Bite the Bullet?
Even before the 08-09 season ended, I’ve had high hopes for the Spurs. We got Richard Jefferson and his offense-defense in an offseason trade, and my expectations for the team shot even higher. A couple of days later, the Spurs drafted promising rookie and co-Big East Player of the Year, DeJuan Blair, and I got even more excited. Then we signed veteran Antonio McDyess and his mid-range shooting, and I was jumping for joy. We split our preseason games, 3-3, but Blair and Hill’s play helped keep my enthusiasm for this team and this season off the charts. Ten games into the San Antonio Spurs’ 2009-2010 season, and here I am--alone, jobless, without the company of comforting friends, short of cigarettes, out of alcohol, and wading in the mire of depression brought about by a disappointing season thus far.
Give us more reasons to hope.
If the signing of Bogans added anything to the team, I was certain that it was strengthening our defense. For sure, with Tim and Manu finally healthy, and Tony at or near his prime, we wouldn’t lack in offense. If those three weren’t enough, our big fourth, RJ, would make sure of that. And yet, ten games into the season, our offense isn’t overwhelming and our defense has only recently approached decent by Spurs standards. Ginobili and Parker are both out with injuries, and while Duncan has shown flashes of his former brilliance, even old 21 has had health issues to deal with--albeit minor ones. We’re currently two games below .500, and that’s just plain unacceptable. I never thought this day would happen, but I’d be happy if we could only get to .500.
Since last season’s premature end, I have considered 2010 as the year we take back what’s ours--the Larry O’Brien trophy. This is the year we stand on top of the basketball world once again. Well, this WAS the year we stood on top of the basketball world once again. I’m not even sure which is which anymore. Is the championship still a realistic goal? Eastern contenders are doing quite well. The Lakers seemed to be able to survive through the injuries. Even Phoenix and Dallas are doing (at least for me) surprisingly well. Are we in danger of missing the playoffs for the first time since we drafted Tim Duncan? In reality, if the playoffs started today, we would be outside looking in. We’re tenth in the West, and the team that’s above us, Utah, just beat us today.
We want another picture like this--with RJ, Hill, Dice, and Blair.
We stand at 4-6, which means there are 72 games left in the regular season. That’s a whole lot of basketball to be played. But with little to comfort me in our recent games, I needed somewhere else to find solace. Somewhere I always find reassurance in: history. Will it take me into its soothing arms and rock me to sleep? Or will it give me a GOML look and shrug me off along with Golden State and New Orleans? When you strain enough to witness streaking meteors in the sky, you’ll eventually spot one. It might not actually be a meteor, probably a plane or fireworks from some festivity. But it will keep you placated, sedated into thinking everything’s alright. As it turns out, I had to stay up hours to look for those shooting stars. I had to pay a huge sum of money to afford a tranquilizer. I had to work to determine whether history’s on my side.
Do you see the shooting star? I don't either. But if you wait, it will come. In June.
I looked at all the NBA champions to see whether any one of them started out like we did--with a losing record. A year ago, there were the Lakers, starting out with their dominant 9-1 record. The Celtics had the same record through ten games a year before them. In 2007, when we won our last championship--which just seems oh too far away--we had an 8-2 start. Miami, Detroit and the 2003 Spurs gave me some hope: they all started out at 6-4. But our current Spurs have the win-loss record reversed. The next "best" are the ‘99 Spurs, the ’91 Bulls and the ’85 Lakers. They were at .500 at the ten game mark. Even if you look at the average record of all the NBA champions by the first ten games (7.4-2.6), we are off the mark. And I am out of luck. Will I just have to accept the horrible thought that maybe this isn’t the year we win our fifth Championship?
I was almost resigned to that fate, when some light in the sky changed all that--some light that wasn’t a meteor, instead a very shiny bullet. The Washington Bullets.
The 1977-1978 Bullets hovered around .500 throughout the season and had to deal with a couple of injuries. They ended the season with a 44-38 record; that was good for fourth-best in the East. They began to get healthy when the playoffs started and swept the Atlanta Hawks in the first round. Playing solid basketball, the Bullets upset, guess who, the San Antonio Spurs in the second. They would go on to beat the Sixers in the Conference Finals in six games, and then beat the Sonics on their home court in game 7 of the finals to win their first NBA Championship. Interesting though, is that those Washington Bullets started 4-6. Hey, just like us now!
Wes Unseld had 15 points and 9 rebounds in that Championship-winning game 7.
In the past sixty seasons of the NBA--even if you include the BAA years--no team has ever won the Championship after losing the first six of ten games. No team, except for the ‘78 Bullets. They’re the only team in the history of the NBA to ever win a championship after starting 4-6.
The one and only team.
One.
Now, let’s write history and make that two. Go, Spurs, Go!
References: Wikipedia and Sportsecyclopedia for the Bullets' season, and http://www.basketball-reference.com/ for the stats.
4 recs |
27 comments
Comments
Well, we play the Bullets Wizards on Saturday, so… fate?
The Spurs - now playing defense again! ...but only against Dallas.
by Tim C. on Nov 20, 2009 2:07 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Destiny.
"Yes, it's important that I have good numbers, and I'm well-respected as a player. But I think it's more important that I'm respected as a man." - Some Tall Guy Who Wore #50
by theonlyromeo on Nov 20, 2009 2:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Veeery interesting post! This is our cold streak. Let’s do this guys and girls. It’s hard, but we’ve got to believe. Am I sounding like a Kings Mavs Warriors fan?
by Ed (dfjmed) on Nov 20, 2009 6:09 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
1998-99 Spurs started 6-8. Due to the strike-shortened season they only had 36 games remaining to right the ship. Remarkably, they snagged the #1 seed.
by doggydogworld on Nov 20, 2009 8:50 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
…….and had so much momentum going into the playoffs they went 15-2, sweeping both the Shaq/Kobe Lakers and the Rasheed Wallace Blazers (thanks to Sean’s Memorial Day Miracle)
by doggydogworld on Nov 20, 2009 8:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, we’re not getting that 1st seed this year. But once this team is healthy and gelled, watch out.
The Spurs - now playing defense again! ...but only against Dallas.
by Tim C. on Nov 20, 2009 11:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
16-2
Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney
by bellasa on Nov 20, 2009 11:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
isn’t it 15 because of the best of 5?
by BlaseE on Nov 20, 2009 11:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep. Back when the first round was less interesting.
The Spurs - now playing defense again! ...but only against Dallas.
by Tim C. on Nov 20, 2009 11:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, yes… y’all are correct.
That was back when an 8th seed could more easily advance to the 2nd round.
Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney
by bellasa on Nov 20, 2009 11:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I miss the days of the 5 game first round series. Stupid tv ratings…
by Ed (dfjmed) on Nov 20, 2009 11:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Reasons to be optimistic:
Every Western conference team has 3 losses already. Being only 3 losses back gives me some hope if we can just find some sort of streak.
We could sweep the rest of November and be 9-6 with home games against Boston and Denver to kick off December. Follow that with an @ Utah. We need to win two of those at least and be at 11-7 at that point. At Phoenix and then a Portland game are the only scary games on the schedule until January. I’m predicting a 21-10 record at the end of the year. Yes, looking at our schedule, I think we can go 17-4 over the next 21 games. It’s home heavy (14 home – 7 road). There are only two SEGABABA’s (@ Warriors and @ Knicks). Only 8 of the 21 games are against teams that made the playoffs last year opposed to 7 of our first 10 games so far. OKC and Toronto are much better looking this year).
Great post.
by BlaseE on Nov 20, 2009 11:20 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Last season we started 5-6 (which we could match this year) and then won 24 of the next 31. We can all agree this roster is better than last year’s. If we can get healthy and find some chemistry (which we’ve seen in flashes and we know we don’t have any poisoning players), we can right this ship quick and be a top Western team.
by BlaseE on Nov 20, 2009 11:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Indeed. I don’t want to ruin the mojo, but I think in a week’s time we’ll be wondering why we were so down on this team.
The Spurs - now playing defense again! ...but only against Dallas.
by Tim C. on Nov 20, 2009 11:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wes Unseld looks like he’s getting an old-fashioned Swedish massage in that picture.
Try the new PtR--now entirely BAT-FREE!
by Lauri on Nov 20, 2009 11:57 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think if you look a bit closer, on the left side of the mountain, you could see something resembling a shooting star.
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
by the little o on Nov 20, 2009 2:52 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That’s the spirit!
"Yes, it's important that I have good numbers, and I'm well-respected as a player. But I think it's more important that I'm respected as a man." - Some Tall Guy Who Wore #50
by theonlyromeo on Nov 21, 2009 6:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thats actually the comet en route to earth that is set to destroy humnity in 2012. ( Hey , your the one who noticed it)
...Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is forty five.
by alamobro on Nov 21, 2009 10:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well done, romes. I feel better already.
Straight from the No-Stat Zone to your computer!
Dunkin' Cheerleaders
by LatinD on Nov 20, 2009 5:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
YAAAAY!!
Hilariously maladjusted. But for all the right reasons.
by Queness on Nov 20, 2009 10:09 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, people. It’s just that I normally put up a facade of pessimism—except when it comes to the Spurs, who enabled me always to look forward to last second Horry (or Kerr, or Fin, or Mace) threes, crucial defensive stops, and game-winning plays. I wanna see the Spurs back to form as soon as possible. It’s not that I’m becoming impatient; it’s just that I want it now. If you know what I mean.
Oh, and I’ll never learn how to center pictures in fanposts.
"Yes, it's important that I have good numbers, and I'm well-respected as a player. But I think it's more important that I'm respected as a man." - Some Tall Guy Who Wore #50
by theonlyromeo on Nov 21, 2009 6:52 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Very noice, romeo. I thought the ’95 Rockets, given that they were only the 5th seed when they won their second championship, would be the team closer to our current plight, but the Bullets are cool.
And Wes Unseld really looks massive in that photo.
by silverandblack_davis on Nov 21, 2009 12:31 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Them old school shorts look kinda tight
There are no sacred cows for DSL except for holy cow Blair.
by 'DSilverlining on Nov 22, 2009 2:41 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
If the signing of Bogans added anything to the team, I was certain that it was strengthening our defense.
It really pains me to say this but Bogans was the most underrated addition we made. I was expectin Mason to fill-in Bowen’s shoes. But it appears Bogan is Bowen part 2. Thank God we are regaining our defensive edge. It’s all sunshiny days from hereon.
There are no sacred cows for DSL except for holy cow Blair.
by 'DSilverlining on Nov 22, 2009 2:47 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
That is definitely true about him being the most underrated. I thought he would be stuck on IL with Hairston and even wanted him cut to make a roster spot for M. Williams.
by BlaseE on Nov 23, 2009 8:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I like what he’s doing now, but I can’t help but wonder, “If Hairston’s the one getting regular minutes, would he do as well, or better? Or even Haislip?”
"Yes, it's important that I have good numbers, and I'm well-respected as a player. But I think it's more important that I'm respected as a man." - Some Tall Guy Who Wore #50
by theonlyromeo on Nov 23, 2009 7:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bogans being in the starting five is really saying a lot about the confidence that Pop has in him. I could have picked Blair, biased as I am. But if the MH twins can display the same hard-nosed defense then they are a better option with their height, athleticism & offensive threat.
There are no sacred cows for DSL except for holy cow Blair.
by 'DSilverlining on Nov 24, 2009 1:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

































