Pounding The Rock: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cottagers Confidential for Fulham FC Fans!

Thunder Execute Spurs [Updated with 3 stars and more]

I'm so hostile right now.  Well, I was hostile at the end of the game, a 101-98 loss.  I hate losing games like this one.   We got out-executed, or as Pop said, "Oklahoma City had more guys play better."  Honestly though, I don't think you really have to dig too deep into the stats to understand how we lost this one.  We more or less played them to a draw, and they had a couple things go their way.  They had 2 more offensive rebounds than we did, but they outscored us 20-4 on second-chance points.  They also got to the line quite a bit more than us.  Especially in the second half, when we only got to the line 4 times.

Of course, I will dig deeper.  It felt to me like we got beat like a red-headed step child.  Or, how about killed by a Red-Headed Stranger?

Photos by JanieAnnie

Star-divide

It Was the Time of the Preacher When The Story Began

The first quarter was a slow start for us.  The Cowboy Thunderclusters held us to 8 points over the first 6.5 minutes of the game, jumping out to a 15-8 lead.  The Durantula got 12 of his game-high 25 points in the first.  Eight of those came at the free-throw line.  We fought our way back into the game and had tied it at 25 by the end of the quarter.  We did it despite the fact that Manu couldn't shoot straight.  He was 0-5 and responsible for 5 of our last 7 misses in the quarter (and that includes FinDog's 36' turnaround that almost went in to end the quarter).  A big part of the reason we got back into the game, though, was Manu's 2 assists, 2 steals, 1 rebound, and 2 free throws.

Even though we gave up 25 points to the Thunder in the first quarter, I thought we played really solid defense.  At least, we played good defense when we set up our defense and rebounded.  They got 9 of their points at the line.  Of their 8 made field goals, 2 were off the offensive glass and 2 were on the fast break.  Additionally, another one or two field goals (one for sure) were set up because the Spurs got lost in transition defense.


Airball_medium

I'm pretty sure he airballed this one.

The Preachin' is Over and the Lesson's Begun

It was in the second quarter that the Thunder really did themselves some favors.  They played poorly, and our guys gave the youngsters a lesson in execution.  We put up 28 points.  We went to the line 14 times and made 12. We shot 8 of 16 from the field.  The Thunder went 8-20 from the field and committed 5 turnovers.  What they did very well, though, was keep themselves in the game.  They scored on their first 4 possessions of the quarter to go up by 4.  Their next 12 possessions resulted in 6 points.  Four of those were second-chance points.  Another 6 of those points came on a pair of drives from Green and Westbrook where they got and-ones.  Without those 4 plays, two hustle and two athletic, they are down 17 at the half instead of 7. 

Sir HotBod played some serious-ass lockdown defense on Durant.  Cubits was phenomenal defensively against KD.  He denied, he challenged, he worked early in the possession.  He was just awesome.  Nothing I can say can capture how well he played Durant.  I know, I know.  Lauri is torn.  Durantula or Sir HotBod? 


Gh_ding_medium

No, that's not Muggsy Bogues covering Durant.  Somebody needs to talk to Sir HotBod about his posture.

Gh_fronting_medium

"My man can't score if he doesn't have the ball."

The Lesson is Over and the Killin's Begun

The third quarter was an abomination for the Spurs defensively.  The ThunderCats had two separate streaks of 6 possessions where they scored.  They shot 15-24 in the quarter.  They hit both their 3's for the game and managed 3 offensive rebounds on those 9 misses.  Oh, and 1 turnover.  32 points on 22 possessions for the quarter.  Those are ass-whipping numbers.  Miraculously, we were never down more than 5 in the quarter (despite our 5 turnovers) and entered the 4th quarter down 4.  Why?  Because Tim was carrying our butts.  He had 22 points on 9-13 shooting.  Well, it was Timmy and Sir HotBod.  HotBod had 13 points on 5-7 shooting (one of those misses was an end of quarter toss from 30+ feet).

(I'm back at home now, 3:30 hours after the game ended, and I'm still a little bent out of shape about this one.)

Surprisingly, it wasn't Durant that killed us.  It was Russell Westbrook who tore us apart.  And I mean he really tore us apart.  He worked us from many different spots and we didn't have any answers.  For the quarter, he had 9 points, 6 assists, and 3 rebounds.  They posted him up.  They ran side screen and roll.  They ran isolation.  They ran high screen and roll.  They looked like they were scoring at will.  My initial recollection is that Westbrook did most of his damage against Parker.  However, he had 5 points and 3 assists in the first 7:42 against Tony and 4 points and 3 assists in the final 4:18 against George.

Td_move_medium

Shake and Bake.  Shake and Bake.

An' just when you think it is over, it's only begun.

The fourth quarter got off to a terrible start.  Harden got a 3-point play and RJ fouled Durant on the break and just like that we were down 9 points 1:12 into the 4th.  We fought back and made a game of it.  We scored on 7 of our next 8 possessions to make it a 1 point game with 5:57 to go.  Most of our offense came from San Antonio McDyess, who hit 3 jumpers -- Antonio had 9 of his 10 points in the 4th quarter.  In that stretch, the Thunder managed to scrap together 6 points,  2 from Sefolosha and 4 from Collison.  One of Collison's buckets was a running hook from about 6' that the Spurs would give him from now until forever.  These were big buckets their role players contributed.

The next 4 minutes and 39 seconds was some horrific offense from our guys.  We scored 2 points on 1-8 shooting and one turnover.  One possession took us three shots just to hit the rim.  We managed to scrap our way back into it and keep it interesting.  However, we didn't execute in crunch time, either.  Tony had a turnover with 39 seconds left.  RJ had a turnover with 16 seconds left.  Now, when I look at the play-by-play, I understand why Pop said we were beat because they executed better than we did.  It's almost, yes almost, like he knows what he is talking about.


Scrum_medium

"Twins!"

Mg_bench_medium

Our chances of winning go down A LOT when he's not playing in the 4th quarter.

He cried like a baby
He screamed like a panther in the middle of the night

Rage, where did you go?  Wednesday night you took 23 shots, were aggressive, and manhandled the Mavericks.  Tonight?  Four shots.  Yep, seriously bro, you took 4 shots and scored 4 points (kudos, though, for making both your free throws).


Rj_non_shot_medium

This shot didn't count.

Reprise

But he could not forgive her,
Though he tried and tried and tried.
And the halls of his memories,
Still echo her lies.

Before the game, I wrote down my keys to success.  Here they are:

  • Turnovers -- we needed to limit the Thunder's ability to get out on the break.
  • Durant at the line -- he hasn't been shooting well this year, but he's had some games where he's gotten to the line a lot.
  • Defensive intensity -- could we bring that competitive intensity we had in the Mavs game?
  • Containing Jeff Green -- his season high in points was 24 and in rebounds was 11.

So, how'd we do?  I'd give us a 1 out of 4.

  • We committed 15 turnovers that led to 15 points.  Not horrible, but we also had some very untimely turnovers.  D
  • Durant went to the line 15 times.  9 in the first quarter.  F
  • I thought we really worked on defense.  Yes, they abused us in a couple stretches, but it wasn't from not working. B+
  • Jeff Green had 21 points and 10 rebounds.  His point total would have been much better if he had done better than 1-6 on open 3-pointers.  D-

[Update:  I forgot the 3 stars last night.]

Here are your 3 stars:

3. Antonio McDyess - 10 points and 6 rebounds in 20 minutes.  He make big shots down the stretch and grabbed some big rebounds.  Exactly what we need from him.

2.  Tim Duncan - Efficient.  22 points on 14 shots.  10 rebounds, 3 assists, and 2 blocks.  Zero points in the fourth quarter of a close game limits you to second star though.

1.  George Hill - His 18 points were only impressive for when he scored them.  He scored almost all of them when his team really needed a bucket in stretches of the third and fourth quarters.  His first half buckets came when he found himself covered by Jeff Green and in both cases he cleared out his side of the court and got an easy bucket.  Still, George was awesome defensively.  Durant had 2 points on 1 of 4 shooting in the second quarter.  Those two points came on the first possession when he curled around a high screen and hit a 16 footer.  After that, he got nothing.  In the fourth quarter, George stole the ball from Durant twice.  Btw, George played 32 minutes.  He never left the game after entering in either half.

Topic of Discussion

If George is this good, and Pop keeps calling him the best player and one of the most improved players in the league, then who gets the crunch time minutes?.  With Tony, George, Manu, and RJ you only have 3 positions.  It's a nice problem to have and I am going to be VERY interested to see how this goes when everybody is healthy.  You can't bench your best 2-way player when the game is on the line, and right now, that guy is George.

Manu's Injury

Manu tweaked a hamstring in the Mavs game and didn't practice the last couple days.  Pop said he held Manu out because of the hamstring because it tightened up on him.  I saw Manu stretching the hamstring on the bench during the timeouts of the fourth quarter.  I told Bellasa I thought he didn't play because of the hamstring.  She thought it was because Manu couldn't make shots.  I thought it was the hamstring before Coach Pop said it was the hamstring.  I'm going to think it was the hamstring AFTER Coach Pop said it was the hamstring.

3 recs  |  Comment 49 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Its retardiculous that Rich only took 4 shots. We gotta get this guy going .

The three other stars on the team know when theyll be able to pick theyre spots to be the hero.

But not RJ. Hes new, this isnt his team, and its the teams ( and Pops) responsibility to make him feel comfortable taking shots.

We got time. Im just concerned that hes going to get locked into a position where hes basically taking as many shots as Bruce Bowen while having 10 times the athleticism and making about 10 times the money. Its doesnt make sense.

...Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is forty five.

by alamobro on Nov 15, 2009 3:35 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Yea , Westbrook really killed us. If hes gonna be able to routinely score 19 points on better than 50% shooting, Dole out 11 assists with ZERO turnovers against us….

...Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is forty five.

by alamobro on Nov 15, 2009 3:37 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Wow Cubits really did that good of a job on KD ??

Impressive !

...Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is forty five.

by alamobro on Nov 15, 2009 3:39 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Eh, I’m so pissed I wrote an a pretty nasty recap about our guys. Don’t know if I should put it up, though.

The Spurs - now playing defense again! ...sometimes

by Tim C. on Nov 15, 2009 3:47 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Answer: Yes. We can always revisit it when we win the championship and laugh.

Straight from the No-Stat Zone to your computer!
Dunkin' Cheerleaders

by LatinD on Nov 15, 2009 9:50 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Was the reason Manu wasn’t playing in the final stretches his abysmal shooting, or was it something else? In the final minutes we really needed someone who could step up and execute, be it a shot or an assist or drawing the foul, we wasted a lot of opportunities.

If you haven't lived with a squirrel, you haven't lived. - Bob Ross

by Hipuks on Nov 15, 2009 4:22 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

A hamstring muscle tightened up on Manu Ginobili.
 “I kept him out because of the hamstring,” Spurs coach Gregg Popovich said. "He hasn’t been able to practice on it since the Dallas game [on Wednesday] and it tightened up on him again.

“I thought it was best to be conservative and not have that hamstring get worse and lose him for a longer period. It was a close call, but I would do the same thing again and sit him with that tight hamstring for sure.”

by jalberto on Nov 15, 2009 8:35 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think by now Pop is willing to live and die by Manu’s randomn ways in the fourth even though he didn’t do squat for 3 quarters.

by LionZion on Nov 15, 2009 2:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Manu did get to the line 7 times. It sucks his shot was off but at least he was playing hard. Maybe if Manu had played in the 4th quarter, we wouldn’t be -9 in FTA’s.

by BlaseE on Nov 15, 2009 9:19 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

things that we should know

first, by more time tp playing(against russel)westbrook was just killing us and when george played him,he slowed down.so my suggestion to pop is, george is a defensive minded guy than tp,we all know that,and so why not play them together for sometime, hill as sg tp as pg.i guess this will do when tp is not playing great defense,which george brings.
second, play dice much than he does now, why are still experimenting on this one?lets play dice more as pf and td c.pls.cuz if we don’t my warning is that, we can be on a loosing streak, a streak that would cause us on the rankings by the end of the season,that our december sure lineups,or that of jan,can’t help us to get to the number one, i know were not after the rankings,but its the west,upsets could come.
third,why did we play so great w/o the two superstars?!chemistry was just there,everyone fitted and adjusted,so im perplexed about this,does this mean that everybody not including td and tp are already adjusted and that the two should adjust more than the other guys?!im an avid spurs fan,and im just hurt that were loosing.like last yr i had faith on this team,and they didn’t disappoint me, but i guess when you look at this,why pop is still experimenting when its obvious dice should play more time so as george,manu and 24 mins for blair would be great maybe 16 mins for bonner and 12 mins for mason and findog.i guess bogans is good at irritating others, so i guess 24 mins for him won’t hurt. i guess pop is trying to see by the end of the month who to put on certain situations,their minutes, teh chemistry they would bring,how good a lineup could be.but i expect that after this month,we would have a 20 game winning streak,due when you look at the talent and paper,where we should be winning.pls lets do better than lebron and his cavs.pls.

by tp_09 on Nov 15, 2009 4:49 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I hear you, tp. But I think these guys are still getting used to each other. The championship is played in June. It’s November. We’ve got a long way to go in the season and think these guys need more playing time together. I don’t think it will take much time but I do agree that making a habit of dropping games like this is what separates good teams from great teams. We should have executed better.

I mentioned in the game thread and again agree with you here that everyone seemed to be clicking without TP and Timmy. I saw several drives during this game, even Elliot commented during the broadcast, where RJ was trying to drive and Tim was standing in his way and clogging the lane. No bueno, Timmy. RJ is our leading scorer and it would behoove us to get him involved. And if he’s not firing then we need to find a way to get Manu involved. If not him, try Bogans. And so on… The offense seemed way too stagnant.

Also, what does Tony do these days besides over dribble, try to draw a foul against the other team’s bigs and then fall down? I’ve always been a huge TP fan but…is Cubits winning me over with his fearless defense and savvy play? Hmmm…

by JustinBK on Nov 15, 2009 8:25 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Justin,

I too noticed a couple of drives where RJ even bumped into his own team mate on the drive! I know eventually RJ will be able to create for TD even more, but at this point, it seems RJ/Tony/Timmy are on the court at the same time, there’s no fluidity to their offense.

Tony seems stuck in his way of trying to play a two man game with Timmy and everyone else is just standing around, watching. I know the reason, you don’t want to bring your man into their area on a two man game, but that kills the spurs movement. We make it easier for the defense to defend.

I liked it when Hill was the initiator with Tony on the floor. It gives Tony a chance to run away from his man and score within the offense, but that’s only from the limited time that they were both on the court and Tony actually let Hill take it up court.

by xman130 on Nov 15, 2009 9:02 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Man I want Tony to experiment with shot creation for others other than kick outs. If only he knew how to involve our bigs in the drives to the paint like Manu.

by LionZion on Nov 15, 2009 2:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If timmy is not a big and TP doesn’t involve TD, you are right.

by biolb on Nov 16, 2009 1:30 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Lost me, blolb.

by JustinBK on Nov 16, 2009 12:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Great recap of a tough loss, Wayne. That you were able to write something this good fter driving home from San Antonio leaves me in awe!

Try the new PtR--now entirely BAT-FREE!

by Lauri on Nov 15, 2009 7:31 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

*after

Try the new PtR--now entirely BAT-FREE!

by Lauri on Nov 15, 2009 7:31 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good read, Wayne. I thought I was ticked off after the game… who knew you were hiding all that rage under that cool persona?

I know that Manu couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn last night, but I wish Pop would have played him with George and sat Tony. Tony was just a mess last night. He was out of sync. At least when Manu was in the game, the flow of the game was working much better.

I agree with Justin it’s November. Still, this was a very winnable game and we gave it away.

Of course, I’d rather play it safe with Manu’s minutes if there was a possibility of an injury.

Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney

by bellasa on Nov 15, 2009 9:19 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

What? No props for using working a Texas treasure into the recap? Where’s my dead to me list?

We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.

by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Nov 15, 2009 10:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, bubba. My scratchy throat and achiness got much worse after the game. My brain feels like lead surrounded NY cotton balls. Btw- I love me some Willie Nelson.

I don’t care what pop said, I still think it was more coaches choice than hamstring issues. In my fuzzy state I must have accidentally mind melded with him, so I totally know what he was thinking.

Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney

by bellasa on Nov 15, 2009 11:56 AM CST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

I think it is the hamstring. Plus Pop needs to find out how the other guys respond in the fourth. We all know what Manu can do(by that I mean, its not always complimentary, but most of us good with that :P)

by LionZion on Nov 15, 2009 2:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The "Caution" BS

Manu made it clear that Pop’s holding him out in the fourth had nothing to do with caution about an injury. It was Pop being obstinate for reasons that only he knows, but that are not uncommon with him. People keep talking about RJ adjusting to his new team. I think a much greater problem is TP adjusting to what he now has around him. He’s always been a score-first point guard. We all know that. And his assists usually came on the pick and roll with Timmy or passing to Bruce or Fin in the corner. RJ is a different animal.

by agutierrez on Nov 15, 2009 10:38 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

TP to SG?!

perhaps Pop need to rail into TP like he did those many years ago? — George, though it’s only been a few games, appears to be playing all aspects of the game better so doesn’t he deserve a start? — he’s receiving more minutes which is the 1st step — would TP losing his job be sufficient incentive to get his mind in the game & DISTRIBUTE?

TP is a veteran leader but he needs to bring the newbies along & not expect them to kow tow to his ways

We need more motion & drives to the basket & less 3s

We won’t win every home game but let’s learn from our mistakes so the losses won’t be for naught

btw — when can we expect the H Brothers to play more than the last minute of a blowout???

by KevinH on Nov 15, 2009 11:31 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Gotta agree with Wayne on the "Hammy"

Watching Manu play, it looked like the hamstring was bothering him all night – lack of explosiveness, no “hops”, passing the ball when he drove to the basket rather than go up to the rim. I also saw him repeatedly try to stretch that hamstring, one time right in front of Pop in the huddle by using the scorer’s table as a prop. He wanted to be in there to make a difference. I’ve watched his body language a lot over the last two seasons. I trust Pop on this one – he knows Manu too well and knows he’ll play through pain when he may be injuring himself further (remember the 2008 playoffs?).

by janieannie on Nov 15, 2009 12:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If I recall correctly he barely knicks the front of the rim on his first three point shot from the left side of the arc (too lazy to go back and load up the game right now). Manu’s legs just weren’t there.

by JustinBK on Nov 16, 2009 12:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

In looking at the shooting percentages in the box score, both teams were identical in percentage of field goals made (and three-pointers). The difference came at the free throw line – our percentage was higher, but they had so many more opportunities.
When I sent Wayne my photos last night, my comment was that they were as out of focus and ill-timed as Manu’s shots. I missed all of Duncan’s dunks and a few nice shots by George. I never got my rhythm going last night either.
Manu’s body language on the bench in the 4th quarter clearly showed his disappointment at not being in the game to help close it out. He had that same far-off stare into nowhere he would get last season when he sat on the bench. I watched him trying to stretch that hammy to get it loose – I suspect it bothered him the whole game, as evidenced by the few drives to the basket. When he did drive, he tended to pass it off rather than go up to the rim.

by janieannie on Nov 15, 2009 11:21 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

+ 1

...Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is forty five.

by alamobro on Nov 15, 2009 2:34 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

If you add one to an imaginary number you don’t really get an answer.

We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.

by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Nov 15, 2009 2:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i+1 ?

"Mr. Gilmore deserves to be in the Basketball Hall of Fame damnit. Highest field goal percentage EVER"

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gilmoar01.html

by Artis Gilmore on Nov 15, 2009 2:53 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

two units

so far, it looks like TD, TP and RJ playing together is not a good combination of players for us.
however, RJ played very well with Manu and George. it’s like we can play two units: Duncan, Parker, Bonner, Finley and Bogans; and Manu, RJ, Hill, McDyess and Blair. if we play those units each roughly half of the time, we can have a high-quality team on the floor during whole game, give opponents very different looks and win a lot of regular season games this way. there is still a question who should be playing at the end of a close game (I’d say whoever is hot), and who can carry us through the playoffs (this would take more adjusting and Pop’s experimenting).

by Kondor on Nov 15, 2009 3:21 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I could not agree more on those combinations, although McDyess seems to play well with either group as well as Bogas/Hill.

RJ seems to play alongside Hill/Manu, same with Blair. I think Pop will find the right combinations sooner or later, I’m not too concerned, I just wish we could win a few more before we got the train going full speed ahead.

by xman130 on Nov 15, 2009 5:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Agree

We really need a distributing point guard.

by Neuwaldegg on Nov 15, 2009 5:16 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

When Rj scored 29pts, George Hil had like 4 assists. So don’t know how he is a better distributor.

by biolb on Nov 16, 2009 1:28 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

it doesn’t necessarily have to be Hill, Manu played the point well throughout the two games that Parker was out.

When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.

by the little o on Nov 16, 2009 1:42 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I refuse to let “Sir HotBod” become a regular nickname in PTR.

Obviously we haven’t learnt how to play when Tim, Tony, Manu and RJ are all available. But honestly, Tony needs to try to get RJ involved. Either that or bench RJ and put him in along with Manu.

Straight from the No-Stat Zone to your computer!
Dunkin' Cheerleaders

by LatinD on Nov 15, 2009 9:54 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Oh, and good recap, Wayne, as usual.

Straight from the No-Stat Zone to your computer!
Dunkin' Cheerleaders

by LatinD on Nov 15, 2009 9:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, and good recap, Wayne, as usual.

Straight from the No-Stat Zone to your computer!
Dunkin' Cheerleaders

by LatinD on Nov 15, 2009 9:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, and good recap, Wayne, as usual.

The Spurs - now playing defense again! ...sometimes

by Tim C. on Nov 15, 2009 10:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, and good recap, Wayne, as usual.

Try the new PtR--now entirely BAT-FREE!

by Lauri on Nov 15, 2009 10:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, and good recap, Wayne, as usual.

If you haven't lived with a squirrel, you haven't lived. - Bob Ross

by Hipuks on Nov 15, 2009 10:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Freaks, all of ya.

Straight from the No-Stat Zone to your computer!
Dunkin' Cheerleaders

by LatinD on Nov 15, 2009 11:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with you on the “Sir Hotbod” nickname, LD.

The entire name should be used: Sir Hotbod Handsomeface.

Try the new PtR--now entirely BAT-FREE!

by Lauri on Nov 15, 2009 11:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think the boys should really have a say in this, Lauri. I love the nickname.

My people call it "sarcasm." - Lauri

by CapHill on Nov 16, 2009 9:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Even this grandma is in total agreement !

Wouldn’t you like to just pinch his cheeks ! (Now behave, I meant his face )

Timmy D .... enough said.

by Ms. Smith on Nov 16, 2009 5:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Y’all are funny.

Sir Hotbod Handsomeface ain’t bad… if I were a p-star I’d totally use that name.

by silverandblack_davis on Nov 18, 2009 7:43 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s really funny to see the nickname in this 48MoH piece. I like the nickname though. It’s fun.

by BlaseE on Nov 16, 2009 7:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh my har.

In case anyone doesn’t know the origin of the nickname, it’s the name Strong Bad gave himself in a comic he wrote called Teen Girl Squad. I’m a sucker for anything related to Homestar Runner, so of course I think the whole thing is hilarious.

Try the new PtR--now entirely BAT-FREE!

by Lauri on Nov 16, 2009 10:06 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Does this mean you are OK with "Handsome-face " …. ?

...Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is forty five.

by alamobro on Nov 16, 2009 2:46 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, we don’t need one so long as no single player is dominating the ball. Therein lies the problem.

by Neuwaldegg on Nov 16, 2009 9:53 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the San Antonio Spurs.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Spurs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

36285915_n00_small
Ginobili the twister
N57800174_30973067_9724_small
Spurs Haiku
Shoes_small
D-TOUR 2, Higher Body Count
Img_3626_small
Photo Recap - Spurs Sink Clippers
Tdtp87_small
Going for Fifty!

Recent FanPosts

D-rob1_small
Unofficial Spurs v. Magic Recap
Georgehill9_small
A proposal
Imgres_small
Overpaid vs. the Best Bang for the Buck
N57800174_30973067_9724_small
St. Patty's Spurs Haiku
D-rob1_small
St. Patty's Day Shot Chart
Sp-tim_small
Yahoo PtR March Madness Group

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Who should start at small forward for the Spurs?
Keith Bogans
71 votes
Michael Finley
47 votes
Malik Hairston
301 votes
Richard Jefferson
239 votes
Someone else
94 votes

752 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

George Hill - A Rising Force of Goodwill
Not even GameStop would take this off my hands; "zero used value" they said. So, I'm throwing this up on eBay, if anyone wants it.
A quick visual summary of the Spurs/Cavs game.
Pardon my French.

Recent FanShots

Blazersedge: Exclusive Interview with Portland Assistant GM Trade Machine
Asking GSoM: Can the Golden State Warriors end their 23 game losing streak in San Antonio to the Spurs? + Anthony Tolliver + GSDL + Raja Bell + Monta Ellis/ Stephen Curry co-existing
RU: Alonzo Gee gets double-double, second 10-day contract
Ginobili Regaining Form in Time For Free Agency Summer
QUOTE OF THE NIGHT "When he's Manu Ginobili, we're a significantly better...
Antonio McDyess tried to break Jason Maxiell
Monroe: Spurs' situation with Splitter reminds of Scola
Dwyane Wade playing dirty?
Clutch BBS: Rockets-Nets Recap, Comic Book Style

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Orlando Magic forward Rashard Lewis (9) shoots a three-point basket as Miami Heat forward Michael Beasley, left, defends in overtime during an NBA basketball game in Miami, Thursday, March 18, 2010. The Magic won 108-102. (AP Photo/Lynne Sladky)

Magic Lose Lead Late, But Win In OT On Lewis Three-Pointer

University of Kentucky basketball coach John Calipari watches the NCAA tournament selection show with the team at his home Sunday, March 14, 2010 in Lexington, Ky. Kentucky was named the top seed in the East region of the NCAA tournament and will face E. Tennessee State Thursday in New Orleans. (AP Photo/Brian Bohannon) link

The NCAA Tournament, Through An NBA Fan's Eyes

Orlando Magic guard J.J. Redick (7) tries to get control of the ball as he is guarded by San Antonio Spurs guard Malik Hairston, left, guard Roger Mason, and center Ian Mahinmi (28), of France, during the second half of an NBA basketball game in Orlando, Fla., Wednesday, March 17, 2010. Orlando won 110-84. (AP Photo/John Raoux)

Magic Rout Spurs 110-84

More from SBNation.com >


Coach

Ats_big_small Wayne Vore (ATS)

Player

Supergino_small LatinD

Doas_small jollyrogerwilco

Bunnycookie_small Lauri

Oberto_fab_small silverandblack_davis

Sp-tim_small Tim C.

4558041c970_main200_small CapHill

Announcer

Sharpened_-_copy_small BlaseE

Profile_5_small Fred Silva