This Year's 1st Quarter is Last Year's 3rd Quarter: Blazers-Spurs Recap
Another night, another loss. The man on the left killed us. As did the oldest man in the NBA, who ironically isn't a Spur.
On the positive side, at least our defense kinda, sorta showed up tonight. Unfortunately, the offense didn't. Despite what Fred has told us in the past, I don't like SEGABABAs. I don't think the Spurs do either. And I'm fairly certain they aren't fond of the Northwest Division right not, either.
The Bad
Here's the Boxscore. Notice the ugliness that is the Spurs' shooting percentage. We couldn't hit the broad side of a barn tonight. And even though the 3s weren't falling, we continued to chuck, to the tune of 4-21. That's below the Mendoza Line. The Spurs also got killed on the boards, allowing the Blazers way too many second chance points. Pryzbilla grabbed 13 rebounds (6 offensive) in 18 minutes. Those are Blair-like numbers.
The 1st quarter was atrocious - no energy, no defense, no nothin'. Duncan got pushed around most of the game by Oden (14 pts), and Pop insisted on not providing him with any help by playing small ball for too many minutes. We were also sloppy, with too many turnovers in the 1st half, and stupid fouls at the end of the second half (yes, Manu, I'm talking to you). Not to mention that the bad defense in the last two minutes of quarters from last season reared it's ugly head again.
For the Spurs to have a chance against good teams, the slow starts have to stop. Getting behind by double digits in the 1st quarter requires too much energy to overcome. If this isn't fixed, the Spurs will continue to rack up numbers in the "L" column.
The Good
However, unlike last night's debacle, there were some bright spots. If you throw out the 1st quarter, the Spurs were slightly better than the Blazers. The defense made an appearance in the 2nd half, spurred by our last signing of the summer, Keith Bogans. I now begin to see the wisdom of RC in inking Bogans as the defensive specialist. Brandon Roy did most of his damage against other defenders. Bogans' aggressiveness on the defensive end coming out of halftime helped change momentum.
George Hill did a good job taking over primary point guard duties after Tony got hurt. Yes, he made some mistakes, but he rebounded from his poor showing last night. RJ responded to Pop's scolding and was much more aggressive going to the basket in the 2nd half. McDyess finally showed some glimpses of what we were hoping he could be.
Your 3 stars (Slightly Different from Wayne's):
3. Antonio McDyess - He wasn't great, but he looked better than he has all year, and went 4-6 with his midrange jumper.
2. Richard Jefferson - Yes, his plus/minus is bad, but he provided points when needed, was more aggressive on the boards, and had a great dunk that overly excited many of the PtRers.
1. Keith Bogans - In a not good game, he was +4. He managed to slow down Roy, and his defensive intensity seemed to spark the rest of the team. As a bonus, he provided 5 points and 4 rebounds.
Side note: When Blair was in the game tonight, I spent some time watching his defense. Although he did lose his man a few times on backdoors, overall his pick and roll defense showed improvement. He is learning to move his feet, which is another tidbit of good news.
23 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Like most good teams that keep losing...
Each night is a different reason. In Utah there was no defense. IN Portland there was awful shooting. There are also the little things, such as a missed FT when points are needed, an untimely turnover that quickly pushes a 3 point spread up near double digits, and the inability to end quarters with something positive.
The bad luck bounces will even out. Better individual play will occur when new guys are familiar with the system and all guys know their roles. But the lack of enthusiasm to start games and the poor focus and/or decision making to end quarters must be corrected now.
I do like that Pop put Bogans in the starting lineup. The return to being a defense based team is the priority IMO.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
You have to think
if Parker had stayed in, this would have at least been a whole lot closer. I’m fine with Bogans starting since he’s the best defender at SG we have (though Hill can play SG with his size, I would’ve liked to see his defense on Roy).
Defense was nary the problem since Roy will crush just about any team no matter what (currently have him as #2 on my top-5 SG), but wow if that offense sputtered. Though how often have we seen Parker get fired up and make some truly epic shots to get insane amounts of points in hardly any time?
His momentum and game-changing ability at this point in his career rivals that of Ginobili’s in his prime, and we certainly could have used that last night. Once Parker gets going, perimeter options open up with Jefferson (impressive game last night), Mason, Finley, Bonner, etc. But without Parker, you see games like last night where we go 4-21 from 3-point range.
Parker is the key to our offense more so than Duncan or even Ginobili, without him we’ll struggle to get any offensive game going unless Blair gets back to being a momentum shifter off the bench and Jefferson gets back to Bucks form with 19 point games.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
Agreed about the Parker thing. If we had Parker in the fourth, we would’ve definitely gotten some points instead of chucking up those 3s that Mase kept missing, and Manu wasn’t hitting many of his j’s, only really getting points in the paint (not a bad thing).
In hindsight, this isnt a bad loss…Except for the fact that we’re now 2-3. But I think most people didn’t expect us to get the W tonight, on a SEGABABA IN the Rose Garden to a hungry Blazers team. Mix that with the fact that Parker was out the second half, and our loss suddenly becomes a lot easier to swallow.
Hi
Blazer fan here. I think the Blazers got lucky in this one. It was really the perfect storm for a spurs loss, and a Blazers win. Back to back road trip for the spurs, blazers being 2-3 and needing a win at home, Parker missing the 2nd half, cold shooting by the majority of your normally reliable shooters. It could have got ugly for my blazers if Parker didn’t get hurt. Even without him, the spurs cut the lead to 3 in the 4th, but looked like they spent a little too much energy coming back from the double digit deficit. Good game guys, I am not looking forward to playing your squad anytime soon. One of those factors I listed changes in your favor, and blazerland is probably wondering why we are 2-4….
you mean spewing the truth?
Seriously, blazers got lucky with TP going down and the fact the Spurs missed about a billion wide open 3s. and I’m a blazer fan!
"Do me a favor. Put your lip over your head... and swallow." Max Goldman
I think that both Wade and Kobe are better.
And since the start of the season, Roy hasn’t played very well.
forgot Kobe was a shooting guard
I always think he’s a small forward for some weird reason.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
Yeah Roy is struggling
Yet he is averaging 25 a game. I can’t wait til he pulls it all together.I hope T.P. is O.K. Spurs & Blazers are both off to a slow start but I think they will both pull it together soon. I look forward to some epic games between these two teams.
"BEER IS LIVING PROOF THAT GOD LOVES US"
- Benjamin Franklin-
Nice cap Cap. I think that Pop was just playing around with lineups during the game. I’m glad we played some sort of defense in the last three quarters, we’ll be alright. As long as we’re seeing flashes, of good offense, and good defense from the team, I’ll reserve the heckling.
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
Thanks for the recap, Nan. Ah geez… it’s bad that I missed the game but worse opening your browser and staring at a loss. Damn it all.
by silverandblack_davis on Nov 7, 2009 12:45 PM CST reply actions
Several have said Tony would have made the difference. I disagree. He looked tired last night. Steve Blake had no problem staying in front of him, even in full court pressure. Steve Blake! Furthermore, Tony has regressed defensively. Not that he was ever a stopper, but until now his defense improved every year.
None of the Big 3 are up to snuff. Tim can’t outplay mid-tier bigs like Oden/Boozer at either end and Manu has gone from genius-on-the-edge-of-control to mostly just out of control. This is largely due to Pop’s “report out of shape” preseason conditioning plan. Maybe this will pay off in the 2nd half. We can always hope.
At least we got to see a little defense. And RJ made Sportscenter.
I think it was 6th or 7th. Pop quickly assigned RJ to the inactive list so it won’t happen again.
Speaking of inactive list, will Tony go on it? Can you shuttle players back and forth every game or is there some kind of one week minimum?
by doggydogworld on Nov 7, 2009 3:52 PM CST up reply actions
Tony’s ankle has me troubled. The fact that it gave under his own body weight is not good. It means his ankle is weak. Once you turn it enough times, it becomes easier and easier for it to give. But, if you don’t severely injure it, the sprain does not keep you out for long.
"GINOBILI!" -- Sir Charles
I can attest to that, as I can now roll either ankle at the drop of a hat. Even though Tony is still young, he has a lot of miles on those wheels. I’d like to see the Spurs use some precautionary measures (more tape, ankle guards, etc.) to prevent the sprains from happening.
My people call it "sarcasm." - Lauri
From my seat on the sofa, it appeared to me the offense picked up a bit when Tony went out. He seemed to be dribbling way too much last night and looking too much for his own shot. Manu’s missed shots seemed to be on-line, but off the front of the rim – a little more energy in the shot and he’s good.
Point # 1.
Hmm. Heres an observation based on several years watching this team. We are having trouble playing cohesive basketball. “Gelled” type ball. The most cohesive unit the Spurs have ever fielded was the 2005 title team. All the other championship units were able to get by on sheer defensive presence (99) or talent and firepower (2003 ). The 2007 team was probably the weakest title unit San Antonio has ever fielded.
If this team doesnt learn to play together, lets just say not winning another title will be the least of the teams problems.
Pops structured approach to coaching might not work this season. There are too many new guys on the team. You cant tell me this team isnt being overcoached, when a club like Boston can go out and play like gangbusters the exact same season they were basically constructed from the ground up. That team played great right out of the gate. We have arguably as much or more talent , and we look like sh!t. Our losses havent been CLOSE.
#2. A few people in here, myself included, have noticed that we are perhaps the shortest Spurs team of the Duncan era.Our interior D has been non-existent. Because well…there is no one down there who can bother or block shots. Tim Duncan either cant do it anymore , or is waiting until February to start. ( I honestly believe its equal parts.) Unless Theo steps into a time machine ( Ian is out of the equation here, I think the organization gave him more than a fair shot ) we are not gonna have anybody bothering shots down there when Duncan isnt in the paint. Therefore our perimeter guys will be under increased pressure to begin defending.
I believe they will , but ultimately if this team wins the title, it will be in spite of being the smallest Spurs team of all time.
...Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is forty five.
we are having the results of a shitty preseason. Most teams use the preseason to get team chemistry, but Pop treated the preseason as a joke thrown in a different lineup every game.
The only big that Pop is using is Duncan, we and we have 7. Why the hell do they signed Mcdyess and Theo. We cant win with Finley as the PF.

by 






























