Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Lakers vs Spurs: A Game in the Iron Maiden


Yes, it was torturous.  But, that isn't what I had in mind.  A game of such distinct halves couldn't be better exemplified than a pair of songs from Iron Maiden.

In the first half, the Spurs were warriors.  They fought.  They scrapped.  They clawed.

In the second half, the Spurs were cowards.  They panicked.  They took forced shots.  They played scared.

Star-divide

The Trooper

 

 

In the first half, the team played with that perfect mix of ultra-high energy and composure.  And it was led by one man.

George Hill.  He was marvelous.  He scored on an array of shots.  He was making plays all over the court.  He was aggressive attacking the Lakers in the paint and in transition.  He dominated Derek Fisher.  

In addition, Manu was draining 3's.  Between Manu and George, they scored 32 of the Spurs 48 points and were 5 of 7 from deep.  If it hadn't been for Matt Bonner losing his shot -- 1 for 6 on 3 pointers -- the Spurs would have had much larger than a 7 point lead. 

Bonner, Mason, and Bogans combined to shoot 1 for 9 from 3-point land in the first half.  The team got up 17 3-pointers in the half and only made 6.  To put it frankly, the team was taking the first semi-good look it could get from deep.  That attitude planted the seeds of collapse for the second half.

 

Run To The Hills

Run for your lives.

 

In the second half, the Lakers turned their game up another level.  Especially on defense.  The Spurs response was to panic.  Instead of moving the ball more.  They moved it less.  Instead of leaning on their teammates.  They went one on one.  The Spurs took more forced, contested, and rushed shots then I have seen in any game this year.

The semi-open looks from the first half were now rushed almost contested looks.  Instead of moving the ball, the Spurs rushed shots.  Everybody was guilty.  Manu.  Matt.  Roger.  McDyess.  Blair.  I can mentally see all of them rushing shots.  Tim and George did too.  But they deserve their own bits.

Tim got owned last night on our offensive end.  The first time I have ever seen it.  Ever.  Pau Gasol shut Tim down one-on-one and in embarrassing fashion.  I can't say any more.  I'm just shocked.  I'm not shocked that Tim would go 2-11 from the floor.  I'm shocked because with the shots he was taking, he'd go 2-11 every game. 

George.  George disappeared in the second half.  I think it is the next step in his growth.  He has to find a way to continue to produce offensively when teams give him some real attention.  I can't be down on him for the second half, though I'm sure he's down on himself, because it is new territory for him.  You just don't carry teams offensively for 48 minutes in a playoff intensity game without a lot of learning.

Summary

We saw a lot of good last night.   The team, even without Tony, can play some really nice basketball at a really high level.  We saw that when Tony gets back, we will have a third perimeter player capable of attacking the basket and causing problems.  We showed that we can rebound with the Lakers. 

We saw a lot of bad too.  We saw that we still have a long way to go to knock the Lakers off their perch.  We saw you can't win when you shoot 37% from the field.  We saw that we need to continue to trust in each other and play as a team when the intensity picks up.  We saw that Tim won't be able to carry us in a series against the Lakers.

Last night, I was very down.  Trust me.  This morning, though, I feel much better about the game.  Bynum and Parker being out really skews things for both teams as they each represent where each team has the biggest mismatch.  I don't know how to consider them, so I'm ignoring them.  We shot terrible from 3-point land.  We were 8-27.  An abysmal 29.6%.  Some of that is because of the Lakers defense.  They were exceptional last night.  But, not all of it.  We missed quite a few good open looks.  On the other end, the Lakers were 10-20.  50%.  The Lakers are a terrible 3-point shooting team and if they are hitting that many 3's at that high of a rate, then you are going to have a really hard time beating them.

Your 3 stars:

3 -- Nobody:  I don't think we had anybody else really step their game up last night.  Hence, the ugly loss.

2 -- Manu Ginobili:  Manu was again outstanding.  I do think he forced some shots, but he definitely competed.

1 -- George Hill:  George logged a team-high 42 minutes.  He carried the offense in the first half.  He played really tenacious defense.  He dominated Derek Fisher.

Comment 160 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Yep exactly – if the game was played in only the first half – they would have won.

Where the hell was Timmy offensively?

"Mr. Gilmore deserves to be in the Basketball Hall of Fame damnit. Highest field goal percentage EVER"

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gilmoar01.html

by Joe deLarios on Mar 25, 2010 9:25 AM CDT reply actions  

the game was destined for us to lose – when you have to rely on jumpshoots to win your game with little to no inside game, it is only a matter of time before they go cold and the game is over. We will continue to see this for the rest of the this short season, into the playoffs and next year if we do not boost our interior. I shudder to think that last night will be a reoccuring theme with Mr. Power Forward.

"Mr. Gilmore deserves to be in the Basketball Hall of Fame damnit. Highest field goal percentage EVER"

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gilmoar01.html

by Joe deLarios on Mar 25, 2010 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Tony Parker coming back will help. He’s better than Hill at penetrating and getting the defense off balance. He will also provide a spark when Manu isn’t on the floor.

by Big50 on Mar 25, 2010 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Fair analysis. I would argue, however, that the reason the Lakers shot so well from the arc was because we were double teaming Kobe and leaving them with wide open shots. These are pros. Even some of the most mediocre three point shooters can hit open shots (except for Mason and Bonner apparently, because they got lots of them and hit nothing). I would argue that it was a mistake to double team Kobe. While he is still obviously a great player, he cannot consistently dominate a game or a fourth quarter like he used to. I also wish Pop would have tried Hairston on him. At the very least, it would have let us know if he could slow him down a bit. Keep in mind that as players age and their physical skills decline (and yes, that is definitely happening with Kobe) it is the young bloods who give them the hardest time. It would be nice to know going into the playoffs where we are very likely to face the Lakers that we have someone who could make Kobe work. After all, we now know that Bogans, Jefferson, Mason and Manu can’t. Why not find out if Malik can? He did a pretty damn good job on Durant.

by agutierrez on Mar 25, 2010 9:43 AM CDT reply actions  

I agree, we need to see more Hairston. The kid can play defense and is better than Bogans on the offense.

by Big50 on Mar 25, 2010 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree except Kobe is more than capable of dominating a game and/or fourth quarter. That’s why their record is what it is. Without Kobe, this team would be battling Houston and Portland for the 8th seed.

by BlaseE on Mar 25, 2010 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

they are pros but what about ours? they can’t seem to hit the broad side of a barn

"Mr. Gilmore deserves to be in the Basketball Hall of Fame damnit. Highest field goal percentage EVER"

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gilmoar01.html

by Joe deLarios on Mar 25, 2010 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree. Teams have been making Kobe a passer for the past few months when I think he should be forced to carry them as much as possible. He’s got lots of wear and tear on his body and having to carry the heavy load while keeping his teammates as uninvolved as possible is the best way to beat this team in the playoffs. Opponents, including the Spurs last night, are making this too easy for LA.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Its pretty evident that no one in the league can stop Kobe Bryant. ( Thats why hes Kobe Bryant ) I thought the Spurs defense against him was sound for the most part. Let him play one one one basketball and fail to get his teamates involved.

The way you do that is play him one one one. Sure its gonna look bad cause hes going to score alot, but it will keep his teammates from getting involved.

And your right, maybe they should not have collapsed on Kobe at all , but then again, the guys who hit the threes in the 4th quarter ( Brown , Kobe and Lamar ) are all horrible three point shooters.

I think too much is being made of this game.

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Mar 25, 2010 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think too much is being made of this game.

Agreed. One problem with the let Kobe get his but stop the guys around him is that we don’t have great answers for Odom and Pau or Bynum on our roster. Duncan can only guard one of them. Odom abused us last night though.

by BlaseE on Mar 25, 2010 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’ll post photos in a photo recap of plenty of Spurs going one on one with Kobe last night, and all but living in his jersey. He is just a phenomenal shooter

by janieannie on Mar 25, 2010 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

True that.

I have flying monkeys at my disposal, and I'm not afraid to use them.

by Lauri on Mar 25, 2010 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think you’re right that too much is being made of this game……..
only because it is the same RQC/H collapse that we have seen from this team all year.
The loss was not a surprise, therefor the game is just another one, of many, signs that this team needs to improve for next season.

"Mr. Gilmore deserves to be in the Basketball Hall of Fame damnit. Highest field goal percentage EVER"

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gilmoar01.html

by Joe deLarios on Mar 25, 2010 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think seeing more Hairston is a fine idea. But lets not kid ourselves, he has no hope of stopping or bothering Kobe Bryant.

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Mar 25, 2010 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

For the Toros, Marcus Williams went for 29 points on (8 of 8 FGA, 4 of 4 3PA, and 9 of 9 FTA) with 4 assists, 2 rebounds, a block, and a steal.

4 turnovers too, but give the guy a break…..

by BlaseE on Mar 25, 2010 10:02 AM CDT reply actions  

… and since when did Matt Bonner’s younger brother Luke play for the Toros? He is listed at 7’1" 240 pounds and is shooting 44% from 3. He turns 25 on Sunday.

by BlaseE on Mar 25, 2010 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

He’s been there about a month or so.

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Mar 25, 2010 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sounds like we need to bring him up to the big squad

by Big50 on Mar 25, 2010 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

As good as Hill played, he was nowhere to be seen in the 2nd half. He scored 1 point in the 2nd half and took a bunch of bad shots and made turnovers. He seemed to think that since he played well early that things were just going to go well the rest of the game. I’m not saying he wasn’t our best player, but he’s got to get a solid 48 minutes.

Our shooters have GOT to hit wide open threes when they are there. Duncan was out of gas…clearly he was on fumes.

by Big50 on Mar 25, 2010 10:04 AM CDT reply actions  

Mason pisses me off… complains about getting mins and when Manu sets him up for big 3’s in the corner he can’t knock em down…

damn i miss Bruce.

by FreshmakerDTM on Mar 25, 2010 10:14 AM CDT reply actions  

Playing LA is one time we really miss Mr. Bowen. He would’ve forced Kobe to work harder and required fewer double teams while still scoring the same number of points as RJ. That hurts.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lets stop dwelling on Bruce.

I think Pop said it best…. " If Bruce was still able to do the things he used to , he would be in the league doing it for us, or some other team "

I do miss him too though.

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Mar 25, 2010 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not dwelling. Just acknowledging and appreciating a guy that could score the same points as RJ but defend in a way that too often was overlooked. A truly irreplaceable piece.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

My bad, spurred. Sorry

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Mar 25, 2010 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

No apology needed.

I think I find myself think of Bruce because the playoffs are approaching. If we make a run, who’se gonna be that guy (other than Manu) who hits the clutch 3 in the 4th quarter? Plus, I always liked the competitive respect he and Kobe had for one another.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Last night, I was very down. Trust me. This morning, though, I feel much better about the game.

Agreed

by Big50 on Mar 25, 2010 10:16 AM CDT reply actions  

Man, this game wasn’t on the the schedule, but it was shown right after the Magic-Hawks game. I was happy, no ectstatic, . . . then the team imploded and subsequently lost. Meh, what a downer. Now I’m conflicted.

by TD21 on Mar 25, 2010 10:24 AM CDT reply actions  

I felt better today, too.

Then I glanced to the side of this page and saw the headline “Lopez Leads Nets to Eighth Win of Season” and I thanked god I wasn’t a New Jersey fan.

I have flying monkeys at my disposal, and I'm not afraid to use them.

by Lauri on Mar 25, 2010 10:41 AM CDT reply actions  

but we might end up like NJ if we don’t have some salary cap reform soon……..

"Mr. Gilmore deserves to be in the Basketball Hall of Fame damnit. Highest field goal percentage EVER"

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gilmoar01.html

by Joe deLarios on Mar 25, 2010 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the recap, Wayne. Since I wasn’t able to watch the game, I now have a good sense of how the game went, without having to read through 4 separate game threads.

by CapHill on Mar 25, 2010 11:03 AM CDT reply actions  

Every post a gem!

I have flying monkeys at my disposal, and I'm not afraid to use them.

by Lauri on Mar 25, 2010 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

So true…I was trying to follow the threads on my phone while watching on DVR-delayed TV and got way behind cuz I couldn’t see thru tears of laughter! Thanx y’all:)

Honestly. You kids today, with your hippity-hop music and your Twiddle. - Lauri

by p2cat on Mar 25, 2010 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Malik Hairston situation is exactly like the George Hill situation last year, when Pop played the JV over him until we had 3-1 deficit in the playoff, when it was too late. THis is exactly what is going to happen this year.

Pop you need to take Bogans and Mase out the the rotation, and put Malik in if we are going to make any kind of noise. Also Pop, Dice has been pretty bad latety you need to give Ian a real chance too.

"He was just a young skinny guy who looked like a winner. We didn’t know he was going to be as good as he is."
—Popovich on Manu Ginobili

by spursfan87 on Mar 25, 2010 11:17 AM CDT reply actions  

Ian? How about giving Blair decent burn? Blair is the guy full of potential chained to the bench….5 points and 6 rebounds in 10 minutes. 4 fouls but maybe that is because he knows he can foul because he isn’t getting any late minutes. He also can’t get into a rhythm.

by BlaseE on Mar 25, 2010 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

The one difference is that Hill had a more refined offensive game and was a ball handler. I don’t see Malik coming off the bench and dropping 12+ points in a playoff game. But I’m more than happy to be wrong about that.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Malik will be the least accounted for guy on the floor in any lineup he is in allowing him space to succeed with his superior athletic ability. I think he could get 12+ points in a solid minutes against a good team.

by BlaseE on Mar 25, 2010 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

I hope you’re wright. More importantly, I too would like to see him get a chance. Especially if it can save Manu and Hill a few minutes per game.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Manu and Kobe respect the hell out of each other. Neither of them complained much at all over calls which is rare for them, or any NBA player. Every minute they were so focused, it was a fun game with in the game to watch those two. They are the two most competitive players in the NBA in my opinion.

The first half we really blew our chances of pushing the lead out far by missing open threes. On defense I thought we did great except for allowing wide open threes and Odom drives to the basket.

"It's Manuway or the Highway" - tlo

by Manuwar on Mar 25, 2010 12:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Manu +12 lead the team, Kobe -3 anti-lead his team…

to put it another way…the Lakers were +12 without Kobe on the court for 6 minutes yet we were -21 without Manu for 15 minutes.

by BlaseE on Mar 25, 2010 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

“Anti-lead”

I love it.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Manu’s line was identical to Kobe’s in points and rebounds, but Kobe had 6 assists and Manu had 2.

That’s not Manu’s fault, my friends. It’s the fault of the shooters who didn’t score off Manu’s passes. If they hit, Manu gets at least 6 assists and we’re in the game at the end.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

i wish they recorded that, assists to unmade shots just for my curiousity

by BlaseE on Mar 25, 2010 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

rec’d

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Manu should not guard Kobe, he was spending too much energy guarding him. He was basically running on fumes the 4th quarter when he almost airball a wide open 3, Pop gave him a break and the lakers make their run.

"He was just a young skinny guy who looked like a winner. We didn’t know he was going to be as good as he is."
—Popovich on Manu Ginobili

by spursfan87 on Mar 25, 2010 5:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Playoffs???

This is a pretty good example of what would happen in the first round if the Spurs draw the Lakers. The game of basketball is often about match-ups and very few teams can match up with the Lakers. Duncan doesn’t have the hops anymore to go up against the likes of Gasol or Andrew Bynum. Timmy can’t defend either on the blocks and Gasol can alter TD’s outside shot as well. Hill was going like a house afire as long as Fisher was trying to guard him, but Jordan Farmer had the speed to halt his penetrations. The Spurs starting lineup against the Lakers should be Parker, Hill and Ginobli in a three guard offense with McDyess and Duncan defending at the rim. But that still doesn’t give the Spurs enough size in the front line to stop a front line of Bynum, Gasol and Odom. They would grab far too many offensive rebounds. Neither Hill or
Ginobli could guard Bryant one on one. Like I say it is all about matchups. Jefferson doesn’t fit in this picture well, because he can’t guard any of the Laker starters and Blair is too small to defend the likes of Gasol or Bynum. The only chance the Spurs have of getting into the second round is to draw the Mavericks or better yet Denver, but with the remaining tough schedule that doesn’t look likely. Last night I new the Lakers would be heavy favorites to win and I was pleased with the first half effort. But Jackson had it all figured out by the beginning of the third period and the Spurs were forced into many turnovers and forced poor shots. I really felt sorry for Duncan. He doesn’t have an answer or Gasol or for that matter Bynum either. Now we will be forced to go up against Cleveland on Friday and I think the match ups aren’t quite as lopsided against the team with the best NBA record. Winning is another story. On Sunday SA must travel to Boston to face a team that is on the upswing now that Garnett seems to have found his legs again. That should be an interesting game, but Hill can’t stay with Robinson.

by jimjule on Mar 25, 2010 12:02 PM CDT reply actions  

jj, well-though out, well-written post.

Also, LA can really play defense. And I didn’t see the refs letting them get away with murder. I just saw quick rotations, heady doubles, hands in passing lanes and it all adds up to a smothering defense.

Also, our shooters looked nervous and weren’t taking their shots with confidence even when they took them. And too often, they weren’t taking them because someone was running at them, even when (it looked like to me) they could have gotten them off in time.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don’t think this game requires too deep an analysis. Spurs played on fumes without Tony against a rested opponent that happens to be the best in the West. Hard to see how they were going to win this game. Yet they were up at the half thanks to defense and Hill. They would’ve still won had role players Bonner and RMJ (who has plenty of gas in the tank but unfortunately just stinks) could hit an open 3. A halftime lead of 13+ would’ve given the Spurs more room for error and required less doubling of Kobe, thus fewer made 3s for LA.

I’m actually encouraged that the Spurs got the looks they wanted without their biggest advantage over LA (Parker) and with TD not himself. If you reverse the restedness of the teams SA wins last night without their main advantage. We no longer need Timmy to dominate to beat LA. We need Tony and Hill to punish LA with their speed, TD to be solid (he will be when rested) and Manu to be Manu. Oh, and for shooters to hit some their many wide open shots.

We still won’t have Tony when we head to LA but I’ll be interested to see how that game is played. I expected to split these final two against LA and that opportunity still exists. It’s hard for me to judge teh guys for losing on a night they would’ve struggled to beat any team not named New Jersey.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 12:27 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Spurred…its nice to hear optimistic thoughts on this game for a change

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Mar 25, 2010 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Fantastic, to the point recap, thanks chief.

Well, there are a couple of things that I noticed along with all that was mentioned above.

1. Outside of Manu, our team’s 3 point shooters seem to be scared while they play quality opponents and/or pressured by defense. I wonder if they are doubting themselves.

2. I’m also concerned about our players corporate knowledge. Let me explain(I know it was mentioned earlier), come 2nd half, Odom with 4 fouls, our jump shots not going in, Timmeh having trouble with Gasol, the logical thing to do would be to attack them and try to put more fouls on them so we get some breathing room, but that wasn’t the case. Our old team, whether they get fouled or not, atleast would have tried. But I attribute this to Tony’s absence and I’m sure we would do better in that department when Tony is playing.

3. Our defense was soft on guys like Shannon Brown and Farmer, we were scared to get on to their face and let them shot almost open 3 pointers. Yes, I’m looking at you Bogans. I remember, a Shannon Brown 3 from the right wing. Bogans was scared to get on him. Lets forget about the missed rotation on Kobe’s wide open corner 3. That was a genuine mistake.

4. When our ball handlers(Hill, Manu) are trapped or in trouble, there isn’t anyone else that could generate offense. All our players excepting Timmeh were standing and being spectators. Yes, i’m looking at you RJ. Now I know why Lakers are deep, they have Fisher, Odom, Kobe, Artest, Farmar, Brown that could handle the ball to do something with it. We have 3, if Tony is playing. I think this would be a big factor when playoffs start.

by Heman on Mar 25, 2010 1:11 PM CDT reply actions  

And by the way, I think once Bynum returns we would have 2 big match up issues, not just one with Odom. That is if Odom plays SF when Bynum plays C and Gasol plays PF.

by Heman on Mar 25, 2010 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Is the answer to that to put Tony, Hill, Manu, Timmy and Dyce on the floor? They would have the size but for a short stretch we would have the speed. Go motion offense, push the pace and hope that Manu and Hill are making their 3s. Seems the Mavs have done that to our big lineups before.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’m not sure if that would work because of their length. They will have major advantage on rebounding.

I think one of our greatest strengths earlier in the season was our bench. Not so much now. We should figure out a way to get our bench going, especially Blair. Of late, he seems to be frustrated. I don’t remember the last time Manu and Blair had their pick and roll going. Blair also needs to know and learn how to manage the clock and not pick up silly fouls.

by Heman on Mar 25, 2010 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Blair also needs to know and learn how to manage the clock and not pick up silly fouls not be a rookie.

FIFY

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

I keep telling myself that I shouldn’t expect too much. Thanks for reminding me.

by Heman on Mar 25, 2010 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

As awesome as The Beast has been, it’s easy to forget he’s in his first year.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

he needs more than 10 minutes against the Lakers to work out some of those rookie kinks though….he can’t figure it all out sitting on the bench

by BlaseE on Mar 25, 2010 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

4 fouls in less than 10 minutes.

Where were you wanting Pop to play him more?

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think we are getting tangled up with cause and effect. I think as long as the beast feels that he is having fun out there..its all good. The moment he feels that he is under pressure to produce, we are in trouble. Let us hope people don’t ask him about rookie wall and how he is handling it.

by Heman on Mar 25, 2010 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

While I agree that his attitude is exceedingly important, I think he can handle the press.

It’s the manner and the degree to which he feels Pop breathing down his neck that could cause issues.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 4:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

I speculate that Pop is trying to save him from a rookie wall, tell him that he already went through it and now has a second wind for the playoffs. Because we will need him for 15-20 minutes per game come playoff time.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 7:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

I like this theory.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

let him play with 5 fouls and know that if he fouls out, its on him….its not like we need him at the end of a game

by BlaseE on Mar 25, 2010 4:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sorry, Blase, what I meant was: at what point during the game were you wanting him on the floor to get the experience you mentioned.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

i can’t give you a minute mark, but I was yelling for him to be inserted the entire second half from my seat …bonner was ice cold and dice doesn’t seem to care much or can’t get involved and blair finished the first half with something like 5 points and 5 boards in 5 minutes…..

by BlaseE on Mar 25, 2010 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Bonner was 2-2 in the 2nd half.

by doggydogworld on Mar 26, 2010 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, I’m not sure if letting him play at the expense of we giving away fouls and hence points is acceptable while we are at the juncture where every win counts. I’m not saying your point is valid, I’m just saying I don’t know the right answer.

by Heman on Mar 25, 2010 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

this game doesn’t matter anything to having blair more capable against the Lakers in the playoffs

honestly, the spurs are likely doomed by their difficult schedule and terrible january from getting homecourt in the first round….since none of the top seedings other than the lakers are for sure, winning this game and fighting for a 5th or even 6th seed isn’t worth shit

and yes, i don’t think we have anything to prove in the regular season…especially not duncan

by BlaseE on Mar 25, 2010 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

i don’t think we have anything to prove in the regular season…especially not duncan

True enough. I just hope that his next gear is as potent as it’s been in every other post season he’s been a part of.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 4:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Manu guarding Artest? No.

The bench is only good when Manu is on it. As for Blair pick-and-roll, the Lakers had scouted that out and were collapsing on him before the pass could come. They left some 3 point shooters open in the process but we couldn’t make them pay.

by doggydogworld on Mar 25, 2010 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

" The bench is only good when Manu is on it."

This is going to change big time when we got an allstar point guard coming off the pine.

Theres a new fanshot that states Tony is well on his way back.

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Mar 25, 2010 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Artest? I was thinking that Kobe and Fisher/Brown would be the fifth players. If Artest and Kobe go with that big lineup I actually think it’s easier to guard them (rebounding aside). You congest everything in the middle, stay with Kobe and make Artest hit contested outside shots. This would make it easier to rotate help to Odom or Kobe when they drive with so many bigs on the floor, and our team defense would have more speed for recovery. Again, rebounding would likely be a problem but if we get it, we’re on the run with Kobe as the only true guard on the floor to defend.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

iron maiden references — AWESOME

gospursgo. hook 'em. metal rules. ganja rules.

by metalandganja on Mar 25, 2010 1:13 PM CDT reply actions  

Just wait until Kaiser sees this.

He’ll go nuts.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 1:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes he will. Where is the little Sunkist freak? He hasn’t been in a game thread lately (of course, just my luck, he participated last night and I’ll look like a doofus.)

by CapHill on Mar 25, 2010 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

I suppose i’m the only one who noticed Bonner’s mostly stellar defensive effort last night? He got torched maybe twice by Odom, but he also came up with several hustle plays (3 steals, a block, and several other knockaways that dont show up in the box score). His shot was definitely off, but dont put him in the same bunch as Mason or the other complete no shows (Bogans).

RJ made one HUGE mistake on defense. Early in the game he tried to get going on offense but was off all night. Definitely tried to take it to the rack a few times though. Honestly, i dont remember seeing him much in the second half, but i do remember he missed a couple open jumpers. I think the effort was there, but not the execution. Although thats better than earlier this season…its not good enough. I still think he can do better, and i think he will do better next year. He won’t be as good as everyone was expecting him to be when he got here, but he’ll be a decent role player.

Genibus Nitito Canus

by SpursfanSteve on Mar 25, 2010 1:16 PM CDT reply actions  

also, even though the lakers did ramp up their D…we missed a crapton of open jumpers. And we made multiple STUPID passes (I’m looking at you, Manu to nobody in the corner, and Hill to Artest…). Really, in spite of the 9 point margin, the game was lost on roughly 3 possessions. Of course, they came at the worst possible time, and then our defense sucked after those turnovers too. Anyway, what i’m trying to say is we still arent executing like we used to. We had at least 4 turnovers that could have been easily avoided. We won’t win as long as that is the case.

Genibus Nitito Canus

by SpursfanSteve on Mar 25, 2010 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yep. And again, look at the 3pt stats. Take away two LA makes and give SA two more makes and it’s a 12 point swing. That’s the game, even without Tony. I say that only because our misses were wide open from players that we want to shoot the ball and they hit 50% which is well above their norm. Reminds me of how Denver beat us in SA when they (especially Billups) were hot from outside. Any good team that shoots 50%+ from 3pt range with that many attempts is going to win, including us.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Heinrich and Rose were hitting everything they through up from anywhere on the court when we played the bulls. Houston has had similar games against us too.

by BlaseE on Mar 25, 2010 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

At your request, I’m leaving you alone. But for the record, you’re not making it easy on me.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

i know. I’m not saying opponents making shots against us is an outlier anymore. But i contend that normally, we’re going to make more open shots. The only exception i think is Mason, who wont make anything ever again.

Also, where are the Bonner haters? I expected to be flamed for saying he played probably our best post D for the night.

Genibus Nitito Canus

by SpursfanSteve on Mar 25, 2010 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

My guess is that it’s hard to hate on Bonner with much vigor when your head is spinning from watching Duncan get owned by Pau.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’m not a Bonner hater but my head is spinning from the JV player with Mason on his jersey. This guys is major suckage in a contract year. How did that happen?

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 7:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Id say Mases psyche has taken him out of the game. He probably feels like an a-hole for requesting a trade.

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Mar 25, 2010 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wow. I’ll bet that’s part of it at least.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 11:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

I can go with that. Any suggestions on how to un-a-hole him? When he makes his 3s and scores 10+ points this team can be near unbeatable. While he’s here he may as well contribute.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 26, 2010 3:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

Any suggestions on how to un-a-hole him?

My suggestion is to send him to the D-league. It seemed to help Malik a lot this year. If Mason is not a lost case, it could clear his mind a little bit. If this doesn’t help, we’ll need to get rid of him.

We should start rebuilding around Durant

by Kondor on Mar 26, 2010 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Last night, I was very down. Trust me. This morning, though, I feel much better about the game.

I don’t feel better this morning.

I’m always optimistic. ALWAYS. But right now, I’m just a glass-half-full guy instead of a glass-eighty-percent-full guy. It’s not a subtle difference, and I definitely feel it.

I’m still rooting for the Spurs, still hoping they’ll get out of the first round (one step at a time) and still wanting them to go as far as they can. But I’m not expecting anything from them.

Hate to me a Debbie Downer (apologies to all the Debbie’s in the audience) but I just don’t think they have it this year. Even if our outside shooters light it up for a game — or even a series, there’s no sustained performance from them this year, and I can’t expect them to hit shots consistently.

This is a team that NEEDS dominating performances from Tim in order to win games, EVEN when Manu’s playing well/very well, and it doesn’t seem that Tim’s body will allow him to do it (so I’m no longer thinking that Tim’s waiting to start jumping until the playoffs) Blair seems to have hit the rookie wall, and who knows what we’ll get from Tony when we get him back.

I hate feeling this way, but if it was just a feeling, then I could shake it off. I’m afraid that what I saw last night isn’t an outlier — but what our team is actually capable of when they play elite competition.

::sigh::

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 1:18 PM CDT reply actions  

law of averages, man. No way will we shoot 28% from the field on a regular basis.

Genibus Nitito Canus

by SpursfanSteve on Mar 25, 2010 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

And 20 bucks says the Lakers cant shoot 50% from trey stripe 4 games out of 7.

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Mar 25, 2010 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Heman’s point above

Outside of Manu, our team’s 3 point shooters seem to be scared while they play quality opponents and/or pressured by defense. I wonder if they are doubting themselves.

If they’re shooting w/o confidence, it could get even worse than 28%.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Question: was it more about confidence (aside from Mason) or a tired team playing their third game in four nights against top competition?

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

It was either, both, and also Timmeh’s being unable to drop in a shot when he was open, and being blocked by Pau when he wasn’t.

This may be my low point as a Spurs fan since May 13, 2004.

Or I could just be worn down from battling a stomach virus since Tuesday evening.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think you are weighting this game more than it deserves to be. Let me put it this way, PJ let Kobe play 42 minutes. Pop let Manu play 33. Even ignoring Bynum and Parker in terms of the match-up, we didn’t put our best foot forward.

Just have faith that Pop and the Spurs are trying to win games as sneakily as possible. Don’t give up hope until the playoffs. It’s not worth it. The Lakers are the most important team to experiment with and hide things from so losing to them in the regular season is the most acceptable….even with all those stupid missed shots.

by BlaseE on Mar 25, 2010 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, I just got around to reading the comments from yesterday’s preview and posted this.

I really, really hope you’re right. And I haven’t given up hope, but I do know that I’m no longer anticipating that we could pull a team-gets-healthy-and-gels-for-the-playoffs-and-does-just-enough-to-get-to-the-finals a la the Rockets in ’95 6th seed championship run.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hey that year, 95, the Spurs were the power house with a crazy(Rodman) who although didn’t go nuts still fizzled and really hurt us against Houston.

15 years later lets hope the Lakers crazy man Ron Artest under performs enough, or just starts imploding their team.

I’m really confident that we’re gonna punk the hell outa’ someone in the first round and get our momentum going in the second round.

"It's Manuway or the Highway" - tlo

by Manuwar on Mar 25, 2010 5:48 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I’d give one of the jrwlings new guinea pigs to feel that kind of confidence.

Hmmmm. Maybe not.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sorry about the stomach virus. I hope rest, meds and a Spurs winning streak that starts on Friday get you feeling better.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 7:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks, SO. Feeling better already, but the appetite is coming back more slowly than I’d like.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thank you! I was gagging from the optimistic bullcrap. We’re not good enough this year. It’s that simple. I’m sure pages upon pages could be written on why that is so, but at the end of the day, it is.

To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.

by Hipuks on Mar 25, 2010 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

While I accept your thanks, this post isn’t the kind of thing I’d like to appreciated for.

Hate feeling that way.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Against the Lakers I agree we’re not good enough. But I love our chances against anyone else if we’re healthy. Manu is taking his game to another level right now. We just need to get nasty on defense.

"It's Manuway or the Highway" - tlo

by Manuwar on Mar 25, 2010 5:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not sure if we have the tools to get nasty on defense. May be we will get a little better with crisp rotations.

by Heman on Mar 25, 2010 6:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Blair has some nasty in him.

"It's Manuway or the Highway" - tlo

by Manuwar on Mar 25, 2010 6:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

He might, it is yet to be seen in full flow though.

by Heman on Mar 25, 2010 7:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yea, Blair looks like he has a mean streak in him.

Thing that worries me is he might not know how to channel that. Hes still just a 20 year old kid…

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Mar 25, 2010 8:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

You said it, so I don’t need to say anything. I think, you are right on money.

We should start rebuilding around Durant

by Kondor on Mar 25, 2010 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well we probably arent winning a title. Mkay. Lets cut the crap we are not winning the title.

Unfortunately not winning the title seems to give some people the green light to start spewing all kinds of negative banter, which is fine. ( Although I find the unoptimistic/negative bullsh%t at least as annoying as you find the optimistic crap. )

I dunno why people gotta get called out for highlighting positive aspects about the team.

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Mar 25, 2010 6:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

That was the whole point of this year, to win the title. We didn’t go over the cap so that we could escape the first round and say what a job well done.

To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.

by Hipuks on Mar 25, 2010 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

I didn’t get all negative. I just said that I was down to glass-half-full status for the first time in a long while. I’m still optimistic — just less expectant. Didn’t I say that?

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 11:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

jr dub.

 There wasnt anything negative about what you said. You expressed doubt about the teams ability to win a title, as pretty much everyone in here has. Myself included.

 You didnt say that positive comments makes you nauseous. There just seems something wrong with that . And I know this was partially directed at me , because if you read my comments ( I am sure you have ) I am one of the optimists in here.

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Mar 26, 2010 12:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

It seems I got overly sensitive there. Guess that’s what happens when you get out of a comfort zone – as I was this morning when I wrote what was, for me, a pretty negative post.

And, yes, you’re definitely one of the optimists. No doubt.

Thanks for clarifying.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 26, 2010 1:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hey JRW, I’m at work and have to run, so I kinda skimmed—did someone already call you out for this?

Hate to me a Debbie Downer

Basically voted most normal person on PtR.

by Queness on Mar 26, 2010 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not only was it completely ignored, but they also gave me a pass on going possessive instead of plural on

Debbie’s

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 27, 2010 12:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, and that one’s getting to be so damn common. I just didn’t want to sound like a total harpy in one comment, especially if it had been noted already.

Basically voted most normal person on PtR.

by Queness on Mar 27, 2010 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, thanks for noticing me all the same.

You know I appreciate it, and you don’t even have to say

your welcome

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 28, 2010 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rough, rough loss lastnight. First half was great, second stunk….in a big big way!!!!!

Go Spurs Go!!!!!!!

by mikesatx on Mar 25, 2010 2:10 PM CDT reply actions  

IRON MAIDEN!!!! MY FAVORITE BAND OF ALL-TIME!!!!

But yes this was very disappointing, though the first half showing gives me some hope if we don’t play LA in the round of the playoffs.

Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.

by KA1Z3R on Mar 25, 2010 2:51 PM CDT reply actions  

…Like a fly to honey.

I knew it wouldn’t take long for you to show up in this thread.

Thanks for not letting me down.
=]

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Does anyone else remember when mason used to make open three’s?

by The Calvinator on Mar 25, 2010 3:19 PM CDT reply actions  

Does not compute. Maybe we should tell Real Madrid they can have him, and just leave Splitter alone.

Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek

by Tim C. on Mar 25, 2010 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

+5

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Per Hollinger's Per Diem Today
Let’s start with San Antonio. Yes, San Antonio. I realize Wednesday night’s second half didn’t do wonders for the idea that the Spurs can make a run in the West, but check out the big picture. San Antonio has won 10 of its last 14 against a difficult schedule and did most of the damage without an injured Tony Parker. At full strength, the Spurs were good enough to the beat the Lakers by 20 in January; in fact, until Wednesday, they were ahead of the Lakers in the Power Rankings. The recent struggles of Tim Duncan are worrisome, but after 60 games of scuffling, San Antonio seems to be hitting its stride.

He is listing as the first contender to upset the west in case you didn’t get that from not having the surrounding info. You can read a copy of it for free here.

by BlaseE on Mar 25, 2010 4:30 PM CDT reply actions  

Its a sad day in the twilight zone when Hollinger is more optimistic about the Spurs chances then some Spurs fans.

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Mar 25, 2010 6:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

He was critical of us last year (correctly so) and complimentary of our title chances in 2007 (correctly so). His optimisitc feelings match mine. Now let’s give Timmy a few games off and get Tony back to make him look and us feel good.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 7:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Now let’s give Timmy a few games off

Amen. We haven’t seen nearly enough of this as I was hoping we would when the season began and there was all that talk about resting him in back to back situations.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 25, 2010 11:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

The lakers held us to 24 points in the paint. Our lowest total since the wizards game on january 2nd where we only needed 16 points in the paint to absolutely destroy them on any open look we wanted. Parker and Duncan would never let that happen in the playoffs…..or let the Lakers stop them.

by BlaseE on Mar 25, 2010 4:41 PM CDT reply actions  

A few observations from last nights game:

1) Pau did not bite on any of Tim’s moves. He knows he is athletic enough to contest or block a shot without having to guess. There are two (or more) counters to that. The first is to go into his body and suffer the inevitable blocks for the chance of getting extra foul calls. The second is to set up on the elbow to take Pau out of the paint and make Tim a passer or jump shooter. We all want a post presence, but Tim shoots nearly 50% from the elbow area and removing Pau from the paint allows others to attack the basket.
2) Manu has serious stamina issues. It isn’t that his stamina is bad, it is just that he goes all out on both offense and defense when he is in. You can see him losing his balance and shooting touch at the end of games. For all of the people screaming for Pop to put him back in the game during the 4th quarter, he had no choice.
3) Hill had a great first half because the Lakers defense was focused on Manu and Tim. With Pau doing a great job defending Tim by himself, the Lakers changed focus and shut Hill down.
4) For this team to succeed in the playoffs, we need to shoot 35-40% from 3. Nothing else will work. We still may lose (especially if the opponents shoot 50% from three).

Finally, one thing I found amusing last night. When the Lakers get beat and other teams celebrate, Laker Nation is quick to bash the team that just won. “This is just a regular season game and you are celebrating like you won a playoff series”. I was surprised at how much the Lakers celebrated last night. Why would a 1 seed need to celebrate a regular season victory over a 7 seed? Pot, meet kettle.

by SpurScientist on Mar 25, 2010 5:48 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Why would a 1 seed need to celebrate a regular season victory over a 7 seed?

They had several tough games against weak opposition, and were not quite sure, where they stand. Yesterday they felt again that they were the championship material. So they celebrated. However annoying for us it was, I cannot really blame them. For them it was a good quality win against a likely playoff opponent.

We should start rebuilding around Durant

by Kondor on Mar 25, 2010 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

My point is not about what the Lakers did, it is about what Lakers Nation does. The next time the Lakers lose and the winning team celebrates for the exact reasons that you gave above, take a look at the volume of comments that mimic my statement above. I just found it amusing.

by SpurScientist on Mar 25, 2010 7:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

I just found it amusing.

Sorry, I just cannot care less about the Lakers Nation, so I guess I missed your point.

We should start rebuilding around Durant

by Kondor on Mar 26, 2010 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hm.

All that celebrating tells me that that a healthy Spurs team is not a Laker fans first choice as an opening round oppenent.

( yes, oppenent )

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Mar 25, 2010 8:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

First, I love the use of oppenent. I’ve even added it to my spellcheck’s dictionary so that it doesn’t prompt me to correct it every time I use it.

Second, if you put it in italics, then you won’t have to type things like “( yes, oppenent )” — unless, of course, you want to.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 26, 2010 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

oppenent sounds great, except that “opening round oppenent” is excessive, like “two championship contenders met in the Finals to play for the trophy”.

We should start rebuilding around Durant

by Kondor on Mar 26, 2010 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Gotta disagree with you, K. You can have championship contenders meeting in any round.

Alfajores cause mojo! - janieannie

by J.R. Wilco on Mar 27, 2010 12:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

In every game Wayne your shot chart comes to mind when they look like they are open but have a bad % from that spot. Last night it really showed up.LA always starts slow and comes on in the 2nd and 4th where they, mostly Kobe, turn up the shots and rest turn up the defense at the same time. Ron Ron seems to be the player that really beat us last night. We for sure do not have an answer for him. On either end.

by indiancharlie on Mar 25, 2010 6:28 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah, Ron-Ron can thank some of the refs for those 5 steals. He just bulldozed his way into people and got preferential treatment.

by silverandblack_davis on Mar 25, 2010 7:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

True.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 7:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’m not sure that LA came on in either quarter. The Spurs defended them very well in each; actually in all except the 3rd. The Spurs dominated the 2nd but the missing of all the open shots prevent it from being the wide margin it should’ve been. In the 4th they had nothing left. Without Tony and with the recent schedule, there was no one to offensively win the game. Then Kobe decided that if we weren’t going to score he may as well hit a couple no-pressure 3s and seal it.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Mar 25, 2010 7:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lost in all this is just how good a defensive team the Lakers have become….

F%ck, I hate them.

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Mar 25, 2010 8:33 PM CDT reply actions  

Yes, it looked like they put a lead lid on our offense. It was very impressive really.

We should start rebuilding around Durant

by Kondor on Mar 26, 2010 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Bad loss but I still have a good feeling for this season’s playoffs. I don’t care what effin’ seed we get. We’re gonna paint the world with silver and black!

just having fun...

by day_late_friend on Mar 25, 2010 8:44 PM CDT reply actions  

Artest should have been called but I think the refs are switching to a more playoff type of calling these games. What I was really trying to point out was his whole game of playing for 36 min. with F.G. of 5-11, F.T. of 5-9 (he went to the line 9 times) for a + 16 and 8 rebounds. All of that while only being called for 3 personal fouls. Those appear to be alot of some real balanced numbers. But what to me is even more shocking are their 3 bigs Gasol, Odom and Artest go for a combined +40 on offense vs.our 3 Tim, Dice, and Bonner for a combined -21. Theirs played 121 combined minutes and ours for 84 combined min. On rebounds,our bigs got 20 and LA ’sgot 33 out of their total 40. The bigs got us. All year I have been hard on RJ and soft on Dice. No more nice…dice.

by indiancharlie on Mar 25, 2010 8:50 PM CDT reply actions  

We jacked up 27 threes? Thats criminal…

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Mar 25, 2010 9:18 PM CDT reply actions  

Well…to be fair 23 of those were wide open bricks…

by Big50 on Mar 26, 2010 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Interesting stat….

The Spurs actually had one more rebound 44 to 45.

And the Spurs had 4 more offensive rebounds.

Dejuan had 6 rebounds ( four of them offensive ) in only 10 minutes !

Crappy teams fear us !

by alamobro on Mar 25, 2010 9:22 PM CDT reply actions  

I am so going to that Maiden show!

AKA: Linix129, sw12

by Sean Wunderlich on Mar 25, 2010 9:33 PM CDT reply actions  

just now catching up to this.

1 – must drop a post in here because of the iron maiden theme
2 – was in route to SA when this was posted and never caught back up to it….but why else would i want to given how THAT game went
3 – when i hit SA, the first thing i heard on my rental car radio was…..you guessed it….iron maiden. it was flight of icarus. frankly, KZEP played so much maiden while i was in town that i feard one of the band members had died.

by bones on Apr 7, 2010 8:03 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the San Antonio Spurs.

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Tim-duncan_small
TY PtR! and Why I choose the Spurs!
Xthunderbird_small
Tumbleweeds, Tailfeathers, and Timmy!

Recent FanPosts

Ginobili_small
Friday 02-10-12 NBA on ESPN Game Thread
Manu-ginobili_small
Manu's Return: What We Ought To Expect
Photo_on_11-10-11_at_6
Spurs Off-season Priorities
Photo_on_11-10-11_at_6
2012 Free Agent Power Forwards
Nba_finals________small
Having (a little too much) fun during the Spurs winning streak
Artis_gilmore_small
Joe deLarios Advanced Box Score: San Antonio Spurs at Philadelphia 76ers
Manu-ginobili_small
Why have our GREAT SCOUTS missed on this guy?
Nba_finals________small
How much should we enjoy Tim Duncan's waning years?
Photo_on_11-10-11_at_6
2012 Free Agent Centers
Artis_gilmore_small
Joe deLarios Advanced Box Score: San Antonio Spurs @ Memphis Grizzlies

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Predict the Spurs 2012 Rodeo Road Trip record

  595 votes | Results

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

quite a change : Manu Ready  
@Infomanu  in Twitter
Lets do this! Road trip!
Pop wants a timeout

Recent FanShots

Best post moves in the NBA, voted by the players.
Blinebury: Parker Continues to Shine
Tony Parker makes all starteam
Gregg Popovich looks like lock for NBA Coach of the Year
Questions I ask myself (The Big Fundamental)
ST: Ten Reasons Why Ginobili and Leonard Should Start
Tony Parker named to the Western Conference All-Star team
Hollinger: Watch out for the Spurs (Insider)
Missing FanPosts
Shooting Star

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


G.M.

Jrw_small J.R. Wilco

Coach

D-rob1_small Big50

Oberto_fab_small silverandblack_davis

Nerf_reactor_small CapHill

Screen_shot_2011-12-02_at_4 Josh Guyer (completely deck)

Player

08playoffshappybench_medium_small Justin Biehle

021_small transgojobot

Duncan_small SpursfanSteve

Manu_the_grey_small DrumsInTheDeep

376094_10100544199117568_16706926_51964808_1200814736_n_small MatthewTynan

Ref

Halloween_06_028_small alamobro