B/R: Are the Spurs too young to win a title?

Network Bar

B/R: Are the Spurs too young to win a title?

What a crazy notion.

almost 2 years ago Tim C. 10 comments 0 recs |

Comments

It actually makes a little since. Mainly if for some reason our “Big 3” are not available and totally healthy. We would be depending on Hill(2nd year), Blair(rookie) and maybe Ian (plays like rookie) to take up slack.

Going for "50"

by Nlclove on Mar 20, 2010 9:41 PM CDT reply actions

The Spurs’ average age of 27.6 ties the L.A. Lakers and trails four other title contenders.

Oh God no! That means were old. Oh well, at least we’re still better looking. :)

The Lakers "Too big, too strong, too long, too good."

by olf on Mar 20, 2010 9:53 PM CDT reply actions

When Bucks’ G.M. John Hammond bought out the expiring contracts of Bowen and Oberto, freeing them to re-sign with the Spurs, Buford and Gregg Popovich passed.

Damn – is this true? Could we have gotten Fab back? I assumed he had been traded by the Bucks.

by swgeek on Mar 20, 2010 11:48 PM CDT reply actions

Bucks trade Fab to the Pistons, who bought him out. Reporting at the time said the Spurs planned to sign him back. Either the reporting was wrong or getting DeJuan in the draft changed things.

by doggydogworld on Mar 21, 2010 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions

I still wish the Spurs could have gotten Fab back somehow, fouls and all. I can’t help but imagine what DeJuan Blair could have learned from Fab’s veteran savvy and “corporate knowledge”.

Of course, would BLAAAAAIIR be getting the kind of playing time he has this regular season, if Fab was on the roster? Or would Fab have been given the same treatment Youngevity was?

...!!

by transgojobot on Mar 21, 2010 7:02 PM CDT up reply actions