ATS Summer League Microscope - Jerryd Bayless - Portland Trail Blazers
By popular demand, Jerryd Bayless got placed under the ATS microscope. This is an evaluation of his performance on Wednesday against the Rockets. I will work in some other observations from the Blazers beat down of the Spurs from Saturday as well.
The main question surrounding Bayless, "Is he a point guard?" The answer, "No." Well, that's my answer.
The ATS View of Bayless
Bayless didn't have the toughest of match ups in the Rockets game. He was alternately going against Mike Green, Will Conroy, and Garrett Temple. None of these guys have been rotation players in the NBA. I don't any of them will be shortly.
In the game against the Rockets, I think two things speak to my "No" answer. One, Bayless ended the first half with 11 points, 5 turnovers, and 0 assists (He had 7 more turnovers vs the Spurs and his game low for the summer league is 6). Two, in crunch time, the Blazers went to Pooh Jeter in the fourth quarter as the point guard and play maker, and Bayless played the shooting guard. Pooh had 15 points, 6 assists, and only 1 turnover in 21 minutes. Bayless went 1-5 from the field in the second half in his role off the ball.
The thing that jumped out at me regarding Bayless is that he is very effective creating his own shot, largely because of his strength. At 6' 3" and 200 pounds, he's a very solid guard and he likes contact. On several occasions he used his good first step and strength to create space for his shots. I'm not sure how effective he can be scoring against the bigger point guards like Billups, Fisher, Williams, and shooting guards if they match him in the strength category or are much longer than he is.
In addition, his points came exclusively on isolation plays from the top of the key, or in transition, and almost always early in the shot clock without running an offensive set. He was not effective in the pick and roll at all as the extra pressure from the help defender forced him to back up. On a couple occasions he picked up his dribble for no reason well outside the 3-point arc and this stalled the offense.
In general, his ball handling seemed a bit sloppy and his decision making fairly poor. He forced several passes and others were not accurate. If he wasn't getting his offense early, then the Blazers offense really struggled.
So, if Bayless isn't a point guard who can distribute the ball and create shots for his teammates, the next question is whether or not he can be effective playing off the ball?
Other observations
Dante Cunningham has been very impressive. Mainly, knocking down mid-range jumpers like he is LaMarcus Aldridge. I would like to know, though, why he rides an exercise bike when he's on the bench? Back? Legs?
Jeff Pendergraph has been solid and seems to be an effective big man at 6' 10". He's doesn't shy away from the rough stuff although I think he wasn't quite prepared for Joey Dorsey.
Pooh Jeter has been really good in the two games I have seen him.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
Nice writeup on Bayless
Haven’t seen him play much. Guess we know why the TrailBlazers are so interested in Hinrich.
I hope Pooh makes it. The League has been Pooh-less since Richardson left, and that’s just wrong.
"Give me chonchon."
by Slowpoke Rodriguez on Jul 19, 2009 1:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
On Cunningham staying warm
Dante injured his groin in the opener Monday.
by Dekko on Jul 19, 2009 1:52 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Blazer fan here
Completely agree, would much rather have Mike Conley… Or Kirk Hinrich… Or Ricky Rubio… Or Ramon Sessions… Or… You get the point. Which just so happens Bayless cannot guard the POINT either.
Patience :)
by TheGreatDane17 on Jul 19, 2009 4:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Generally Swimming Upstream...
I’m going to be in the minority here…and I’m fine with that.
I think Bayless is going to (eventually) be a very good point guard. He clearly has a lot of learning to go through, I won’t argue that point. He’s never played the point at any competitive level. Even last year with the Blazers, the few minutes he received at the PG spot were generally in garbage time…with the exception of when Blake went down.
I’m not saying he should be the full time backup next year. I’m just not opposed to holding on to him and letting him develop for the next 2-3 years.
by BlazerNation on Jul 19, 2009 10:35 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I completely agree with that “holding on to him” sentiment. He’s still very young and will get better. In addition, as a pairing with Roy who can handle the PG duties he might be a very good.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Jul 20, 2009 12:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gritting my teeth and finally deciding to let it slide.
But when you get back to Austin, as I said before, the gloves are off.
5 in 10
I want my Manu o;—-)
by jollyrogerwilco on Jul 20, 2009 2:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






























