Gregg Popovich tests the Fates
It does not take a genius to figure out that Gregg Popovich does not care what a silly blogger has to say. After all, this is the same guy who regularly blows off sideline interviews on national television. So when I say he's making a mockery of David Stern and the entire NBA, it's certainly not going to change anything about a man who foolishly projects the image that he fears nothing. A coach that uses sarcasm and a wry smile only as a means to mask a staggering stubbornness that has cursed the Spurs on more than one occasion.
In case you don't know what this is all about, let me fill you in. The Spurs beat Golden State in OT late Monday night. They played again Tuesday in Denver, and Pop benched their three best players; Duncan, Ginobili and Parker all sat out. Ginobili's absence was loosely linked to a hip contusion. Pop didn't even use fake decorum for his other two stars, saying:
"Parker makes the All-Star team, becomes hard to deal with, so we're going to sit him and teach him a lesson," Popovich joked. "Duncan says he wants to renegotiate his contract, so I said, 'Sit, I'm not talking to you.' "
Jesus, Pop. Why didn't you just say "Hey Sterny, you can bite me!"
This whole charade looks awful. I'm sure Pop will pull it off, but I doubt David Stern forgets it. The Nuggets definitely won't. Professional athletes look for any reason to play the disrespect card, and Pop basically handed Denver a deck full of them.
Personally, as a Spurs fan, this smacks of the same Popovich arrogance that has gotten the Spurs in trouble before. The same stubbornness that led to Pop playing Van Exel and Horry in the playoffs when it was clear they were DONE (speaking of Horry, his playing time during last year's playoffs looks especially bad when you consider how well Bonner is playing this year). It's possible that tonight's game won't matter. The problem is, there's no way to know that right now.
Pop loves to downplay home court advantage in the playoffs. I know I'm pointing out the obvious, but HCA is hugely important in the playoffs. Even for the Spurs. Over the past six playoffs, the Spurs are 42-13 at home and 26-25 on the road. During the past three championship years they won a total of two series in which they did not have HCA. Who did they beat? Phoenix, both times. Phoenix! A team entirely designed to lose to the Spurs in the playoffs.
Read that again. The Spurs have won three championships with the Big 3, and during those playoff runs they didn't have HCA for only two series... against Phoenix.
In fact, over the past six seasons, the Spurs have lost only two playoff series when they had HCA. One was in 06, to Dallas. A series that featured two OT losses, Nick Van Exel's ridiculous playing time and questionable officiating. The other was in 04, against the Lakers. Yeah, you remember what happened that year.
But it's only one game you say! What's one game? Well, let's take a look.
In 2008, one more win would have meant having home court against New Orleans, a team they barely survived against. One more loss would have put them in a 3-way tie with HOU and PHX (I don't remember which position they would have had in that scenario and don't feel like figuring out.)
In 2007, one game would not have made a difference.
In 2006, one game would not have made a difference.
In 2005, one game would not have made a difference.
In 2004, one more win would have meant jumping Minnesota in the standings, giving them home court throughout the WC playoffs and avoiding the Lakers until the conference finals. One more loss and they wouldn't have had HCA against the Lakers.
In 2003, one more loss would have meant the 3 seed instead of 1 seed.
So, in the past six years, one single game would have made a significant difference in seeding half the time.
Duncan and Parker aren't hurt. Manu has a freaking bruise. The Spurs have FOUR DAYS OFF after tonight's game. The "Rodeo Road Trip" is now, in actuality, eight games spread out over 20 days, with two breaks of four and five days off. This is simply a profoundly conspicuous nose-thumbing at the entire NBA power structure. It's silly and foolish to say the least.
I don't know if one game will make a difference. Neither does Pop. And given that unknown, you better have a really good reason to throw a conference game in the middle of the season. Pop doesn't have one. And if he did? Well, if he wouldn't tell Craig Sager, he certainly wouldn't tell me.
1 recs |
182 comments
|
Comments
I am fairly certain we would have been last of those 3 teams in 2008.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 3, 2009 9:48 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Way to ruin NBA TV fan night Pop.
Of course, Billups decided sitting is more fun than playing too, so the Spurs might still get this one. As a Blazer fan, I don’t find this whole throwing the game to the Nuggets thing very amusing.
Dunk
by Billy Ray Bates on Feb 3, 2009 10:02 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
He probably was gifted a new wine today, dont complain
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what."
by Chilai on Feb 3, 2009 10:11 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I don’t doubt that there will be some reaction from the league office, but I’m support Popovich on this one. The regular season is about 30 games too long. Quite frankly, if I were Popovich, I would have been doing this YEARS ago. Back before they had an inactive list, they used to make up injuries to hold guys out… I would have been sitting Duncan at least 20 games a year with chronic cases of 24-hour projectile leprosy. Manu would have had roughly 25 cases of acute meningeal encephalitis with unexplained remission.
I think Pop would have enjoyed that…
chaos... panic... pandemonium... my work here is done.
by rick2g on Feb 3, 2009 10:23 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
OK
But I think I speak for all Blazer fans when I say, why against the Denver Nuggest??!
by Pickerind on Feb 3, 2009 10:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t think we haven’t forgotten about the 1989 Western Conference Semifinals, no matter how many championships we win…
by tomasito on Feb 4, 2009 7:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
“24-hour projectile leprosy”
love it
TITLEBOT 21 READY TO PERFORM MISSION. BANK SHOT CALCULATING.
by jollyrogerwilco on Feb 5, 2009 12:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You know what’s funny? I didn’t even notice Finley didn’t play until I read it on some POR forum.
by sungo on Feb 3, 2009 10:32 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Yes. Since when did the Big 3 become the Big 4?
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson
by CapHill on Feb 3, 2009 10:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, how can you hate on FinDog like that after the show he put on for you Saturday.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 3, 2009 10:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I will one up that!
After Findog has contributed more (the sum of his efforts) this season than at this time last year. Fin is more reliable ( gosh??$%) than the JV’s layups and fast breaks this year.
by LionZion on Feb 4, 2009 10:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know what to think, but fuck Stern, regardless.
by LatinD on Feb 3, 2009 10:34 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Let me try once more:
I don’t know what to think about this, but I still prefer Pop over any other coach in the league right now. With him at the helm you know the Spurs will be coached properly and with great skill during the rough times, and yet you still can’t predict when he’s going to throw a curve ball at you and hit you right between the eyes. That’s something.
And fuck Stern.
by LatinD on Feb 3, 2009 10:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nicely put.
I am happy. I am proud. - Manu Ginobili
by bellasa on Feb 4, 2009 11:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I understand what Pop was thinking..coming from a overtime victory with the big 3 playing huge minutes and Finley too, we would have mostly likely lost in his eyes..so why not give the stars some rest.
But the fan in me wants to see our players play considering they have 5 days off before the Celtics game.And this is why I’m going to business school and Pop has 4 titles with the Spurs..he can coach and I can criticize from afar!
by adam8065 on Feb 3, 2009 11:06 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think the flight is pretty long too from there. Plus the air is thin. Plus Karl on the sidelines is just bad mojo and with all the bad mojo circulating the league, Pop is trusting the Force.
by LionZion on Feb 4, 2009 10:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I gotta say, I honestly agree with about 87% of what you say, Matthew. But I couldn’t disagree more here. Granted, it IS a big FU to the league and Stern, but it’s much more and you know that. Several points from Colorado….
1.) Pop was in the CIA, not the Postal Service. The CIfuckingA of mindgames, deep-seeded psychology, and chess games. And his players never call him out for these kind of “boneheaded” maneuvers. Why is that? Why, in all the years, do we never hear even a remotely passive-aggressive statement questioning something like this that appears so stupid? They trust him. Even more importantly, why is that? They buy into and understand beyond what we ever could the things that make Pop so different from the other cookie-cutter coaches. We’d be better off realizing that when Pop does something like this, he’s not sending a league message so much as further demonstrating that he is concerned with ONLY rings and his team. Period. Not us, not the ticketholders, not winning streaks, not Stern.
2.) Would we all be feeling this way had we won? At one point, our SCRUBS were only down 2 and with two minutes left were only 4 away.
3.) This loss makes me happy. Obviously not as happy as a win of course, but happy in that we truly have the craftiest coach in the association. Think about it, there were MANY victories in this game-
-the toughening of our B players. It was all on them, and they clearly wanted it. This further maturation only helps us long term.
-further court development of players who normally get no time. Are we ever gonna see Malik again? Not likely, but I definitely trust him more now.
-increased confidence and belief in every player on our team. If there was doubt before that we weren’t deep or the window was closing, it’s gone after tonight.
-a subtle psychological message to the West’s “3rd best team” that there most certainly is a gap between 2 and 3. This kind of realization is crushing to athletes, and I assure you that the thuggets will be thinking about this tonight and tomorrow.
-establishing further control/dominance over another “contender.” Does any of us really believe that Chauncey would have sat the 2nd if it was a close game with the Big 3 involved? Manipulating another team into playing OUR way versus the other way around further increases our mental advantage if we face them later.
-denying Denver any credibility. Deep down, regardless of records, this team is still arguably the most emotionally and mentally weak team in the league. Showing them that we don’t look at them as serious implants that doubt, while stripping away all of their morale and confidence. Again, don’t think the thuggets aren’t realizing that they luckily and barely escaped the JV team from San Antonio, at home.
4.) Guess what? Teams don’t need another card in the deck to be motivated to beat us. We’re the San Antonio SPURS. We’ve got 4 major cards in 10 years that guarantee that by and large, teams will be bringing their A games to play us. Though respected, we’re not well liked and that’s not going to change regardless of lineup cards.
5.) Some interesting stats- If not for a near 100% Carmelo star-performance, we win this game on the heels of a guy named Roger Mason Jr. and a guy who last week was not even one of the superstars in the D League. AND… we had 18 TOs while forcing 16.
6.) In the Risk vs. Reward arguement, there was minimal risk to this mindfreak. We get blown out, so what; what did you expect against such a turd sandwich? We win….. holy shit. The SPURS suddenly are invigorated with an incredible confidence and unity that couldn’t have been gained any other way. As it happened….. still a tremendous gain in that we’ve grown, matured, and proven ourselves TO ourselves. AND demoralized a conference foe in the process.
Bottom line, it could come out this week in the press that snubbing the league was exactly Pop’s intention. But I see so much more here, and based on Pop’s track record, believe that there’s more to it than simply standing tall against the league. It’s easy to get pissed and emotionally charged as a fan about this game, but guess who has the pole position in the “I don’t give a shit” line? I couldn’t be happier with our coach. He’s crabby and distant and defiant, but I’m so confident with him at the reins and I trust that simple appearances can be very deceiving. We have a coach that is so committed to winning (REAL winning, the kind that comes in April and May) and committed to running the marathon and not the sprint; that he makes decisions like this.
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 3, 2009 11:11 PM CST reply actions 7 recs
“Minimal risk.”
This game could cost the Spurs HCA in the playoffs. I’ll take HCA over a bunch of mindgames, vagaries and bs.
by sungo on Feb 3, 2009 11:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
True, but we can’t play the “could cost us” angle. If we get into that, we’re then playing it on Dec. 30 vs. the Bucks, at Houston on Nov. 29th, etc. EVERY game is critical in that debate. It’s all gonna depend on many factors outside of our control, and if HCA comes down to 1 game then we have a discussion. But we can’t play for that now with so many variables. The mindgames could have more effect towards getting us HCA than one W will.
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 3, 2009 11:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Mind games, etc. are such an incredibly small part of the picture. The Spurs have won three titles with these guys because they have three of the top 25 players in the NBA (along with 1 in the top 3).
You’re right, it does come down to things outside your control, so you control what you can. Like who plays and who doesn’t. The Spurs probably win this game with Tim and Tony in the lineup. There’s a roughly 50% chance one game will cost us a spot in the WC standings. That’s worth more than what little there is to gain from mind games and dicking around.
by sungo on Feb 3, 2009 11:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You are talking like it was a virtual certainty that they would have won had they played TD and TP. But it would have been a completely different game, so it’s impossible to say. I’m guessing the Spurs had no more than a 30% chance of winning this game, given the short rest and all. They probably win the game if it had transpired exactly the way it did, except that Tim and Tony would have played. I will say that it would have been amusing had Pop called time out and nonchalantly inserted the Big 3 when the scrubs cut it to 4 with a couple of minutes left.
Like everyone else, I’m torn. If I had been a Spurs fan in Denver and paid, say, $150 to take my family to the game (including a hypothetical older son who adores Manu Ginobili), I would be extremely upset. It feels like the Spurs and the NBA have defrauded their fans, like buying tickets to a U2 show and having to watch Poison instead. From a strategic point of view, though, Pop knows better than all of us what kind of rest his team needs. It may shock you, Powell, but I bet he’s aware of the importance of HCA as well. For whatever reason, he decided his team was better off resting his stars. I think he’s earned some benefit of the doubt.
by tomasito on Feb 4, 2009 7:20 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
HCA is a mindgame too
After more than half a decade of big three leadership, i am gonna think at this point, HCA isn’t as important as maybe the initial part part of this decade. It still is an advantage, but even among intangibles considerably less so, and I would think the Big 3 can decidedly elevate role players in hostile environments now.
Where it becomes physically important is with the debacle of flight breakdowns, sleeping in airports, our previous series going to 7 games and having to turnaround and face a fresh team…its easier at home.
by LionZion on Feb 4, 2009 10:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You are my man Sima
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what."
by Chilai on Feb 4, 2009 11:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you SIMA and have complete trust in Pop.
"When you fail to plan, you plan to fail." -Henry Ford
"It's not how you enter your sport, it's how you exit." - Dr. J
http://myspace.com/eme0916
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=569220294&ref=profile
by Ed (dfjmed) on Feb 4, 2009 11:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Matthew has a very valid point, but that’s an awesome post, Sima… I couldn’t agree more.
I am happy. I am proud. - Manu Ginobili
by bellasa on Feb 4, 2009 12:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Spurs mental edge over Nuggets or Thuggets
Let’s not forget that Denver was without Kenyon Martin last night and Billups sat out the second half.
I think that the Nuggets found out the game wasn’t going to involve the Big 3 and just tried to cruise to victory and a Spurs team that suddenly felt JVish without their stars played a big heart game.
While I don’t discredit the effort by the Spurs role players – I don’t really think they got all they could out of the Nuggets either.
Very interesting move by Pop – I like his confidence in knowing how an NBA season works.
by Nate Timmons on Feb 4, 2009 2:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I understand giving the big 3 a rest but why against a team we could meet in playoff and not have HCA
by dmf2150 on Feb 3, 2009 11:21 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Damn
And here I am thinking that he was tinkering around with the lineup last night!
"....It is more about them than it is about the team. Cannot play with them. Cannot win with them. Cannot coach with them. Can’t do it. I want winners!" - Mike Singletary
by DennardC on Feb 4, 2009 12:04 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Pop is going through an odd phase. The other night he started Kurt Thomas instead of Matt Bonner and he did it so suddenly not even the PA guy at the AT&T Center got the memo. Then he plays 4 guards and one small forward at the same time for 3 minutes in the second quarter of the Warriors game. Now he spontaneously rested 4 of the top 5 scorers on the team to make a point to NBA schedule makers, against a playoff contender. And then he almost coached them to a victory.
Just throwing this out there but in 2003 the Spurs sealed the best record and HCA throughout the playoffs right before the season ending, affording them one giveaway game. In 2004 the Lakers won a game against some team that bumped them up to their seeding and screwed us over. We won 11 games to end that season. I’m not condoning tossing away games, I’m actually really annoyed as you are. I figure the silver lining in this is that our bench guys got something out of this game, and the big 3 have no fatigue excuse to give come Sunday.
by r21x on Feb 4, 2009 12:32 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
i think
pop is going through the early stages of senility, and all the players are too scared to say anything about it.
What the Bowen giveth Horry taketh away. --LatinD (2008 Playoffs Round 2, Game 1)
the Spurs do not defeat you so much as they grind you into tiny shards of psychological wreckage.
-the Denver Post
by Hamer_SpursFan on Feb 4, 2009 12:47 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I understand the logic, at least theoretically
but I don’t understand the timing. I don’t know what kind of weight to put on it, but I have always thought of pop as one of the, if not the, best coaches in the NBA
by ryryslyry on Feb 4, 2009 2:01 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Stampler weighs in.... (DON'T CALL ME FAT!)
1. Before we bitch and moan too much about how this game affects us in the standings, let’s see how we play at Boston. I said after the Warriors game that I’d be happy to win one of the next two and we still may. If we lose that one (and the odds are that we will) THEN WE CAN BITCH.
2. I think Pop either underestimated his guys or overestimated Denver. We beat them on the road on earlier in the year when we played like absolute horseshit the game before vs. the Pistons and the Nugs were hot as hell. Denver always matches up poorly against us and I think we had a great shot to beat them. Even if Manu was only 80%, he has a great track record in segababas, despite the myth that he has less endurance than any other good player. Manu’s scoring average is better in segababas than any other situation.
3. It’d be one thing to rest the guys if the Boston game was Friday, but with it being Sunday, it’s kind of inexcusable.
4. If I’m Stern, or in any way affiliated with NBA.com or the Nuggets, I’m pissed at Pop. People paid good money in this shit economy to see two NBA teams compete at the peak of their respective abilities. They didn’t pay to see the home team throw their jerseys on the court and win. I know Pop has a responsibility to his team first and foremost, but this move was an insult to the game’s integrity and things like this is why the NBA has such an awful reputation with the casual sports fan. If the coaches don’t care about the regular season, why should the players? If Stern suspended Pop a game without pay, I think it’d be appropriate. If he’s going to rest his guys, why not rest himself as well? This is the most embarrassed I’ve been to be a Spurs fan since Horry hip-checked Nash at the end of Game 4 in 2007. Or maybe us not selling out the arena against the Jazz in the Western Conference Finals that same year. Pop’s really an arrogant prick sometimes.
5. Sometimes I really don’t think Pop understands why he and his players get paid such ridiculous salaries. Sure winning is the most important thing, but it’s not the only thing. Sports are entertainment at the end of the day and the paying customers want to think that the players and coaches appreciate them or are at least don’t think of their fans as a nuisance or a burden. Pop may not hate the fans, but he sure doesn’t do anything to keep them entertained – like having a garbage time guy like James White for example – and he’s never understood that the media is the conduit between the team and the fans. By treating the media like shit, Pop is indirectly treating the fans like shit. He acts like he’d rather play the games in empty arenas with no TV or radio coverage at all. He really doesn’t understand the point of having a professional league. Pop keeps telling the media that sports are unimportant and that people should be paying attention to the real news in Iraq or whatever, and this to me is retarded. He is actually encouraging the people who make his job possible to not be NBA fans. I don’t see Pop turning down his salary but he thinks the whole exercise is frivolous? Who the fuck does he think he is?
6. Finally, Matthew, I think you’re not giving yourself nearly enough credit. I’m positive Pop respects you far more than Craig Sager.
by Aaronstampler on Feb 4, 2009 2:24 AM CST reply actions 2 recs
4. Stern will be pissed at Pop it he makes it into the finals, that will do far more damage to the NBA than throwing away one game.
If Stern were to suspend Pop for this one game, that would set a terrible standard. Are you gonna pretend that teams and coaches give their all on all games? We both know better than that. Fine, Pop did it more blatantly than most would. I would rather he do that than tell the players to not give a fuck since he’s gonna bench them early anyway. I’m as proud of being a Spur fan as have ever been, I can look at any other team’s fan in the eye and ask, would your coach have the bells to do what mine did?
5. Movies are entertainment at the end of the day too, that’s the excuse the people who make Disaster Movie always make. Besides, who judges what’s entertaining? What of us that liked the dick move he just pulled? If the NBA was purely about entertainment, then let’s reduce the shot clock to 10 seconds, that’s oughta speeds things up and entertain most people.
He’s absolutely right, sports are unimportant, we make them into a big deal. Sports are a bunch of guys or gals playing together trying to outscore the other team, anyone who had never seen sports and heard that description would say, who the hell would make a big deal of that?
I’m offended when coaches and the media talk about games as if the life itself depended on it, they make it as dramatic as an election. When at the end of the day, doesn’t matter who wins or loses, life will go on as usual.
He gets paid the big bucks because it’s supply vs. demand, if any idiot out there could do his job, they’ll be doing it for a lot less. It’s also about making money, nobody wants to watch a crappy team on tv. Should be give bonuses to Pop for the excellent team he puts on the court from year to year while teams like the Clippers are an eyesore to watch? Much less talented players get payed a lot more than Pop, that’s the real unfair thing here.
"Long ago there were these two awful towns. Sodom, named after sodomy, and Gomorrah, named after...after an even weirder move"- The Professor Brothers
by Hipuks on Feb 4, 2009 2:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with Hipuks 100%.
Also, the problem lies with the length of the regular season. Pop wouldn’t throw games if we had 40 to play instead of 82. I enjoy the NBA so I don’t mind, but if you’re talking about entertainment, the casual fans think that the RS drags on endlessly.
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 7:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
From a pure business perspective, NBA is entertainment, period. Any attempt to make it anything else is pure marketing malarkey, regardless of how effective it is.
From a fan’s perspective, you can be invested emotionally in a team or in player(s), and you can be sinking your money into their pockets… but you can’t be really financially invested because, unless you’re a ticket scalper, you’re never getting any of that money back regardless.
From a player’s perspective, you’ve either got the cushiest job in the world, or you’re struggling as a journeyman to make enough money to effectively last you the rest of your life. In either case, a smart player, no matter how much they love the game, knows that every minute they play is another tick in the clock, and sooner or later, either their knees, their tendons, or their reflexes will fade. Knowing that your coach understands this is utterly invaluable. Truth be told, my experience with coaches is limited to middle school and high school… and not a one of them gave any real consideration to the long-term health of their players so long as they could suit-up next game. NBA coaches are probably worse – most of them are in a revolving-door job, and if they don’t put up wins now, they’re on their knees begging for a commentating job where they will have Stephen A. Smith drenching them with spittle and hyperbole for hours on end. Playing for a coach who takes your long-term health and career into such obvious consideration is bound to inspire a considerable amount of loyalty. In the NBA, you can throw millions after players or people like Isiah, but you can’t just go down to the corner and buy a good coach and manager for any price.
Basically, from a fan’s or an executive’s position, you’ve got every right to be pissed at Pop. If you’re in his locker room, you KNOW he’s looking after you as well as he can.
chaos... panic... pandemonium... my work here is done.
by rick2g on Feb 4, 2009 10:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Spoken like a software engineer who has been through a series of cost-cutting layoffs and has had to listen to upper management spin it as “we are better”, “we will just have to execute harder”, etc. Oh wait, that’s me. Not you.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 11:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Lol
Stampler…you went to the game didn’t you. LMAO! :P That sucks.
Sure yer annoyed. Spurs and Pop sure have an obligation to the fans. Sure the NBA is sustained by fans. But you are giving the casual fan too much credit and Pop not enough. If yer a hardcore spurs fan, well you swallow the boredom and shrug off the expense.
This late in the game, Pop isn’t worried about his legacy, job security, relationship with his stars, Stern, nor the casual fan. I am sure he does care about the team and the hardcore fans. Otherwise winning wouldn’t be that big a priority nor effort, nor playing the right way, nor defense nor a bunch of other stuff. There are only two coaches in the league in this league and arguably the other one is always playing mind games with pretty much everyone.
So Pop prob has more reasons than what we know. And if he doesn’t, hopefully he has a new theory he is trying out. If Pop wanted the Spurs to be entertainment to a casual fan, well we would have had a different image in the this decade(maybe not different results..who knows).
by LionZion on Feb 4, 2009 11:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Stampler went to the Warriors game, not the Nuggets game. SiMA was the guy headed to the Nuggets game but bailed. We were this close to having PtR representation at three straight games.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 11:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The only obligation Pop has to Spurs fans is winning championships. He could send the scrubs out for 82 games, and if he won the ring all would still be forgiven and forgotten.
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 11:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You can argue for hours….but still if the scrubs won that game now Popovich would look like a genius. It was close.
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what."
by Chilai on Feb 4, 2009 11:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh come on, since when do we give a shit about one game? This is the same Pop that throws in the towel way in too early when we’re in double digit deficits against good teams.
If we’re gonna complain about one game costing us HCA then there’s about 20 games in a season that could’ve been won and weren’t. Are we the Suns now? Do we care about the regular season that much?
It’s ridiculous that people gave Pop shit over this but nobody complains when during the last games of the season most good teams play all their scrubs while crappy teams are trying to fight their way into the postseason. Should fans feel slighted then? Or does it only count if we do it in the middle of the season?
I for one, feel proud to have a coach that would make this move. He just gave the NBA the equivalent of this:

"Long ago there were these two awful towns. Sodom, named after sodomy, and Gomorrah, named after...after an even weirder move"- The Professor Brothers
by Hipuks on Feb 4, 2009 2:38 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
was just gonna make the point about pop’s ability to throw in the towel. nobody does it like he does, whether its holding out a ready to come back manu vs the suns a few years ago, or pulling his front line early in games – or now, leaving our best guys on the bench. i’ll say it again and we all know its true: nobody throws in the towel better than gregg popovich.
my opinion is that he should have played the guys because we have some days off before the next game. wouldnt have ahd a problem with them getting smaller minutes. but at the end of the day, i’m not gonna complain about it any more than that.
a few other things:
i watched some of the NBA TV preview right before this – with gary payton and zo mourning. for one thing,GP will not be employed in this fashion after all star break. WOW. i’m not sure if he is just that terrible – or just flat insane. i mean he played an awful lot of basketball at a very high level to have so little actual knowledge to impart.
plus, none of these turds even took the time to do some basic level research on the game. they had no idea that the spurs big 3 werent gonna play at all – yet it was all over the place leading up to game time….there wasnt even a lacky intern around there or something?
by bones on Feb 4, 2009 9:04 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
that was the one thing that kept coming to my mind, that nobody complains about this scenario at the end of the season. how many complaints are thrown around when Pop, or another coach of a contending team that’s sown up a certain playoff spot, sits the star players to rest them/prevent potential injury in the last game(s) of the regular season? if there are any, those who have them don’t speak up. this is being way overblown in my opinion, but it’s at least fun reading everyone’s comments.
by znimrod on Feb 4, 2009 12:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i'm conflicted about it
on the plus side:
- we nearly won – i’m happy our scrubs did this well against the third placed team in the west
- giving those guys a good extended run helps them – well duh
- it certainly sends a message to stern and the league – if pop wanted to convey some disgust at scheduling (that is what it was about right?), he certainly did
- i admire the ballsy-ness (its a word, right?) of it – doing at the end of a season, or to rest players who can’t handle back-to-backs, sure, but mid-season, just to send a message?
on the negative side
- i really can’t fathom throwing a game when seeding hasn’t been decided – its not like they give out extra awards for making your playoff path more difficult
- it reeks of arrogance
- it was shit for fans who paid to see it – you don’t care? thats fine, but to me thats a bit of a dick move (and yes, people do complain about it at the end of the season when it happens)
- we lost – and i don’t like that
i think i’m definitely leaning more towards not liking it though.
by sleep research facility on Feb 4, 2009 5:34 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Interesting stat
The JV finished with a +6. Everyone else was -.
Well, he's Manu Ginobili. -rolls eyes and smirks-
by Bruceleebowen on Feb 4, 2009 6:40 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Interesting
I like how you pick and choose non-HCA series. They only won at Phoenix on championship runs, but how many times have they beaten a higher seed and not gone on to win the title? I think it’s funny everyone is getting their panties in a bunch over one game. I find it even more hilarious that this was probably good for the Spurs. It showed us Malik Hairston should be in front of Udoka in the rotation. It showed other teams Oberto and even Vaughn are not finished. Remember we’re trying to trade them (possibly)? So go take some Midol and chill the fuck out.
by Ankle Bones on Feb 4, 2009 6:45 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Tell us how you really feel Bones….
Well, he's Manu Ginobili. -rolls eyes and smirks-
by Bruceleebowen on Feb 4, 2009 7:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
midol? really….
Sorry, just busting your balls.
I am happy. I am proud. - Manu Ginobili
by bellasa on Feb 4, 2009 2:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, you know, it’s what women…oh, nevermind.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 2:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I actually thought it was too much and hit the post button instead of the cancel button by mistake.
I am happy. I am proud. - Manu Ginobili
by bellasa on Feb 4, 2009 2:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
To everyone
Subs does not equal scrubs – they are legitimate NBA players.
by 4Him on Feb 4, 2009 7:37 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Except on the Spurs. Subs equals A Bunch of Suck
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 9:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, that’s why they almost won in Denver.
by 4Him on Feb 4, 2009 11:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We win that game maybe 1 out of 25. The Nuggets played down to us like nobody’s business. If that was our team for the whole year, we would seriously challenge the 9 win record.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 11:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Basically the same team we had when Tony and Manu were out, minus Duncan. I think we’d get 25 wins.
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 11:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No way. Duncan played like a beast in those games and we ran all the offense through him. Unless George got a lot better with the playing time it would be awful. We’d have nobody that could score in post and nobody that could take his man off the dribble. Double Dreck!
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 12:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
At the end of every season, the teams NOT playing for playoff position, sit their starters. Sometimes for 2 or 3 games. This is no worse or different than those.
This has nothing on the abomination that went on last year when 5-7 teams were flat out tanking for 2 months. THAT is what should piss Stern off.
Sitting our starters one game is still better than the teams that go into “rebuilding mode” mid-season and bend their fans over for the duration.
My point, the NBA has bigger problems with coaches/organizations not giving their all for A game. See Thunder/Sonics, Grizzlies, last year’s Heat who threw in the towel and had their coach go on scouting trips instead of to actual fucking games.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 9:05 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
and riley took zero heat from the league for that escapade.
by bones on Feb 4, 2009 9:07 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and I forgot to mention that Riley then quit on the team.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 9:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If some crappy teams can throw away seasons why cant popovich throw away 1 game?
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what."
by Chilai on Feb 4, 2009 11:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Overblown
Look, I watched the game last night. It was painful. We have good subs, but there’s a reason they are our subs. Would I wish that we had played our best and won? Yes, no doubt.
Here’s the deal. Pop’s job is not about entertaining people…on any level. Stern’s job is to make the NBA entertaining. Pop’s job is to win…rings. If he can do that by giving the subs a game against a good team on the road to almost take one, that’s fine with me. I would rather see this now that at the end of the year. That’s when I want to see good rhythm and solid play from my team.
Pop is probably smarter than most of us here. Is he a dick? I don’t know, but all I know is that he has been better than %100 of the other coaches out there in the last 10+ years so I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.
One man's toxic sludge is another man's popuri
by Big50 on Feb 4, 2009 9:08 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
and our guys did have a legitimate chane to winin the 4th….somehow.
by bones on Feb 4, 2009 9:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the Nuggets completely lost focus with Pop’s line up and played just good enough to win.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 9:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe that was the plan all along. Call me ridiculous, but to me Pop KNEW that the Nuggets would play down to our level if we sitted the Big 3. So maybe we had 25% chance to win it with our full squad against Denver giving 100% focus and effort. We sit the three headed monster and still the chances are 25% because Denver loses focus. Imagine that in the last minutes the Nugs went cold and a player like Mason hits 2 or 3 consecutive treys. It can happen.
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what."
by Chilai on Feb 4, 2009 12:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Denver would never have 100% focus or effort regardless. Pop could be holding all their wives and parents at gun point and say he’ll only release them if Denver beats his team and they still would fuck around and take ugly shots.
by Aaronstampler on Feb 4, 2009 12:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree. If Pop held their tat needle hostage he would have their undivided attention.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 12:36 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
duuuuuuuuuuuuuuude. i think that ink convention must have just rolled thru denver. my 4 year old son even picked up on this. the conversation went something like:
bones: look at that guys hair (balkman), we could use that to mop the floor.
little bones: that’s funny daddy, but look at all his tatoos too.
bones: he sure does have a lot of them
little bones: he sure does – DADDY look at that guy, and THAT guy too. do they have to have all those tatoos to play for that team? where are they from anyway, the moon?
then birdman anderson hit the floor and THAT took about 5 minutes to explain.
by bones on Feb 4, 2009 12:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m impressed that you can explain the birdman at all.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 12:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
….i should have added “before giving up” to the end of my post…..
by bones on Feb 4, 2009 12:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We HAVE to call them the Denver Moonmen now.
Not to go all Gregg Easterbrook on y’all, but we have to.
by Aaronstampler on Feb 4, 2009 1:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They are now, and forevermore, the “Denver Moonmen” in my book.
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson
by CapHill on Feb 4, 2009 2:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
good thing i didnt tell you all that we were also calling them the poop-nuggets later on in the evening……
by bones on Feb 4, 2009 9:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Poop-nuggets has a nice ring to it also.
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson
by CapHill on Feb 4, 2009 11:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL at the “moon” comment. Kids are awesome.
by tomasito on Feb 4, 2009 11:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Blazer fan hear,
this action has prompted me to release this email;
Dear Team Presidents and General Managers,
The Portland Trail Blazers are aware that certain teams may be contemplating sitting their star players for the purpose of throwing games and adversely impacting the Portland Trail Blazers playoff position. Such conduct from a team would violate its fiduciary duty as an NBA joint venturer. In addition, persons or entities involved in such conduct may be individually liable to the Portland Trail Blazers for tortuously interfering with the Portland Trail Blazers’ playoff chances and perspective economic opportunities.
Please be aware that if a team engages in such conduct, the Portland Trail Blazers will take all necessary steps to safeguard its rights, including, without limitation, litigation. :-)
by 2phattoplay on Feb 4, 2009 9:42 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Don’t forget that our lawyers will work for Pop, and he will use his mind games on your lawyers.
One man's toxic sludge is another man's popuri
by Big50 on Feb 4, 2009 10:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Also don’t forget Pop might use “enhanced interrogation techniques” on your witnesses.
"Long ago there were these two awful towns. Sodom, named after sodomy, and Gomorrah, named after...after an even weirder move"- The Professor Brothers
by Hipuks on Feb 4, 2009 10:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Just ask Beno his name. He cant spell it anymore.
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what."
by Chilai on Feb 4, 2009 12:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Clever, but . . .
Sounds familiar. Norsktroll, is this you?
by Corvid on Feb 4, 2009 12:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
hey, at least we got your boy malik hairston in the game for extended minutes. i kinda figured this was pop’s olive branch to the folks in oregon or something…..
by bones on Feb 4, 2009 12:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Common man....
You got to credit your sources. That’s not cool.
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Feb 4, 2009 4:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Tomasito said it first up above but I was definitely thinking it last night as well- How many of you were sick enough to imagine the same thing?
Five minutes left and we’re down by half a dozen, Pop calls timeout. He walks out further onto the floor than normal, silently gazes into the Denver crowd, sneers, looks over at the huddle and nods. At that moment, Timmy, TP and Manu strip off warmups to reveal uniforms; and head to the scorer’s table to check in. SPURS play lights out for the remaining 5, beat the thuggets by 12, and Pop still sends an amazing message to the league.
(So why didn’t Pop do this? If not to avoid being a dick, which we already know he’s apathetic to, could it be……that he…..had…..other reasons? Interestingly, there would be absolutely no psychological advantage with that scenario. In fact, I’d argue that it would set us further back. It’s painfully obvious to me that Pop didn’t simply do this to just rest starters or send a Stern message. Maybe to jack up Portland’s postseason though. We all know how deeply terrified of Portland we truly are, thank goodness Pop took a stand.)
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 4, 2009 10:50 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah those blazers scare me. Greg Oden is the shit!!! He can hack you into sumission for the length of the game…..or until he reaches 6 fouls.
(to be honest im very afraid of the blazers, just not this year)
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what."
by Chilai on Feb 4, 2009 12:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Blazers number 1 weakness right now is
Allowing dribble penetration by opposing guards.
You guys have Parker and Manu. Not a recipe for success.
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Feb 4, 2009 4:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i was thinking about what would happen if pop put the regs in when we got the game close. man, that would have been classsic. even better than what he had been doing all night. had he done that and won the game, i may well have changed the name of my son……who i wanted to name gregg in the first place (but after my wife’s rich uncle…..).
by bones on Feb 4, 2009 12:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Funny
Change your sons name…………classic
Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall. - Confucius
by raynorschiene on Feb 4, 2009 3:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And I’d put money on the fact that somehow, Chauncey’s “injury” and Kmart’s “strep throat” would supernaturally heal up in the second half.
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 4, 2009 3:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Been thinking about this a lot. Here is my theory (with tongue somewhat planted in cheek):
We should have lost the GSW game. That was a crap call that got Manu to the line in the 4th. There were 5 worse fouls in the last 5 minutes of that game that did not get called and an out of position ref blew a late whistle on Manu’s drive. It wasn’t a charge like the GS announcers were claiming, but a good no-call, meaning we lose.
So, we’re one down in the karma column now after getting a game against GS we should not have gotten, plus it drags us into overtime and a very late (early?) arrival in Denver for a difficult game. Do you want the karma payback against Boston on Sunday? Or another more important game later in the season? No. Get it out of the way now. Sacrifice to the FSM and get it over with.
Pop is a genius.
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." – Aldous Huxley
by spurchief on Feb 4, 2009 11:35 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Lol Karma part is good.
Just wanted to point out that ‘bogus’ call in favour of Manu. If Turiaf hadn’t crossed in front of him and kept to one side and bumped/pushed Manu around on the drive, it prob wouldn’t have been called. But he stepped in front and allowed Manu to draw clear contact on a drive which they have to call imo. It would be too blatant if not called. If Turiaf was smart, he would have played like Bruce and clearly bother the drive but not allow the other guy to draw too much contact and thus take a chance on 3 refs going for a no-call.
You can’t bank on ref whistles. Gotta bank on maximizing whichever outcome you want and Manu played smart and desperate, while Turiaf did dumb and desperate.
by LionZion on Feb 4, 2009 11:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Same way last year when Fisher did dumb and desperate but unfortunately Barry did dumber and slow and (what the hell!!) nothing…ugh.!!
by LionZion on Feb 4, 2009 11:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And you are one for noticing it, yeah it was all about karma. We need all we can get, because the game against the celtics will be aired on national TV here, and the spurs have a record of 0-25 on those games. Its incredible how much the Spurs suck when the channel known as “Canal 7” (shitty shitty public TV channel) broadcasts their games. Manu especially lays a big turd. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that his big brother is the commenter.
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what."
by Chilai on Feb 4, 2009 12:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Canal 7 curse is strong. I’m likely to watch it online, anyway, because I won’t stand for another butchery of the game because of the freaking lottery.
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 12:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
dear good, that sucked ass
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what."
by Chilai on Feb 4, 2009 4:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Blazers have the 'KGW curse'
Whenever the games are broadcast on the local channel we have a sub .300 record.
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Feb 4, 2009 4:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
In fairness to Pop...
We played without Fin too, so really his absence negates Tony’s absence. It was like a regular game without Tim and Manu.
by Aaronstampler on Feb 4, 2009 12:34 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hollingers thoughts
One other idle thought: I’m not sure if Spurs fans are upset by what happened last night. But I guarantee Blazers fans are.
John Hollinger from ESPN.com
One man's toxic sludge is another man's popuri
by Big50 on Feb 4, 2009 2:31 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
You really care?
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 4:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Care?
We haven’t been in the playoffs in 6 seasons. I have watched the standings every day since December. I follow every game of the 9 teams playing for the 8 spots. Yes I care. (I’m not mad at the Spurs or anything. I think it is probably for the best that they rest their guys. Pop showed major balls doing that and doesn’t need my respect, but has it anyway. Just don’t do it against the damn Nuggets.)
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Feb 4, 2009 5:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Nuggets are making the playoffs. You just don’t want the Spurs tanking against the Jazz, Mavs, or Suns.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 5:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I know the Nuggets are gonnna make the playoffs
I want to catch them for NW division lead.
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Feb 4, 2009 5:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That has nothing to do with us then. You have to win your division on your own.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 5:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How about some perspective from other sports
Do you hear anything from the fans when the Yankees rest 3 of their regular starters like 8 times a year? All those guys do is stand around in a field all day. How much rest do they really need?
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 2:39 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I’m just amazed those guys can occupy a locker room with A-Rod for eight months a year without beating his face in with a bat.
by Aaronstampler on Feb 4, 2009 2:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Or even moreso, do you hear the national outcry when phx rests the Big Snaq for 40 games per year?!
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 4, 2009 3:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve been dwelling on this game a bit more today, desperately trying to avoid starting a project that sucks. So, here’s a another view on this game:
What did Pop learn last night?
I think that may be the whole point of what happened. Pop needed to learn a few things and there was no way to do that with TD, TP, and The Sickness on the floor. And you have those guys out, might as well take Fin out too. So, here’s what I think he may have learned. Jump in with your own thoughts as well:
- Malik Hairston might be a viable NBA 8th – 12th man. He did not shit himself out there and provided some good minutes as well as defense.
- The JV is still savvy, but has nothing else to offer. No, I don’t think he needed to learn this, per se. But it’s always nice to get your opinions reaffirmed.
- George Hill needs some more minutes if he is going to contribute in the playoffs. Preferably with a pure second unit (no Tim on the floor) that allows him to be aggressive and not feel like he has to defer.
- Mase can run the point for short stretches, but it’s not a good idea for long periods of time. 8 turnovers? Yuck. Oh, and the man cannot make a layup. Can. Not. With an open lane and no help defenders, the guys needs to pull up from 10 feet.
- KT’s recent solid play can be viable in extended minutes. He played a pretty good game last night and has been solid – shooting and rebounding – for a few weeks.
- But Oberto and KT should only play limited minutes together and only in emergencies, like foul trouble for Tim or the lack of any other viable options. They are moving toward the same spots on the floor all the time.
What else did Pop learn last night?
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." – Aldous Huxley
by spurchief on Feb 4, 2009 3:23 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Ime probably needs to be re-buried on the bench.
We can’t run the offense through Fab in the post.
Bonner is really worth a damn off the dribble and needs one of the big 3 kicking out to him.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 3:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m really hurt by the Ime thing…. I had such grand plans for him and he seems to have faded away this year. It seems that last year, he gave me at least some hope; but there’s not even that for him now.
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 4, 2009 3:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
in my office, we used to call him Bruce Jr.
now, no matter what we call him, he doesn’t seem to pay any attention
TITLEBOT 21 READY TO PERFORM MISSION. BANK SHOT CALCULATING.
by jollyrogerwilco on Feb 5, 2009 1:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m now viewing Hairston as Udoka’s replacement. Too bad we couldn’t fly the GIST over just for this game.
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson
by CapHill on Feb 4, 2009 7:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+1 to both of these. I was very impressed with Hairston last night. He has come a long way since Summer League in Utah.
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." – Aldous Huxley
by spurchief on Feb 4, 2009 9:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree regarding Mason, and thought as much during the game thread. It was so bad that I would’ve preferred to see Bowen’s drives and layups again. They’re at least 50% more effective than Mason’s.
…And that’s sad.
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 4:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So!
HORSE is back. Who’s happy? …Anyone?
You guys should check this post. Lots of interesting ideas to improve the ASW. My favorite is the suggestion to change Rooks Vs. Sophs to Rooks Vs. D-League All Stars. Can you say “Malik time”?
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 3:32 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but which team would he even play for?!
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 4, 2009 3:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He’d be allowed to score on both ends of the court.
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 3:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So he’d play like you, huh?
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 4:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Udoka
I didn’t think he did that bad last night. Sure he had a couple of TO’s and missed a couple open shots, but he did a decent job on Melo and played fairly good defense. No?
One man's toxic sludge is another man's popuri
by Big50 on Feb 4, 2009 3:53 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
He did, but he still just looks lost and discombobulated out there. He doesn’t have the same intensity or focus that he did last year, and that may be a confidence loss since Pop slid him over into the “Bonner” victory cigar role this year. But either way, it’s not promising.
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 4, 2009 3:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, there’s something positive: we definitely aren’t boring today.
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 4:06 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Not only that, we have our first recced comment. Sadly, it is that ass monkey SiMA who got it.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 4:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Somedays you just wake up and say, “I’m going to be a prick today,” don’t you?
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 4, 2009 4:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You better believe it.
Plus, I’m jealous as hell. I’d had my eye on that prize for a while.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 4:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You need to work on being more interesting then, ATS. That should work.
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 4:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not likely. People around here don’t seem to think the truth is interesting.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 4:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You need to add more silly pics to break the post and give us plebeians a respite from all that truth-telling.
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 4:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus, you’ve gotta go in with a pure heart. You can’t be so concerned about recognition and fame; gotta be more concerned about spreading information and enhancing the understanding of SPURS fans worldwide without glory.
Unfortunately, your heart is rotten. I could teach you, but it would involve heavy use of quads.
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 4, 2009 4:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
that’s just too funny, Seth
TITLEBOT 21 READY TO PERFORM MISSION. BANK SHOT CALCULATING.
by jollyrogerwilco on Feb 5, 2009 1:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
My real goal is to make TrueHoop. That’s when you know you’re REALLY successful anyway.
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 4, 2009 4:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
werd
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 4:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I totally started that when I recced it. I’m such a trend-setter.
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 4:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The sad part is that it takes away all the fame and glory and professionalism when visitors scroll down to find us talking for hours about how exciting it was to get recced. So bush league of us.
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 4, 2009 4:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Every time I think we’re just a nice big family, I catch someone peeking in a side window. Somebody’s always “just lurking” then “first time posts” months later. I did that for quite a long time before I ever popped out.
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 4, 2009 4:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I lurked for like….2 years
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what."
by Chilai on Feb 4, 2009 4:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Chilai, we were born to rec each other.
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 4:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
this is getting a bit uncomfortable
TITLEBOT 21 READY TO PERFORM MISSION. BANK SHOT CALCULATING.
by jollyrogerwilco on Feb 5, 2009 1:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
mmmm…..that’s what she said!!!
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what."
by Chilai on Feb 5, 2009 12:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Even with all of that, what did we lose by, like 6 or some small amount?
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
by bren on Feb 4, 2009 4:11 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I wasted the entire day so far checking the repercussions of Pop’s decision. How can I not love this guy? He’s walking blog fodder.
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 4:21 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I mentioned this to ATS last night (and he’s probably sitting on it to write a long credit-less post that will amaze the masses later) but I think there might be something to it. To me at least, watching Pop working to further develop everyone not named Titonibili confirms further that what we see is what we get- we’re not going after anyone this year to complete our run.
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 4, 2009 4:37 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Titonobili—nice. I’m going to have to rec this comment to the Elysian Fields. Your comments are always so reccable.
by tomasito on Feb 4, 2009 4:38 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I just fell out of my chair. Then recced your response to my response.
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 4, 2009 4:39 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I need to start this kind of symbiotic rec-lationship with someone… Hipuks, wanna rec out in the closet?
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 4:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It would be a lot of work, but actually funnier than hell to start secretly reccing every comment made by just one poster so that everything they said would be green. We could all feign ignorance and question SB Nation’s template when they asked about it.
I already have a target.
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 4, 2009 4:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the site admin can change the number of rec's required to turn a comment green
On Blazer’s Edge it is 5. But on others it is only one.
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Feb 4, 2009 4:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Pfft!!! I know who your target it. Same as mine.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 4, 2009 4:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you’re being evil… just let it go.
I am happy. I am proud. - Manu Ginobili
by bellasa on Feb 4, 2009 7:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If he’s going to write that post, then he needs to add this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-S_soY5Jg_Q
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 4:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
BTW, ATS, that’s actually a pretty cool idea. A post going over Pop’s history as the Spurs coach… especially in the last few seasons, where he’s shown himself to be completely comfortable doing whatever he wants.
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 5:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Pop might result in less work productivity for Spurs fans than March Madness for all others.
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson
by CapHill on Feb 4, 2009 7:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you guys watching any games tonight? Portland @ Dallas looks yummy, but it starts late.
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 4:27 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Cavs – Knicks on ESPN tonight, cant have enough of Alvaro Martin and Carlos Morales.
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what."
by Chilai on Feb 4, 2009 4:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh? Will watch that too, then. Although I think Martin is on vacation.
by LatinD on Feb 4, 2009 4:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
from Basketbawful concerning the game-
“Not surprisingly, George Karl was pissed. He called his team "selfish” and accused them of playing down to their competition. “We were fortunate. We still have a tendency in messing around with the game. It’s kind of come back in the last couple of weeks. We’ve still won most of the games but we should have attacked this game with a professional attitude and an intensity, and probably should have gotten the game over by the fourth quarter.” He also said: “I do realize in the NBA it is a trait of good teams winning playing bad. Going on a road trip after this performance scares the hell out of me.” It should."
:: cue evil maniacal laugh, circus music and puppet hand-motions ::
by SgtinManusArmy on Feb 4, 2009 6:03 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Are the hand puppets for the Denver Moonmen so they can understand the basics of the game? I hope so, because right now, they’re losing to the Thunder. Maybe Pop’s plan consisted of fucking with their minds so much, they don’t do a thing the rest of the season. Damn, he’s an evil genius!
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson
by CapHill on Feb 4, 2009 7:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Did you guys read the poll on Blazer's Edge today?
"When you fail to plan, you plan to fail." -Henry Ford
"It's not how you enter your sport, it's how you exit." - Dr. J
http://myspace.com/eme0916
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=569220294&ref=profile
by Ed (dfjmed) on Feb 4, 2009 6:06 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
This whole thing that Pop pulled pretty much proves what I’ve been saying all season long: without Duncan, Manu and Tony, this team just isn’t all that good.
Sure, they had a shot at the win late in the fourth, but a shot isn’t good enough.
They completely wasted really high-level performances from Mason and Hairston last night. Those two deserved to be backed up with a good supporting cast, and without our whole team playing, it just didn’t happen.
I gotta tell you, if this continues throughout the rest of the season, we’re not going to be able to go far in the playoffs. In fact, we could miss the post-season all together.
Not so funny now, is it?
TITLEBOT 21 READY TO PERFORM MISSION. BANK SHOT CALCULATING.
by jollyrogerwilco on Feb 5, 2009 1:28 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm. JRW, I think the point you are making here is that the bench, as currently constructed, is not good enough to win deep in the playoffs, yes?
Name me an NBA team who could sit 3 starters and a solid bench guy and compete with any other NBA team. Some of the guys out on the floor looked pretty bad because they were out of their normal roles. Bonner is spot-up-and-shoot, not dribble drive. KT tried to post up Maggette and get a back-to-the-basket shot. And the results were predictably awful. I like Mase a lot, but he’s not a PG.
My point here is that your assertion that the Nuggets game proves our bench is bad is faulty logic. They might be bad, but this game was not a true indicator of that. Once you get past any team’s top 3-4 guys, you are talking about players who all have significant holes in their game. If they didn’t, they’d be one of the top 3-4 guys.
Put the Spurs’ JV against the Mavs for instance, without Dirk, Howard, Kidd, and Terry and who’s left? A bunch of suck. Your starters are Barea, Antoine Wright, Bass, Dampier, and James Singleton. Matt Carroll, Gerald Green, and Ryan Hollins are your reserves, along with Devean George, if he’s not injured. I put our bench up against those guys any day and expect to get a win or come close. But it would be ugly because both teams would have players out of their normal roles.
Complementary players are just that – there to complement the Big 3. And when asked to do otherwise, it’s not going to be pretty. Measure them by their contribution to the team (scoring, rebounding, assists, and W-L record) and to the Big 3, not by how well they play when the players they support are all out for a whole game.
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." – Aldous Huxley
by spurchief on Feb 5, 2009 11:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Uh-oh, I think spurchief’s sarcasmometer broke.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Feb 5, 2009 1:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
SC, I did NOT mean to hang you out to dry – writing a serious reply to my foolish post. But ATS is correct, I was being sarcastic.
TITLEBOT 21 READY TO PERFORM MISSION. BANK SHOT CALCULATING.
- Goathair at theblowtorch.blogspot.com
by jollyrogerwilco on Feb 5, 2009 2:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep, the sarcasm-o-meter has been on the fritz for a week. Anyone know someone who could work on these things?
I’m probably a little hypersensitive to all the talking heads at ESPN looking at our bench and saying we have no chance of winning a title. I’ll be the first to admit we need a big, but I’ll roll the dice with these guys and a healthy Big 3 anyday. That’s my excuse anyway. That and lack of sleep from these stinking West Coast games.
My bad, JRW. If I had thought about it, I have known you were better than that.
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." – Aldous Huxley
by spurchief on Feb 5, 2009 3:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m just glad you read and replied first, because I was going to say the same thing.
I'm comfortable winning -- Emmanuel Ginobili
by pollackj on Feb 6, 2009 9:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
I thought that at least the part about “if this continues for the rest of the season” would have been a pretty big tip off. Pop might be crazy like a fox, but there’s no way he’ll continue to sit the big 3 through the playoffs.
That said, (and while this was NOT my intention) it is a little funny to think of spurchief and pollackj reading this and thinking, “What in the world was JRW smoking before he wrote that?”
TITLEBOT 21 READY TO PERFORM MISSION. BANK SHOT CALCULATING.
- Goathair at theblowtorch.blogspot.com
by jollyrogerwilco on Feb 6, 2009 2:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
My brow was significantly furrowed. And I wanted some of whatever you were smoking…..
Happy to play the fool for you, pollackj.
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." – Aldous Huxley
by spurchief on Feb 6, 2009 3:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't smoking anything
BTW, good luck getting a sarcasmometer repairman on short notice. But, no worries, those things hardly ever actually break down. It’s usually just a problem with the settings.
Go ahead and check out yours, and while it may seem like you don’t want it set to “NO” — that’s only because you’re looking at it upside down. It’s actually “ON.”
Hope that helps.
TITLEBOT 21 READY TO PERFORM MISSION. BANK SHOT CALCULATING.
- Goathair at theblowtorch.blogspot.com
by jollyrogerwilco on Feb 6, 2009 9:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 






























