Game #18 Recap - Clippers top Spurs 90-85
In front of a home crowd with reasonably low expectations, the Clippers defied standings, history, and the best laid plans for a 80-2 season with a gutsy victory over our heroes the San Antonio Spurs. Blake Griffin and his rookie pals built an improbable lead over the NBA-best Spurs, and the long lost Baron Davis contributed just enough to protect it while the Spurs fought and clawed to no avail. If you're a glutton for punishment and savor that bad taste in your mouth right now, jump below and read on, friend.
Just one night after a thorough, all-cylinders win over the Warriors, the Spurs weren't able to summon any of the dominating offense or clutch defense that's becoming our trademark. The closest we came to the comeback victories of late was a third quarter push that cut the Clips' lead to five. Our effort to steal the game died however when our offense could only produce 6-21 shooting and 2 FTs in the final period.
The Clippers ended our perfect road record, perfect record against crap teams, and a head-to-head streak that was at 942 games. All it took for them to shed that King-Kong sized monkey on their collective backs was an amazing show by the game's best rookie and a complete meltdown of everything SA's come to rely on to win games. This is more than just a case of the Back to Backs, this was a Complete System Failure.

Even in a season so young that casual fans assume it hasn't begun, the Spurs have somehow managed to play the Clippers four times (counting preseason). It was clear when the Clippers played 'at home' in Austin Texas, and it's clear now - Blake Griffin is the next unstoppable big man in the association. Fans will inevitably draw comparisons between tonight and our struggles against a young Minnesota front-line of Kevin Love and Darko Milicic, but Griffin is more like Shawn Kemp or a thirteen year old Charles Barkley than either of those young pups. I'll give you a quick scouting breakdown of this Rookie of the Year lock, based on tonight's game:
If Blake Griffin catches the ball on the move, or anywhere close to the basket, he scores on you.
If Blake Griffin catches the ball and posts up or faces his man, he'll throw up a bad shot or turn it over.
Even though most of his damage was done before the fourth, The Griffin was showcasing both his lion and eagle DNA tonight. On transition plays, cuts, and successful roll plays, the Clippers used him to devastating effect. In the halfcourt the most pain he caused us was with well-timed passes to counter the double-team and set his team up for three pointers. With a set defense we could get stops, but so much attention went into Griffin there was no-one available to rebound the miss or defend the other four Clippers. A flawed masterpiece for the rookie, but in a game where no Spur had an answer it was enough.

Can we just say, 'back to back' and wash our hands of this mess? I don't think that's the real cause here, except perhaps in the case of our venerable forwards Tim Duncan and Antonio McDyess. Our big bigs were a combined 4-14 and had a noticeable athleticism deficit against the Clippers this night. Blair got benched with finality in the third quarter, and a distracted Tony Parker joined him after two turnovers in two minutes and finished with 18 minutes total. An off night for the big three (Manu was just five of fifteen) is a good place to start looking if you want to know how the Spurs ended up shooting just 35.6%.
You don't reach a low like that without combining poor performance with bad luck. The bread and butter of our hot start is how great we've been at hitting threes and getting points at the free throw line. These tactics involve forces beyond our control: luck and referees. We got great looks for our best shooters tonight, but neither Matt nor Manu could convert the trey. Meanwhile, a lot of the misses and unproductive plays by George Hill and Ginobili were during attempts to draw a foul that went uncalled.
Our best chance for a comeback was in the fourth, when we weren't dealing with Griffin's insanely productive offense (first and third quarters) or the three point barrage that occurs when you double him (second quarter). Tough play from Richard Jefferson and George Hill almost got us back in it, but the lead was just out of reach. The Spurs will regret not grabbing this game as a win, but it's not like our failure was a lack of effort or team focus. We were just <wince> outplayed by the Los Angeles Clippers; some nights the worst team can be the better team.
Three Stars:
George Hill - Seven of Sixteen Shooting is good for 44%, when the team was just 35%. Hill played great defense tonight and was a big part of the second and third quarter runs. This is surely reflected in his plus/minus where he finished +9 on the night. Good play from George is encouraging, but let's hope it doesn't take benching Tony to get more of it.
Richard Jefferson - RJ is the only Spur who had a good night by the usual standards. He was 5-11 for 13 points, had 9 boards, and drew a ton of fouls during the second period that we were unable to capitalize on. Furthermore when Udoka was in (let's call him RJ 0.5) there was a noticeable drop-off in just about everything. Perhaps RJ has me a bit spoiled.
Gary Neal - He's no Blake Griffin, but our own rookie phenomenon demonstrated why the Spurs staff was so high on him draft day. Oh wait, that's right, we got Neal for free, without a draft pick or national consensus that he's good. Well, he's very very good, and his zone busting threes are genuinely exciting in a way that just seems wrong for a San Antonio Spur.
Next Game: Friday, December 3rd, at Home against the Timber-Wolves
40 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I disagree a little. I think most nights our shooters wont be that bad. I think in back to backs, many of them will be. I think at the end of the year our 3pt% is going to be somewhere around 44.
Manu was trying to force a lot of things tonight. A couple times he got lucky, most of the time he didnt. But most everyone seemed pretty passive except for him so i dont blame him too much.
I dont think Splitter should have taken Bonner’s minutes (i’ve seen that posted elsewhere). I think he should have taken Duncan’s. Give Bonner enough shots, and he’s going to catch fire. There’s no point playing Tim in back to backs-especially when he plays 30+ the night before.
thats all i’ve got to rant about for now, i think.
Bonner with the nice box out!
Good point about the big man rotation. As for Manu being the only active guy tonight, I will say we were definitely missing the sharp execution and defined roles that got us the quick start.
The Clippers had Davis, Griffin and Bledsoe to create the opportunities, and Gordon, Butler and the big men to cash it in.
The Spurs were all over the place. The starters were way too passive, only Neal and Hill seemed willing to shoot or take it on themselves to create offense. Bad ball movement and lack of execution is probably on the Big Three, who failed at their own offense and creating more chances for RJ, Blair and the shooters.
disagree...a little bit
about bonner’s minutes. i’m no nba coach, still i’m not quite sure why duncan played at all. my choice would have been to start mcdyess and bring in splitter and bonner for heavy minutes, whatever worked that night, and give duncan the night off. bonner had a rough shooting night, obviously, so splitter gets his (duncan’s) minutes instead. kid’s gotta learn sometime, might as well be the clips. hindsight=20/20.
if this was some sort of experiment to see if the new, slimmer duncan can play many minutes on BTB’s, well now we know.
These tactics involve forces beyond our control: luck and referees.
Which tactics in basketball do not depend upon these things?
"If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert"
- DBG
The tactics of Tim Kness are always under his own strict control — and no one else’s.
RJ2.0: vive la différence.
I think of it this way – Team A has a post player who demands double teams and good shooting defense. Team B scores with three pointers and guard penetration and has different strengths on defense.
Team A will reliably get better looks than their opponent by walking it up and letting the post player create. They will win grinding, methodical, suffocating wins. Team B will employ higher risk strategies that depend on specific kinds of basketball luck: basket luck with three pointers, referee luck with foul-calling… strategies that usually pan out over forty-eight minutes.
i disagree that griffin needs double teams. His jumper is not reliable enough yet that it is necessary for us to send them. Pop obviously disagrees, but i dont think he shoots a high enough percentage.
Bonner with the nice box out!
by SpursfanSteve on Dec 2, 2010 5:43 PM CST up reply actions
It’s always possible that Pop, while respecting Griffin, also wanted to work on the team’s double-team post defense. They had no reason to do it the night before and practice can only work so well. Sometimes you gotta try it games. Double or no double, it was not going to decide the game so he may have given it a try. Use each one of the 82 for purposes to get better.
Thank you SF Giants for an incredible 2010 season and painting the City orange & black!
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
great points.
Bonner with the nice box out!
by SpursfanSteve on Dec 3, 2010 4:02 PM CST up reply actions
Good shooting defense. I can argue that this is as much influenced by luck as a good shooting team relies on luck. As good a defense you play on a shot, you might be unlucky any given night and the other team might still make most of their shots.
"If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert"
- DBG
Good shooting defense … is as much influenced by luck as a good shooting team relies on luck
LE, I’m going to have to disagree with you on this. While there is some luck involved, it’s so much less than with offense. Good D pressures teams into taking shots they’d prefer not to, from spots they’d rather not use, with players that aren’t their first choices, and before they’re quite ready. That IS good defense. While a team might go off on any given night, when you’re looking across an entire season, the defense will see success.
RJ2.0: vive la différence.
Nice recap, grey. Maybe it’s just really one of those games when everything goes wrong for us and most things go right for the other team. I’m pretty sure next time, we’ll let Griffin get his but shut down the others.
"A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It’s what happens while you wait for moments that will never come." - Lester Freamon, The Wire
by silverandblack_davis on Dec 2, 2010 5:48 PM CST reply actions
red right hand
enjoyed the recap. also, i now feel compelled to quote nick cave’s “red right hand”:
You’re one microscopic cog
in his catastrophic plan
Designed and directed by
his red right hand
and i guess in that scenario, the spurs were the cog in griffith’s plan.
Is it just me or..
Although i am loving the 15-3 start, I cant help but be reminded of the Dallas Mavericks of a few years that started off the season 12-0 and held the best record in the league the entire season then got killed in the playoffs because they thought they could outscore everyone and not worry about playing defense. Maybe its just me but i dont think we are gonna win shit this year if we dont start playing some interior defense. We are getting killed by the kevin loves’ and blake griffins’ of the league!!
it’s a good thing those teams aren’t seeing the playoffs anytime soon.
You are only young once, but you can be immature for a lifetime
by the little o on Dec 2, 2010 11:21 PM CST up reply actions
First, welcome to PtR, SD.
Second, I think the reason so many people around here have been calling for Splitter to get more playing time, is because of the need to address the point you bring up. Myself, I’m convinced that Pop has decided (for some reason unknown to us) to bring Tiago along slowly, but I don’t doubt that he’ll be in the mix making the D better when the stakes get high.
RJ2.0: vive la différence.
nice recap! i think it was just a bad shooting night for our spurs. we had a lot of open looks but the shots just did not fall. now let’s see how we do this time against the lovely milicics.
The Lovely Milicics
Cap, now that is what I’d call a solid nickname for the Timberpuppies.
It has the added benefit of sounding like the name of some emo band.
RJ2.0: vive la différence.
That’s a heckuva first comment for sliced bread. “Lovely Milicics” gets a JTU from me.
With all due respect, gentlemen, we're not as crazy as she is.
Good point, Cap.
sliced bread, welcome to PtR. I hadn’t noticed you had just joined.
Also, this IS an auspicious debut, unlike others that have gone before..
RJ2.0: vive la différence.
I hadn’t read that thread in a while – thanks for the much needed laugh.
And welcome to PtR, sliced bread!
With all due respect, gentlemen, we're not as crazy as she is.
i had never read that before. that was truly epic.
Bonner with the nice box out!
by SpursfanSteve on Dec 3, 2010 2:28 PM CST up reply actions
also, where is cmoney?
Bonner with the nice box out!
by SpursfanSteve on Dec 3, 2010 2:31 PM CST up reply actions
I talk to him occasionally, he’s still around and doing his pimp thang. His biggest problem is that fantasy football requires so much thought and energy from him just to remain relevant that it’s hard for him to find time commenting. I’m sure he’ll be back soon.
"If I was the kind of guy who posted a signature line, this would be it from now on." -SiMA
by SgtinManusArmy on Dec 3, 2010 3:28 PM CST up reply actions
Ha! I knew what that was before I even clicked it.
MANU GINOBILI Cares not for your humanity --Bushka

by 
































