A Portrait of the Referee as an Artist
Like many casual basketball fans, I grew up watching the NBA two ways: on television, and occasionally, through extraordinary good fortune, from the cramped, obstructed-view seats of the old Hemisfair Arena. Both, to me, were amazing. I developed a love of the game and an undying affection for my hometown Spurs. I also learned, early and thoroughly, an essential truth about professional basketball—refs suck.
How could they not suck, my logic ran, if *I* could see the violation happening from miles away on my tiny TV screen, and they could not, when it was right in front of their faces? The essential unfairness of it chaffed a bit, but eventually I accepted it, just as all adults learn to accept the myriad injustices that surround them as an act of survival. I never became, nor really understood “kill the ref” guy. Sure—I chanted it at high school football games, but more because it was fun to publicly threaten an adult than because of a desire, born out of righteous indignation, to see injury done to the person. To me, ref-suckitude was simply an innate component of the game, like a rim height of 10 feet, or the three point line.
Later in life, I had the opportunity to attend Spurs games more regularly. My love of the team grew ever deeper; I was one of thousands in attendance when the Memorial Day Miracle turned a moribund mass of spectators into an adoring throng that would soon decorate their every vehicle with brooms. But I had an epiphany, courtesy of some good seats. Really good seats. I mean, RIDICULOUSLY good. The guy who was sitting in my seat on the other side of the court? Mark Cuban. The guy who was sitting diagonally in front of me? Red McCombs. That good. The game itself was meaningless—it was the last game of the season, and the Spurs had already clinched home court advantage, so Tim and others were benched against the Mavericks, who suddenly weren’t that interested in winning either. So the game wasn’t that great, but what was great was to see the game from that vantage point. I was watching a lot of subs and scrubs, and these guys, who looked like they were in slow motion when they got subbed into the games that I watched on TV, were so big and so fast when they were moving in front of me, that I often had to crane my neck up at the jumbo-tron to hope for a replay of what had just happened in front of me. And the refs were there, completely unfazed. They saw it all. They had it under control. It hit me like a freight train—in their position, I would be lucky to get ANYTHING right, and they get through most nights with 90+% of their calls unchallenged by a highly partisan, highly inebriated crowd. My God… the refs didn’t suck… they were actually g.. g… good.
So I let that realization simmer in my noggin for a while, and in the mean time I had another eye-opener, courtesy of the tennis courts. I was coaching the JV team at my high school, which made me the varsity bus driver to boot, so I spent that year watching endless matches. Many of you probably know this, but at the high school level, almost all matches are not refereed—the participants call their own. Because of this, there are constant complaints, worries, and fears about players who “hook”—intentionally calling an “in” ball as “out,” especially at a critical point in the match. Do players do this? Yes, they do. However, from watching match after match, I realized that the number of balls that were hit clearly out, and yet played as in dwarfed the number of times (at most one in a match) where an in ball would be called out. The only way to be hurt by this was to let the perceived injustice throw you off your game for the next point.
And this is when I began to realize the artistry of the NBA official. We’ve had a couple of new guys break in to the ranks, and of course we’ve had replacement officials this pre-season. And invariably, the pace of the game suffers, because too many fouls are called. The fans’ reaction? “Awww, c’mon ref!! Let ‘em play!!” And this is the heart of the artistry of the NBA official. It’s not that they don’t see what is happening. They see it all. It’s not that they don’t know the rules. The problem is that they live in a world of grey that is pretending to be black and white. To clarify, I think it would be an enormous challenge to even be a good enough official to be a replacement NBA official who would be criticized for calling too many fouls. And let’s face it, if we read the rules, there are countless fouls committed throughout the course of an NBA game. Just as in my classroom, I don’t send every child to the principal for every infraction of my classroom rules, and NBA official can’t call every infraction of the rules a foul or the pace of the game suffers. So the artistry of the NBA referee is learning to be a genius at painting shades of grey. Every once in a while, they will see a grey that they think is on the white side of the spectrum, while the fans yell black. And vice versa. But at the end of the day I recognize that they are doing a job that I neither could do nor would aspire to. So write the damn check, Stern, and bring our watch-able basketball back.
9 recs |
57 comments
|
Comments
So true. It could be a jungle out there especially in the post-season. Still Crawford’s gotta go. We need new blood.
They ought to have try-outs then teams could draft them or something. Those performing poorly should be given the boot at season’s end. With this, we would avoid another Donaghy episode. Then again, it’s too radical for jurassic Stern. And when will he be put to pasture?
There should be term-limits for that position too. Or they could be elected.
DeJuan Blair is Mr.Snuffleupagus of teh NBA. Freak of nature (elongated arms,ginormous behind), effin unbelievable (rebounding machine), blows you away (for a rook) n cuddly cute.
I ref’d for our local basketball league during the (our) Summer. Eight teams, eight players each. I knew at least six players in every team. Many, I knew very well. A lot of those players owed me money that I didn’t plan to collect. I missed a foul or ten, and they cursed at me like I just stole their bike. (One friend actually got his bike stolen that summer). Not easy, that refereeing.
On the other hand, these referees (or, those locked out ones) are professionals. Dunking on ten foot high rims with seven foot defenders blocking your way is difficult too, but we see NBA players (not Spurs) do them everyday. Grey can be the first three quarters. During end games, during the final minutes, the final seconds, we expect those professional referees to get the calls right. As in black and white. If it means Finley’s three doesn’t count, so be it. A game should not be won or lost because of a blown call or non-call.
And a player should not be thrown out because a ref doesn’t want him to share jokes with his teammates.
"Yes, it's important that I have good numbers, and I'm well-respected as a player. But I think it's more important that I'm respected as a man." - Some Tall Guy Who Wore #50
vespaguy, I enjoyed this to no end. I’m completely with you as far as the respect for the artistry of the Ref. I love the James Joyce reference. I am, in fact, with you every single argument you make — except for your conclusion.
And perhaps I’m completely alone here, but I’m not in a hurry to get the “real” refs back. I so hate the established norms of the NBA as it exists between the refs and the stars, that I think it’s worth it to suffer for a while, as players and officials reach a new equilibrium. At the worst, we’ll wind up with younger refs making the same calls — and that’s still an upgrade.
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 22, 2009 9:15 AM CDT reply actions
Good post, even though I wouldn’t mind some control on the Joe Crawfords and Dick Bavettas of this world.
Straight from the No-Stat Zone to your computer!
Dunkin' Cheerleaders
Wonderful post, Vespa. I’ve had the privledge to sit in a variety of seats over the years. When you’re that close to the court, you really do appreciate the brilliant and thankless job done by the refs.
And although I hate agreeing with JRW, I’m with him on this….
And perhaps I’m completely alone here, but I’m not in a hurry to get the "real" refs back. I so hate the established norms of the NBA as it exists between the refs and the stars, that I think it’s worth it to suffer for a while, as players and officials reach a new equilibrium. At the worst, we’ll wind up with younger refs making the same calls — and that’s still an upgrade.
Part of the reason that we’ve seen so many calls in the preseason is because the replacement refs are following a little thing called the rule book. And they’re treating everyone on the floor like a player instead of treating some like superstars. I won’t miss that aspect of the game when the others refs return.
Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney
I agree. For me, the most important part of a referee’s job, regardless of sport, is consistency. In baseball, each umpire has his own strike zone. As long as he calls it consistently throughout the game, players adjust and won’t complain. I can’t believe I’m saying this, but I think most NBA refs do a good job. The problem is with the ones whose egos have grown so immense through the years that they feel the need to insert themselves into the game. However, I think most NBA players know how the “real” refs work and how to exploit that referee’s tendencies. Hence, the relief of NBA veterans to have the “real” refs back.
My people call it "sarcasm." - Lauri
Let’s imagine for a minute that the refs aren’t whistle happy by accident, but that they actually have been instructed to lay down a new order, with the message being: “These are the new (read: old) rules. This is now your reality. Get used to it.”
There’s really no way to do something like that without completely replacing the old guard. And if it comes at the expense of the ref’s union, I’m sure Stern won’t shed any tears over it. Maybe Stern’s house cleaning plan all along was to wait until the ref’s time came to renegotiate, so he could kill two birds with one stone.
</conspiracy theory>
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 22, 2009 10:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Well, I’ve already determined that Stern is the devil, so I can’t say absolutely not to your fiendishly clever theory.
My people call it "sarcasm." - Lauri
Stern’s worse than the devil. The devil gets handed to Stern when he does bad things.
"Yes, it's important that I have good numbers, and I'm well-respected as a player. But I think it's more important that I'm respected as a man." - Some Tall Guy Who Wore #50
by theonlyromeo on Oct 22, 2009 10:32 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
haha! I like how we’re getting pretty good at this theme of jokes. Recced!
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
by the little o on Oct 22, 2009 10:37 PM CDT up reply actions
Just thought I’d say (since this is the 2nd time I’ve seen this now) that when you say “rec’d” you should actually go ahead an rec what you’re replying to.
It’s under “actions” — right next to “reply”.
And, just so you know, I used to forget to do that constantly until a good friend (SiMA, where are you) pointed it out to me.
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 22, 2009 10:43 PM CDT up reply actions
but I did! I did! I did see a puddycat!
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
by the little o on Oct 22, 2009 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions
I wonder if a refresh is necessary in order for the person who didn’t rec, to see the rec of another user. The comment pops up automatically, but I’m not sure if the rec does as well.
This merits further investigation.
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 23, 2009 1:57 AM CDT up reply actions
Yes, a refresh is necessary. I could go into a long, boring explanation for why this is the case, but I will be efficient and judicious and say that it is because of efficient and judicious software programming.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Oct 23, 2009 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions
In other words: It’s not an issue, it’s a feature.
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 23, 2009 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions
jeez jrw, I thought you would be able to realize such things, heck even I realized such things (granted, it was when you scolded someone for not doing that very thing. Hehe. Don’t worry, perhaps it’s only you who says “reced” and doesn’t do it afterwords (WTF! I didn’t know afterwords was spelled like that!).
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
by the little o on Oct 24, 2009 2:21 AM CDT up reply actions
You don’t want to be on my bad side, tlo.
::He said, pretending to have a bad side.::
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 24, 2009 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions
::afraid that by replying, he’ll be on both sides of jrw::
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
by the little o on Oct 24, 2009 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Ahhh!!
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
by the little o on Oct 24, 2009 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions
fiendishly clever
Hey, I like that. Almost as much as I liked bella’s
And although I hate agreeing with JRW…
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 22, 2009 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Just to Clarify...
I hate me some Joey Crawford just as much as the next guy. I don’t in this post mean to imply that I’m endorsing all NBA referees, no more than I would endorse all NBA players. There are clearly refs with biases (Crawford) and there are clearly refs that are crooked. And I think one reason for this is that it’s so hard to find people who can do the job well. I also believe that it is in the NBAs best interest to have an aggressive talent identification program, and to groom a new generation of refs, adding new blood each year. But a lockout like the current one shows us how much the talent suffers if you have to replace everyone in one fell swoop, just like the talent in the league would suffer if every team was replaced with all rookies.
Understood.
Thanks again for this thought provoking post. Keep ’em coming.
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 22, 2009 10:41 PM CDT up reply actions
This is a really great take on the refs, vespaguy. While I agree that referees probably have the worst job in the world at times, I can also see other reasons why fans get upset at them for bad calls – primarily, what everyone in this thread has been saying about superstar calls. I don’t like the Mavs, but the foul calls in favor of D-Wade during the 2006 finals were atrocious and they really got the shorter end of the stick, much like how I believe that the Spurs got the bad end of the deal during our series with Dallas that year.
And then of course, I hate refs who think they are “bigger than the game” and put it upon themselves how they want the games to turn out. There goes the image of Joey throwing out Tim for laughing.
I agree with your suggestion about having some sort of succession plan with the referees. Bavetta’s older than a dinosaur, and hacks like Crawford feel like they know it all on the simple claim of having a long officiating tenure, which simply isn’t fair for the players.
by silverandblack_davis on Oct 22, 2009 9:52 PM CDT reply actions
speaking as someone who reffed local leagues for about 6 years, and did 2 years of state junior league (including a weekend tournament when i was 15 when i had to ref under-18s – basically guys a step below australia’s national league level), this
The problem is that they live in a world of grey that is pretending to be black and white
is true at all levels. you simply cannot call every single thing, or the game would be the most disjointed pile of crap of a sport on earth. you’ve got to let a little bit of stuff go, because no one wants a whistle every 10 seconds. in my opinion, its something you learn as you ref more and more.
the thing i’m curious about – do many nba refs get shown the door? i know some have (at least one of the replacements was a former nba level ref), but it seems to me there isn’t enough of that happening as skills either diminish, or coziness with the players gets too high.
free george hill!
by sleep research facility on Oct 23, 2009 7:41 AM CDT reply actions
I knew I liked you.
I haven’t read the above piece by vespaguy yet (that whole formatting wall-of-text thing), but I will soon. I think there is a lot to be discussed about the refs and it is very involved because it isn’t just about “do they suck?”
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Oct 23, 2009 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions
Read it as soon as you can. It’s one of the better fanposts I’ve read recently.
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 23, 2009 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions
damn you! Now I must read it.
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
by the little o on Oct 24, 2009 2:23 AM CDT up reply actions
Read and recced.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Oct 25, 2009 7:19 PM CDT up reply actions
great piece. I never thought of it that way. If I were a ref, i would probably call every travel I see. Fans would hate me.
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
They probably would. I hate you already, and you’ve never called me for traveling even once!
=]
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 26, 2009 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions
Why you always traveling with those suitcases? Are you on the run?
Blair's the third quarter kick in the opponent's balls - the little o
The Spur's "Los Cojones Grandes"
by 'DSilverlining on Oct 26, 2009 11:14 AM CDT up reply actions
On the run? No doubt.
I’m trying to get away from that spotlight and the smoke machine.
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 26, 2009 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions
you look a lot like Dick Tracy or that guy from Casablanca
Blair's the third quarter kick in the opponent's balls - the little o
The Spur's "Los Cojones Grandes"
by 'DSilverlining on Oct 26, 2009 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions
Thanks for noticing. I get that lot.
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 26, 2009 2:57 PM CDT up reply actions
“I get that lot”
Does “lot” refer to a group of people you hang out with, people that maybe you “get” because of your familiarity with them?
9.20.21.24.34
ACLs are like crutches. They’re only for the weaklings who can’t get along without them. -jollyrogerwilco
Not quite.
It’s more in the vein of “I’m too cool to use articles today.”
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 26, 2009 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Why is your head hanging? There is a poignant sadness in your visage.
Blair's the third quarter kick in the opponent's balls - the little o
The Spur's "Los Cojones Grandes"
by 'DSilverlining on Oct 27, 2009 1:34 AM CDT up reply actions
that’s the beauty in JRW. Sure he’s into photography and all, but why would he make his avatar that of an obviously (i hope i’m correct on this) non-photographed picture? Well perhaps what the picture represents is a little more important. But what does it represent? Well, I see I man carrying his whole life in his suitcases, about to leave everything he knew behind, sure, he’s not looking forward to it, but it’s something he must do. The problems of the world seem to burden him, something that the Supreme Lexicon Overlord must daily deal with, as he tries to find beauty in people’s mistakes. But the light, oh that damn light (and that stupid smoke machine), it perplexes me.
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
by the little o on Oct 27, 2009 1:58 AM CDT up reply actions
The light cast a pale gloom over the whole spectacle. Very touching and sentimental.
And the smoke… could be global warming caused by methane from beans. ;-)
Blair's the third quarter kick in the opponent's balls - the little o
The Spur's "Los Cojones Grandes"
by 'DSilverlining on Oct 27, 2009 2:26 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
And the smoke… could be global warming caused by methane from beans. ;-)
Every night, you seem to do it.
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
by the little o on Oct 27, 2009 2:44 AM CDT up reply actions
Dudes…. It’s from Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller.
Superman wears Manu Ginobili pajamas to bed. - CMoney
thanks for letting us know bella. Now we have a little more power over JRW (well first I have to learn a little about the book)
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
by the little o on Oct 27, 2009 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Robert Frost received a letter once, quite a long letter, from a woman who’d been touched by a poem he wrote. So affected was she by his work that she spent the better part of 5 pages explicating the poem and what she thought he meant by it. She ended her missive with the query, “Is that what you meant?”
Frost is reputed to have been much impressed with the quality and detail of what she’d unlocked from the poem. So impressed that he sent her back a letter with the reply, “It is now.”
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 27, 2009 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions
hehe, nice compliments, but I’m not buying that. Most artists hate for people to know what they meant, or their true feelings. Frost probably said “it is now” because it kills two birds with one stone. First, it allows him to not tell the fan what his poem really means in a nice way, hiding his true self from the world (artists are a little arrogant like that in not sharing their point of views while wanting people to be constantly thinking about it). Second, it does all of this in a nice way, making the artist seem friendly and touched by the fan.
Frankly I think that if the person was truly a fan of frost, the fan would want to know what frost’s initial meaning of the poem was, regardless if it’s changed. Frost knows this, yet still doesn’t reveal what he meant. He could’ve easily said, “it is now, but before, I meant this…” (in a nicer way of course).
Anyways, what do you think, should I read DOAS or just watch the movie? I’ll probably just watch the movie.
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
by the little o on Oct 27, 2009 4:53 PM CDT up reply actions
The less time you spend on it, the better. It’s depressing and pretty much a downer altogether.
But I chose it b/c I’m in sales, and I’d like eventually not to be, and I liked the image. So, for all of those things (and b/c it’s a pretty good piece of literature) I used the image.
There have been a number of times when I’ve almost switched to a Manu caricature (no one ever did use it, much to my surprise) and most recently …
Anyway. I’ve stuck with it all this time and so I likely will for a while yet.
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 28, 2009 12:39 AM CDT up reply actions
I took an advertising class in High School and it was pretty much about how to make a sale. I don’t think I learned shit from it, though my eBay items sell pretty well. I think I would suck at sales, since I don’t like people that much.
If you haven't lived with a squirrel, you haven't lived. - Bob Ross
I can see how being in sales might be kind of a downer. I don’t exactly have quality experience at it, but I did spend some time working in staples as an easy tech/sale’s associate. Boy, I hated selling people things that they didn’t need, whether it was upselling, warranty plans, or even cross-selling. I won’t say I was great at it, I was descent at best, but I felt like I was destroying a little part of me whenever I made them open up their wallets more and more (specially the nicer, more ignorant customers). Perhaps things would’ve been different if I got commission, but I don’t think I would feel that much better.
Anyways, kudos for tolerating all the self-loathing. And what’s this?
It’s depressing and pretty much a downer altogether.
boy you certainly know how to pick ‘em. I can’t wait to read it! Well, I’ll probably wait a little while (Spurs are gonna play tonight!), but I’ll definitely read it. Besides, it’s been a while since I read for real. Thanks for letting me know, about stuff.
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
by the little o on Oct 28, 2009 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions
I’m serious. Don’t take the time to read it. If you must, watch the Dustin Hoffman version, and take the extra time you have left to read “The Old Man and the Sea.”
THEN we’ll talk.
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 28, 2009 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions
okay, “The Old Man ATS” I’ll read first. Then I’ll read DOAS.
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
by the little o on Oct 28, 2009 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions
One more time and for the record: I do not recommend DoaS.
Read it at your own risk.
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 29, 2009 2:21 AM CDT up reply actions
right, don’t worry i won’t hold you accountable for it. I might not even read it this year or next.
When the tooth fairy's own tooth falls out, it is taken during the night by Princess Peanut.
by the little o on Oct 29, 2009 2:48 AM CDT up reply actions
But… I loved DoaS! They teach it at my high school in junior year. I think they want us to become crazy people.
by silverandblack_davis on Oct 29, 2009 3:56 AM CDT up reply actions
I don’t get anyone teaching this to youngsters. I was in 9th grade when they depressed my whole class with this.
Consider the gun jumped
5 in 10
by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 29, 2009 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions





























