Game 14 Recap: I'm Thankful For Michael Beasley
Game 14, @ Minnesota: Spurs 113-109 (OT) (Record 13-1) RAGE: +3
This will give you insight into my life. I didn't watch the Spurs game live because I went to a Sharks-Blackhawks game with Manoli. The Spurs started at 5 p.m. where I live and the hockey game wasn't until 7:30, meaning literally the whole time on the car ride to the game, during dinner beforehand and sitting in the arena for 40 minutes waiting for the opening face-off, I was eschewing polite conversation so I could stare at my terrible, useless, almost completely non-functional BlackBerry to get score updates on the game. Obviously for much of it, I was in a sour mood.
"HOW ARE WE DOWN 21 TO THE T-WOLVES? HOW ARE WE GETTING OUR ASSES KICKED BY DARKO MILICIC? JESUS, DOES K-LOVE HAVE A 100-100 IN THIS GAME?"
I was basically being a whiny girl, and Manoli, a front-running Lakers fan (he gave up on the Warriors three years ago), was making fun of me.
Then the fourth quarter started and little by little the Spurs were making their comeback. My phone kept not working, and I kept having to turn it off and on for it to update. And that was just to get score updates. Meanwhile Manoli has this fancy I-Phone that not only was working perfectly, but even had a graphic of the court, showing where guys were making and missing their shots.
"HOW CAN YOU GET A 21-FOOT JUMP SHOT BLOCKED YOU FRENCH BASTARD?"
The Spurs made it a one possession game a few times and I was going insane like I was actually watching the game, imploring the team to get a stop on my phone. I was cursing them for getting so close, 95-94, only to tease me and let me down 100-94 with under two minutes to go. Gah!
Then RJ goes to the line, but just gets one. 100-95. A stop, Manu misses a three, Jefferson hits one and it's 100-98. "GET AN EFFING STOP!"
NO. 102-98. Two freebies for Manu. 102-100. "GET ONE EFFING STOP DAMMIT!"
NO. 104-100. Manoli tells me Manu fouled Darko too, so it's going to be an and-1. NOOOOOO! Wait a minute, dummy, you misread that thing. Manu got a layup and HE got fouled. 104-103. "ONE EFFING STOP, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD."
NO. 106-103. We see a graphic saying Neal is at the line and at first it said he only had two shots, and we're thinking, "Hmm, I guess that was smart for Minny to foul intentionally."
Then the thing refreshes and we see that not only did Neal have three free throws, but he made 'em all. HOLY COW TIE GAME.
By now the national anthem of our game was being sung and Manoli was openly imploring me to put the cell phone away. I didn't care. I wanted to make sure the game got into OT. IT DID! Finally, a stop!
Obviously, most of the first period was a blur, and I think a did a fist pump when I saw Rocket give them a lead with a three. Then another fist pump for Manu's steal. Dammit, he got blocked, seven seconds to go. "NO THREES DAMMIT!"
I yelled out loud when the words, "Manu Ginobili blocks Kevin Love's 25-foot three point shot, Antonio McDyess rebound." I was going kinda crazy.
The buzz didn't wear off until the first intermission and the whole time I was watching the hockey game, all I was thinking about was how great it will be to watch the Spurs when I got home.
Manoli, kept making fun of me, saying it's only Minnesota, but I didn't care. He says the Blackhawks and Sharks are BOTH his favorite teams and he was like my nine-year-old cousin Samantha, rooting for whoever was leading. Sharks won 5-2. It was a decent game, but one marred by the fact that neither team has a big-nosed Argentine on its roster. Just a bunch of random Finns and Swedes. Meh.
God, that game was so stressful, and I was only keeping up by words on a screen. I can only imagine what watching it live was like. It's nuts to be so emotionally invested on November 24, right? How we can keep this up for seven months? This is gonna be a crazy year.
Speaking of crazy, here's a short vid of Manu being Manu. I'm aware there are people out there who don't think of Gino as their favorite player ever. And those people are stupid and ugly and wrong.
El Mirón: Manu Ginobili (via Chasky33)
Now obviously, the Spurs didn't play well for most of the game. Some of the reasons were their fault and some weren't. Offensively I thought they were listless and lazy. Both Manu and Tony were unwilling to drive after a couple of their early efforts were nullified by Darko. Same thing with Timmeh. He missed a couple shots and had a a couple more stuffed and he checked out mentally. Just shut it down. You could see him thinking, "Screw this noise, these guys are way too young and energetic for me, let me save my strength for Dallas in two nights." It didn't help him any that Dick Bevetta, a notorious home-biased referee, was openly letting the T-Pups go over his back and foul him around the basket without any calls. I don't really know what Minnesota was doing differently, but for some reason we weren't even trying P&Rs at all. It was a lot of Iso offense, and the ball movement was severely lacking.
The threes weren't going in either, for anyone, for a variety of reasons. For one, that court of theirs is just weird, and I think it fucks with visiting teams who aren't used to it. The wood in the middle of the court is one color, and then it's way brighter in the offensive zone. I think it's distracting for shooters. Also, I don't think any of the first ten or so threes we tried were very open, again there wasn't enough passing, no drive-and-kicks, none of that. We forced quite a few of them, especially Manu. Late in the second quarter and in the third we were getting better looks and bricking the open ones, but by then we already suffering from the bad momentum of having missed so many.
Then there was the defense.
Look, let's clear up something right now: Anyone who thinks Kevin Love was the star of the game for Minnesota clearly doesn't understand the game. All he was doing was grabbing uncontested defensive boards off our three point jacks and cleaning up garbage on the other end by rebounding over Bonner or shooting short jumpers off Tiago.
Darko, on the other hand, was a fucking BEAST. He was dominating at both ends of the floor, just completely abusing The Golden God. He blocked five shots, was completely unguardable by any of our bigs, and even when he missed, it set up easy weakside rebounds for Love to feast on. I was completely blown away by how good he was, and really, to me he was the star of the game, even over Manu. You know Joe Dumars and Chad Ford were watching the game at some bar, getting drunk off their asses, and screaming to the bartender, "SEE! YOU SEE THIS? YOU STILL THINK I'M CRAZY YOU STUPID ASSHOLES?"
That doesn't mean I'm dismissing Love. Not at all. He was great too, in his own way, but he's more of a rich man's Blair, and not someone who can influence a game on defense like Darko can. Also, I think if you're absolutely committed to taking him away on offense, you can. His offensive game is limited. I don't think Pop or the team took the T-Pups very seriously at all, didn't game plan for them and weren't aware they were in a basketball game until midway through the second quarter. The whole team, the bigs especially, played as though they've never seen Darko or Love before.
There is something else that has to be pointed out: Splitter was getting murdered out there. I love the kid, but let's admit it, he got an education out there last night. It didn't matter who he was guarding, Darko or Love, they were both scoring on him at will. Minnesota pretty much gave the ball to whoever he was guarding on every play. Sometimes Leg got flat out beat, other times he had good position and they made shots over him anyway. Either way it was ugly.
Alright, so I crunched the numbers. In Tiago's first stint he was out there for 9:36, in which the Spurs got outscored 25-18 and Love and Darko combined for 11 points. In the second half he played for 12:20, in which it was 31-22 good guys and the Minny bigs had 10. So that's 49-47 Spurs in 21:56 and 21 for their guys, but it felt like 80-30 T-pups and 60 for Darko-Love (heh), and I think that's more important than you know, actual facts. He was noticeably better in the second half, but he had a lot to do with them getting out to a big lead in the first place.
We also suffered from having to play Rocket so much in this game, where he was getting predictably mauled on the glass against Love. I wrote coming into the game that I was excited about the Blair-Love match-up, but it never materialized because he played stupidly and got in foul trouble. He keeps racking up silly loose ball and over the back fouls and that put-back he tried against three defenders was beyond dumb. He thinks that just because he comes up with the offensive board it's his right to put up any kind of shot, and it's just not the case. Sometimes by the time he gets the ball he's pinned too far underneath the glass or surrounded by a bunch of bigs and the smart play is to pass it back out.
As a consequence of Blair's struggles, for the first time all season we abandoned the chameleon "do what you do and still kick your butt" approach and played like a generic version of the Thunder, basically. Our bigs couldn't complete with their bigs and we gave up trying to after a quarter. It doesn't sound like a good sign at all, but I'm guessing Timmeh and Dice will take Minny a lot more seriously the next time around.
The more serious problem lies with Blair. Increasingly, it's looking like he's going to wind up being the odd man out in the big man rotation. The one skill he has over the others - offensive rebounding - is the asset we value the least, compared to interior defense, defensive rebounding, shooting, etc. There's just too many guys we're facing night after night that Blair can't guard, whether it's mobile shooters like Rashard Lewis/Dirk/LaMarcus Aldridge/Bosh/Jeff Green or post guys like Gasol/Bynum, Darko/Love, Jefferson/Millsap, David Lee, Zach Randolph/Marc Gasol, etc.
I think the main problem is he's miscast in the starting role. He's meant to be an energy guy off the bench and that's all. It's just that the team's big man situation isn't ideal right now. All five guys have different skills and they're all good in different ways, but there are catch-22s everywhere. Normally you'd want Tim to start with Dice, but Tim's lost weight and isn't spending much time in the post this year, meaning for the first time in forever he's actually a legit power forward instead of a center masquerading as one. Playing a lot of minutes with Dice would wear him down. Same thing with Rocket, so you want to play Tim mostly with Blair or Splitter. Meanwhile you can't bring both Blair and Bonner off the bench together because you'd be seriously undersized and soft defensively.
It seems to me that the team is grooming Splitter to start eventually, perhaps by the second half of the season. Dice will be the third big and Bonner the fourth. Blair will only play if the team is flat and needs some energy, or on those SEGABABAs where Tim and/or Dice are resting. So eventually he and Blair will be flip-flopping roles.
In the fourth quarter the threes eventually started to drop; after a 2-of-19 start, they canned eight of their last 13. Manu made a number of big shots, and had the steal and the block in overtime, but lots of guys contributed to the comeback. Tony hit a couple of long twos (ugh), RJ had that three to cut it to two and played some good defense, and Rocket and Neal both hit threes as well. Dice stated off slow defensively but heated up as the night went along and had a block on Luke Ridnour's lay-up to send it to OT.
However, equally important to the win were the contributions of a couple T-Pups; Ridnour, Wayne Ellington, eternal Manu whipping-boy Corey Brewer, and particularly Michael Beasley, who's an absolute clown. He had like three air balls, two passes into the stands and some careless fouls. Also, really, really stupid hair. I think the T-Pups must regret Stephen Curry. Imagine if they had a real perimeter shooter to go with those bigs, they might be a seven or eight seed. Instead they're going nowhere with their terrible guards.
It would be something if Darko could keep this up and totally turn his career around and change everyone's perceptions of him. He's only 25, you know. Still, we shouldn't get too carried away with him. He started the year poorly and even Kwame Brown has had big games now and then. Let's see if he can keep it going for a month or two. All I know is that Milicic was not happy with the officiating after the game.
Your Three Stars:
3. Gary Neal - He didn't play all that great, but it takes some stones to sink all three freebies in that situation, especially when you're a rookie.
2. Tony Parker - Not his most dominant game but he had effective stretches here and there and didn't allow his counterparts to do much offensively. He's falling in love a bit too much with the three (says the guy whose favorite player shot ten of them).
1. Manu Ginobili - 26-6-6-1-2, with a few ghastly turnovers thrown in for good measure. Our guy really knows how to fill up a box score. My favorite part was when he got an elbow from Brewer early in the fourth and then he hit back-to-back threes on him and gave him this look on the jog back down the court like, "You like that, mofo?"
Don't tell me I was the only one who noticed it.
Up Next: Friday, Vs. Dallas (10-4). Coming off an impressive win at OKC. They're still the Mavs, still annoying as shit, and still no threat to anyone of consequence in May. They've been better on the road (5-1) than at home and their coach, Rick Carlisle has made noise about being the best zone team in the NBA, which would seem to fit us to a tee since supposedly we can shoot threes well this year and stuff. Tyson Chandler's there now and he always has given Timmeh trouble. Dirk has always been an impossible match-up for us, but actually think smalls who get underneath him give him more problems than bigs, so guys like Neal and Hill might get some time on him. Punk ass Jason Terry has gotten off to a good start too, and why shouldn't he since it's November instead of May. We're catching a bit of a break in that Rodrique Baeaioubuoieas (sic?) is out.
I think the key will be for Tony and Manu to play well. Revolutionary concept, I know.
In a way I'm glad the Minnesota game unfolded it the way it did before we played these guys. Now they won't go into it complacent and lazy and they'll come out angry and focused. I think we make it a baker's dozen.
35 comments
|
9 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I was at the game. It was really really depressing to watch Darko consistently dominate Duncan down low. And the Wolves fans LOVE Darko for some reason. They go nuts over him. At the pause during the national anthem, someone screamed DARKOOOOOOOOO loud enough for everyone to hear.
That said, I never felt like the game got out of hand and was pretty confident we were going to win. Pop’s rotations made no sense to me. I was screaming about him letting Tiago get manhandled by Love all night without enough McDyess in the game, but obviously he knows what he’s doing and managed the minutes perfectly to secure the comeback.
The defense is what’s really disconcerting. The offense has been en fuego all year, and last night we were missing easy shots around the bucket and wide open threes that just don’t go down sometimes.
That said, I think I’m a borderline jinx. The two Spurs games I’ve seen here have gone into OT and last time we need 55-7-10 from TP to get out of 2OT.
Also, what a great market to root for opponents. The Target Center is never over 35% full and we had 3rd row seats for $40 a pop. From ticketmaster. Face value. Shocking. Oh, and they have 1 banner in the whole arena: 04 division title. Yikes. No wonder Stern talks about contracting
Pop’s rotations made no sense to me

Yo, I’m 6-11, but I just want to dribble through my legs and shoot jumpshots like a guard. - Marc Blucas on Tim Duncan
by TDzilla! on Nov 26, 2010 3:29 AM CST up reply actions 4 recs
Oh classic Pop!
"Rip it and grip it!" -Kevin Costner
by The Augustus on Nov 26, 2010 7:37 PM CST up reply actions
Love the signature by the way. I was just watching that clip only a few days ago.
"Rip it and grip it!" -Kevin Costner
by The Augustus on Nov 26, 2010 7:38 PM CST up reply actions
I hate to say I told you so (since I didn’t), but I told you so (kind of). Darko could be a difference maker in this league. There aren’t a lot of centers that can affect the game in both sides the way Darko can. Granted, the sample size is too small to draw any definitive conclusions but the talent is definitely there.
I also think that Beasley could become an elite scorer if he ever gets his head on straight. There’s just so much talent there. As for Love, I think he is a fantastic player, but I don’t think he is the kind of guy you build a team around. Both his scoring and his rebounding seem to be complimentary in the way that Stampler hinted to. He just takes what the defense gives him, which is great for a role player but not for a franchise player.
"Deep down we all know that swagger comes hand in hand with insecurity. We strut not to convince competitors of our dominance; we strut to convince ourselves."
Matthew Powell
In Beasley’s previous 7 games he had averaged 29 points, whereas RJ had averaged 13.5 points in his previous 7 games. In this game, RJ outscored Beasley 19-11. I don’t know whether RJ’s defense had a great deal to do with Beasley playing so poorly or not, but RJ seemed to quietly have another good game.
RJ was 6-9 from the line, helped make up for a bad shooting night. He’s been getting a lot of free throws this year. He was always good at that in New Jersey.
Gotta wonder he’d be getting these calls if he hadn’t had such a torrid start to the season.
For now, it is Timmy’s team and Manu’s blog. -swgeek
There’s just too many guys we’re facing night after night that Blair can’t guard, whether it’s mobile shooters like Rashard Lewis/Dirk/LaMarcus Aldridge/Bosh/Jeff Green or post guys like Gasol/Bynum, Darko/Love, Jefferson/Millsap, David Lee, Zach Randolph/Marc Gasol, etc.
Blair had a solid game against Utah. Jefferson and Millsap aren’t quick and explosive. Millsap is slightly bigger, but Blair did good in that game. But I agree with your main point. He should be coming off the bench because he doesn’t match up well with a lot of the quicker/bigger bigs.
Tony Parker – Not his most dominant game but he had effective stretches here and there and didn’t allow his counterparts to do much offensively. He’s falling in love a bit too much with the three (says the guy whose favorite player shot ten of them).
Parker’s been shooting the 3 well in his shooting of 3’s recently. Hes 4/6 from 3 pt. Defenses give him the spacing for a 3.
Honestly, it’s more valuable if he takes 2 steps back and hits the corner 3 rather than a corner long 2.
Nice work Stamp. Your recap was exactly how I watched the game too. I work in Korea and all the games are on in the morning (local time), so I was watching the game updates on my Iphone too. Usually I go home and watch the match with league pass, so I never look at the scores at work. But I thought since it was the Wolves, I’d have a quick glance at the box score after the first quarter. Of course we’re getting owned and now I’m thinking, shit, I don’t wanna go home and watch this game if we get smoked, so I kept track of the game and the rest is history.
But I had the same ordeal with the Neal FTs as well. Neal makes 2 of 2. I thought that was real smart by Minnesota and I had given up hope. one refresh later and we’re going into overtime.
We woulda lost that game 9 times out of 10 last year. This year we just have the moxy to get us through those tough spells. Whether it be them playing well or us playing poorly, we know we have the focus to scrap it out. The old saying is old for a reason, “Good teams find a way to win, even when they’re playing bad.”
Plus, the ANALysts are starting to take notice, which means more coverage for us and almost makes the podcasts worth listening to again.
"Are you gunna bite all day little doggie, or are you gunna bite?"
We woulda lost that game 9 times out of 10 last year.
This year we’d only lose it 6 out of 10 times. Fortunately this was not one of the 6.
Beasley will drive Kurt Rambis to drink. The ultimate coaching nightmare is a player with outrageous talent and zero clue.
by doggydogworld on Nov 26, 2010 1:12 PM CST up reply actions
The ultimate coaching nightmare is a player with outrageous talent and zero clue.
Well put, doggydog. That’s positively sig-worthy.
For now, it is Timmy’s team and Manu’s blog. -swgeek
Exactly the kind of player Pop would trade for sandwich and a bag of chips. No clue on how that kind of player would get signed by the Spurs in the first place, however….
Hey, if posting a sharp, insightful, yet non-sarcastic comment were that easy, even olf would do it.
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Nov 26, 2010 5:23 PM CST up reply actions
I have to go back up and finish reading, but real quick
Meanwhile you can’t bring both Blair and Bonner off the bench together because you’d be seriously undersized and soft defensively.
This is something that’s so obvious it must be true, but there is counter-evidence both in the fact that we played these two together a bunch last year (probably more than we had to) and it did very well against other benches (not just better than the catastrophe you think it’d be, but great).
Of course these lineups we’re talking about, they often featured a guy named Manu Ginobili who puts Blair and Bonner’s talents to work. This year we’re starting Manu and not playing Bonner Blair much. 11 1/2 minutes so far with mixed results.
It’s more about having a play maker on the floor than anything. You need a Tony or Manu. Hill is not a back up point guard.
This is why Pop is subbing out Manu or Parker (most of the time Manu) early in the 1st quarter to ensure that he has a ball handler at all times in the game.
Amazing the number of sports writers who though Hill was a PG that could replace Parker if he were traded away.
And amazine number of £ers have thought that too.
In fact I remember expecting such toward the beginning of Hill’s rookie season when I went through my anti-Parker phase.
For now, it is Timmy’s team and Manu’s blog. -swgeek
Hill can play PG imho. But we’re comparing his ball-handling to one of the best, if not the best, starting guard tandem in the NBA. Compared to a locked-in TP and a never-say-die Manu, most PGs in the league would appear inadequate.
In any event, I think it was more important for Hill to get his confidence in his shot back in the early going this season than to force him to handle the ball every time TP was resting. Now that his shots have started to swish, I think we can expect to see him run more plays and with improved decision-making. It’s bizarre how confidence in one facet of a player’s game can cross over into other aspects of his game. (Great players seem to know this, and when their shots aren’t falling, they often focus on defense or rebounding or making the right pass, do well in that area, and then they seem to be unable to miss. It’s weird, but you see it so often with players like Manu.)
Hey, if posting a sharp, insightful, yet non-sarcastic comment were that easy, even olf would do it.
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Nov 26, 2010 5:35 PM CST up reply actions
Hill’s point guard skills aren’t that much, unless you consider not coughing up the ball a big key to it.
Hill’s strengths show most when he’s a 2 guard. His effectiveness goes down a lot when he is the point guard because he can’t really create for himself.
He’s important to the team, but the way you get the most out of him is by having him be the off guard with Parker or Manu.
what’s this you call “hockey?”
"Yes, it's important that I have good numbers, and I'm well-respected as a player. But I think it's more important that I'm respected as a man." - Some Tall Guy Who Wore #50
I saw a three part documentary on it called “The Mighty Ducks” a few years back.
Apparantly, it’s a non-stopped fun fest until you have to play against Iceland or the Varsity hockey team.
I know this doesn’t explain much about the rules of this game (the documentary didn’t go into rules), but that’s what I know about it.
zzz
Additional points on an excellent analysis. We actually never had seen this Darko and Love before. We prepared for these guys the way they were last year. Obviously, both have improved tremendously. I think you were too hard on Tiago. He actually played very well considering that Darko was playing out of his mind. With Tiago in the game we slowly crept back into it. He also caused a key Darko turnover. Finally, your analysis of Blair is spot on. All of us had high hopes for the Beast and we all still hope he finds a niche. But he has severe limitations and they are being exposed on a nightly basis. I think it’s just a matter of time before Tiago replaces him as a starter.
When the RAGE meter was first unveiled, I never thought we’d be at plus 3 this early in the season — if at all.
While I too am thankful for Michael Beasley and his wayward passes, it’s a testament to the resolve of the Spurs (not to mention the inexperience of Minny) that this came up as a win.
What a fun game to watch!
For now, it is Timmy’s team and Manu’s blog. -swgeek
Speaking of the Twolves’ inexperience, the fouling Neal behind the arc with less than a minute to go was awful for them. Some Minn. fans were saying it was a bad call, but they never should’ve given the refs the opportunity to blow the whistle. imho. I guess maybe they figured the Spurs would get more of a lift had Neal made the triple than for making three FTs (how little they understand the team), or that the rookie would miss at least one (again, how little they understand this team).
The Spurs turned up the defensive pressure at the right times and were able to exploit the Twolves’ inexperience just when they were most vulnerable to mental mistakes.
Hey, if posting a sharp, insightful, yet non-sarcastic comment were that easy, even olf would do it.
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Nov 26, 2010 5:42 PM CST up reply actions
Thank God for Neal. Would have been utterly humiliating otherwise. He gave the Spurs a chance at redemption in overtime.
"Rip it and grip it!" -Kevin Costner
by The Augustus on Nov 26, 2010 7:37 PM CST up reply actions

by 
































