Pounding The Rock: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Post-UNC Thoughts

San Antonio Spurs Season Preview

I know what you are thinking.  Why today, ATS?  Why today for a team preview when the preseason has just started?  Well, today is my day.  As part of blogger preview organized by Jeff at CelticsBlog, I've got the Spurs on Saturday, October 10th.  So let's get down to it.

With the Spurs offseason acquisitions putting them well into luxury tax land for the first time, there is only one sufficient outcome to this season.  Winning it all.  Will they do it?  Let's take a look.

Star-divide

Front court

The front court is where the Spurs have the most significant changes.  I'm considering small forwards to be part of the back court.  This may sound strange to non-Spurs people, but the Spurs use their 2's and 3's interchangeably.  Roger Mason, Manu Ginobili, and Michael Finley are just as likely to be on the court as a shooting guard as they are as a small forward.  

The Spurs have seven players on the roster for the two front court positions.  Of those seven players, two played in a game for the Spurs last season:  Tim Duncan and Matt Bonner.  The Spurs added Antonio McDyess, Theo Ratliff, and Marcus Haislip in free agency.  They picked up DeJuan Blair in the draft.  Ian Mahinmi missed the season with an injury and has played about 23 total minutes in his NBA career.  Those five guys will be replacing the contributions of Kurt Thomas and Fabricio Oberto.  With so many people around, minutes are going to be hard to come by.  I expect Tim's minutes to be down, but not by much.  Expect stiff competition for playing time in the Spurs front court this year.  AND, a really big and, that stiff competition presupposes that Popovich doesn't play small ball with either Finley or Jefferson at the 4.

Backcourt

Richard Jefferson is the big new name.  Bruce Bowen is now in retirement.  Ime Udoka and Jacque Vaughn were not resigned.  The Spurs just recently signed Keith Bogans.  With the holdovers from last year and the signing of Malik Hairston this summer, the Spurs back court now consists of:  Tony Parker, Manu Ginobili, Richard Jefferson George Hill, Roger Mason, Michael Finley, Keith Bogans, Marcus Williams, and Malik Hairston.  Yes, that is 16 players on the roster.  Williams and Hairston are both on unguaranteed contracts and one of them won't be on the team.  Still, that's a lot of depth.  How deep?

Well, George Hill IS the backup point guard.  He and Tony will get all the point guard minutes this year.  Manu and Jefferson will get the bulk of the minutes (I'm calling over half "the bulk") at the 2 and the 3.  That leaves about 40 minutes per game for Finley, Bogans, and Mason with the winner of the Williams/Hairston battle getting nothing.

Offense

The end of the Bruce Bowen era and the addition of Richard Jefferson gives the Spurs a completely different look on offense.  We no longer have a player the opposition can ignore on defense.  That's not quite true.  Teams couldn't ignore Bruce because he could bury that corner three.  However, they could hide their worst defensive player very easily.  You just had to be warm to be able to guard Bruce.  Gone are the days where Steve Nash would spend his game covering Bruce.  Now, he gets Richard Jefferson?  I don't think so.  The offensive balance and ability to attack mismatches will be something new for Spurs fans.  We might see some different looks this year and a reduced role for Tim.

In his media day interview, Manu flat-out said Tony Parker is the offensive leader of the team.  I don't think this year's Spurs will be running nearly as much offense through Tim in the low blocks.  We had been moving away from Tim in the last few years, but I expect him to be much less of a focus this year.  I think Tim will be getting the ball a lot more on the move and in the high post than as a set play down in the blocks.

The last couple years the Spurs have lived and died by their 3-point shooting.  When they were on, they were hard to beat.  When they were off, they couldn't win. Michael Finley, Roger Mason, Bruce Bowen, and Matt Bonner are all spot shooters.  We routinely had at least two of them on the court at one time.  Add in a Kurt Thomas and Fabricio Oberto, who doesn't really shoot at all, and the Spurs played large chunks of games with three guys on the court who specialized in standing still and shooting.

This year, I think the Spurs will be able to be more consistent scoring the ball and less reliant on 3-point shooting.  I'd like to think the additions of Jefferson and McDyess as guys who can put the ball in the hole will keep teams from forcing the ball out of the hands of our stars and putting it in the hands of one dimensional shooters.

Oh, and having Manu back healthy will be a huge lift on the offensive end.  His ability to drive and create for his teammates IS what he brings to the team.  This team will be good offensively.  In fact, I think they will be one of the most efficient offensive teams in the league.

Defense

Defensively is where I have the biggest question mark for the team.  Last year was a huge step back in team defense for the Spurs.  Perenially one of the best defensive teams in the league, the Spurs in '09 were nothing but ordinary.  Will the addition of Jefferson and a longer, stronger, defensive focused front court players turn that around?  I'm not sure.  I hope so, but this is the one thing the team will have to prove on the floor this year. 

The additions of McDyess and Ratliff give the Spurs some extra rebounding and shot blocking ability.  Shot blocking, or even shot challenging, was something we didn't get last year out of Thomas, Oberto, and Bonner.  The addition of Jefferson adds some size and athleticism on the wing.

Last year, the Spurs didn't make teams uncomfortable.  They played smart, position defense.  If a team could hit the jumper, we were content to let them take it.  Hopefully, this year, we can start making teams uncomfortable again.

Athleticism, Length, and Energy

Where I hope we see the biggest improvement in the team is in the intangibles.  The new roster changes infuse the team with desperately needed athleticism, length, and energy.  The additions of Jefferson, Ratliff, McDyess, and Blair; and the emergence of George Hill, should help the Spurs with all the smaller things we didn't do well last year.  A team that scraps for offensive rebounds.  A team that tips rebounds.  A team that challenges shots in the paint.   A team that collects loose balls.  A team that creates turnovers.  A team that gets some easy baskets.  A team that can win a game against a good team without playing a perfect game.

The Spurs will be good this year.  They will be very good this year.  But, they will need to be great.  Will we see greatness?  That is the question to be answered and I really like our chances.

4 recs  |  Comment 22 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Nicely written ATS.

Especially like a few parts :
A team that can win a game against a good team without playing a perfect game.

and
Hopefully, this year, we can start making teams uncomfortable again.

How badly I have missed that last part over the last coupla years. We’ve been contend to concede ostensibly low percentage jump shots that never looked low percentage against us.

by LionZion on Oct 10, 2009 1:20 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice.

Long live Mr.Bowen

by ddog28 on Oct 10, 2009 1:27 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Pretty good summary, Wayne.

I think it would be incredible if Pop managed to keep Finley on the bench for the majority of the game. He could be perfect as a spot up shooter we bring in when our offense is stagnant and we need someone to make some points, and despite all our complaints, Findog has proven he can hit big shots.

Straight from the No-Stat Zone to your computer!
Dunkin' Cheerleaders

by LatinD on Oct 10, 2009 2:52 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Right there with you LD. Findog gets some unwarranted hate

Just call me The Profit

by Manuwar on Oct 10, 2009 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Like Bonner, he was asked to do more than he should have been. Both guys should be back to where they belong as awesome scoring options off the bench. It speaks to our depth that two starters from last year are probably 3rd string at their positions now.

by BlaseE on Oct 10, 2009 6:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Injury is my only concern

TD and Manu, though not the only guys on the court who can score anymore, are still major parts of this team. Both have been injury prone the past couple years and I don’t expect that to change. I’d really like to see them get greatly reduced minutes this year until playoff time. If they only played like 25 minutes a game (if that much) we’d still make second seed in the playoffs, which is perfect for me.

Hell, for games against easy opponents, let’s just sit them the whole game. Let the young guys get more minutes to help with their development for the future and keep Manu and Timmy Deets healthy.

If both Manu and Timmy are healthy, this team is the best team in the NBA. But that is a very big if

Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.

by KA1Z3R on Oct 10, 2009 5:22 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

You what I keep forgetting?

That we have Richard Jefferson, and every time it dawns on me, I get excited. I cant wait for this season to start.

I dont think we’ll be quite as stout on defense in terms of locking guys down, but the increased athleticism should hopefully mean fewer offensive rebounds for the opponents and a greater offensive output for the Spurs, both of which are contributing factors to our defense; we should be able to score more this year and I think McDyess and Blair and Mahinimi can get off the floor quicker than Thomas or Oberto.

Credit to Oberto though, I always thought he was very good at tipping rebounds and back tapping loose balls to keep plays alive; he was solid role player for sure.

Id personally keep Hairston over Williams, I dont see what the big deal is with him. I also hope Mahinmi gets more run this year, McDyess was a nice add, but his minutes will need to be safeguarded as well

Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.

by bren on Oct 10, 2009 5:28 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I’ll emphasize this in a later post, but it may come as a surprise to you that we were, by far, the best defensive rebounding team in the league last year.

We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.

by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Oct 11, 2009 12:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting

I wouldnt have guessed that, one can hope that would even improve with the new front court

Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.

by bren on Oct 11, 2009 8:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=teamstatreb&season=2009&seasontype=2

By “best defensive rebounding team” I mean in terms of defensive rebound percentage. We grabbed 77.9% of our defensive rebounds. Next best was Orlando at 75.9%. The worst team was Golden State at 68.1%.

We were also, by far, the worst offensive rebounding team at 22.0%. The next worst was Toronto at 24%. 2% is a large margin in these stats. Like the difference between being a 45% defensive field goal percentage and 43% defensive field goal percentage.

I’ll leave it to Fred and BlaseE to prove how really good and how really awful we were in those two categories last year. HOWEVER, I will say that the dominance at the defensive category came at the cost of getting fast break opportunities. So, while being a better rebounding team might not mean a better defensive rebound percentage, maybe it will mean not having to commit as many guys to the defensive glass and being able to run a little more.

We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.

by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Oct 11, 2009 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Greet stuff ATS. I would keep Hairston over Bogans. I think Malik knows our system better and is more athletic. He certainly has the better upside considering how young he is.

Do you think the FO has one more trade up their sleeves? It’s the only thing that makes sense. But what position do you think they would wanna strengthen?

by SaSleepless on Oct 10, 2009 9:11 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I say keep both Bogans and Hairston, as the 3rd string SG and SF, respectively. That leaves Williams out, but he really hasn’t impressed(he was solid last night, but Hairston and Bogans both looked better in the box score). If he kicks ass for the remainder of the preseason, I’ll stand corrected.

9.20.21.24.34
ACLs are like crutches. They’re only for the weaklings who can’t get along without them. -jollyrogerwilco

by Tim C. on Oct 10, 2009 9:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope they do not make another trade. We’re set talent wise, we just need everything to gel.

Just call me The Profit

by Manuwar on Oct 11, 2009 1:43 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Spurs preview

Good job Wayne! There is one added possibility and that is a trade of two SPURS for one if it would give us a more solid player than or a first round draft pick for next year. The question is would we want the odd man out, ie: Hairston or Williams, be worth the loss of someone like Finley or Bonner. Maybe not. Regardless, the roster problem isn’t as big as the sharing of minutes. Not too many for Duncan and Ginobli, but enough for them to meld in with the new players. Then getting enough time for the older support players like Finley, Bonner and Mason and finally working the youth troopers like Hill, Mahinmi, Blair, Haislip, Hairston and maybe Williams. Like you say in your piece, there doesn’t seem to be enough minutes to go around. What a wonderful problem for Pop to have. The big challenge will be keeping experienced guys happy while bringing the younger players up to speed. If anybody is can balance that fine line it most certainly would be Pop. Can’t wait for the show to get on the road.

by jimjule on Oct 11, 2009 10:28 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think if I remember we were god-awful on free throw attempts per game. I think with Jefferson, Blair and Hill having a more expanded role, it should shore up that problem.

by JaySo on Oct 13, 2009 3:43 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Maybe Jefferson and Hill, but Blair is a Spur through and through – 60% FT in college.

My people call it "sarcasm." - Lauri

by CapHill on Oct 13, 2009 7:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chip to the rescue! He’ll be shooting 70% before the end of the season. If he can teach Tony how to shoot, he can teach anyone.

by JaySo on Oct 13, 2009 7:26 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That might be true, we’ll just have to see. I have a lot of faith in Chip’s teaching ability, but Timmeh’s still not a good FT shooter. Also, JaySo, it helps in following the conversation if you use the reply button under the comment you’re responding to.

My people call it "sarcasm." - Lauri

by CapHill on Oct 13, 2009 7:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry Cap, I was so excited to respond to you that I forgot to reply. Anyway the problem with Tim is he is a good shooter, I’m sorry but with him its mental.

by JaySo on Oct 15, 2009 8:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think that’s the case. I don’t actually believe that he allows Chip to help him. For all of his being a team player and humble enough to let others take the lead on offense, etc. I think (based on previous quotes from Pop and a gut feeling) that Timmeh thinks that if he just guts it out, then he’ll be able to get his FT% back to where it was earlier in his career.

As ATS has noted before, he needs to use his quads more, and (as C. Rosen has said) he ought to start with the ball closer to his release point, in stead of beginning his shot below his belt.

But, what do we know? He’s the superstart.

If I’m wrong about all of this and he actually does allow Chip to tutor him, then I’d agree it’s mental. I just can’t see that he’d still be using his crazy stance and non-fundamental shot foundation if he was under the instruction of a shot doctor.

From under the radar to hanging in the rafters - Big50
5 in 10

by jollyrogerwilco on Oct 19, 2009 1:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Any word on how severely Popovich will restrict the minutes

of Duncan and Ginobili?

"I've hacked into your brain. You're throwing a party and no one's showing up."

by ignign*kt on Oct 14, 2009 12:07 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I haven’t heard much, but I think we will see them a lot in the first half since they didn’t play Miami. Unlike Parker who played this summer, their preseason is also about getting them into game-shape and not just team chemistry. I wouldn’t be surprised if the rotation is similar to the Olympiakos game (minus Parker), and Blair doesn’t play until the second half.

by BlaseE on Oct 14, 2009 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the San Antonio Spurs.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Spurs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Black_small
Ginobili vs. Dracula, Chapter 4
0910_bonner_sandwich_small
Warning: Blair Rebounding (Wallpaper)
Small
In Praise of Complementary Players
The_big_four_small
Bella's quirky musings... allas version
Duncan_dunk_small
PtR QuickCap: Spurs Discover Long-Lost Art of Defense, Stifle Mavs in 92-83 Win

Recent FanPosts

Sbn-avatar_small
NBA Live 10 Gameday Poll:: Regular Season Week 5 (4 Games)
Spurromeo_small
Bite the Bullet?
D-rob1_small
Unofficial Spurs/Mavs Recap
Sbn-avatar_small
NBA Live 10 Simulation (4):: San Antonio Spurs @ Dallas Mavericks
Bunnycookie_small
Tuesdays are for Losers
Bunnycookie_small
Rainy Days and Monday Loser Threads Always Get Me Down
Halloween_06_028_small
Proposed Lineup

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Who has the best hair in the NBA?

  957 votes | Results

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

48MoH: Early Assessment of Team D

Recent FanShots

True Hoop> Bruce Bowen on dirty play
Ginobili out; Parker doubtful
Craziness at 48MoH
Eva Longoria Earns Philanthropist Of The Year Award For 2009
nba.com> Raptors claim Mensah-Bonsu off waivers from Houston
True Hoop> Shane Battier, King of the Quad
SBN: NBA Power Rankings, Week 3
Y!> Woj> Iverson, Jackson followed path to freedom
Y!> Rumor: Three-way deal sending Nocioni to Celtics?
Hornets pushing all the wrong buttons with Paul

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Coach

Ats_big_small Wayne Vore (ATS)

Player

Supergino_small LatinD

Doas_small jollyrogerwilco

Bunnycookie_small Lauri

Oberto_fab_small silverandblack_davis

Roadavatar_small Tim C.

4558041c970_main200_small CapHill

Announcer

Manucrazy_small Aaronstampler

Zoe_spurs1_small BlaseE

Small CECabrera21

Profile_5_small Fred Silva