Bobcats 92 Vs Spurs 76: You Shall Not Mention The Second Half

If you don't feel like reading the post, this will do for a recap
You knew this was coming. The Spurs had won two straight games against playoffs teams, and one of them was the Lakers; they had finally garnered some attention from the national media, and pundits around the world had propelled them to the top 7 places of their bogus power rankings; Blair, the Teen Beast, had gone 20/20 and it was gorgeous. The spotlight was too bright for the Spurs: a letdown was looming.
So our Spurs lost, and it was Joakim Noah. If for some more reason you want to know more about this disastrous game, go beyond the jump. It won't be worth it.
Mojo Disclaimer
Me being on recap duty has no influence on the outcome of the game. Me always having to gripe about disappointing or downright crushing losses is a mere coincidence. Someday I will recap a great win, and be able to be positive about it.
I hope.
A Throwback First Half
I doubt there's a coach in this league that has the ability to impact a team so profoundly in a short period of time like Larry Brown can do.
There always seems to be a spike in the overall quality of the teams he coaches during their second or third year in his system, as the players embrace his defense-first philosophy and his love for half-court sets that evolve into fast breaks after a timely steal of a turnover for their opponents. Sometimes we forget that Larry sowed the seeds for the Spurs' current philosophy in the early years of Robinson's career. If Larry hadn't decided to coach that devastated post-Gervin team of defense-last offense-yes-please riff-raff, the Admiral might've been stuck in a lousy team for years despite his herculean efforts, and might've moved on after all. Or maybe Gregg Popovich, his protege, might've learned a different branch of basketball and become an advocate for 7SoL decontracté fun. Who knows?
In any case, San Antonio would've had a far different history without Brown's influence, and people should thank him for it.
The first half reminded me of the classic games versus Larry Brown's Pistons. Good defense at both ends, horrible offense for long periods of time at both ends, too, and low-scoring affairs. Both teams missed their first 4 shots, a small sample of what was to come. I'm not going to lie: it was fugly. But it was also nostalgic to me, in a way. Thanks to Blair and a great push by the BAM late in the half, the Spurs finished with a 4 point lead. Our offense was mediocre, but our defense kept us in the game.
It Didn't Happen
I know I said you shouldn't mention this half, but I have to. I'll be quick about it.
This was our worst half of the season, most likely, and yet I can't find it in me to get upset about it. At some point in the third quarter they started making their shots, after a dry spell that lasted a half a quarter - we continued shooting blanks. It's times like this when you wish you had the option of bringing two great shooters off the bench, Bonner and Findog, to be able to check if they have the hot hand. Tonight, everyone was off: Manu was missing his jumpers again, Mason followed suit and overdrove many times; Tony kept turning the ball over; RJ was timid and his shot was also off. Nothing was going well, and the third quarter ended on a whimper. Mine.
As someone suggested during the game thread, the Third Quarter Collapse evolved (mutated) into a new beast called Second Half Collapse. They made 3s at will, we clanked ours. They got fouls, we got turnovers. Nothing worked: substitutions, pep talks, yelling, changes in the line-up. With 6 minutes left in the quarter Pop decided to rest his starters, put in our Defeat Cigars, and called it a night.
Why am I not so upset? Because these aren't the Spurs. We shot 38% from the field and 20% (5-25) from three. We've proven we can score, and we will be even better off when the Gingerhead and the Mummy come back. Defense, now? Hm.
It Wasn't All Negative
There certainly are no "3 stars". It was a horrible, horrible game that I don't care to watch ever again. There's always something to share, though, and it might even brighten your day.
- This photo now exists.
- DeJuan Blair continues to be amazing. He had a double double with 11 points and 16 rebounds in 31 minutes (and only a couple of those came during garbage time). I just can't get enough of his smooth acrobatic layups between two or three defenders, and today he proven he's faster than most centers. He even tried to dribble a couple of times, but that didn't end well.
- We got to see a lineup of Ratliff, Ian, Blair, Haislip and Mason. It was something else to see Haislip driving to the basket and fail, and Ian had a beautiful layup. tlo suggest we call them BAM, too - Big Ass Mofos.
- ...That's all.
I apologize for any typos and gibberish. It's late, and my body needs some rest. Tomorrow we face the above average Memphis, and a second loss would send PTR back into Panic Town. Let's have some faith.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
vs LA: 5 points (2 fg) from 6:28 in the 3rd until 8:42 in the 4th (9+ minutes)
vs OKC: 2 points (0 fg) during first 5+ minutes of Q3
vs Char: 2 points (5 fg) from 6:16 in the 3rd until 9:07 in the 4th (9+ minutes)
Big early leads vs. LA and OKC made these offensive droughts survivable. Not so much tonight.
Big Ass Mofos?
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
by the little o on Jan 15, 2010 11:53 PM CST up reply actions
Gosh, there are so many mistakes in this, I cringe that I can’t poke fun at any at them (the Defear Cigar in particular). Good recap regardless LD. Don’t blame yourself in being assigned the recap for this loss. If anything, I got home and began watching the game when the Spurs were up 55-51 in the third, and then, well Chinua Achebe said it best. So blame this one on me. My only act of redemption was when the Admin blocked me and I couldn’t see the game, and the Roberts’ lead grew anyways. Yeah yeah, I know, I’m still blamed.
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
Damn, I just went over the post and tried to fix some of the mistake. I hate that. I was nodding off and actually found I typed some crazy stuff while nearly-asleep. For instance, I have no idea where this came from:
the land of Ra
I asked Tim et al to give it a look, but I guess we were all asleep. Meh.
Bone breaking? -340
Dunkin' Cheerleaders
Sorry dude, didn’t check my email before sleeping. I could barely finish the Memphis preview.
The Spurs - now playing like sh*t again!
Meowwwww
Maybe the Bobcats will get a little more respect now after this season.
A few remarks :
Duncan still produces this year but not at an MVP level. His defense is really lacking.
TP is a step slower (maybe because of his injury) and it shows when he can’t blow by somebody like DJ Augustin, who is not that fast.
If Manu can’t shoot the 3 and we have no Mason or Bonner or FinDog to do it, a good defensive team will kill us. No spacing = no more points (as long as TP don’t get better)
Which leads me conclude that really RJ is nothing more than a complementary scorer. There is no big 4.
Thanks for the tough recap LD. I gotta disagree on one thing.
Why am I not so upset? Because these aren’t the Spurs. We shot 38% from the field and 20% (5-25) from three.
These are the Spurs though. When faced with quick trapping defenses, defense overloading them on the ball side and enough length and quickness to hurry the 3pt shooter, this was our response. This is the first time we have played a team with D this good right or trapping so hard and fast. We saw this last year in the postseason when Dallas did it and we collapsed so bad. I hope our guys practice this shit and learn to get some drives going against such a D instead of always taking the given 3pt shot.
Maybe, but I saw Manu miss three shots where he was completely open. I saw Mason miss 4 shots like that. Bogans missed at least 3. Blair missed 2 layups. RJ missed 2 triples.
That wasn’t great defense. That was just a lousy shooting night. We are a great 3-point shooting team, and it’s a weapon that should punish the team that leaves us open.
Bone breaking? -340
Dunkin' Cheerleaders
i agree on Manu’s open shots. He shot whatever he regularly gets. But Mason I felt was bothered coz the D closed in on him fast, not enough to contest the shot, but just enough to bother him into rushing or at least missing.
Also, when we are getting nothing from inside and have to rely on the 3, its more pressure on the shooters with every miss. That factors in. Even with being a good 3pt threat under normal conditions, yesterday was our response to a tough situation. What I am saying is, we can’t discount it as an anomaly, coz it wasn’t a normal situation. Yesterday should be taken as our response under a pressuring defense.
I’m not taking about Mason’s usual shots off the dribble, around the pick. Those were well contested, and it might’ve bothered (despite him having the quickest release I’ve seen, and having shot over outstretched arms many times). I’m talking about his corner 3s off the pass, and he was wide open. Maybe he’d lost some confidence, but in Mason’s case I doubt it.
Relying on triples is a double-edged sword, but like it or not that’s our team. If some of those 3s had fallen they would’ve had to change their strategy, and it would’ve been a different game. I can’t wait to play against the Bobcats again.
I agree, though, that trapping defenses gives us trouble.
Bone breaking? -340
Dunkin' Cheerleaders
Last year we over relied on the triple. This year with such depth, in the first half we showed we can move the ball reasonably well and cut inside and get some buckets. In the second half, I think a major part of the let down was our energy. We were contend to take what the defense gave. Timmeh got constantly doubled and nobody showed the initiative to cut inside creatively.
Also, even though RJ is playing ok, when is the last time we have thrown an alley oop to that guy. Really, why do we not incorporate his talents into the offense for a few possessions. I wonder what Pop is waiting for.

by 
































