A Quick Statistical Update on the Spurs
Some of you may remember a statistics-based post on where the Spurs stood on offense and defense a little less than a week ago. Well, with the latest winning streak, there's been some changes.
So, if you'll remember, I put more stock in efficiency ratings than actual points scored or given up. This is because teams play at different paces - for example, 2 of the Spurs 4 wins this past week were against the Heat, who played at a slower pace(91.2 possessions/game), and the Timberwolves, who play at a faster pace(96.1). With that in mind, there's going to be a lot of variance in how many points you score or give up, depending on the pace you play with.
For efficiency per 100 possessions, we're going to look at basketball-reference.com. I've included images, since there's no way to hyperlink to pre-sorted stats for the three categories we're looking at. We're also going to look at John Hollinger's team ratings, which take a few other factors into account, as a second opinion.
Offense
First, let's talk about the offense. When we last checked, the Spur's offense was 5th in the league. That's pretty good for such a "boring", "washed-up" team. But after the wins, where do we stand?
The Spurs are tied for the 4th-best offense in the league right now, although if the decimal points went further out, we'd see the Spurs slightly ahead of Toronto. Not too bad, huh? Now we'll look at Hollinger's offensive ratings, where our turnover rate knocks us down a bit. But, we're still in the top 5, after being 7th last week, so not really much to complain about. If the Spurs can clean up the TO's, they should be able to pass Toronto and Denver in the rankings, bringing them to 3rd overall. I don't have to tell you what a departure that is from previous seasons.
Defense
As Spurs fans, the offense is a nice luxury, but that's not what we care most about. We want to see this team get stops. Last week when we looked, the Spurs were the 11th best defense in the league, by efficiency. What does it look like now?
So they've moved up, but here's where I play Debbie Downer: All 4 of the teams the Spurs played over the last week are in the bottom half of the league in terms of offensive efficiency, but their best defensive performance by far came against the best of those 4 teams(Miami). And there's some other good news: the rebounding woes experienced earlier in the season are pretty much completely gone. The Spurs have the 2nd best rebounding rate in the league(after Memphis, of all teams), which helps them rise another spot to #8 in Hollinger's defensive rankings. If they can keep up the good work on the glass, and play tough defense like we saw in the second half against Miami consistently, this team will be who we thought they were coming into the season: One of the league's juggernauts.
Overall Efficiency
It's been a while since we look at the leaguewide Simple Rating System (SRS) ratings from B-R, so let's do that now.
After that demolition of Miami last night, the Spurs have moved up to 5th in the league in terms of their overall efficiency by the SRS metric. They're still second in the West, but tantalizing close to the Lakers - a couple more big wins should put us into the pack of teams with 6.0+ ratings. I say "a couple" because the next two games are against weak competition, not a team in the top half of the league like last night's contest.
And finally, we come to Hollinger, whose power rankings really like the Spurs. Again, I prefer the SRS method because of its simplicity, but Hollinger's computers weight the most recent 10 games more heavily, and that's led to the Spurs being 3rd-best in the league by his calculations.
What we know
The Spurs improvement has been evidenced by the results on the court lately, but it's nice to see statistics backing it up. But the real tests are going to start soon. Our next 3 games are against Washington, Toronto and Detroit, so those won't really tell us anything. But after that, we have Dallas and the Lakers, with one cupcake(New Jersey) in between. The big games are just around the corner, so the Spurs would be wise to speed up the learning curve and gain some more consistency.
Happy New Year, everyone! And may the Spurs make it a great year for us to watch them.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Really awesome post. I love stats that are easy to understand you make good points with them. This shows exactly how much potential this team has. Even with how they’ve struggled all season they’re still this good and can be ALOT better. Juggernaut is truly the word to describe this team at full potential.
"We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams." -Willy Wonka
bonner
could our recent success be due to the fact that we no longer have a line up of 4 people playing d and bonner. just wondering this team kinda resembles the old spurs teams. duncan is the admiral, blair is duncan, rj is sean, mason and manu are elie and tp is avery.
Blair is not Duncan. It’s funny, I’ve always preferred a lineup with two bigs in the paint, and the improvement seems to coincide with the Spurs’ return to this type of play. I also like that Timmy is actually playing power forwards these days, since he’s just as effective in the high post(if not more so, considering his passing ability) as he is down low.
However, having Bonner off the bench for floor-stretching can’t be all bad. Just as long as he’s not trying to match up against all the great big men in the league on defense, it just doesn’t seem like a problem for Matty to be our 4th big.
The Spurs - now playing like sh*t again!
Blair is no Duncan but we need to make sure this young man gets his opportunities. This guy can be Baby Barkley for us if we allow him to be great. Yes he is under sized but this guy can play and he is hungry. What he lacks in height he makes up with hunger. He really knows how to finish around the basket and that is a gift when you are undersized. So I see our success link to Blair’s success. If we do what it takes to make him better, he will make us better.
Feed the Beast more mins.
Bonner getting hurt changes the dynamic. However, Manu and Parker both sucked a lot when Bonner was healthy (during the time frame). You also had RJ still getting to know the system and develop comfort. Now, all seem to be hitting their stride and working towards getting to that goal point.
Bonner, if used wisely would help that powerful bench/role players. You have to remember, that when you play the best teams, you need all your key bench guys because generally your whole bench doesn’t stand out against the top tier teams – only a few players generally.
Great points. Except for Timmeh, who started the season well and hasn’t stopped, no one was playing to their potential. That has changed – it just took longer than we (and Pop) expected for the new and old pieces to mesh.
Silly things do cease to be silly if they are done by sensible people in an impudent way. - Jane Austen
Manu and Parker sucked because they would prefer not to play with Bonner, but of course they would never say it out loud because these are good people and great teammates. But I think their poor play was linked to Bonner being on the floor with them and his unorthodox style.
Bonner used wisely would be Bonner staying on the bench, unless it is garbage mins.
We are rebounding better = NO BONNER
We are playing better defense = NO BONNER
We are scoring in transition = ABSOLUTELY NO BONNER
We are blowing people out = NO BONNER
I don’t know how you can’t contribute our recent success to NO BONNER, when that is the only thing that has changed in the line up.
No one is Duncan except Duncan, I was meaning that we are more of a traditional spurs team now without bonner playing 20 minutes a game, I have no problem with him stealing a few minutes off the bench. However I hate when he starts, and when we were relying on him to slash to the basket our team was in trouble. I would rather see haislip in there if that is our plan of attach for bonner.
I was wrong.
It only took one ugly win to move us into that group of teams with an SRS of 6 or more. We’re at 6.00 as of today, and our closest opponent, the Lakers, are at 6.07. The Celtics lead the league at 6.31, so we’re pretty much in that group of elite teams now, statistically. But those two teams(BOS, LAL) have dropped off a lot with their injury issues, so take that with a grain of salt. I guess the good news there is that they aren’t as deep as the Spurs.
The Spurs - now playing like sh*t again!

by 



































