Showin' the Love: Spurs @ OKC - Game 9 Recap
So, I guess maybe I should take a sentence or two to reintroduce myself to PtR, and to all the new members I'm not yet familiar with. I've been hanging around this particular corner of the internet, off-and-on, since before it was named PoundingTheRock. It was the absurdist writing/ranting/whining of the inimitable Matthew Powell that sucked me in, and I still miss his insecure, misanthropic, homoerotically-tinged homophobic spiels. If balding, out-of-shape, emotionally damaged ex-engineers with the wrong type of reproductive equipment were my thing, I'd have been like, totally all over him.
It's been quite a while since I did my last recap, and I noticed one thing that kinda made me realize just how long... Most regulars are, I'm sure, familiar with the PtR Lexicon, and how it's existence (or lack thereof) was, for quite some time, a running inside-joke. It was LatinD's misspelling in the comments of my last recap that spawned the Lexicon. That's waaaaayy too long ago... much longer than I intended to go between game recaps.
Like I mentioned above, I was obviously a bit disappointed when Matthew left the site, but I've burnt myself out on enough online forums that I understand the need to occasionally cauterize part of your online existence in order to maintain your real-life sanity. In a way, that kind of accounts for my occasional disappearing act... I don't want to burn out, so I take breaks... including unintentional ones caused by that pesky condition we generally call 'real life'.
Since re-volunteering, I'd been debating with myself whether my extended absence was triggered by Powell's retirement, by Stampler's temporary drift away from us, by the Spurs' slow descent from the top of the NBA food-chain, or by the everyday personal and family issues that everyone deals with overwhelming my spare time. All of the above, probably. I've read that people can only deal with so much change before they get physically sick, and between getting married, finishing a new degree, changing jobs (twice), a new house and two new kids, it was inevitable that my online activity would suffer. What can I say? I've been busy... but I missed you guys/gals. (Cue sympathetic & sickly 'Awwwww' from audience). I could write more, but I'd probably end up sounding like an emo teenager on ecstasy, and nobody wants that.
Anyway, PtR did just fine without me. Ownership passed from Matthew to Wayne to JRW without any noticeable hitches, Stampler is back and writing more and better than ever, and the game threads have exploded far beyond what they were two-three years ago. Some other things have changed tho... in the past, I could slap up a post that more than flirted with the boundaries of slander and implied bestiality without worry. Now, because we're under the SBNation umbrella, I apparently need to account for things like 'copyright', and 'plagiarism', and 'libel' in order to avoid 'massive lawsuits'. I'm still wrapping my head around the policy for images, so please don't hate me for not including any in this recap. (Also, I'm trying to figure out whether referring to OKC as 'Okies' would be offensive, but the SBNation policy doesn't seem to cover Steinbeck references.)
So, about the game... 8-1. That's the best Spurs start for a while, so it appears that Manu's plea to Pop to not actively throw away early games has borne some fruit. We've been helped along by a relatively cream-puff-y schedule so far, but we've also seen three likely playoff teams (I expect to see OKC make the playoffs this year). If nothing else, we haven't lost any gimme-games yet. NOOCH wasn't supposed to start off 8-0, but I don't think anyone's going to pencil them in for a sure win this year unless CP gets hurt again. So, aside from some games being a bit closer than I'd like, so far so good. Not great, but good.
Unlike Stampler, I'm actually a bit optimistic about our defensive potential. While we don't have any shut-down players anymore (ie, Bowen and a younger Duncan) the Spurs are showing some flashes of excellent team D. More than offense, defense requires active communication between teammates, and it takes longer to fit new players into a scheme. The first half was another showcase of the San Antonio Suns defense, but our beloved Spurs finally showed up after halftime. There were a couple of possessions late in the game where the rotations and shifts looked nearly flawless, and the Spurs were rewarded by a string of 24-second violations. Against a team with Westbrook and Durant, that's not nothing. I'll re-evaluate after we've gone up against some top-tier teams, but it's just possible that our D may not be the open sieve that we were worried about earlier this year. I hope. Consistency will definitely be an issue for the next couple of months, but I'm hopeful.
Last night we were helped along by a 3-point barrage mostly courtesy of Matt Bonner. He took a couple of ill-advised 5 footers, but had an otherwise near-perfect night shooting. His defense is still his weak spot, and Pop pulled him once OKC started attacking him on isolations. Given my earlier optimism about defense, that was a less-than-nice reminder dose of reality, but the good guys still managed to hold the Thunder to 38 points in the second half. Also, I like our scrubs. Last night, any sub who played more than token minutes had a plus/minus of at least +10. They didn't suck.
Other early-season ideas/notes/ephemera
Rage: It's still early, but like most other San Antonians, I've largely forgiven RJ for his learning-curve season, especially if he can keep this up. I'd like to see more on defense, but his aggressiveness is a welcome factor on the other side, especially now that 4-down may not be an offensive staple. He had an off-looking game last night but still scored 18 on 11 shots. I'll take that.
Tony: Like many on this site, I have a tempestuous love-hate relationship with Frenchie. I love it when he passes to Manu, and I hate it when he doesn't. However, since this was to be the last year of his contract, I had been planning on spending the next 8-10 months shamelessly extolling the virtues of all things Parker in an attempt to do my (very) little part in keeping him in silver-and-black. But then he went and signed a pre-season extension, thus deflating a theme I had been planning on milking all season long. Now I've got nothing. Thanks for the assist, Tony. (Seriously, on the off chance that this paragraph ever makes it to Parker, I love you Tony, and don't let my constant hating ever convince you otherwise).
DeJuan: Still struggling, but he also keeps showing signs of BLAAAAAAAIIIR. (7pts in a row!) Defensively, he's getting exposed a bit by bigger opponents, but he's still doing things like grabbing 11 rebounds (7 offensive) in 16 minutes. I'm still unsure what to think of him long-term, and it doesn't help that phrases like 'an undersized, unpolished Malik Rose' keep coming to mind.
Splitter: If I'm involved in a fatal accident in the near future, my wife apparently becomes property of Tiago. I don't believe I have any choice in this matter, and I'll simply have to resign myself to constantly sniffing my food for any suspicious almond-y smells. Anyway, three quick fouls more or less consigned him to the bench this game, but based on his previous performances, I expect him to be starting by January. I'll be very interested to see how he handles Gasol when we face the Lakers.
Georgie: He managed to pull in a +19 on the +/- despite shooting 1-10. I'll probably waste a couple of hours later trying to figure out how that is statistically possible.
Timmeh: It's a SEGABABA, so I'm giving Timmy a break here – 6 points, but efficient defense and +6 on the over/under. Best stat of the night for Duncan? 23:06 minutes played. We all know he can turn it on for the playoffs as long as he's healthy, and having his teammates step up for games like this is probably the Spur's best take-away from this particular outing.
Manu: Again, some leeway for the SEGABABA, which have always given Manu problems. For the first three quarters, it looked like fatigue was seriously slowing him down, but then he stepped into a phone booth just before the fourth. 4-14 shooting overall ain't good, but 21 points on 14 shots ain't bad. Plus, he delivered the killing blows to put any thoughts of a comeback out of OKC's mind. Timing is everything with Manu.
So, I'm enjoying this season so far. Winning always smooths over the rough spots, but nobody is expecting much from this team come April/May (let alone June), so it almost seems like every win is a bonus. No stress... not for me as a fan, anyway. Also, I'm having conversations like this while watching the game:
Wife: "Wait... what did they say that guy's name is? That one?"
Me: "Ummm... that's Serge Ibaka."
Wife: "What?"
Me: "Serge Ibaka."
Wife: "No, seriously, what's his name?"
Me: "Serge Ibaka."
Wife: "Are you making fun of me?"
Me: " Look, it's spelled right here."
Wife: "...oh. Ok."
*Semi-long pause*
Me: "What did you think they were saying?"
Wife: "Sir Chewbacca."
*Another pause*
Me: "That's awesome."
So, as a consequent, I now, rather badly, want the Spurs to trade for Ibaka. Also, I may need to start giving my wife writing credit on any recaps and posts.
So, our PtR trademarked Three Stars:
3. Manu and RJ (tied): Manu... you kinda sucked until you didn't. Then you were awesome again. And RJ put in yet another efficient game. RJ, keep it up. Manu, stop playing with me like that.
2. Tony: I'm glad we'll still have you to kick around Tony.
1. Bonner: I actually kinda wanted to give Serge the #1 star, but 1) He's not a Spur, and 2) I couldn't find out which glyphs to use to do a good Wookie growl. (I'm thinking harmonized glottal stops...) So I suppose Matty gets it. 7-7 on threes. I GUESS that's pretty good.
57 comments
|
11 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
“Sir Chewbacca” it is.
"We suck on 'D. Both individually and team-wise, we suck. We're pretty consistent that way. I don't know if I have an answer to that. If I did, we wouldn't suck quite so bad." - Popovich
by Aaron "Hirschof" Preine on Nov 15, 2010 2:49 PM CST reply actions
No problem. I might get to updating the page sometime in 2011.
With all due respect, gentlemen, we're not as crazy as she is.
Yeah … I didn’t think that Sir Chewbacca should have to wait that long.
He’s a busy man, you know?
The point with intangibles is that no one can see them.
I see it!
Um … that might not be the easiest to work out. Please stand by.
(Good stuff though.)
The point with intangibles is that no one can see them.
Sweet! I had a friend who kept getting my e-mail in their spam, so I just assume that’s where it goes now. :)
No worries. I figure the odds are 0.00009%. But can’t hurt to ask, right? I got my one time though, so I can live with that.
Awesome! I feel lucky to read so many good writers here. Thank you for coming back.
Hey, if posting a sharp, insightful, yet non-sarcastic comment were that easy, even olf would do it.
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Nov 15, 2010 4:04 PM CST reply actions
I’m still unsure what to think of him long-term, and it doesn’t help that phrases like ‘an undersized, unpolished Malik Rose’ keep coming to mind.
This is great because Malik had neither size nor polish. He had some of what Dejuan has when it comes to energy and ball magnetism, but that’s like comparing a campfire to Canopus.
He managed to pull in a +19 on the +/- despite shooting 1-10. I’ll probably waste a couple of hours later trying to figure out how that is statistically possible.
Good tool for this. The pluses in George’s Plus Minus were the stint from 5:39 left in the 2nd forward and the 4th quarter. Both times he played with Bonner, RJ, and two out of the big three, who were taking turns lighting it up in these minutes.
I didn’t see this or any of the game, but how batshit were the lineups starting with about 8 minutes left in the fourth? Spurs go Tony-Hill-Manu-RJ-Bonner and OKC sends out Westbrook-Maynor-Harden-Spellingosha-Durant! Who here thought the deciding center matchup would be Durant versus Bonner, and that Matt would win it?
by greyberger on Nov 15, 2010 4:43 PM CST reply actions 3 recs
Spellingosha
Hee hee.
I didn’t see the game, but if I had, I still wouldn’t believe that Matty outplayed Durant. This season is weird.
With all due respect, gentlemen, we're not as crazy as she is.
on one point wasn’t RJ the five, when we put neal in for bonner…an even smaller smaller ball lineup
by SpurInDallas on Nov 15, 2010 11:48 PM CST up reply actions
comparing a campfire to Canopus
I love this.
The point with intangibles is that no one can see them.
When I read that part, I thought for a moment that you had written it, given your love for… let’s just say, interesting similes. Or was that a metaphor? I always had trouble differentiating the two in English class.
I think greyb. deserves a rec for making me GOL with that comparison, and another one for pointing out the usefulness of the popcornmachine tool. Could someone lend me another to make his post turn green? :)
Hey, if posting a sharp, insightful, yet non-sarcastic comment were that easy, even olf would do it.
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Nov 15, 2010 5:52 PM CST up reply actions
I’ll have to watch the replay to be certain, but I think RJ 2.0 was still covering Durant at that time.
Hey, if posting a sharp, insightful, yet non-sarcastic comment were that easy, even olf would do it.
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Nov 15, 2010 5:43 PM CST up reply actions
If a byproduct of this excellent recap is for us relative noobs to see you in a new light, Mission Accomplished. I can’t believe how many quality writers we have! I’m drowning in my inferiority!
Oh, and that game really was everything we needed it to be. I couldn’t agree more with your points.
Does anyone still use a pen anymore? Other than metaphorical ones?
Hey, if posting a sharp, insightful, yet non-sarcastic comment were that easy, even olf would do it.
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Nov 15, 2010 8:11 PM CST up reply actions
I have a quill, a bottle of india ink, and a roll of papyrus that I pressed myself.
by DrumsInTheDeep on Nov 15, 2010 8:20 PM CST up reply actions
GOL
Hey, if posting a sharp, insightful, yet non-sarcastic comment were that easy, even olf would do it.
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Nov 15, 2010 8:33 PM CST up reply actions
Now I really want to see what comes out of your pen.
Hey, if posting a sharp, insightful, yet non-sarcastic comment were that easy, even olf would do it.
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Nov 15, 2010 8:34 PM CST up reply actions
I wanna see what comes out of your pen.
TWSS!
Rim Rockin' Red Rocket -silverandblack_davis
by SpursfanSteve on Nov 16, 2010 10:26 AM CST up reply actions
Sweet! First Stampler comes back and now this. You were before my time here on PtR, makes me wish I had discovered this site earlier – very engaging.
Lauri: thank goodness I have you magnificent bastards to waste [the offseason] with.
I forgave RJ when he restructured his contract. My problems with him were never with the output, just the quality to the dollar. Now he has nowhere to go but up in my book*.
*Which is a pop-up book about pop-tarts. Slightly edible.
Although, Spurs didn’t sign him to that contract, so those expectations shouldn’t ever have been so high. To me, Spurs made the investment and it looks like it is working. If RJ played like this last season his contract would have demanded a lot more money. In the end, it actually worked out well for the Spurs, if you think about it. Spurs just weren’t healthy last year
As another PtR’r pointed out, if RJ had played like RJ 2.0 last season, he probably would have been snatched up by another team in this crazy off-season. Too many teams that had cleared out cap space trying to land LeBron but lost out on the sweepstakes… they would have latched onto an RJ 2.0 in a heartbeat.
Still, I doubt that RJ regrets missing out on that too much. He got what he wanted from San Antonio, he’s playing well and looking comfortable on-court, and I think he genuinely likes and appreciates being a Spur.
Hey, if posting a sharp, insightful, yet non-sarcastic comment were that easy, even olf would do it.
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Nov 16, 2010 12:19 PM CST up reply actions
I don’t know if he would have played like RJ2.0 without all the work in the offseason though. But you are correct that if he had even played like RJ1.5 he would be a lot more expensive at best, and elsewhere at worst.
Lauri: thank goodness I have you magnificent bastards to waste [the offseason] with.
You right, he probably wouldn’t have.
But grego was saying “If RJ played like this last season his contract would have demanded a lot more money.”
I was just saying that it would have, but most likely he wouldn’t be wearing Silver and Black. Grego’s right… it worked out well for the Spurs (this year).
Hey, if posting a sharp, insightful, yet non-sarcastic comment were that easy, even olf would do it.
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Nov 16, 2010 1:04 PM CST up reply actions
Oh the offseason work definitely paid off. But familiarity with the system and healthy players also helps. All the right pieces came together during the 1st season.
???
Do you mean after the first season?
Hey, if posting a sharp, insightful, yet non-sarcastic comment were that easy, even olf would do it.
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Nov 16, 2010 5:25 PM CST up reply actions
Like I mentioned above, I was obviously a bit disappointed when Matthew left the site,
WHO?!
Good start, welcome back.
Biggest coach Pop/Tiago Splitter homer on the internet™
by Josh Guyer (completely deck) on Nov 15, 2010 6:15 PM CST reply actions
It was an absolute joy to read this. Glad you decided to come back.
"I've got Tim (Duncan) and you don't. That's the difference." -Gregg Popovich
I third that emoticon.
"A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It’s what happens while you wait for moments that will never come." - Lester Freamon, The Wire
by silverandblack_davis on Nov 15, 2010 10:38 PM CST up reply actions
I liked Hill’s shot selection better this game, more drives to the basket. I take it that the bad results were due to being slightly off-balance. I won’t be surprised if his next game he doesn’t score 20+ points.
Against Chicago and their D? That’s a bold prediction… props to you (and Hill) if he has a breakout game against them.
Hey, if posting a sharp, insightful, yet non-sarcastic comment were that easy, even olf would do it.
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Nov 15, 2010 10:54 PM CST up reply actions
George had ‘only’ 14 points against the Bulls, but he looked more confident (hesitated on one shot that led to a wasted possession, but otherwise solid), and played well on both sides of the ball, especially in the 4th quarter (?) if I remember correctly. So props to you for your prediction.
Hey, if posting a sharp, insightful, yet non-sarcastic comment were that easy, even olf would do it.
Mike Monroe: ...the uninformed presume Parker is expendable.
by freshtunarightofftheboat on Nov 19, 2010 1:00 PM CST up reply actions
Awesome reading…..
You know what’s awesome too? Spurs are first in the NBA, ….ahhhh, the view is good from up here!
by spursfan_needs_counseling on Nov 16, 2010 11:37 AM CST reply actions

by 
































