Game #31 Recap: San Antonio Spurs blitz listless Los Angeles Lakers, 97-82
The much ballyhooed match up between winners of eight of the last eleven NBA championships turned out to be more of a sample size of how the two teams have been faring more than a quarter of a season already past. The San Antonio Spurs kept going to its newfound fast breaking attack, while still being able to resurrect its trademark team defense to stymie the two-time defending champions Los Angeles Lakers. The Lakers, now losers of three straight by double-digit margins, continued to grope for recognizable form, whether it be in its vaunted triangle offense or its rangy defense, but found no help in either end as shown by Kobe Bryant's 8-for-27 shooting night and having afforded only 82 points total.
After the click, how about I stop writing about A game and start talking about THE game? Sounds good? Let's do this.
I've rendered myself pretty much useless during the holidays. I have the rest of the days off from Christmas until the New Year, and all I've done was eat, sleep, play those gawdawfully addicting Humble Bundle games, watch a few movies to catch up on what I've missed (Shaun of the Dead, In Bruges, Forgetting Sarah Marshall, Up, etc.), and practically breeze through the first season of Modern Family, which I've been dying to finally start watching. I've also been horribly anti-social, shunning invites by friends to go out and have a good time, and just prefer to twiddle my fingers surfing the Internet, waiting for this Spurs-Lakers game. In December. Which really doesn't mean anything.
Or does it?
I'm not sure, as there are always two sides to every argument, just like there's always a silver and black to every Spurs uniform. Huh, that didn't make any sense, did it?
These two teams respect each other's body of work for the past decade and what each is capable of doing, much to PJ's unabashed dislike for the Spurs, and it started by them marking this date on the calendar as a "measuring stick" game. As with any team who seriously wants to win, you treat these types of games with a little more importance than the rest, because more often than not, when the smoke clears, it's the Lakers - and hopefully, the Spurs -- who will be there standing when we get to the better part of the playoffs.
Simply put, the game showcased the vastly different style of play the Spurs have been effectively doing (with the occasional D thrown in), and how the Lakers still look like they have a major hangover after back-to-back titles.
"Forget about whether this is your daddy's Spurs, it isn't even last year's!" -- jrw
The first few minutes of the game started with Kobe scaring us all by hitting four of his first five shots to help the Lakeshow to an early lead, until an old Laker tormentor showed up -- Tony Parker. Le Baguette, flashing his best form, ran circles around LA's guards and big men for layups and threw in a couple of jumpers for good measure. I was expecting him to use the teardrop early and often against the tall Los Angeles frontline but I don't think I saw any of it, which is a testament to how Tony was just in attack mode all game -- no weaksauce in there, just drive it in and shove it in their throats. Also, see, only 3 assists! The Spurs ended the quarter with a flurry as Neal swished home a three ball and another Matt Bonner Bomb from beyond the arc to hike the lead to 9, 27-18.
Finally realizing that the unathletic Bonner, the rookie Tiago Splitter and the crazily undersized Blair are playing, Phil Jackson decides to give the Spurs hell by unleashing the twin towers combination of Pau Gasol and Andrew Bynum, and boy, did it mess up the Silver and Black some. Gasol, the unfairly skilled big man that he is, pours in seven points during a brief run to give the Lakers back the lead entering halftime. The seven footers also clogged the paint to take away drives, while the Laker guards chased the shooters out of the three point line -- although you can also say that the Spurs hesitated on some of them and also missed open ones. Overall, it was a cold shooting quarter where the Spurs made only 7 out of 20 shots, missing all 5 attempts from beyond the arc. Also, with Duncan resting, the big men seemed rattled on how to deal with Pau and Drew's size and length. You gotta admit though, those two are really a handful for anyone.
"He's our best defender." -- Ginobili on Hill
Still, the highlight of the second quarter was George Hill standing up to Kobe Bean -- words were exchanged, technicals handed out, invisible sandwiches thrown by Bonner from the bench at the Mamba, and at this point, if you've watched too many games of Michael Jordan going commando on those who try to undermine his rule, you would've thought, "Uh-oh... Kobe's about to go bananas now and take over." Well... Didn't. Happen. What happened the following quarter was pretty shocking though.
Whatever adjustments Pop and his staff made at halftime sure worked like magic. Maybe Pop was thinking, "Eh, you dare give me the twin towers treatment? Here, have a DeJuan Blair for your hassles." Blair just balled in the third, creating havoc on pick-and-roll situations with his length (getting 2 steals in the boxscore for his troubles), and for the game, equaling the six offensive rebounds of Laker big men trio Pau-Bynum-Odom combined. Now that's amazine. It also helped that DeBeast got his own offense going, hitting 4 of 6 shots in the quarter.
As for Bryant who was supposed to go off and show to the young George Hill not to mess with a five-time champ, he practically shot himself and his team out of the game, missing the final four of his THIRTEEN straight missed shots (after starting 4-of-5) before finally making a three-pointer at the 4:43 mark to end the drought. At that point in Kobe's slump, Phil would've said ""If I was playing, I probably wouldn’t pass him the ball the next time." Oh wait. He DID say it. Should've said it to his teammates earlier, Phil. Spurs go up 71-62 after a 29-18 quarter.
Heading into the fourth, the Lakers were determined to make a bit of a run and turn this into a nailbiter. Hill and old-ish rookie Gary Neal, however, were having none of it as Albatross scored on two freebies while Neal made up for a three that didn't make the 3rd quarter buzzer in time by splashing home a three ball in the face of Chris Anderson Jr. a.k.a. Matt Barnes. The rout was on. Or maybe not?
A shooter will just keep on shooting, 13 straight misses be damned, as the Black Mamba finally finds some fire in his hands by canning two straight triples to bring the Spurs lead down to 9. George Hill, though, was determined to not let the trash-talking and finger-wagging go to waste, as he went to work by scoring 4 of his 10 points and continued to hound Bryant to prevent him from getting in a groove. Most righteous, Mr. Hill. And here is the game ball for your efforts. Spurs win! Spurs win! Spurs win!
Some post-game musings (this is where I try to write about THE game, star or no star in blog reviews or whatever):
A) Bizarro Spurs this season is turning more and more like the Spurs for the rest of it, and nope, it's not that defensive, lockdown Spurs of championships past. Players running off to the races with either miss or make is now happily ingrained in my brain, and I have to say... so this is what Suns fans feel like when Nash and A'mare were ballin' back in the valley, or when Run TMC were making the hearts of Bay Area fans pump blood faster than Don Nelson's D-less offense.
I have three things I love about this newfangled game, or whatever the cool kids call it these days.
The Outlet. I have never seen the Great Bill's play -- Bill Russell and Bill Walton -- and have only read about them in books, but they might have looked like Tim Duncan circa-2010-2011 somewhat, especially in the outlet passing department. I've been appreciating it more and more the last few games when Timmy grabs a rebound, turns around and surveys the 'scape like a good ol' seafarer looking out for dry land, and then rifles the ball with an overhead pass to the farthest open guy to jumpstart -- not just initiate, mind you, but get it off to a really rolling start -- the fast break machine. It's not been praised much this season, but Duncan's height, his ability to see the floor well, and skill to make the long bullet pass to a streaking teammate has been integral to making all of this run-and-gun thingy work. Even Blair's getting into the act, too. Just watch them. It's loads of fun.
Defense. While it hasn't exactly been vintage, it's what you need to be able to successfully run. The defense these days is not lock you down-choke you-stomp on your throat variety, but the number of steals and deflections our guards and bigs (particularly DeJuan) make create opportunities for easy baskets. Also, defensive rebounds are a factor to initiate fastbreaks, and the Spurs are currently middle of the pack (15th) in defensive rebound rate, which is fairly decent given Duncan's limutes and Blair's undersized-ness.
Tony Parker. I mean, who the hell still wants to trade this guy? As he showed in this game, he is our one clear advantage over the Lakers. I know Manu was feeling under the weather and shot awfully, but he can't come close to approximating how TP just messes up the entire Laker defense. The big men can't block Tony's shots if they can't see where he is, and the penetration drawing defenders into the paint almost always makes sure that our shooters get decent looks at the basket. And now that the offense has switched to full blast, Parker's ability to push the ball even on made field goals becomes more integral. No one on that Lakers roster, and not many in this league, can keep up with Tony in a foot race.
B) Sean Elliott also talked about Parker wanting to get "quicker" in the offseason and how it shows now. While some observed early in the season how Tony seems to be slower and may not be able to regain that speed because of previous injuries, I'm not that worried because being "fast" is different from being "quick." Steve Nash, old as the Bible poing guard that he is, recognizes the value of quickness in his game -- being able to stop and start on a dime, having that explosion on your first and second steps, being able to turn 'round corners with ease, etc. Basically just having improved reaction times at what you do, and Tony has been able to do that this year not just with the usual pretty spin moves but with his decision making as well.
C) Seeing Tim and Manu struggle wasn't pretty, but with the Spurs winning despite that? It warms the heart.
D) The Lakers went away with pounding the ball inside not just because the Laker guards tried in vain to create for themselves, but also because of the great "digging" defense that the Spurs guards played to support the bigs. Every time Pau or Bynum got the ball on the low block, someone was doing a "soft" help -- just trying to reach out and poke the ball to discourage the big man from putting it on the floor, while maintaining ample space to help out on shooters if ever the opposing big man kicked it out. It made for effective soft double-teaming, but I figure the Lakers will have something to counter it the next time, or until their shooters start making shots to open up the interior.
E) Even CIA Pop acknowledges that the team will need Tiago if it wants to make a serious run at the title, as shown by playing Splitter early. Despite being saddled with foul trouble and not returning to the game until garbage time, Tiago finally got a taste of what it feels like to play with real talented big men the last few games, going up with the Lakers front line and of course, getting to do battle with Dwight Howard a couple of games ago. While he wasn't stellar, he did have that big block against Pau. Let's see how he'll fare against the likes of Amare, Garnett and Shaq.
F) The Spurs literally ran the Lakers out of the building with a 17-4 edge in fastbreak points. Who wants to grind out games and knees anyway? Surely, not this year's Spurs.
G) I also liked the fact that our shooters weren't discouraged at all after misses. RJ missed three wide open ones in a row and ended up 2-8 on three pointers, Manu was 2-7, and Neal, 3-9. Live and die by the three maybe? Although we've had some wins that have shown we can be miserable from trifecta distance but still live to tell the tale about a win.
H) After committing 7 turnovers in the first half, the Spurs only had 2 more the rest of the way while forcing the Lakers to a total of 16 turnovers. Way to clean up their act, eh?
I) The Lakers are playing poorly these days, but make no mistake about it, they'll be back. It's not rocket science to guess that.
Your Three Stars
It's hard to decide the order, and credit goes to the entire team for playing a terrific team game, but these three were the best of the best:
3 - George Hill -- RJ would've made it if not for all those missed open threes. Hill definitely makes an impact the most on defense, and the offense he provides is nice, too. 10 points, 9 rebounds, 3 assists, 2 steals and 4 BLOCKS! Wow.
2 - Tony Parker -- This is hard. Tony played superbly, and he's also deserving of that number 1 star. 23 points, 2 rebounds, 3 assists, and 2 steals (that led to breakaway layups).
1 - DeJuan Blair -- Any time you go up against two hulking trees with only your 6-7 height but a girth rivaling that of the equator, expect a sore body the next day. And for that, along with his great play, Blair gets the top nod. 17 points (8-14 FGs), 15 rebounds (6 offensive), 2 steals, 1 block, 2 TOs, 5 fouls. Also, he dropped this gem during the NBA TV post game interview:
It doesn't matter how tall you are, as long as you got the heart.
True dat, DeJuan. But I will end this with a rather satisfying quote, which Mr. Ginobili succinctly put, "only a December game" be damned:
It’s always great to beat the champion.
Yes it does, and by season's end, we all hope you will be the champion, Manu.
Up Next: It's getting real serious. The West's #2 team, the Dallas Mavericks, are again in the crosshairs as the Spurs visit Dallas. Will Dirk play or not? I'm guessing he will because Carlisle is far from going CIA, and would prefer winning each and every regular season game then choke away playoff games. That is the truth. As for the Spurs, let's keep on keeping on, shall we?
84 comments
|
13 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This just in:
Kobe can’t sleep. He’s having a hard time choosing between his Manu Ginobili and George Hill pajamas.
(",)
by day_late_friend on Dec 29, 2010 4:04 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
It’s a whole set of wardrobe then.
(",)
by day_late_friend on Dec 29, 2010 5:25 AM CST up reply actions
I believe Kobe owns a Bruce Bowen Blanket. :D
"White-orange, orange, white-green, blue, white-blue, green, white-brown, brown"
by magnuskrauss on Dec 29, 2010 12:03 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Keeps him warm but gets under his skin. Wool perhaps? I’m told it causes VC and Ray Allen to break out in hives.
Thank you SF Giants for an incredible 2010 season and painting the City orange & black!
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
I vow to never mention "playoffs" and "49ers" together again until we have a "quarterback."
Tony should get #1 since he set the tone and never relented. TP and RJ really got the crowd going early on.
Hill should be at least 2 or 1 because he set the defensive tone (nice moment with Kobe – almost like re-energized the team) with Manu (even if his numbers don’t stand out. The defense is what really helped the Spurs win this. They haven’t won a game with the shooting numbers (FG, FT, 3pt) they’ve had since 2005 against Phoenix.
I also penalize Blair a little because he was a tale of two halves. His first half was fairly forgettable. He was awesome in the 2nd half though.
Eh… I can also say that it wasn’t all Hill on Kobe. Manu set the tone for defending him, and did a great job setting off Kobe’s rhythm for the entire game. Plus, it was team defense that kept Bryant off the paint, not just George.
I made sure to say that Tony’s also deserving of that 1st star, but decided to give it to Blair because he practically outrebounded three 7-footers (yes, I consider Odom seven feet long) who aren’t exactly stiffs. So yeah, it’s subjective.
"A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It’s what happens while you wait for moments that will never come." - Lester Freamon, The Wire
by silverandblack_davis on Dec 29, 2010 7:21 AM CST up reply actions
Yah, it’s all subjective (just want to give you a hard time). Just my thoughts. Not expecting you to change it even if I had a slam dunk case. :)
Yes, Manu deserves props for his defense. That was his best part of his otherwise fugly game. The team/help D was stellar on Kobe. They made sure Manu and Hill never got burned.
The reason why Hill would be above Manu (even though his D was great) was that Hill had a solid all around game and the exchange with Kobe seemed to a be a moment when things slightly changed.
Part of the reason I put Parker over Blair is he setup the momentum and the crowd. That’s important in the big games. That’s not to say that blair didn’t do a good job of closing the window on them in the 2nd half though.
Parker to me is always the difference maker. In the series when Spurs won the first two and lost 4 straight, it was because parker went from superstar to nothing. Now that the Spurs don’t play 4 down as much, Parker has more room to expose the weakness at the guard positions.
Spurs strength is at the wings (since it’s Kobe vs. Parker/Manu/RJ/Hill + supporting cast of Neal and Anderson basically)
I’m with you. I did feel at some point though that Kobe wasn’t playing like the old Kobe, which really helped us defend him better than the usual. He took too many contested fallaway jumpers and seemed out of control on drives, which is unusual for a player who can create his own shot against anybody in this league. It’s probably the age or the finger and knee injuries finally taking it’s toll.
"A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It’s what happens while you wait for moments that will never come." - Lester Freamon, The Wire
by silverandblack_davis on Dec 29, 2010 8:44 PM CST up reply actions
I agree. Kobe’s mileage is catching up to him. He missed 13 straight shots. That’s the most he ever missed in a row. The good news, is the Spurs have more to make up for Duncan’s age than the Lakers have to make up for Kobe. That just might be the difference maker in a 7 game series in the post season. Kobe showed signs of weakness in the OKC series and down the stretch at the end of last season
Having said that, a lot will depend on Pau (not getting run down with his big minutes) and Bynum (staying healthy) stepping up.
The Spurs shot 42.5 percent from the field, 28.1 percent from 3-point range, and 66.7 percent from the line. A quick check of Basketball-Reference.com shows they hadn’t won a game with that sort of statistical combination since beating the Phoenix Suns in November, 2005.
It’s no accident that San Antonio’s uncharacteristically permissive defense of late coincided with Hill’s absence as a result of a sprained ankle. With him out, the Spurs allowed four straight opponents to hit the century mark, culminating in the 123 they permitted Orlando on Thursday. For the season, San Antonio gives up 4.6 points per 100 possessions fewer with Hill on the floor.
“When the game started, I thought it was going to be a long night,” Ginobili said. “He made the first four and they were pretty tough shots, but then I could bother him a little more on the catch. [But guarding] Kobe is not one-on-one defense, ever. You need the team to be there contesting and crowding the paint, so we did a great job in that regard.”
"A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It’s what happens while you wait for moments that will never come." - Lester Freamon, The Wire
by silverandblack_davis on Dec 29, 2010 7:28 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Great recap of an awesome win, davis! Rec’d!
(",)
by day_late_friend on Dec 29, 2010 4:18 AM CST reply actions
No bad on Blair, but the player of the game was easily Parker.
His attack was remarkably sharp and focused, the way he was weaving around the Laker bigs, placing the ball just out of their reach.
[ "Duncan, the Spurs' 34-year-old captain, was aghast when Splitter told him he used to watch him as a kid."]
"I didn't enjoy that at all," Duncan said
It seems Pop thinks so as well.
http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=301228024
[ "Duncan, the Spurs' 34-year-old captain, was aghast when Splitter told him he used to watch him as a kid."]
"I didn't enjoy that at all," Duncan said
See reply to grego above. Let me also note that Blair was a big part of that decisive 3rd quarter run that put the game out of reach. But yeah, to each his own.
"A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It’s what happens while you wait for moments that will never come." - Lester Freamon, The Wire
by silverandblack_davis on Dec 29, 2010 7:25 AM CST up reply actions
A great recap of a/the wildly satisfying game.
All these GIFs are breaking my browser.
by quincyscott on Dec 29, 2010 7:58 AM CST via mobile reply actions
“The formula for beating the Spurs was simple: Slow down their stars and make their role players beat you. San Antonio’s demolition of the Lakers shows the Spurs’ depth has made that plan obsolete.” writes John Hollinger, Daily Dime.
by indiancharlie on Dec 29, 2010 8:15 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Gotta like how though only Parker put up a lot of points, Blair and the Bench were enough.
Manu needs to attack the rim like Parker.
Team and individual defense was the story of this game. Kobe made it easier on them by taking so many shots. The bigs of the Lakers clearly are the tough match up for this Spurs team.
Everyone says Duncan had a terrible game. But I think defensively he, Blair, and even Bonner kept things from being easy for Bynum and Gasol. Fouling instead of giving up dunks was huge.
I think that Manu may be somewhat coasting at this point in the season (to the extent Manu would let himself coast) while trying to be fresh and healthy for the season’s end and playoffs. If the Spurs were losing a lot of games, it would be necessary for him to begin stepping up his game early. With the current record, he can afford to hold back some and then sharpen his game by going into attack mode late in the season.
Let’s not forget that Manu had a sore throat…. he’s probably battling a cold or the flu.
They're not your pop's Spurs... they're Pop's Spurs 2.0!!!
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Dec 29, 2010 6:09 PM CST up reply actions
First of all, I have absolutely defied anyone from day one to entertain the idea of trading Tony Parker. The man is the BEST point guard in Spurs history, and the 2nd best in the game today by a freaking chasm (giving the nod to Nash over TP, but let’s be honest, who would you rather have running the Spurs’ system right now?). Shoot, I could (and have) write paragraph upon paragraph of superlatives to describe Tony’s play and demeanor throughout his career, but I should stop myself short of an all-out Parker-rant.
The REAL purpose of this woefully sidetracked comment is to praise Pop and this Spurs TEAM for their efforts thus far this season. We’ve got a long way to go, and last night, while satisfying, was hardly a capstone, but dear God in heaven I’ve never seen anything like this start from a Spurs team. And for that, all the credit goes to Pop. As much as he sticks to his own method of doing things, his decision to depart from that for the sake of tapping the potential of this roster has turned the league on it’s ear AND I FREAKING LOVE IT. It has given me no end of pleasure to see ESPN run from talking about SA—you can almost hear them audibly wishing for the wheels to come off so they can sweep the Spurs under their customary regular season rug. But this team simply will not be denied right now, and deserves every accolade they get to this point.
Keep it rolling, San Antonio!
"You may all go to hell, and I will go to Texas." -Davy Crockett
"Give me an army of West Point graduates, and I'll win a battle. Give me a handful of Texas Aggies, and I'll win a war." -Gen. George S. Patton
Popovich is a strange bird, and I mean that in the best way. He is absolutist and unwavering in his philodophical approach to the game, his insistence on hard work, toughness, attention to detail; but he is flexible whe it comes to Xs and Os, how to adjust to the skills of his players, how to adjust to his opponent. He will try just about any strategy or tactic, he will borrow from anyone’s playbook. It’s to a great degree this combination of perfectionism and flexibilty that makes Popovich a great coach.
All these GIFs are breaking my browser.
by quincyscott on Dec 29, 2010 2:53 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Well done, davis. I had the happy all over again.
I have flying monkeys at my disposal, and I'm not afraid to use them.
P.S. Loved the captions. Especially Blair.
An alternate caption for that TD picture: “I’m not angry, Kobe. I’m disappointed.”
I have flying monkeys at my disposal, and I'm not afraid to use them.
by Lauri on Dec 29, 2010 10:37 AM CST up reply actions 6 recs
This. Is. Awesome.
"You may all go to hell, and I will go to Texas." -Davy Crockett
"Give me an army of West Point graduates, and I'll win a battle. Give me a handful of Texas Aggies, and I'll win a war." -Gen. George S. Patton
by Trey Felder on Dec 29, 2010 10:57 AM CST up reply actions
Feels good to be a Spur today. Can’t wait to bring the momentum to Dallas on thursday.
Chuck would probably have to think twice on making those making-out-with-the-mavs comments before the game, specially now that they lost to a depleted Raptors team without their german one-man team player.
by spursfan_needs_counseling on Dec 29, 2010 10:42 AM CST reply actions
didn’t he say that the spurs weren’t going to be #1 by Thursday’s game?
guess he has to eat those words now
It's a fez, I wear a fez now, fezzes are cool
-The Doctor
yes, I forgot about that….I can see Kenny replaying that quote tomorrow!
by spursfan_needs_counseling on Dec 29, 2010 11:50 AM CST up reply actions
When Ernie showed the upcoming TV sched that showed the Spurs-Lakers game, Chuck said “Uh-oh! Spurs about to go on a losing streak.” Makes for good TV, as now Kenny and Ernie can replay that clip and force Chuck to doudle-down on his negative view of the Spurs.
Thank you SF Giants for an incredible 2010 season and painting the City orange & black!
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
I vow to never mention "playoffs" and "49ers" together again until we have a "quarterback."
I confess that I’m curious what ‘doudle-down’ means, but since it sounds vaguely obscene, perhaps I should let it be…. }>
They're not your pop's Spurs... they're Pop's Spurs 2.0!!!
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Dec 29, 2010 6:12 PM CST up reply actions
ha! I read that more than once and didn’t catch my misspell. In that case, double down could be a few things, most of which would be obscene.
Thank you SF Giants for an incredible 2010 season and painting the City orange & black!
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
I vow to never mention "playoffs" and "49ers" together again until we have a "quarterback."
The ± differential (difference between a player’s on-court and off-court ± value, per 48 minutes) for Irk is a staggering 27 points, which I believe leads the NBA for ‘qualified’ players (i.e. those with enough minutes) this season. What’s more, it’s not all offense…. Dallas’ D gives up 6 more points per 48 minutes when he’s off the court than when he’s on-court.
While it’s certainly an argument that he’s their MVP, it does suggest that the Mavs are a vulnerable team ─ should he get injured, go into a slump, or simply get fatigued, they may have little else to compete with. Contrast that to the Spurs, who were able to beat the Lakers last night despite sub-par stat lines (but not games) from Timmy and Manu.
They're not your pop's Spurs... they're Pop's Spurs 2.0!!!
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Dec 29, 2010 6:24 PM CST up reply actions
it does suggest that the Mavs are a vulnerable team ─ should he get injured, go into a slump, or simply get fatigued
or put playoffs McDyess to guard him …I believe that may work too.
by spursfan_needs_counseling on Dec 30, 2010 8:27 AM CST up reply actions
great recap!…but do we really need to see Tiago sparkling like a so-called “vampire”???
It's a fez, I wear a fez now, fezzes are cool
-The Doctor
Oh, so you’re Team Jacob. I get it. Werewolf freak.
I have flying monkeys at my disposal, and I'm not afraid to use them.
by Lauri on Dec 29, 2010 11:40 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Team Keogh all the way!
"White-orange, orange, white-green, blue, white-blue, green, white-brown, brown"
by magnuskrauss on Dec 29, 2010 12:06 PM CST up reply actions
TP
Tony showed what he can do when he’s in all out attack mode, against anyone, but in particular someone slow like Fisher. Now he needs to do the same against Dallas. In our first meeting, he was very passive against Kidd. Never could figure it out and it was key to our loss. Sure hope the big, ugly german is back at full strength. Wouldn’t want it any other way.
Dallas will be much better at packing the lane behind Kidd. I don’t envision Parker being allowed to knife through the lane unopposed tomorrow night. But I won’t mind if he proves me wrong.
All these GIFs are breaking my browser.
by quincyscott on Dec 29, 2010 3:03 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
So I finally finished watching the game this morning (I fell asleep watching the replay last night). You hit every single point I saw during the game, davis, especially the outlet passes by the big men and Tony’s excellent probing of the Lakers defense to get open shots. Otstanding recap and otstanding team win!
With all due respect, gentlemen, we're not as crazy as she is.
Great recap.
Walton almost looks sickly in that pic, with the stick arms and the giant dome. Someone should be kind to him. Give him a burger.
Well done on the recap. I have no complaints on stars for this win; you can’t go wrong as it was a wonderful team victory. What feels great is seeing Tony be healthy enough to play to the higher standard he set in 2007/08, as well as the kind of game long team defense that is required to win games of this magnitude.
Hill was smart and outstanding. Tony dominated with quickness and timing. Blair worked his big butt off and managed to rule the paint with both physical effort and athletic grace. The energy of all three, along with their starting and bench mates, carried the team.
That they whupped the champs on a night where the Spurs were far from perfect shows just how high the ceiling for this team can be. It also shows (and I write this with full perspective and no overreaction to one game) that the Lakers are not dominant. They will have strong bursts throughout the season because they have Kobe, size and the earned resume of a champ. But two teams in the conference have surpassed them, two others have gained ground, and the Lakers have gotten older. They’ll still win 50+ games, the Pacific, and be a visciously tough out in a best-of-seven. But it is unlikely that they will get the yellow brick road treatment as they did last post-season: a #1 seed that avoided the three teams that give them the most trouble (Spurs, Mavs and Nuggets) while facing a playoff newbie, a team that can not win in LA, and a team with not enough size. While they are the three-time Conference champs, their most recent title was due to Perkins missing game 7. This LA team started being exposed late last season but avoided all potholes in the playoffs. That is unlikely to happen this season. How very much I want the Spurs to be the team in May that shovels the last grains of dirt on another Lakers run.
Thank you SF Giants for an incredible 2010 season and painting the City orange & black!
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
I vow to never mention "playoffs" and "49ers" together again until we have a "quarterback."
That would be nice, indeed. Let’s just store that image away for the time being—it’s a long season. But that would be very storybook.
All these GIFs are breaking my browser.
by quincyscott on Dec 29, 2010 3:09 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Great recap, bro.
I went to the game, and it was so much fun. We were a couple of three-point daggers that rimmed out away from bringing the arena down. I’m perpetually appalled by the large number of Lakers fans that show up at the AT&T Center when we play them, but I guess that perennial winners will always have fans.
I hope that in 20 years I get to read a comment from a Bucks fan complaining about the throngs of fair-weather Spurs fans in Milwaukee. And Argentina.
I smell death... everywhere.
Eh, the bandwagon Laker fans are everywhere. I even saw Laker jerseys at the Surs/Suns game in November.
Free Tiago Splitter!
Oddly enough, I’ve seen quite a few Suns jerseys at numerous Spurs games.
Checking in on their big brother, I guess.
"We suck on 'D. Both individually and team-wise, we suck. We're pretty consistent that way. I don't know if I have an answer to that. If I did, we wouldn't suck quite so bad." - Popovich
by Aaron "Hirschof" Preine on Dec 29, 2010 4:30 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah… must’ve been the same when Jordan’s Bulls traveled around. But the good thing about them is that that team was so great, they even turned non-Bulls fans into fans. At least the Spurs won this one, and that’s all that matters.
"A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It’s what happens while you wait for moments that will never come." - Lester Freamon, The Wire
by silverandblack_davis on Dec 29, 2010 8:51 PM CST up reply actions
Great recap. The long-outlet-pass fast-break that Timmy (and DeBeast, to a certain extent) executes reminds me somewhat of the ‘Showtime’ Lakers, who were known for scoring quickly off of makes AND misses. It just tickles me that the Spurs beat LA over and over with a page from their old playbook. :)
They're not your pop's Spurs... they're Pop's Spurs 2.0!!!
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Dec 29, 2010 6:28 PM CST reply actions
Question
Are we ever going to see James Anderson?
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
Garnett suffers a knee injury in the Celtics game against the Pistons. Could be the Spurs face a Dirk-less Mavs and a Garnett-less Celtics.
They’re saying that it’s a calf injury and it doesn’t look that bad. He’s scheduled for an MRI tomorrow. I am hoping we’ll be facing those teams with their complete line-ups.
(",)
by day_late_friend on Dec 29, 2010 9:16 PM CST up reply actions
This is shaping up to be an interesting season. In the east, you got the Miami “super team” (who is playing very well and will only improve) that might at least provide a stumbling block to Boston, the Magic who look totally different, the Bulls who figure to be a very tough out and are playing well despits Boozers absence.
And in the west, you got Dallas who are fielding maybe their best team ever, the bizarro Spurs (who currently lead the league in officiency) the defending Champion Lakers, and a few teams who can still pull it together to make a deep run, like the Jazz, Thunder and Hornets.
I dont mind how top heavy the league is this season.
[ "Duncan, the Spurs' 34-year-old captain, was aghast when Splitter told him he used to watch him as a kid."]
"I didn't enjoy that at all," Duncan said
officiency
I like that. But do we then go with deficiency, though only or bad defense? What then is efficient defense?
Thank you SF Giants for an incredible 2010 season and painting the City orange & black!
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
I vow to never mention "playoffs" and "49ers" together again until we have a "quarterback."
Deficiency, I like that also. But we need to alter it so as to eliminate any negative connotation.
How about " D-fficiency " ?
[ "Duncan, the Spurs' 34-year-old captain, was aghast when Splitter told him he used to watch him as a kid."]
"I didn't enjoy that at all," Duncan said
by alamobro on Dec 30, 2010 11:38 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Works for me.
Thank you SF Giants for an incredible 2010 season and painting the City orange & black!
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
I vow to never mention "playoffs" and "49ers" together again until we have a "quarterback."
You probably knew this, but I didnt coin the term “officiency”. I had seen it somewhere a while back, then I saw Tim C. use it again recently.
But this is the first time I have seen a Defense/Efficiency mashup.
[ "Duncan, the Spurs' 34-year-old captain, was aghast when Splitter told him he used to watch him as a kid."]
"I didn't enjoy that at all," Duncan said

by 








































