just my opinion.

by GMac14 on Apr 11, 2010 8:01 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

+1

Genibus Nitito Canus

by SpursfanSteve on Apr 11, 2010 9:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

GMac, I don’t care if you’re 14 or 41 — your head’s on straight, dude. (Although I’d say that Tony’s actually top 5, at least.)

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 11, 2010 10:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks. I’m 27, so nicely in the middle of that..lol

I definitely agree about Tony being top 5, heck Manu when healthy too. But I just figured that would cause a firestorm of complaints if I wrote that, so I wanted to get my bigger point across first.

But now that my bigger point is out there, it has always seemed a little funny to me that everyone has jumped on the George Hill bandwagon so quickly, yet fail to remember how good Tony really is. Like we just said, we’ve got a top 5 or 10 point guard. If we trade him and make George the point, is he top 15? Top 20? Why give up that advantage?

by GMac14 on Apr 12, 2010 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

You could even make a case for RJ being a top 10 SF, but I digress.

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Apr 12, 2010 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree. Obviously he’s struggled to get going, but I would agree with you. (Not sure what would get more criticism, us saying Tony shouldn’t be traded and is a top 5, or us saying RJ is a top 10 anything…)

by GMac14 on Apr 12, 2010 10:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

The reason they want to “give up that advantage” is b/c they don’t see one right now with Tony getting back into game shape.

And that’s just exacerbated by the way the Spurs were playing with Hill in Tony’s spot for the 4 previous weeks. Which was (I’m sure the thought process goes, if not the argument itself) due to George’s playing within the offense, unlike that selfish Parker.

Tim, stop me before I convince myself that TP is the best thing that’s ever happened to the Spurs. Please stop me.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 12, 2010 3:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’m think up a nice little post on the myth of the pass-first point guard, but it’s going to have to wait until the weekend, I’m afraid.

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Apr 12, 2010 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

thinking

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Apr 12, 2010 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Looking forward to reading it.

Except that’ll mean that we’re inching our way ever closer to being Parker supporters. Can anything stop this seemingly inevitable momentum?

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 12, 2010 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Only if Hill develops the offensive game and decision-making of Parker. Don’t hold your breath.

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Apr 12, 2010 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, yeah. Hill or Temple.

Now who am I kidding?

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 12, 2010 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Are you two going to be okay? Do we need to get you some therapy?

by CapHill on Apr 12, 2010 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

We’ll see. I might need some at the end of the season if we don’t win another ring, and I’m still defending Tony against all comers.

::shudders::

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 12, 2010 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

That makes sense.

I guess I just have a hard time understanding the rationale. I mean, George and Tony have been asked to do completely different things. Anybody is going to look good as our PG when Manu is initiating all of the offense and dropping 35 a night. And I guess that goes along with what you’re saying about Tony and how selfish he is, while George is the most unselfish guy to come along.

by GMac14 on Apr 12, 2010 10:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Really, we’re going to have to stop this conversation eventually, and if it’s not now, then I’m afraid that by the time we do finish I’ll have registered number9isawesome.com as my Tony Parker fansite.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 13, 2010 1:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

You would abandon 5?

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Apr 13, 2010 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

I would not.

But this new jrw who keeps posting seemingly valid, coherent defenses of Parker — I don’t know what he would do.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 13, 2010 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Absolutely !

Yep, we ain’t the Lakers, our guys are professionals. Even if they felt that way, would never voice it. For one thing Pop wouldn’t tolerate it. I think Mase will find out the hard way, regardless of how much he is struggling right now, won’t be the main reason he might be gone after this year.

I don’t follow stats or know tons about the game, still learning. RJ just doesn’t fit into our system in my opinion. I think he is doing the best he can do for the most part, his frustration is hard to watch. He does play better with Manu, but who wouldn’t?

BTW in case you haven’t caught on, I love Manu, really love watching him play. If he turns the ball over, I can’t wait for the next play. He redeems himself 99% of the time. I’ll take Manu over Kobe any day of the week and twice on Sunday!

Timmy D .... enough said.

by Ms. Smith on Apr 12, 2010 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

I’m still reserving judgment on RJ. Wings take a while to really get the Spurs system. Witness the struggles of Horry, Barry and Finely. All of them looked exponentially better after they had a year under their belt.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 12, 2010 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Will be very interesting to see if RJ opts out or is willing to give the system one more year. I bet year 2 would look much better than year 1.

by GMac14 on Apr 12, 2010 10:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

RJ looks like a useful player recently. I am glad we have him for the playoffs.

I am here to state the obvious.

by Kondor on Apr 12, 2010 11:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree, just wonder if RJ does. I would think it is tough for a veteran to struggle, will say a lot about him if he sticks with us. The few times I have seen barking between our players usually involved RJ. Don’t get me wrong, I like him and hope he can fit in.

Timmy D .... enough said.

by Ms. Smith on Apr 13, 2010 8:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

a message if rj would opt out

phoenix and nash rj?
then lets get amar’e seriosuly his defense is mediocre but can play terrific offense…get amar’e for rj guys!
period!
oh wait amar’e’s better when his with a pass first point guard.
and that only mean we need some one like that cuz he will not have any problems right(to suit,the point guard to any sytem possible)
oh wait what am i thinking,trade tp or not?
arghhh

Magic Johnson on Ginobili:His list is his list(to kenny),You are the most exciting European player that I've seen, period. So forget about his list.His the most exciting,the most exciting.Who you seen dunk like this man right here?
Ginobelieve!!!!!!!!

by tp_09 on Apr 12, 2010 12:39 PM CDT reply actions  

Tony for Lebron James. That would be about the only one I’d make. Oh, Dwayne Wade too.

Other than that, you’re not getting equal or better talent.

by Cedarpark on Apr 12, 2010 3:14 PM CDT reply actions  

Since we’re being silly now, why no Durant?

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 12, 2010 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Because he can’t play the point?

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Apr 12, 2010 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

But James and Wade can?

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 12, 2010 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes, actually. It’s not their “natural” position, but they both have done it in the past and performed well.

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Apr 12, 2010 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ok, I agree that they can play point, but you wouldn’t use them there for an entire season.

And at this point we’re just distracting ourselves from the main question, which is why Cedar wouldn’t trade Parker for Durant (as if OKC would even go for such a trade.)

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 12, 2010 8:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

i have absolutely no problems with this idea.

by CapHill on Apr 12, 2010 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1. I would much rather have Durant than LeBron. Can you imagine LeBron after Pop yell directly into his face like he does all the other players?
(Yes, I know this is imaginary world, but I like my play-worlds to have consistent behaviour)

by swgeek on Apr 12, 2010 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ugh. yells, not yell.

by swgeek on Apr 12, 2010 4:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

I like my play-worlds to have consistent behaviour

This made me GOL

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 12, 2010 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’d have LeBron over Durant, because you know, LeBron is better.

I did a lot of soul searching. I didn't find anything.

by Hipuks on Apr 12, 2010 7:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Only in real life

"It's Manuway or the Highway" - tlo

by Manuwar on Apr 12, 2010 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

LeBron is better to hate

I am here to state the obvious.

by Kondor on Apr 12, 2010 11:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Durant is the best player in the world not in Spurs uniform. I’d have nobody over him.

I am here to state the obvious.

by Kondor on Apr 12, 2010 11:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

my sillyness was a ploy to bring to light how silly it would be to trade TP. Durant would be a great fit—I forget about that kid, but I don’t think I’ll be doing that for long.

by Cedarpark on Apr 12, 2010 6:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Please see that you don’t!
=]

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Apr 12, 2010 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

for the future

my thinking of the Tony Parker situation is they should trade him because it can maybe help the future of the team. Tony is a very good player but in George Hill the Spurs have a decent cheaper player who fills the role nicely. If the Spurs could some how trade Tony, R.J. and maybe even the rights to Splitter for Chris Bosh after he signs a new deal and maybe a second round pick then the front line would be set for the next few years. it just makes so much sense for the Spurs to trade Parker. I think Parker is a good player and it would be sad to see him traded but it could really help the future of the team

by gunnin' gervin on Apr 12, 2010 6:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Cedarpark

a lot of people dont like Bosh for some reason but the stats dont lie. he is a good proven player. he has never had the talent around him like he would have around him if the Spurs got him. he is kinda like Pau Gasol in the sense that a lot of people act like he just got good with the Lakers because of those Memphis teams he has played on. But Gasol just like Bosh always dragged sub par teams into the playoffs always facing double teams. Splitter like you said is an unknown commodity but like i stated we know what Bosh can do and he is the same age as Splitter so why not take advantage of anothers curiocity if you can.

by gunnin' gervin on Apr 12, 2010 6:30 PM CDT reply actions  

Wow. A lot of people dont like Bosh. LOL! you have to remember Jermaine O neal was a good player when healthy with the Pacers and they were a decent defensive team because he played with good defenders. The Raptors have always been a bad defensive team because of the way they have played. Bosh is one player and no matter how bad or good he is at anything he cant change the way the team plays as a whole offensively or defensively without help. even Lebron’s team were not that good at defense unti they got a defensive minded coach and the players to help the team play the defense they play today. It is a team game people and you have to have other players who can do what he coach wants them to do to win.

by gunnin' gervin on Apr 12, 2010 7:49 PM CDT reply actions  

Okay i agree with some people that say Bosh isnt the best one on one defender but he has enough athletic ability that he can hang with the stretch fours and decently guard post up fours. Besides if he comes to the Spurs he will have Duncan watching his back as will Duncan have Bosh doing the same. To the Gentlemen or lady that stated Bosh is a third or fourth option at best on a championship team, i must say that is pure non sense. He would be a great second option on any team in the NBA. He is also a power forward and not a small forward or guard which means he doesnt handle the ball or start the offense like the usual suspects who get named as elite players. Post players will always need somebody to get them the ball, which means they are only as good as there team mates who play on the perimter. I will admit that Bosh does shoot a lot of jumpers to be a power forward but he shoots pretty well and he rebounds decently. It is harder to find decent big guys and way easier to find wing players these days so if you can get one then you have to make the deal happen

by gunnin' gervin on Apr 14, 2010 1:13 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the San Antonio Spurs.

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Manucrazy_small
Game 3 Thoughts...
Manucrazy_small
Game 2 Thoughts (Rinse, Lather, Repeat)
Manucrazy_small
I wrote a thing
Supergino_small
The Media And The Pursuit of Symmetry
Manucrazy_small
Game 1 Thoughts

Recent FanPosts

6868_small
Thursday Not Quite The Same Loser Thread.
82128_spurs_nets_basketball_small
I was in Middle School when Timmy was Drafted, I am 27 now.
Small
How did I became a Spurs Fan??
Covera_small
Which one's Bruce, and which one's Kawhi?
Small
Touches
6868_small
Wednesday Blueberry Banana Nut Oatmeal Loser Thread.
Pop-pyramids-av_small
PtR Playoff Prediction Contest: 2012 Conference Finals
82128_spurs_nets_basketball_small
Patty Mills or Jeremy Lin, who do you sign?
Small
The Heat scare me.
Small
A cry for advise/help from seasoned Spurs ticket-holders.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Who will the Spurs face in the second round?
Memphis Grizzlies
28 votes
Los Angeles Clippers
60 votes

88 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

San Antonio Sweepers in action!
SI: Tim Duncan is the most successful player of his generation.
The San Antonio Spurs aren't boring
My birthday cupcake from my lovely wife ;)
NBA BIG commercial

Recent FanShots

Watching ton of video of SAS vs OKC reminds me that, sometimes, League...
James Harden vs. Manu Ginobili - Comparison
The Spurs may want to give Chris Kaman another look
Misleading Headline? "Parker says Westbrook hasn't faced PG like him yet"
Danny Green on CBS
The Genius of The San Antonio Spurs
San Antonio Spurs seem destined for a fifth NBA title
Mavs Moneyball is rooting for....the SPURS!
Manu Ginobili Mixing It Up With LA Fans (Video)
Tim Duncan is not only not known just as Tim, he is not even known as...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


G.M.

Jrw_small J.R. Wilco

Coach

D-rob1_small Big50

Oberto_fab_small silverandblack_davis

Nerf_reactor_small CapHill

Screen_shot_2011-12-02_at_4 Josh Guyer (completely deck)

Player

08playoffshappybench_medium_small Justin Biehle

Kawhi_small Edg5

Duncan_small SpursfanSteve

Manu_the_grey_small DrumsInTheDeep

376094_10100544199117568_16706926_51964808_1200814736_n_small MatthewTynan

Ref

Halloween_06_028_small alamobro

Spursshirt_small Trey Felder