A Rosy Outlook on the State of the Spurs
The San Antonio Spurs have won three of the last five games. Two of those wins came against teams with winning records--a demographic that has given the silver and black more than a few problems this season. The other win was a nail-biter to open the annual Rodeo Road Trip--a stretch of time that has historically been kind to the Spurs. Tim Duncan and crew, once the NBA model of a tough defensive squad, have also been limiting opponent scoring: less than 100 in the last five.
If you’re a die hard Spurs fan who cries when San Antonio loses playoff series to the Mavs or the Lakers, these past few games offer a lot to be ecstatic about. Read on to find more.
Blair and Hill have been playing well.
That’s about it. Aside from that, there’s pretty much nothing else but shitty suckitude from the four time World Champs. Pinch your noses. This is gonna stink. Just kidding. There are actually more things to be grateful for.
RAGE
Lately, Richard Jefferson has been playing like the $14 million investment that he is.
Not! Gotcha again, sucka!
RJ sucks. Let’s just get that out of the way (not that I won’t ever mention it again). He wasn’t bad in New Jersey, and he was rather good in Milwaukee (or so I heard: no one really watched Bucks games last season). But he just plain sucks in silver and black. I dunno. Maybe it’s not his colors. Perhaps it reminds him too much of that tux he had rented before calling off his wedding. Some people say it’s Pop’s fault for not using RJ wisely. Others claim the returning veteran Spurs should be the ones to make RJ’s transition smooth(er). Still, many say it’s just a lack of chemistry among people who need time to learn how to play with one another. I say, fuck it. He sucks. RJ as a Spur just isn’t working out so far.
In the last five games, he barely averaged double digits in points, and shot just a shade over 40%. And if you add up his +/- scores (I don’t think you’re supposed to do that, but I wanted to), he lost us a total of 20 points over the last five games.
RJ: Shitty BBIQ
The Big Three
It’s a good thing the rock of consistency that is the Big Three has been picking up the slack for the Big Questionable Fourth, and scoring big time when we need to.
Not! Gotcha once more! This will not get old for me.
In the last five games, Tony, Tim and Manu have been giving us 38.8 points per game--combined. To be fair, Parker played in only two of those games. But like the Front Office who faults Manu for being injured and refuses to extend his contract immediately because of it, I hold Frenchy’s injury against him. Besides, even with Mr. Longoria missing three games, our triumvirate core has been coughing up nearly four turnovers per game. And we know Tony would only have added to that.
The Big Three has been reduced to little more than a Big Pile of Shit.
Shooting Stars
Our shooters have been getting their groove back. NOT-- Ah, this is getting tiresome. This year, they’ve either been missing in action or missing from three. They’re just not that reliable.
In the Portland game, for example, our designated shooters--Bogans, Finley, Bonner and Mason--combined for zero makes. Zip. Zilch. None. Nada. Mace, a notorious bomber the past season, didn’t even play. More on that later.
Our shooters have been shooting like shit.
The Game Plan and the Game Master
Talking about shooters, it pains me to realize that our inside-out game of Timmy in the post, doubled, then kicking out to shooters, just doesn’t seem to be as effective anymore. Perhaps it’s because Tim isn’t doubled as much anymore (for whatever reason). Maybe because our shooters don’t command the respect of opponents anymore. I don’t know. But it hasn’t been that effective. Our single play that seems to be somewhat effective is the pick and roll: the MTB, MTT, TTB, TTT (I’ll let you figure them out; you’ll get it).
Which leads me to the coaching. More than a few fans--including one that rhymes with "Most Frown"--have been calling Pop out for questionable-to-terrible coaching this season. While I’m not one to question a CIA agent’s schemes, I have to present one scenario: The Portland game again. If you look at the boxscore, Parker played rather well. He shot 50% en route to 18 points, with 6 assists, only one turnover, 2-2 from the line, and a +/- of positive 12. But during one stretch late in the fourth when Portland was roaring back, Tony couldn’t do a thing to stop the bleeding. Of course, one couldn’t do much when you’re glued to the bench. Pop, why? Oh, and when we needed a three desperately, Mason wasn’t in. Again, Pop, why?
Our staple offense isn't too appetizing anymore.
DYA (Defense, Youth and Athleticism)
A lot of fans have realized that we need to come up with something different this year. Our personnel is different. There’s no spry Duncan to anchor the defense. There’s no Bowen to hold the opposing star in check. Instead of having defense as a given like before, (some say) it is our offense that is constant, and that it is because of poor defense that we lose games. Maybe we’re just too slow to close out on the shots we used to block or alter. Maybe we’re too old to be banging with other younger bodies. I don’t know. Take Youngevity. Look for the Fountain of Youth. Do what it takes. We just need to be able to keep up with the opposing offense.
What we got instead
On offense, we have terrific athletes, so we have to use that to our advantage. Maybe we should run more. At times we prove to be too small. Maybe we should give Mahinmi some burn. Too old? Let’s try Hairston. Too soft? Put Theo in. We got to do something. Anything.
The Spurs have to think outside this box they are in.
What to do
I haven’t really offered too much insight into how I think the Spurs could improve, or if they can still improve. I’m not sure if we need another trade (read: not Amare), or if we need a coaching change. I can’t tell if changing starters would help, or if another assistant coach would. But I know one thing for sure. The San Antonio Spurs have been playing like shit. And it’s not funny. I’m not sure what May or June holds for the Spurs. But as I watch games--as we Spurs fans watch games, we should be reminded of one thing:
The next game could be a shitty game. And/or the one after that.
I'm almost done. Recognizing that many PtR'ers are avid readers, I here recommend a book that's essential reading for a Spurs fan nowadays. I predict this will be a quotable.
What Spurs fans must be thinking while watching games
And finally, I give you something to really be optimistic about:
There might just be a pot of gold at the end of this shit.
38 comments
|
7 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I would normally rec it but it is to shitty…
"If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert"
- DBG
I’m not sure if we are allowed to put all this shit in the front page, but what the hell. You’re the shitmeister.
Bone breaking? -340
Dunkin' Cheerleaders
Hilarious…
But we need to go easy on RJ because he didn’t go to the Air Force Academy and he makes a living shooting jumpers and dunking so you don’t need much sense to do that.
I really don’t think it is his fault, he shouldn’t be expected to play 2 positions when he hasn’t figured out the first one yet.
Right now RJ doesn’t look like he is having any fun out there.
This team used to be a fun team to play for.
This was funny. Unfortunately the play of our beloved Spurs is not. I don’t know what it is. This team has talent, but it’s not playing like it consistently. In fact, they’ve been consistent only in their inconsistency. I sure hope there’s something out there to give this team a boost, ‘cause it’s getting stanky!
Nice humorous writeup but..
Reading your headline and the first couple sentences I thought, “I sure am looking at things negatively after these last few losses. How can this guy possibly find anything positive here?”, eager to read on and hopefully discover some positive signs I might have missed.
Hill and Blair rock. Already knew that. But they’re not our core.
I didn’t find anything else positive! So I guess your title is sarcastic. Or I’m just reading everything with a big dose of negativity now.
And while I also thought it was crazy to not put Parker back in in the 4th (and to go to Ginobili for the tying shot with the way he’s been shooting lately), I think firing Pop at this point would absolutely wreck the team for the rest of TD’s era. Duncan is way too ingrained in Pop’s coaching and would never fully adjust to such a drastic change, especially as he’s getting older. Also Pop’s just been too good for the Spurs for too long to get fired after about 1 and maybe 1/2 bad seasons. Not going to happen.
What we do need to do is start contesting shots like we used to. We’re well over half way through the season and I’ve seen glimmers of hope in this regard at times. (Even Parker has shown bits of decent D, and dare I say even Bonner once or twice.) It’s just totally inconsistent. So if this continues to improve, and if Pop starts making some more sane substitution decisions, we have a chance to be significantly better come the playoffs.
And maybe this weekend we can trade RJSucks to some guy on the streets in LA this for a “How to play basketball defense DVD”.
Or a Kazaam DVD. Great post, romes. At least we can always have a laugh here at PtR… because winning is not the only thing in life that matters…
.
.
.
.
NOT!
by silverandblack_davis on Feb 5, 2010 4:48 PM CST up reply actions
lol, you left out mr. hanky
oh, and parker was trying to get in, but there were no dead balls for three and a half minutes, so just bad luck
i got to say i agree to all ur points, great thread. but i think it’s really pop’s head that’s our prob. like why sit timmy in the fourth where we could have won it,i forgot the game, so as yesterday why sit tp and mason?stupid right?then in that grizzlies game where we were trailing then by around 6mins we had great d,thanks to mr george hill,why did he put timmy just 2 mins or 3 going to 2 mins under trailing by 2 or 3 where he could have put timmy 5 mins before when we we’re surging back?to many questionable things, i dnt know if his doing this to show his players how they suck,or to test the players if one superstar is out(literally he bench them in 4th q’s?(f that shit),is he thinking other plans for this team, or pop wants to be fired,like what he said,if he can’t win a ring better fire him.man i really hate san antonio now, right now for 5 days i haven’t watch one of their games, nor any bball nba games, it just hurts, its like okc is my 2nd fave team its fine when they lost bcuz their the future so as my 3rd chicago its fine their young,their more of a future,and as for san antonio,they’re the present and its not fine to loose,we would suck after post duncan era if this still continues in years to come!
0-82!
that would be unbeatable!cuz even if mj comes back to help nj for example,even them can’t beat 0 and 82!
what im saying is we are consistent in sucking, and im not saying to fire pop now, but i think pop said that that if he was not going to win he wants to be fired,i dnt know if it was his humor, but i think we just need to be in the playoffs,and win,dnt care bout the seeding.but why not show ur fans that u can do it…consistently…the winning ways,so that we may feel safe in april and may…
on the verge of winning 48-34 wow…
http://www.nba.com/2010/news/features/02/05/racetothemvp.week14/index.html?ls=iref:nbahpt1
that is just projected we could win less than that or hopefully 50 is even hard to get…unless a 10 or 20 game winning streak…which is hard to get…
:(
We all kind of thought that coming into this season the main focus would need to be managing our main three’s minutes even if it meant losing some close games. I think this has cost us several games already, and it has taken our team longer to gel since no constant line-up has been established. Manu has said that 5-6 of the games could have easily been won which would put us at 34-14.
Pop should have gotten RJ going earlier in the season. Maybe called a few plays for him for a couple of games. Instead of treating him like hes Udoka.
...Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is forty five.
Pops got to go back to Spurs identity - Stiffling Defense
Pops is to blame for the Spurs woes because he has gone 180 degrees from the Spurs identity of two bigs and stiffling defense. Even in his last comment, he stated and I quote:
“The combination of poor shooting and the turnovers down the stretch gave us the loss.”
That was not the reason for the loss. It was POOR defense. The Blazers scorched the Spurs with over 50% (or 51.3% to be exact) while the Spurs shot a not bad 44%. If the Spurs played a modicum of defense, they could have put the game away earlier and would not need to make those needed shots in the 4th quarter. In fact, the Blazers scored 80% of their shots to rally from being down 7 (70-77) to be up by 1 (88-87) in less than 6 minutes in crunch time of the 4th quarter. Where was the Defense then?
Again, I repeat, it was NOT the missed shots but the POOR defence that did the Spurs in. And yet, Pops says it was the missed shots?!?! Why? In the olden days, Pops would be lambasting the POOR defence. Now, he says it is the missed shots.
That is what has changed!!! Pops has gone from pushing the Spurs to play D and instead has been pushing them to play O. Why o why has Pop gone over to the dark side?
Forget defense. It’s not gonna happen with this team anyway. We can either outshoot the opponent or lose. That’s why 44% was not enough. We just needed two more baskets to win.
Ok if this is the “new Spurs” philosophy, then we’re just going to continue losing to every good team, and drop out in the first round.
Every good team can shoot well. It’s the D that makes the difference on that level.
Remember Phoenix’s crazy regular season win records a couple years ago? They shot well. But they always got owned in the playoffs because they’d meet teams like us that played good D.
We don’t want to be the Suns. We want to win Championships.
my comment was more of a “tongue in a cheek” variety, don’t take it too seriously, but there is unfortunately some truth in it. I guess, we can already establish that we are not winning a trophy this year with this team. our options seem to be: 1) have fun, win 50+ games and lose in the 1-2 round; 2) desperately try to play defense with the team which cannot do it, win 46-48 games and go into the lottery; 3) hope for a magic trade that puts everything in place and gives us a championship team. regardless of our desire to win the Championship, you may admit that it is a VERY long shot this year.
Hey, a countryman. Welcome to PtR, dude.
by silverandblack_davis on Feb 7, 2010 12:00 PM CST up reply actions
Our bigtime 16 million dollar aquisition was 3 of 8 for 8 points last night.
The man is a BALLER !
...Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is forty five.
I think the FO has decided their chances of resigning Mace at the end of this season is probably slim. Also being a contract year for Mase, he wants more playing time, coz he tweeted something to that effect at some point. I think FO is trying to move him, which could explain his lack of playing time in the last coupla games.
I think Mase really brought it in the first half of the season. He was playing the backup pg decently and draining good looking shots and also making really good passes. In a playoff pic with a tightened rotation, maybe we could afford to lose him? I don’t know.
I really like Masons game, unfortunately all he is bringing to the team these days is streaky shooting. He is average at best at everything else. If he can be packaged with Bonner and Finley for a decent return I don’t see any reason why the spurs shouldn’t go for it. If the front office wants to try to salvage this season and the way the roster is put together “as is”
Just as long as we aren’t bringing in any other streaky one dimensional players. Got enough of those as it is.
by finn ball on Feb 6, 2010 9:17 AM CST reply actions 1 recs

by 








































