Quick Poll: Small Forward
by Tim C. on Feb 26, 2010 10:37 PM CST
Email
PrintPop's had 3 different starters at small forward in the last 5 games, and tonight a fourth player who fits the position impressed. So, here's a poll all about it.
162 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i voted jefferson – he is the most skilled out of the options. but i think hairston should be his backup, and if mini-ears doesn’t have it going, let hairston play.
neither finley nor bogans should start. finley should be used purely as a shooter off the bench in limited minutes (if he can get any form back on his shot). bogans? behind manu and romaju off the bench in the backcourt rotation. use him as a defensive pest – send him out there in short bursts to get under the skin of the opposition pg/sg/sf, play a little dirty.
but what do i know…
free malik hairston!
by sleep research facility on Feb 26, 2010 11:01 PM CST reply actions
Malik just saw his first real game action in a while. i dont think that earns him a starting job quite yet. Jefferson has not contributed much, but he is more consistent than any of the others
by Ohio Spurs Fan on Feb 26, 2010 11:03 PM CST reply actions
Wow. 8 points and 5 rebounds for Malik in only 18 minutes ( on 4 of 6 shooting )….
( Too bad we may not see him in another game this season )
...Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is forty five.
Who voted for Bogans?
"He was just a young skinny guy who looked like a winner. We didn’t know he was going to be as good as he is."
—Popovich on Manu Ginobli
+ 1
"Mr. Gilmore deserves to be in the Basketball Hall of Fame damnit. Highest field goal percentage EVER"
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gilmoar01.html
by Joe deLarios on Feb 27, 2010 9:00 PM CST up reply actions
I’m starting to lose trust in Pop. Ian looks like he could provide some very useful regular minutes.
"I will five all over this blog." - JRW
careful there, the artist Wayne Vore formerly known as ATS kidnapped GT and locked him in his basement. GT is being forced to watch reruns of Nellie ball games for the rest of his life.
GTFOML!
by the little o on Feb 27, 2010 1:24 AM CST up reply actions
Yes Manuwar, your comment does not fit the tone of this site. You would not want to ruin the tone of the site would you? Now, I respect your opinion, but please never share it ever again or you will be banned.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
Yep. Manuwar’s certainly on his way to getting banned.
Now all it’ll take is a few hundred more comments with the exact same topic across dozens of posts, and ignoring multiple warnings to lighten up before he’ll be outta here so fast it’ll make his head spin.
Rest the Croissant!
We have stop him before it gets to that point. That’s the beauty of it. Now that we learned our lesson we can ban people as soon as a certain behavior emerges, therefore keeping the tone of site awesome.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
Right now. I don’t care if you’re joking or not. GT had to go. End of story. He was a pill and he refused to be cool. He was dragging everyone into countless arguments and the site was a bummer because of him.
That is all.
Rest the Croissant!
I don’t know man, your “End of story” kinda brings down the tone of the site for me.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
He was a pill and he refused to be cool.
I’ve been trying to understand this but can’t somehow, please help me.
GTFOML!
by the little o on Feb 27, 2010 4:13 AM CST up reply actions
(I’m replying to your post, little o, but this is generally intended—it’s not directed at you specifically.)
At this point, there is nothing to “understand” about banning GT if you don’t already. You do understand, I think—you (and bella, and Hipuks, and whoever else) also just happen to disagree. Which is cool. You have every right to disagree. It’s a tough situation and there’s no way everyone is going to feel the same about it.
Those who were in favor of and responsible for banning GT have repeatedly explained their rationale (not that they needed to—they did it because they genuinely love this community and feel responsible to it). Are you asking them to explain yet again? Or do you just like to keep registering the fact that you disagree with them? Because if it’s the latter, I promise you—we get it already. You disagree.
Now, you can keep bringing up the fact that you disagree, but it’s not going to change anything about the situation, so I’m not sure what the point is unless it’s just that you like stirring the pot. If GT’s banning bothers you so much that you’re not happy at PtR anymore, you’ll have to find some way to resolve that issue for yourself. No one else can do that for you.
I have flying monkeys at my disposal, and I'm not afraid to use them.
you are right in some points, as in, I completely understand why GT was banned, and that I don’t agree with it.
However, I wasn’t trying to stir the pot by asking what the phrase
He was a pill and he refused to be cool.
meant. I just never heard that figure of speech of calling someone a pill before and wanted jrw to explain it, or whoever understood him.
As far as my original reply to Manuwar, it’s primary purpose was just to be funny, not to stir the pot sort of speak.
GTFOML!
by the little o on Feb 27, 2010 3:37 PM CST up reply actions
A pill, according to Merriam Webster’s (the fourth definition) is a disagreeable or tiresome person.
Cool should be self-explanatory.
Email me if you’d like anything more specific.
Rest the Croissant!
My bad. Being a pill is kind of like being a jerk or whatnot.
I have flying monkeys at my disposal, and I'm not afraid to use them.
I let you go first. I knew your fragile ego demanded that sort of coddling.
I have flying monkeys at my disposal, and I'm not afraid to use them.
by Lauri on Feb 27, 2010 3:45 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
As enjoyable as it was to read, I reject that explanation.
I simply expected a bit more to your pill explanation, since you said that you would destroy all comers in any grammar contest.
Rest the Croissant!
thanks, I knew it wasn’t the correct phrasing but wasn’t sure what the proper one was. I was sure someone would pick it up and correct me though.
GTFOML!
by the little o on Feb 27, 2010 9:36 PM CST up reply actions
You’re right, I don’t necessarily agree that Ghost Town should have been banned. I think there were other ways of dealing with the situation. This is the first time I can remember a true Spurs fan being banned from this site. When something of that magnitude occurs, I do believe a post would probably have helped us all understand the situation.
And in light of GT’s self-serving, delusional, victimization post, I don’t think it’s out of line to bring up the subject matter. (From what I can remember of the post, he made some valid points towards the end of his rant). Additionally, questions are still arising from a variety of posters.
Also, I’m sorry if you feel that we’re beating a dead horse. Or acting like errant children because we feel the need to joke about a sensitive subject matter. (Gallows humor used to be an acceptable practice on this site… maybe that has changed?)
Although the members of the inner circle may have discussed this issue ad nauseum, that doesn’t mean it translates to the actual blog. (I wish I had time to read every single post. But the fact of the matter is, like most members, I don’t).
Ultimately, this was Wayne’s decision and he made the call. That’s his right and I support him fully. I may not agree with his decision, but he has and will always have my full support and my appreciation for taking on a thankless job.
In the end, you’re right this is a community. A community of people with a passion for one thing… Spurs basketball.
So here’s to drinking champagne in June on a hot summer’s day while the Sickness floats by in a colorful barge cradling gold hardware in his arms.
Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney
really? what the hell did that guy do? He was kind of repetitive about firing Pop and yadda yadda but was that it? Sorry, missed the boat and as usual out of da’ loop. I guess things must have gotten pretty ugly, huh?
"Mr. Gilmore deserves to be in the Basketball Hall of Fame damnit. Highest field goal percentage EVER"
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gilmoar01.html
by Joe deLarios on Feb 27, 2010 9:05 PM CST up reply actions
Yes, things got ugly.
He was rude. He was insulting. He repeated the same arguments ad infinitum and succeeded in dragging at least half of the active threads into arguments about his pet gripes.
He ignored multiple attempts to reason with him. We stated what we were asking of him, and he persisted in dragging every post into the same discussion. The more casual the PtR member is, the less they might have noticed. But if you read every comment like some of us do, then it was overwhelmingly evident that he was not interested in meeting us even halfway.
When that kind of disrespect is repeatedly shown to the members of PtR, as well as those who run the site, then it should not be allowed to continue.
Feel free to email me if you still have questions about any of this.
Rest the Croissant!
Or he can mail me and get a completely different version of things.
But no, nevermind, if he does then I would have to spend time actually writing an e-mail, and then sending it, and then closing the window, etc. Forget it.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
Your tone stinks. Your avatar is obviously ironic. I can tell from the name you’ve chosen that you’re silently mocking me.
You’re BANNED.
Rest the Croissant!
As long as I don’t have to respond to the e-mail about my ban.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
I’ll come visit you in Bannedville. Save me a room, I think I’ll be joining you shortly.
Oh and please, oh please, make it in the opposite wing from that deranged GT.
Any requests for our stay? Machenga? A nice Cabernet? strawberry oops, wait… I’ve said too much.
Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney
Bailey’s would be nice. What’s so wrong about strawberries? Strawberries and whipped cream is an innocent and delicious dish. Bring two cans of whipped cream, just in case.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
I thought Wayne said he banned him for two weeks. After that I thought the whole banned GT was a running joke.
"I will five all over this blog." - JRW
See half the time people are sarcastic and things get lost for me. I’m dumb like that.
"I will five all over this blog." - JRW
Don’t be afraid to ask, usually people will explain things.
Unless explaining things brings down the tone of the site like it just did above, in which case it’s best not to explain things.
But yeah, for the most part people will explain.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
Ha Ha!
"Mr. Gilmore deserves to be in the Basketball Hall of Fame damnit. Highest field goal percentage EVER"
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gilmoar01.html
by Joe deLarios on Feb 27, 2010 9:03 PM CST up reply actions
Well, Wayne didn’t ban him, I did. My first ever, too.
And I did explain my reasons in several comments, and mails, and whatnot. So don’t put this one on Wayne, Bella. I apologize if you’re disappointed, but he was a repetitive… pill, jolly said.
And Hipuks, you keep making virulent comments and hinting at how we haven’t explained our reasoning. I exchanged many e-mails with you, and you told me you understood my reasons, even though you didn’t share them. Was that a lie?
I wonder if we’re going to have these comments after every loss.
Bone breaking? -340
Dunkin' Cheerleaders
Wow, really? this is sounding like some bad mojo man……….
"Mr. Gilmore deserves to be in the Basketball Hall of Fame damnit. Highest field goal percentage EVER"
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gilmoar01.html
by Joe deLarios on Feb 27, 2010 9:06 PM CST up reply actions
Really. Why bad mojo?
If you really think unbanning GT is going to get wins for the Spurs, then I’m doing it right now. I knew RJ being a lousy player had nothing to do with it…
Bone breaking? -340
Dunkin' Cheerleaders
Hey, I don’t even know the guy…………..I wish I had never heard of the other one either…………..
"Mr. Gilmore deserves to be in the Basketball Hall of Fame damnit. Highest field goal percentage EVER"
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gilmoar01.html
by Joe deLarios on Feb 28, 2010 9:23 AM CST up reply actions
I knew he got banned, I just thought it was a two week thing. Wayne said he did that before?
Anyway I wasn’t blaming anyone but myself for not picking up on when people are being serious versus sarcastic. But since you’re here now, I’ll blame you :)
Also I miss you. Yeah I said it.
"I will five all over this blog." - JRW
My virulent comments are aimed at making fun of people on the ban-wagon. It’s called humor. It’s what I do around here. If you click on the “reply” button your comment will appear under the original comment. The sky is blue.
Also this whole thing started as a joke but man…You guys did a really shitty job at explaining if that many people didn’t even know GhosTown had been banned.
But wait, this whole thing…I don’t like it. We need to bring the tone back up, this smiley should increase the site toneness by 134%:
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
I know it’s humor, and I love you for it, but they also make fun of a reality that simply doesn’t exist. This isn’t a site that doesn’t tolerate dissent, this isn’t a site that bans everyone that disagrees.
Why the heck do we need to explain that we banned GT? He was here for 1 month, at most (even that?), he got into fights with people, he posted the same comment 100 times, and he annoyed the hell out of many people. Was he so important that we needed to address banning him publicly? We explained it over and over again in the comments section. If people care, they probably know.
Bone breaking? -340
Dunkin' Cheerleaders
Love the avatar. Sorry if I’m being too Big Brotherish.
:)
(Smilies work better when I use them.)
Bone breaking? -340
Dunkin' Cheerleaders
With the avatar people will know I’m joking without me posting a smiley face after every comment, it’s a time saving device. It saves the time of people who post really long replies.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
But I agree in principal.
Sorry jrw, I need to know if this is intentional or not. Irregardless of my ignorance, I still need to know.
:)
by silverandblack_davis on Feb 28, 2010 8:13 AM CST up reply actions
I hate it when I break my own rule about always using italics when ironically misspelling words.
Rest the Croissant!
I’m sorry, but I’m gonna have to call bullshit.
All in agreement say Aye. The Aye’s carry.
Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney
There’s no need for you to call BS, when I post multiple contradictory reasons as excuses for my mistake.
The whole fun of the “italics” comment and the “shift the odds” comment was that in one I argued that I hadn’t misspelled but instead had simply forgot to italicize. And in the other (posted immediately afterward) I stated that I’d meant to post it with a misspelling in order get better odds for making money betting on the grammar competition.
But it can’t be both. The whole point of the exercise was to offer mutually exclusive reasons for the mistake. Yes, I made a mistake. I used the wrong homophone.
But at least enjoy my response to the mistake as a whole. That’s the principal point I’m trying to make.
Rest the Croissant!
See… that’s why I laid my money on the Q. It was close, though. I was originally gonna go with Lauri. But I’ve met Q, so I just couldn’t.
Sorry, JRW.
(Insert fucking smiley face here).
Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney
All part of the plan to shift the odds so that I can make a killing by betting on myself.
Rest the Croissant!
My eyes! My eyes! You gotta warn a person, you freak.
Good God, please bring back the cranky mouse thingey.
Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney
I thought you were a valley girl or metrosexual?
When did the Alpha Male thing happen?
Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney
It happened when I was born. I was born a leader, and people followed me. Girls throw themselves at me and I don’t have to try, but I have the Alpha Maleness that others just want to be part of. Twitter? I was the first user. Starbucks? I once mentioned it was good coffee, look at them now. Apple? Once I said, hey this company is sort of cool. Lehman Brothers? I said laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaame before their stock tanked and took almost the whole economy down.
Now you might be tempted to throw yourself at me and follow me, starry-eyed, everywhere I go. but you have to ask yourself, am I ready to go out with an Alpha Male?
Only you can answer that. Or me, I can answer it because I’m an Alpha Male, but that’s not the point.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
In the end it’s still Wayne’s blog, even if he empowered you to make the decision.
Sometimes all of us can be repetitive pills. I thought he was beginning to play nicely with some of us. So you’re right, I don’t understand why he was finally banned.
I guess we’ll just have to agree to disagree.
Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney
Play nicely? Yeah, we’ll have to agree to disagree, all right.
Bone breaking? -340
Dunkin' Cheerleaders
The site’s been a bummer because we’re losing games we shouldn’t be losing.
You can’t lay it all on GT’s doorstep.
Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney
I don’t think jrw meant everything and anything that’s a bummer in PtRland was GT’s fault. I think he meant that GT contributed nothing but negativity to the site.
Is that what you meant, jrw?
I have flying monkeys at my disposal, and I'm not afraid to use them.
The site’s been a bummer? Well, I guess so. I think we’re doing fine, considering very few of us keep any sort of hope for the future.
Bone breaking? -340
Dunkin' Cheerleaders
He was dragging everyone into countless arguments and the site was a bummer because of him.
I was using JRW’s words.
And I think the vast majority of PtR’ers have hope. I know I won’t personally begin to think of freaking out until April 15th.
Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney
Hope. Agreed on that bella.
just having fun...
by day_late_friend on Feb 27, 2010 8:23 PM CST up reply actions
Yes, kinda. I’d like him to get 10-12 minutes.
Last year Pop was late on recognizing George Hills talents (or maybe just too stuborn to play a rook) and I think he might be late again on Ian.
Next year Ian’s gonna be a starter and Pops "favorite"player, lol. Thats Pops way of saying sorry :)
"I will five all over this blog." - JRW
The Georgie example you cite I think might apply to Hairston’s case a bit in this instance. But Yawn is beyond saving as far as the Spurs are concerned, am pretty sure. Yawn barely made an impression on me yesterday while Hairston’s play managed to break through my haze of moodiness about our team.
Hairdog was keeping up with Martin in bothering his shot and drives(not sure if Martin’s fatigue was a factor there?). Yawn, to be honest, looked stupid. The guy shows no bball craftiness or acumen for any one facet of the game.
Blair, on the other hand, got owned by Scola simply through veteran or european craftiness in selling imaginary wrongs. Otherwise I think Blair did quite well. Another is, I see Hill very hesitant to pass to Blair if he is not deep in the block. Same with Mason. I would be hesitant too. But the kid has shown he can surprise. He threw in a surprising controlled good looking hook shot yesterday over Scola or somebody. Best thing is, one can see Blair is learning on the fly and not letting Scola’s antics get to me. That is super amazing composure for a rookie.
I just have a hard time believing another wing in the rotation is what we need. I do like Hairdog though.
Also the same way Blair is learning on the fly I think Ian could benifit from the same. If we were making strides this season, peaking at the right time and all that, then I’d see cause for keeping Ian benched/innactive. At this point though it’s a low risk high reward.
"I will five all over this blog." - JRW
Thing is, Yawn has been part of the ‘system’ for what – four years now? I don’t see him comfy in the offense out there or D, or bringing something more for that matter.
Anything more? What about his size and athleticism? And in his years he’s never seen regular action. Once guys get comfortable they make leaps and bounds. I think he’s looked fine on offense, especially in the pick and roll.
I’m not saying he should start or even be the first big off the bench. There are 96 minutes available at the 4 and 5 spots combined. What I’d like to see is, give or take a few minutes:
Duncan- 33 mpg
McDyess- 25 mpg
Blair- 25 mpg
Mahinmi- 10 mpg
And that leaves Pop around 3 minutes per game of small ball since I know he can’t quit cold turkey :)
"I will five all over this blog." - JRW
You just like his Frenchness. He was abused by Scola, and had very quick, silly fouls.
I doubt he will be here next season, unless Tiago screws us over.
Bone breaking? -340
Dunkin' Cheerleaders
He was abused by Scola
Most bigs don’t have Scola’s slick moves, actually none that I can even think of since Hakeem. I’m not saying Scola is on The Dreams level, just with the up fakes and slipping under, you don’t see that much. Especially not among the west contenders’ bigs.
And Ian playing 10-12 minutes a game would mean less small ball which is what needs to happen.
Pop uses the same defensive system that he employed when always starting another 7 footer along side Timmy. If Pop doesn’t think the bigs we have available are capable enough to be effective for our defensive scheme then fine. But don’t run the same scheme that is relient upon having two shot blockers in the middle.
Either play more bigs so that the scheme can be fully effective or if you must play small ball (for whatever reasons) change your defense.
Lastly, I didn’t want to admit this but since you blew my cover, yes I like Ian’s Frenchness :/
"I will five all over this blog." - JRW
Next year, Ian’s not going to be under contract.
Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek
I know he’s a FA, I was just yoking about Pop’s going from not playing a guy to the player being his favorite.
I hope we do resign Ian though for a few reasons. I think he’ll be cheap and if the system is so tough to learn then he should be primed for a break through.
"I will five all over this blog." - JRW
Yeah, he’s part of the post I’m writing about centers who are attainable in the offseason.
Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek
JRW, I’d love to stick up for you right about now but I’m STILL waiting on the movie post.
"I will five all over this blog." - JRW
jrw’s reaction to this:
Spurs Basketball. Improving [other] NBA teams since 2010! - swgeek
by Tim C. on Feb 27, 2010 8:33 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
I agree. Pop should at least play The Big Yawn until he fouls out, which should happen in about 15-20 minutes.
by Manu ex Machina on Feb 27, 2010 11:53 AM CST up reply actions
Yeah, I was giving him the benefit of the doubt. I think last night he got 3 in his first 3 minutes, but went the rest of his 10 w/o a foul. Maybe fouling is his way of warming up.
by Manu ex Machina on Feb 27, 2010 12:04 PM CST up reply actions
Eh, I’m still not convinced. When he entered in the 1st, within a span of a minute he had the most egregious travel I’ve ever seen, gave up a silly foul, and then got bullied by Scola on a rebound that resulted in a put back.
Let’s hope we see more of Hariston and less of Finley for sure though.
I have been saying this all season START MANU, deactivate Bogans and put Ian and Malik in the Rotation
TD
Dice
RJ
Manu
Parker
2nd unit
Ian
Blair
Hairston
Mase
Hill
"He was just a young skinny guy who looked like a winner. We didn’t know he was going to be as good as he is."
—Popovich on Manu Ginobli
RJ needs to play off the bench, he seems to do better that way when he’s the primary option off the bench.
Manu also needs to play off the bench, it’s his preference to do so.
And no Finley? At least put him on there so we have some kind of bench.
Hill MUST start
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
Manu needs to start, we can’t keep getting in these early deficits and slow starts. You cant run the offense through Duncan no more, he is no longer dominant. You need to Manu to run the offense. We are now only winning games that Manu goes supernova, and they are close.
Hill can run the second unit, and he will have more freedom on offense.
"He was just a young skinny guy who looked like a winner. We didn’t know he was going to be as good as he is."
—Popovich on Manu Ginobli
I think we’re getting into early deficits because TP’s not playing/playing hurt. We used to dominate the first half only to run out of gas towards the end. I somewhat agree with not running the offense through Duncan. He no longer draws the double team as much as before and is settling for jumpers instead of posting up. But I don’t know if he’s still reserving those banging for the playoffs.The team can still use some plays centering on him though ’cause his still a very good passer.
just having fun...
by day_late_friend on Feb 27, 2010 8:22 PM CST up reply actions
Manu said no more starts for him.
AKA: Linix129, sw12
by Sean Wunderlich on Feb 27, 2010 2:43 PM CST up reply actions
Hey…is there any posting guidelines and rules for this website? I’m a big spurs fan. I see lot of things posted that confuse me, including lack of clear leadrership. I just dont know what is ok and what is not. Please help me.
Here are the guidelines.
Wanna talk smack? Go for it. If you go too far, a couple of people will reply to your comment with suggestions. Ignore those and you’ll probably get an official warning that’ll pop up the next time you sign in to the site. Ignore that and you’ll probably receive an email explaining our views of how you’ve been posting. Ignore that for a while and we’ll put you in time out for a couple of weeks. Come back from that with the same weak sauce and then you’ll get banned.
It’s not easy to get there unless you’re just determined to be a jake about the whole thing.
Bottom line is, if you’re asking, you’re probably not a candidate for being banned. Cool?
Rest the Croissant!
I see lot of things posted that confuse me, including lack of clear leadrership.
Wayne just got burned.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
Our starting lineup killed us
I think Pop would be wise at this point to start playing Ian and Hariston regularly each about 15-18 minutes a game. They both bring the 2 things to the team that we sorely need. Speed and energy. Sure they are going to make mistakes but the only way they can learn is by doing at this point. It would be much better than watching Bonner and Finley sleep walk around out there.
And I don’t care for Jason Kidd much either.
I agree with everything that you have said except the Jason Kidd thing. I thought he showed his ultra competitiveness in shoving Woodson while he was on the court, sure, it’s not sexy, but it’s about winning games and gaining every extra point you can. What I hate is that the Mavs fans probably love what he did but still consider flopping a low blow when our resident saint (Manu) does it. I kinda wish that Kidd didn’t do it so that they would still think that flopping is a heinous crime.
I really really do not live that Mavs.
::links himself over to marksmoneyball::
GTFOML!
by the little o on Feb 27, 2010 4:11 AM CST up reply actions
like* not live
jeez, this steel reserve is sexy…
GTFOML!
by the little o on Feb 27, 2010 4:15 AM CST up reply actions
Man, everyone around here really hats the Mavs. I don't get it.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
Okay, let's not make this personal, let's analyze your statement...
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
Dirk Nowitzki is a choker and a German, which means he has some weird fetish. I wouldn’t be surprised if it involved choking, now what I think about it.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
Mark Cuban is being investigated by the Feds and Jason Terry is a fucking moron.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
All the Mavs fans are effing retards who type in the title box. What’s up with that anyway?
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
I don't appreciate the word "retarded" being used as an insult.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
I'm done with you, I only deal with people that at least have some class.
To serve man.
Gustatus similis pullus.
FUCKING HI-LARIOS
"Mr. Gilmore deserves to be in the Basketball Hall of Fame damnit. Highest field goal percentage EVER"
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gilmoar01.html
by Joe deLarios on Feb 27, 2010 9:10 PM CST up reply actions
I thought it was pretty awesome that he used the rules to his advantage, but then again, without that point, the Mavs would have lost.
by Manu ex Machina on Feb 27, 2010 11:59 AM CST up reply actions
Not that anyone reads this far down but I voted for Malik ‘cause he can’t do any worse
"Mr. Gilmore deserves to be in the Basketball Hall of Fame damnit. Highest field goal percentage EVER"
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gilmoar01.html
I think Jefferson should start and give him the ball earlier in transition because that’s the way he make for most of his points so he can build a comfort zone an build on it, Bogans is very inconsistent and finley is old and he should only be a straight up shooter. Malik has talent and a lot of potential so Pop should give him a chance and steady minutes over finley and Bogans
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
FanShots
Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.
Recommended FanShots
Recent FanShots
Featured Stories
In Association With
Ball Don't Lie - NBA - Yahoo! Sport
- Days of NBA Lives: Wherein Roy Hibbert tap-dances to Maine
- Grizzlies Valentine’s Day cards are the key to love
- Kevin Love would like the NBA to take the MLB’s approach on All-Star games
- Kobe Bryant fires a few hilarious salvos at Jeremy Lin
- Brandon Jennings states the obvious regarding his 2014 free agency, everyone goes nuts
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
