Game #22 Recap: Spurs defeat Hawks 108-92
For three quarters, the Spurs just couldn't seem to get things straight on offense. Atlanta's defense looked to take Manu Ginobili out of rhythm and it was a two point game entering the fourth. Then, with Tim Duncan and Ginobili on the bench, San Antonio went on a run with terrific ball movement, timely drives to the paint, and excellent outside shooting to turn the game into a rout.
In lieu of a normal recap, I'm trying something different. After the game last night, I had a chat with ex-PtR head-honcho Wayne Vore. What follows is a (somewhat edited) transcript of that discussion.
JRW: Hey, Wayne. SiMA has been talking about how the Spurs seem to be toying with teams. Seeing how far they can get ahead with their B game -- kind of like the 2005 - 2007 teams seemed to do.
Wayne: He's crazy. I say "pffftttt." I think this is the difference. Last year, we thought they were messing around and they were losing. This year, they are beating good teams by 16. I think this team is just good. They are so good that when they aren't playing well that they are still even with teams. They aren't jacking around though.
JRW: I'm not saying that they're jacking around. It's like this. It's an 82 game season; too many games to play 100% every game. It's a 48 minute game; too long to play 100% every minute. You have to pick your spots to expend maximum effort, and decide when you're going to use your most effective plays.
Wayne: They still execute better than almost every team in the league. It's just hard to do it consistently throughtout the game.
JRW: Right. They still CAN execute better and it IS hard to do it the whole game, so there will be stretches where Tony overhandles the ball and shoots long J's
Wayne: This team is really, really good. They played awful for most of the night. But the defense was pretty solid and consistent the whole time. Our offense gave them some easy points.
JRW: When the 4th quarter came around, and the game was still in the balance, THAT'S when the offense started to click like it has -- the spacing was immaculate, and the PnR was getting WIDE open shots for the shooters, and they were knocking them down. But that WASN'T happening through the first 3 qtrs. Not consistently and I think the idea is not that they weren't playing hard
It's just that there was a looser hand on the reins until the 4th.
Wayne: I'd disagree. Pop never has a loose hand on the reins.
JRW: C'mon.
Wayne: We were just having a hard time playing against a good team. I'm not joking. Pop doesn't jack around like that. Whoever is on the court is expected to execute precisely. Period.
JRW: on defense, YES. On offense, meh.
Wayne: On defense and on offense. Seriously.
JRW: So, why did our offense suddenly look like a different team when there was more ball movement?
Wayne: Because we started moving the ball. And, I'll bet they started to get tired. They have a good, long defensive team. We haven't played one like that in a while. And manu kept giving them the ball. If Manu has a pretty decent first half we are up 10.
JRW: That was horrible. Some of those passes were bad, and other times, they just did a good job of anticipating where he was about to go, and I was stunned. Anyway, I don't think that Pop jacks around. I just think that there are things he permits for a while in the context of the game, because you can't yell about absolutely everything all the time at the top of your voice, and keep the attention of the players and that's what I meant by a looser hand,
Wayne: It's like what Coach Budenholzer said to me last year, when I was talking to him about running the pick and roll and whether Blair said good picks. He said, "We try not to over coach it." I think that is about all you need to know about our offense. It's a creative side of the court. You can't over coach it.
JRW: Right, because then you end up with a team full of Temples who are over-thinking and can't play aggressive anymore. What I'm saying is not that they're not TRYING (in the toying sense) but that they're not going to their best material all the time.
Wayne: But, I don't think that changes in the fourth quarter. They just learn and get better throughout the game.
JRW: That's where we disagree, and here's my analogy. I FINALLY have one.
Wayne: Hah.
JRW: Imagine a stand-up comedian. He has his set pieces that he uses all the time, and he KNOWS that they'll kill. But he doesn't go straight to those bits all the time. He may open with a joke or two, or he might go straight to needling someone in the front row -- getting a rise out of the audience; working the crowd. But sometimes the timing might just be a tad off, or the audience might start to sympathize, with the guy he's giving a hard time to. The comedian might feel it start to slip away, and he'll go back to his bread and butter sooner and freelance later, or not at all. And that's what I saw tonight. NOT that they were loafing.
Wayne: I think it is similar. But, I think the game is a bit more dynamic. You have to see what is working.
JRW: I see that fluid part to the game too oh, I was thinking dynamic = fluid
Wayne: It would be like a comedian who had different classes of jokes: raunchy, vulgar, clean, religious, etc. Seeing what the crowd responded to and pulling his strong ones from the different groups to close his show.
JRW: Ok. I'd agree with that to an extent, but I see so many things from our offense that just don't seem to belong in ANY category that Pop would ever choose, and that makes me think that's just down to a "let's see if this works" mindset, instead of a "now we'll try the Tony overhandles play a couple of times in a row."
Wayne: I don't think "Tony overhandles", "Manu turns it over", or "Tim won't pass out of the post" are in the playbook.
JRW: You just made my point for me
Wayne: But, we did all of those things tonight. That's just a case of guys trying to figure out how to attack the defense. We ran a ton of plays that failed.
JRW: What I'm saying is that while they're trying to figure it out, Pop is deciding just how far to let the creativity go before he says "ok, guys, this is what we're doing"
Wayne: And, oh, by the way, we still scored 108 points.
JRW: hah! I know. But that's just because the team is crazy good. And we discuss why it was only a 16 point win.
Wayne: We had 65 with 1:25 or so to go in the third and Bill and Sean were saying we wouldn't be able to get to 100. I think this is the critical point.
JRW: well, that just goes to show you they don't know what they're talking about!
Wayne: Our team has the best record in the league, the best point differential in the league, and we aren't playing anybody to death.
JRW: It's a thing of wonder
Wayne: The offense is fine. How do you WANT us to win? Up 40 in the first quarter?
JRW: I'm not saying that ANYTHING needs to be different. I'm not making ANY argument about something changing.
Wayne: Right. If Pop is jacking around, he's doing it less than Phil Jackson.
JRW: I'm not, and never did, say that Pop was jacking around; just that he decides when to pull the levers, and when to let things kinda simmer on their own. Some nights, it'll simmer and then boil and he won't have to touch it at all.
Wayne: I think he does that by the lineups, but not much by the plays. Not on a night like tonight against the Hawks.
JRW: To my eyes tonight, it sure seemed like plays
Wayne: He'll do it up 20 in the second against the Warriors. Sure. He'll want the bench guys to execute the more basic plays. But, he won't expect them to be awesome.
JRW: unlike we do!
Wayne: Tonight's fun facts. Miami and Orlando would be the 6th seed in the West right now. They are 2 and 3 in the east. Chicago and Atlanta would be 7th. They are 4 and 5.
JRW: There's a reason that Horace Greeley said what he did. Or John Soule - whichever of them actually said it.
Wayne: Go West young man?
JRW: That's it. "Go west, young man, because the East stinks!"
Wayne: Fun Fact #2: Number of games the Spurs won in single digits. They have won 8 in less than 10 points, but three of those were 9. We had those three close games early (Rockets, Suns, Bobcats.) and two close ones against the Twolves. That only five wins of less than 9 points. That's amazing.
JRW: That's was really good teams do. And I'm so excited that the team is leading in point differential.
Wayne: Out of 22 games, 8 have been Spurs less than +9. And there are only 4 teams have less than 8 losses.
JRW: THAT is some perspective
Wayne: two have 7
JRW: we're a full game up on Dallas now?
Wayne: Yeah, and that's crazy that we're 19-3 and we have a 1 game lead in our division
JRW: yeah - but they've had starts like this before, we haven't
JRW: do you think that Dallas' defense is for real, or just a fad/regular season thing?
Wayne: Hmm. Well, their defense is only marginally better than ours. I have a hard time believing that Chandler is really that good. But, they did get Butler and Haywood late last season. I'm giving them the cohesion of time credit.
JRW: "The Cohesion of Time" credit?
Wayne: Yeah, time playing together. Like how RJ's 2nd year is reaping benefits.
JRW: Man, he's looking SO comfortable.
Wanye: 18 points on 8 shots. Yeah, that's comfortable.
JRW: and ALL over the court, not just one or two places
Wayne: No. And he's blocking shots and rebounding too.
JRW: 2nd to last preseason game during warm-ups, I watched him and it seemed like he was still not comfortable with this shot. During the game too he was taking what looked to me like bad looking shots. Then, the season begins and he morphs into Annie Oakley.
Wayne: Hah. After tonight, we'll be rated the most efficient offense in the league at HoopData
JRW: Well, historically, it was quite rare for the Spurs to win every quarter in a game. Even in blowouts they'd lose a random quarter as well as the fourth. But this season, we've won every quarter of a game, probably about 5 times.
Wayne: Yeah, we are chewing them up and spitting them out. Machine-like.
JRW: There's an image. In the last podcast, I mentioned how well the team was shooting FT's, and everybody was jumping on me for jinxing the team. I said that I don't have that power, and then -- 16-25 tonight.
Wayne: Tough crowd. Good thing you didn't mention that we were 18-3 and winning games. Did you also talk about how well Manu was passing? Ok, let's look at the Spurs schedule for the rest of the month and predict a record.
JRW: Well, there are some on PtR who keep saying, "We've lost one game per month so far. So that works out to 10-0 since they've already dropped one in December." But, looking at the schedule, I think that 8-2 is my best guess.
Wayne: I'm thinking 7-3 or 8-2. If we hit 8-2, or better, we'll be putting up a MASSIVE win total this year. If we continue a good roll for the next month, we are on a serious gravy train. Also, I'm interested to see how we match up with Denver this year. Our first game against them is after 3 days off for them. Which should be good for us.
JRW: But it's DENVER. You can throw all that out b/c the Spurs' address reads: 1200 Nuggets Noggins Lane.
Wayne: Oh, I thought it was 1800 Moonmen Ave.
JRW: Well, it depends if you're looking at the physical address, or the mailing address. But either way we're in their heads, and have been for some time. Thanks for taking the time.
Wayne: Night.
40 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great recap JRW. Very cool way to keep things fresh.
I just think it’s great how they are winning games this year that they were losing last year. The team and offense are better, but even when things aren’t going well for the team, they are still in the games and have found ways to win in the end. I like the fact that they can win a lot of different ways and when some of our best guys have rough games.
Are our Spurs back to playing @ 80%, 100% of the time?
by In the 666 on Dec 11, 2010 7:16 PM CST via mobile reply actions
They really haven’t played at 100% through a game. The team depth sort of offsets the need to in order to win.
If you take a look at the 72-10 Chicago Bulls, they had games where they pulled out the win with a solid quarter of play.
That’s my whole point. Believe it or not, Chuck B said that “noone I’m the NBA plays at 100% all the time. Teams’ll give you 4-6min spurts of 100%, but not all the time. The Spurs will give you 80% ALL the time. Consistency is the key to championships”… Or something like that. Great quote though. ‘Steady as she goes’ will get us another. All we need now is a “back2back” up in this mug for BigFun (please)…
by In the 666 on Dec 11, 2010 11:01 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
in, not I’m.., F’n spellcheck BS.
by In the 666 on Dec 11, 2010 11:09 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
“via mobile”… (oof) hard to follow from time to time…
by In the 666 on Dec 11, 2010 11:10 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Cool stuff. PtR has been jamming this year and you are doing a great job, but I still miss Wayne. That man just oozes intelligence.
Lauri: thank goodness I have you magnificent bastards to waste [the offseason] with.
That man just oozes intelligence.
You couldn’t be more right, geek.
This post had to be heavily edited just to make it appear that I was able to match his intellectual horsepower.
By the way, this comment was posted at 12-11-10 9:08:07
RJ2.0: vive la différence.
Cool. I am PST, so shows up as 7:08:07. Can you repost in a couple of hours?
Lauri: thank goodness I have you magnificent bastards to waste [the offseason] with.
Don’t you know it’s all about Spurs’ Time?
RJ2.0: vive la différence.
by J.R. Wilco on Dec 11, 2010 9:21 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Don’t you know it’s all about Spurs’ Time?
RJ2.0: vive la différence.
by J.R. Wilco on Dec 11, 2010 9:24 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Reading this post is like reading a Socratic dialogue. If Socrates gave a damn about basketball.
All these GIFs are breaking my browser.
by quincyscott on Dec 11, 2010 10:26 PM CST up reply actions
You know he did. Only he wanted to call it at Socrates-ball and serve hemlock at concessions, so it never took off.
That’s quite a compliment, by the way. Thanks a lot.
RJ2.0: vive la différence.
by J.R. Wilco on Dec 12, 2010 12:56 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
segue here, dallas won. i watched the game and there were at least 3 very stupid calls from the ref during the last Q. i think nba wants them to lead the western conf. grrr…
There were also at least three very bad possessions by the Jazz in the last two minutes.
Dallas is playing very well right now. Man, I hate that team. I can’t decide if I really hate the Lakers more than the Mavs, it’s that close. I think the combination of Nowitski, Terry, and Cuban are just too much. Any one of them individually would annoy the hell out of me. Roll them all together and it’s unbearable. The horror… the horror…
All these GIFs are breaking my browser.
by quincyscott on Dec 11, 2010 10:30 PM CST up reply actions
I had this friend once who used to always complain about the coach of his favorite college football team. The team was very successful, but somehow the coach was an idiot. One of my friend’s main complaints was the offensive play calling. They would run some kind of up the middle draw play that would only go for two yards, and my buddy would be pissed that they didn’t throw a pass to the end zone. I finally realized that he basically saw any play that did not end up as a touchdown to be a failure. What I tried in vain to explain to him is that that draw play action has a passing play designed to look just like it. The defense may see that draw several times and them bite on the fake draw that turns into the sixty yard touchdown my friend was hoping for all along. Or, those little two yard runs become seven yard runs in the fourth quarter as the other team’s defense is worn down trying to stop it.
Plays don’t just work in isolation. They happen in the context of a real game in real time. Even plays that are ugly and don’t seem to work may bear fruit later in the game. Offense is part science, but also part art. The coaches and players are in a lot better position than we are to know what they want to accomplish, who is capable of what, what match-ups they want, and what is working.
I think the best judge of whether or not the Spurs are for real is the point differential. Lots of little mistakes and failed attempts happen. But at the end of the day, if your team is averaging nearly ten points better than their opponents… these guys are good.
All these GIFs are breaking my browser.
If you had said “bubble screens that started 2-3 yards behind the line of scrimmage” I woulda swore you were talkin’bout the ‘Horns…
I’m excited about life without GD.
by In the 666 on Dec 11, 2010 11:07 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Pfffftt, I’m calling BS on this. I’m not even sure this conversation happened. First of all, there’s no way you’d be able to remember with this vivid detail, even paraphrasing, a conversation this long. Second, a conversation between JRW and Mr. WVFATS would in no way be populated by small snippets of interaction like this- it would be a back-and-forth of 15-minute filibusters until one or both of you finally collapsed from lack of air. Third, you completely and blatantly misrepresented my thoughts. I don’t think we’re “toying” with teams at all; I don’t think we’re “testing” our ‘B’ team in any way. I’ve said for awhile now… we ARE just that good. So good, that it almost appears “that we’re batting teams around, like a cat with a ball of yarn.” Saying I think we’re “toying” or “jacking around” implies that I don’t believe we take things seriously, and that couldn’t be further from the truth. I firmly believe that the Spurs are the most focused and professional team in the league. Fourth, Wayne’s a moran. We never thought last year that we were “messing with teams.” We were in solidarity in thinking that we simply weren’t good enough. I even prayed, that just once, we’d play at the point where I could even accuse them of “messing” with another team, but we never got there!
Great recap though. Your stats were junior varsity, but it’s cute that you both tried. And thank you immensely for sparing us the first 45 minutes of your call, when you guys gleefully talked of World of Warcraft and servers and processors.
"If I was the kind of guy who posted a signature line, this would be it from now on." -SiMA
I’m not even sure this conversation happened.
I was thinking the same thing, but if it didn’t take place, that’s some real JRW creativity. At any rate, verra nize (or however that goes).
So that no one overrates my powers of creativity, I’ll clear this up.
It did indeed happen, although it was a chat via instant message, which of course made it easier to edit than it would have been to remember.
RJ2.0: vive la différence.
by J.R. Wilco on Dec 12, 2010 1:26 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I’m going to start “editing” our conversations.
SiMA- “So I think the SPURS are really great, and I’m proud to be a fan.”
JRW- " I like butterscotch pudding, and you’re really awesome at everything you do, SiMA."
"If I was the kind of guy who posted a signature line, this would be it from now on." -SiMA
by SgtinManusArmy on Dec 12, 2010 5:40 PM CST up reply actions
You’re like a little girl. ::rolls eyes::
Just give jrw his props, even if you disagree with his transcription.
With all due respect, gentlemen, we're not as crazy as she is.

by 




































