There Is Still Water in the Glass!
A brief Review of the History of the NBA Finals
More Specifically What teams get to the Finals
With the way the Spurs are playing, everyone seems to be concerned about the seeding in the playoffs. As a person who strongly believes that you can learn a lot from history, I did a little research yesterday prior to going to the Warrior game. I was looking for the answer to the following questions:
- What type of regular season record, does a team need to reach the Finals?
- What is the lowest seed to reach the Finals?
- Does the best record always win the Finals?
- What was the worst regular season record to win a Final?
In my research, I found out a lot of interesting little tidbits which I am now sharing with you. All of this information is from the NBA.com website under history. I just pulled it together to make it easier for me to understand. The chart of pure data and answers to the above questions are after the jump. Please note any errors in the chart are mine and I apologize for any math errors.
WARNING: This is 63 years worth of data.
I have inserted the chart below so that you can reach your own conclusions. I am going to review some of the statistics that I found interesting.
One tidbit that I had not realized is that the NBA has had a 82 game regular season since the 1967-68 season. Prior to that they had 1 year at 81 games, 5 years at 80, 1 year at 79 and 75 games each, 6 years at 72 games, 1 year at 70, 3 years at 66, and 2 years at 60. They also had 1 year in between the two sixty game seasons were they only had 48 scheduled regularly games. According to NBA.com the cut was done to try to ease travel expenses. They however immediately went back to the higher number the next year.
Most people know that the Boston Celtics have won the most NBA Championships with 17 wins out of 20 visits. But I feel that more props should go to the Los Angeles Lakerswho including their time as the Minneapolis Lakers have been to the Finals 30 times. They won 15 of the games. The Lakers have been in the Finals 30 out of 63 times. That is statistically significant any way you slice it. After the Celtics, the Philadelphia 76ers is next with 9 trips, then New York Knicks with 8, Detroit/Fort Wayne Pistons with 7, the Chicago Bulls with 6 and the San Antonio Spurs with 4. Of course the Bulls and the Spurs are the only multi-trip undefeateds.
Now lets look at specific records. I am sure nearly everyone knows that the best record in NBA history was the 1995-96 Chicago Bulls 72-10 (0.878). The team to win the Finals with the lowest regular season record was the 1977-78 Washington Bullets 44-38 (0.537). The team with the lowest regular season record to ever make it to the finals was the 1980-81 Houston Rockets 40-42 (0.489). Below is the chart of the breakdown of the regular season percentage of Finals winners. One reason I do not like statistics is that you will notice it is just as likely for a team to have won 80% of their games as to have only won 50% of their games.
|
Record |
82 game season |
% |
Not 82 games |
% |
Total |
% |
|
80% |
8 |
9.6 |
1 |
5 |
9 |
14.3 |
|
70% |
19 |
44.2 |
9 |
45 |
28 |
44.4 |
|
60% |
10 |
23.5 |
7 |
35 |
17 |
26.9 |
|
50% |
5 |
11.6 |
4 |
20 |
9 |
14.3 |
Of note is the 1974-75 Finals match up where the 48-34 Golden State warriors swept the 60-22 Washington Bullets.
Looking at seeding is hard due to the many changes through the years. Even though the NBA has been playing 82 regular season games for a lot of years, they have not had the same number of times participating. What this means is that a 6-8th seed now would be equivalent to a 3-4 seed in some previous years. Because of not being able to do a direct comparison of the lower records, I just looked at #1 versus not #1. On my chart below I only wrote the rank of the record not the actually seed for the playoffs(way to complicated). The T preceding the rank mains there was a tie. Looking at purely the regular season record, 20 of the 63 winners did not have the best record in their conference/division. 24 of the 63 losers did not have the top records. In short 44(35%) of Finals participants did not have the best regular season record.
|
YEAR |
CHAMPION |
Reg season Conference Rank /record |
% |
OPPONENT |
Reg season Conf Rank/ record |
% |
RESULT |
|
2008-09 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/65-17 |
0.793 |
3//59-23 |
0.720 |
||
|
2007-08 |
Boston Celtics |
1/66-16 |
0.805 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/57-25 |
0.695 |
|
|
2006-07 |
San Antonio Spurs |
3/58-24 |
0.707 |
2/50-32 |
0.610 |
||
|
2005-06 |
2/52-30 |
0.634 |
2/60-22 |
0.732 |
|||
|
2004-05 |
San Antonio Spurs |
2/59-23 |
0.720 |
2/54-28 |
0.659 |
||
|
2003-04 |
Detroit Pistons |
2/54-28 |
0.659 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
3/56-26 |
0.683 |
|
|
2002-03 |
San Antonio Spurs |
T1/60-22 |
0.732 |
2/49-33 |
0.598 |
||
|
2001-02 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
T2/58-24 |
0.707 |
New Jersey Nets |
1/52-30 |
0.634 |
|
|
2000-01 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
2/56-26 |
0.683 |
Philadelphia 76ers |
1/56-26 |
0.683 |
|
|
1999-00 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/67-15 |
0.817 |
1/56-26 |
0.683 |
||
|
1998-99 |
San Antonio Spurs |
T1/37-13 |
0.740 |
8/27-23 |
0.540 |
||
|
1997-98 |
Chicago Bulls |
1/62-20 |
0.756 |
1/62-20 |
0.756 |
||
|
1996-97 |
Chicago Bulls |
1/69-13 |
0.841 |
Utah Jazz |
1/64-18 |
0.780 |
|
|
1995-96 |
Chicago Bulls |
1/72-10 |
0.878 |
Seattle SuperSonics |
1/64-18 |
0.780 |
|
|
1994-95 |
Houston Rockets |
6/47-35 |
0.573 |
Orlando Magic |
1/57-25 |
0.695 |
|
|
1993-94 |
Houston Rockets |
2/58-241 |
0.707 |
New York Knicks |
T1/57-25 |
0.695 |
|
|
1992-93 |
Chicago Bulls |
2/57-25 |
0.695 |
1/62-20 |
0.756 |
||
|
1991-92 |
Chicago Bulls |
1/67-15 |
0.817 |
1/57-25 |
0.695 |
||
|
1990-91 |
Chicago Bulls |
1/61/21 |
0.744 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
2/58-24 |
0.707 |
|
|
1989-90 |
Detroit Pistons |
1/59-23 |
0.720 |
Portland Trail Blazers |
2/59-23 |
0.720 |
|
|
1988-89 |
Detroit Pistons |
1/63-19 |
0.768 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/52-25 |
0.634 |
|
|
1987-88 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/62-20 |
0.756 |
Detroit Pistons |
2/54-28 |
0.659 |
|
|
1986-87 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/65-17 |
0.793 |
Boston Celtics |
1/59-23 |
0.720 |
|
|
1985-86 |
Boston Celtics |
1/67-15 |
0.817 |
Houston Rockets |
2/51-31 |
0.622 |
|
|
1984-85 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/62-20 |
0.756 |
Boston Celtics |
1/63-19 |
0.768 |
|
|
1983-84 |
Boston Celtics |
1/62-20 |
0.756 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/54-28 |
0.659 |
|
|
1982-83 |
Philadelphia 76ers |
1/65-17 |
0.793 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/58-24 |
0.707 |
|
|
1981-82 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/57-25 |
0.695 |
Philadelphia 76ers |
2/58-24 |
0.707 |
|
|
1980-81 |
Boston Celtics |
T12/62-20 |
0.756 |
Houston Rockets |
6/40-42 |
0.489 |
|
|
1979-80 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/60-22 |
0.732 |
Philadelphia 76ers |
2/59-23 |
0.720 |
|
|
1978-79 |
Seattle SuperSonics |
1/52-30 |
0.634 |
Washington Bullets |
1/54-28 |
0.659 |
|
|
1977-78 |
Washington Bullets |
3/44-38 |
0.537 |
Seattle SuperSonics |
4/47-35 |
0.573 |
|
|
1976-77 |
Portland Trail Blazers |
3/49-33 |
0.598 |
Philadelphia 76ers |
1/50-32 |
0.609 |
|
|
1975-76 |
Boston Celtics |
1/54-28 |
0.659 |
Phoenix Suns |
3/42-40 |
0.525 |
|
|
1974-75 |
1/48-34 |
0.585 |
Washington Bullets |
T1/60-22 |
0.732 |
||
|
1973-74 |
Boston Celtics |
1/56-26 |
0.683 |
1/59-23 |
0.720 |
||
|
1972-73 |
New York Knicks |
2/57-25 |
0.695 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
T1/60-22 |
0.732 |
|
|
1971-72 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/69-13 |
0.841 |
New York Knicks |
2/48-34 |
0.585 |
|
|
1970-71 |
Milwaukee Bucks |
1/66-16 |
0.805 |
Baltimore Bullets |
4/42-40 |
0.525 |
|
|
1969-70 |
New York Knicks |
1/60-22 |
0.732 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
2/46-36 |
0.561 |
|
|
1968-69 |
Boston Celtics |
4/48-34 |
0.585 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/55-27 |
0.670 |
|
|
1967-68 |
Boston Celtics |
2/54-28 |
0.659 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
2/52-30 |
0.634 |
|
|
1966-67 |
Philadelphia 76ers |
1/68-13 |
0.839 |
San Francisco Warriors |
1/44-37 |
0.543 |
|
|
1965-66 |
Boston Celtics |
2/54-26 |
0.675 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/45-35 |
0.563 |
|
|
1964-65 |
Boston Celtics |
1/62-18 |
0.775 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/49-31 |
0.613 |
|
|
1963-64 |
Boston Celtics |
1/59-21 |
0.738 |
San Francisco Warriors |
1/41-32 |
0.600 |
|
|
1962-63 |
Boston Celtics |
1/58-22 |
0.725 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/53-27 |
0.663 |
|
|
1961-62 |
Boston Celtics |
1/60-20 |
0.750 |
Los Angeles Lakers |
1/54-26 |
0.675 |
|
|
1960-61 |
Boston Celtics |
1/57-22 |
0.722 |
St. Louis Hawks |
1/51-28 |
0.646 |
|
|
1959-60 |
Boston Celtics |
1/59-16 |
0.787 |
St. Louis Hawks |
1/46-29 |
0.613 |
|
|
1958-59 |
Boston Celtics |
1/52-20 |
0.722 |
Minneapolis Lakers |
2/33-39 |
0.458 |
|
|
1957-58 |
St. Louis Hawks |
1/41-31 |
0.569 |
Boston Celtics |
1/49-23 |
0.681 |
|
|
1956-57 |
Boston Celtics |
1/44-28 |
0.611 |
St. Louis Hawks |
T1/34-38 |
0.472 |
|
|
1955-56 |
Philadelphia Warriors |
1/45-27 |
0.625 |
Fort Wayne Pistons |
1/37-35 |
0.514 |
|
|
1954-55 |
Syracuse Nationals |
1/43-29 |
0.597 |
Fort Wayne Pistons |
1/43-29 |
0.597 |
|
|
1953-54 |
Minneapolis Lakers |
1/46-26 |
0.639 |
Syracuse Nationals |
2/42-30 |
0.583 |
|
|
1952-53 |
Minneapolis Lakers |
1/48-22 |
0.686 |
New York Knicks |
1/47-23 |
0.671 |
|
|
1951-52 |
Minneapolis Lakers |
2/40-26 |
0.606 |
New York Knicks |
3/37-29 |
0.561 |
|
|
1950-51 |
Rochester Royals |
2/41-27 |
0.603 |
New York Knicks |
3/36-30 |
0.545 |
|
|
1949-50 |
Minneapolis Lakers |
T1/51-17 |
0.750 |
Syracuse Nationals |
1/51-13 |
0.797 |
|
|
1948-49 |
Minneapolis Lakers |
2/44-16 |
0.733 |
Washington Capitols |
1/38-22 |
0.633 |
|
|
1947-48 |
Baltimore Bullets |
2/28-20 |
0.583 |
Philadelphia Warriors |
1/27-21 |
0.563 |
|
|
1946-47 |
Philadelphia Warriors |
2/35-25 |
0.583 |
Chicago Stags |
1/39-22 |
0.639 |
Now lets get to why I started searching for this information. My question for myself was, if the Spurs made it into the playoffs as a 7th or 8th seed do they honestly have a chance of making the Finals?
My Conclusion is YES!. The Spurs would statistically still have a chance to win the Championship if they make the playoffs.
The bigger worry is making the playoffs. The 4 teams currently behind us in the standings all have easier schedules and are playing more consistently. Because of that it would be hard for me to say that the glass is half full, but as an Optimist I can say that "There is still water in the glass!"
Go Spurs Go!
9 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
yes we still have a shot, If we get a good first round matchup and a few dominoes fall in our favor.
Pop needs to keep giving Malik and Ian playing time, these two can be our wild cards.
"He was just a young skinny guy who looked like a winner. We didn’t know he was going to be as good as he is."
—Popovich on Manu Ginobili
i'd like to see the Spurs
play the Lakers 1st round.
Hmm, I’m just guessing “inquisitiveman” isn’t the biggest Spurs fan around.
The Lakers "Too big, too strong, too long, too good."

by 






























