Listen Up You Crack Hos
Our Spurs have two problems. In no particular order, they are:
- Their defense and the lack of a 2nd rebounding big
- Manu Ginobili isn't playing well
Tony Parker is NOT a problem. He's playing great. So shut the fuck up already.
First, let's start with a series of useless ass things called statistics:
Let's start by looking at the big 3.
Hmmm, who's numbers kind of look like shit?
Ok, how about our 3 point shooters?
Wow, really? Do you see that conspicuous gap between our good shooters and our bad shooters? I know I do. We shoot 40.3% as a team. We shoot 41.5% from 3-pt when our Antoine Walker wannabe isn't chucking them up.
From these stats, I can only say, "Thank God Manu isn't shooting more".
I hear a lot about how Tony Parker sucks
Really? He sucks, huh. Hmmm, or how about this one from Stampler:
Outside of a turnover, a long two is really the best shot the defense can force.
Well, maybe what Stampler meant to say was "a long two by any one except Tony". Check this pic out.
If you add that all up, Tony shoots 52% -- 76/147 -- from long 2 range. I'll take that. By the way, did you know Tony is also shooting 82% from the line?
But that's not really the issue, the issue is Manu
Manu has dropped off. A lot.
Here are his stats for the last 3 seasons
- His free throw attempts are the lowest since his rookie year
- His 3-pt shooting is the worst of his career, though he does shoot them at a very high rate. Why?
- Did you know his assist to turnover rations positively SUCKS compared to Tony?
And Tony, of course, because let's face it, Tony Parker sucks and he's the sole reason Manu doesn't average 30 points and 10 assists a game.
Stampler
You know what? Manu doens't deserve to touch the ball more than he does. Maybe the reason the Spurs are running more of their offense through Tony is because Manu isn't playing well. Just a thought. Here is Manu's shot chart this year compared to last year
Besides the fact that he's not shooting as well and not getting to the line as much, he's not getting to the rim as often either. When you factor in number of games and minutes played, Manu is taking 6% fewer shots in the paint (granted, his shots per game are down too).
So bring that weak shit again
Explain to me how Tony sucks and Manu isn't playing considerably worse than last year.
0 recs |
67 comments
Comments
Fuck, you just brought it in that post. Well done.

by Hipuks on Jan 14, 2009 7:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
+1
and +1 for steagle colbeagle the eagle
by sleep research facility on Jan 14, 2009 8:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Didn’t you watch the 2005 finals? Manu is way better than Tony!
by Krukow on Jan 14, 2009 8:28 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
yeah, unfortunately we are playing this season!
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Jan 14, 2009 8:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Manu heard you?
So far, manu is playing pretty good today.6-7 FG, 3-4 3 pointers, 2 steals, 2 assists, 0 TO, and 17 points so far. He even dunked on a fast break.
by Willie D on Jan 14, 2009 9:06 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
give him 19 at the half.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Jan 14, 2009 9:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
When have we ever allowed stats to get in the way of our opinions?
I’m doing my part…
Once again, repeat the mantra in my brain…. Tony is a wonderful point guard, I like Tony Parker, pass the fucking ball, Tony, Tony Parker is an All-Star…..
I feel better.
I am happy. I am proud. - Manu Ginobili
by bellasa on Jan 14, 2009 9:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Now, ATS, don’t get me wrong. You’re right: Manu isn’t playing as well as he can, or as we want him to. He says it himself, and we see it every night. What I do believe is that he’s not playing nearly as badly as you seem to think he is.
This is truly a post that Hollinger would love. I’m usually kidding when I say I choose gut-feelings over stats, but you have to admit that they don’t tell the whole tale. Knowing that he came back from an injury that ruined his playoffs last season, it seems only logical that, be it by Pop’s design or by his own choice, he wouldn’t be so aggressive driving to the basket and getting fouls as he was last season. We’ve seen him (and from now on, “we” means “you and me, and talked about it in a game thread”) slowly change that, driving more and more to the basket. The 7 FTs he got against the Magic were his season high, and he did it a number of times already against the Lakers.
Why is his 3pt percentage so low? I don’t know, but it’ll come around. That’s the law of averages, my friend. I have no doubt in my mind. And why is he shooting it so much? Because he’s good at it! He had his best percentage last season, and he’s the same player. Let him clank those 3s during January, and he’ll be ready when things get tough.
In fact, I think his low 3pt percentage is the only thing keeping people in a “Manu’s not playing well” mood instead of a “Manu’s back” euphoria. Last season he shot 49.9% from 2, and so far this season he’s shooting 53.4%, his career best, I believe. TO, assists and rebounds per 48 minutes are pretty much the same. Again, he’s the same player.
There was one post I made where I compared Manu’s play to Timmy’s, and mentioned Finley making a bad play. You said that was a pretty weak way to excuse Manu’s faults – well, by showing us how great Tony is and then jawing Manu, you did exactly the same way. Was there any season in which Tony’s assist/TO ratio wasn’t higher than Manu’s? As far as I can tell, Manu’s and Tony’s roles in this team are different. Hell, Manu gets 2 TOs when he enter the arena, and it’s always been like that. And as far as I can tell, Manu is a SG and Tony’s a PG.
I love a lot of things about Tony’s game. His layups are incredible, and he can drive on anyone and penetrate any defense. His long jumper has been great and he’s even been clutch this year. Why do we complain so much about him? Well, for once he’s stubborn, and we often feel he does some stat-padding that’s annoying. Most of his assists are from passes to open shooters beyond the arc – I think we’ve seen Manu and Timmy P&R more than Tony and Timmy. Or at least it feels that way. And when we are in desperate need for a basket, Tony hardly ever does an original, unexpected pass down low – he either takes that long jumper after the screen, or kicks it out to Mason/Bonner for 3. It’s worked, but I for one get the feeling that it’s not a sound strategy come playoff time.
I’ll say it again: Tony’s one of the best PGs in this league. But when you see CP pass the ball with incredible skill for an alley oop in the final minute of the game, you start wondering if taking a long shot or passing the ball to Manu/Timmy and letting them create is everything there is.
I’m trying to put into words why I sometimes complain about Tony. Hopefully I didn’t come across as a basher, because I sincerely appreciate the lil’ Frenchman. His game just doesn’t excite me – except when he penetrates for a layup. But that has little to do with Manu’s game, and could’ve used another post.
by LatinD on Jan 14, 2009 9:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That one’s totally making it to Jamm’in, btw. :P
by LatinD on Jan 14, 2009 10:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I use too many smilies. Makes me seem juvenile.
by LatinD on Jan 14, 2009 10:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What you say is all true. But that is my point. Tony is playing great. Manu is not. Can Manu play better? Yes. Will he? I hope so, because he has to for us to win.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Jan 14, 2009 10:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I dont agree with the manu bashing, he is recovering and tonight he had great moments, but tony….. I have only one complain: his defense. He’s been disasotrous this year. And that’s the reason why I critiize him, because I know the frenchie can play defense. But offensively? Just spectacular. I dont care what other PG’s do, because the Spurs dont demand their point guard to be a floor general and distribute the ball. We have a system that fits Tony’s strengths as a scoring guard (who also knows how to pass to open 3 point shooters). The guy shoots over 50, doesnt turn the ball over that much (even if his TO’s look horrible still they aren’t a lot), he is shooting over 80 from the line and even making a 3 pointer here and there. He’s doing PERFECTLY what he is asked to do on the offensive end. Manu is trying to find his rhytmn, and as he does recover his superb offensive game, Parker will start to cede more shots and the ball will go to Tim and Manu in clutch time.
Tony isnt perfect, but we need him. I think that Manu playing at a great level is what puts the Spurs over the top. But we cant even start to think about reaching that top without those effective 20+ points Tony brings each night. To me this will always be about Manu, Tony and Tim.
And please Tony….. PASS THE FUCKING BALL TO GINOBILI IN CRUNCH TIME
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what."
by Chilai on Jan 15, 2009 12:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You had several points. Amongst them was that Manu didn’t deserve more shots, that he was shooting badly and should take less 3s, and that his assist/TO ratio was relevant when someone compared him to Tony. I more or less disagree with all of those.
Regarding Tony, I agree in that he doesn’t suck, but you did nothing to disprove that Manu’s stats would be much better if they didn’t play together. I think Manu would average over 20 points per game in just about any team that doesn’t have Kobe. That might’ve been Stampler’s point, despite the random “Tony sucks” comment. We’ve seen that Manu at times doesn’t touch the ball when he and Tony are in at the same time – especially when Manu starts and in the 1st quarter. There’re actually ways of proving this with 82games.com’s stats, but I don’t care enough to look it up.
I just think we need to be patient. The team isn’t playing how it’s going to play during the playoffs, so let’s wait a bit and see how Manu, Timmy and Pop adjust their games. Tony will be Tony, and at least I’m confident that he can bring what he has every game.
by LatinD on Jan 15, 2009 8:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If the team was interested in winning right now, like in a game today, then Manu should be taking less shots because he isn’t shooting well this year. In particular, he should be taking less 3’s.
Manu would be scoring more on any team that let him shoot more. That doesn’t mean he would be playing well. Manu isn’t always the best option on offense when he is on the court.
That said, we need Manu shooting well AND we need him to be taking over games in the fourth. That’s his role. It’s what he is good at.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Jan 15, 2009 8:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, I agree with that. Thing is, we definitely shouldn’t be interested in winning right now, and I don’t think that’s Pop’s plan, either. We need to win just enough to have a good spot for the playoffs, stay healthy and let people learn their roles.
In fact, Hill should be playing more, and Tony less, I think. Or Pop should try putting them together more often.
by LatinD on Jan 15, 2009 8:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree… Manu should be taking more 3’s rather than less, so he can get back into the rhythm of that particular shot. We all know it’s way different to practice your 3’s in an empty gym versus trying to hit them with a professional basketball player up in your face.
He’s Manu. The ball is his. Give him the ball.
I am happy. I am proud. - Manu Ginobili
by bellasa on Jan 15, 2009 2:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, D.
ATS is just mad cuz Manu showed him up last night.
I am happy. I am proud. - Manu Ginobili
by bellasa on Jan 15, 2009 6:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, the number one thing that comes to my mind is the surgery Manu had done on his ankle back in September. Obviously, he has recovered, but he might only be getting his mental mojo back now. The other point would be his age. (shock, horror.) While this is MANU, at some point he is going to start slowing down. Another point is to keep in mind that we work best when we don’t have to depend on Manu to produce a big stat line every night. The offense should flow through Timmy, at least for another year or so, and Tony Parker.
Speaking of Tony, I really don’t think you can expect him to play like a Cp3 or a Jason Kid, however nice that would be. He just isn’t that type of player. His main skill, as pointed out by previous posts, is driving to the hoop. He reminds me somewhat of Travis Outlaw, in the way that he single-mindedly shots at the expense of others on the floor. Somedays, this works out (see his 54-odd points early this season). Other times it costs the team.
Honestly, I think we have a good shot at the finals this season, not counting the fact that this is an odd year. All we have to do is get back to playing through Timmy and TP, using Manu as our X factor, and taking advantage of our stunning young players. Has anyone noticed how nice it is to be able to turn to Mason instead of Horry? Just saying…
"In time we hate that which we often fear." (that means you Dallas)
by TerribleTim on Jan 14, 2009 11:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Another thing: Hi! MANU WE LOVE YOU, KEEP COMING TO PTR!!!! WE WOULD LOVE TO SEE YOU MORE OFTEN
(some Spurs players seriously check PTR)
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what."
by Chilai on Jan 15, 2009 12:20 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I love Tony and I believe he is the best point guard for the Spurs. However, it appears to me that he has a tendency to wilt in the 4th quarter. He either forces the ball, forces the pass, or makes mental errors. He just seems really fatigued in the last quarter of our games.
Maybe it’s all those years of organized basketball? He’s been playing since he was what?… 14 years old?
It’s January guys… and we’re O.K.
I am happy. I am proud. - Manu Ginobili
by bellasa on Jan 15, 2009 12:37 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
In Tony’s defense, he’s been pretty good this year. Except for the last two games.
by LatinD on Jan 15, 2009 8:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Can we even say things like “ho’s” in fanpost titles?
Demeaning, ATS. Flat out demeaning.
by SgtinManusArmy on Jan 15, 2009 4:07 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hey, if you can call me a “whore” like every other day, then I think “Ho” is acceptable.
Leave the gun; take the Ginobili.
by surfergirlsa on Jan 15, 2009 12:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, why is that?
You should definitely beat Sima to the punch next time, sfsa.
Or actually less Ron Burgundy movie quotes is also a good option for me.
I am happy. I am proud. - Manu Ginobili
by bellasa on Jan 15, 2009 2:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Go watch the movie already. I defy you to be bitter after exposure to it’s complete and utter ridiculousness bordering on brilliance.
by SgtinManusArmy on Jan 16, 2009 11:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
isnt the proper spelling HOE?
i only say this becaus ei guy play hoop with has a “Cheeri-Hoes” shirt………
by bones on Jan 15, 2009 12:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
“Hoes” is I believe the proper way to plural “Ho.” Good catch, bonesy.
by SgtinManusArmy on Jan 16, 2009 11:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Statistic cant say it all..
but watching by your eyes and you can see the bad play that STAT never show.
They are all great players, but having a good night and bad night is just normal.
And by the way, who’s “HO’s”? Is it the term right to use on every PTR poster?
I dont think you look to yourself first before calling us “HO’s”..
Sorry for that, but your post title is a lil demeaning..
by spoiled on Jan 15, 2009 5:21 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know about you, but I am a ho. Been one for 5 years now. My main clientele is fat old ladies or fat ladies in general, I also do old white guys, usually Senators or businessmen. My pimp, Pimp Fitzgerald, treats me pretty well, but the does take a 95% cut. All in all I do pretty well for myself, and Pimp Fitzgerald is a fair pimp, as far as pimps go.
I do take offense with the term “crack ho” though. Those people are just plain unprofessional.
So please ATS, next time, let’s leave our prejudices aside and remember that not all hoes do crack.
by Hipuks on Jan 15, 2009 5:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Meh. spoiled, read it in the spirit it was meant to. If you know ATS you know he’s not trying to insult you.
by LatinD on Jan 15, 2009 8:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought it was funny too, ATS. But then again I’m twisted… however, not apparently as twisted as Hipuks. Kudos, dude!
I am happy. I am proud. - Manu Ginobili
by bellasa on Jan 15, 2009 2:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah i do
i tought i post it quite fast too, unfortunately there’s no edit button. I apologize too, it might be my bad night like normal people do.
:D
by spoiled on Jan 15, 2009 4:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No worries. The lack of an edit button pains me too. (…otstanding… snif…)
by LatinD on Jan 15, 2009 4:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How in the world can you mourn ‘otstanding’ when the whole blog has taken it on as a description of a higher level of excellence?
Everybody has misspelled words, but so far, you are the only one who’s created something with your mistake. That’s nothing to “snif” over.
I am calm, filling myself with patience - Manu Ginobili
by jollyrogerwilco on Jan 15, 2009 8:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But did you catch how I misspelled “sniff”? Totally on purpose. Yeah.
by LatinD on Jan 15, 2009 8:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
not a misspelling
that’s an alternate as far as I’m concerned
I am calm, filling myself with patience - Manu Ginobili
by jollyrogerwilco on Jan 15, 2009 8:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
About your second big man (which I am 110% with you on) – from Marc Stein’s Daily Dime on ESPN this morning:
“Yet it’s no secret in NBA front-office circles that the Spurs, in spite of their limited trade assets, hope to acquire at least one more quality player before the Feb. 19 trade deadline. It would be tough, on this evidence, to dispute the theory that they’ll need another big man or another scoring threat to move into what Pop describes as the Lakers’ league.”
Allez Spurs!
by JustinBK on Jan 15, 2009 8:55 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
read that too. hoping for charlie villaneuva. if i post it enough and then throw a dash of salt over my shoulder and click my heels three times, perhaps it will come true.
bottom line on the ATS post for me is that he’s right. i also shook my head in dismay at the insinuation of stamplers comment about a long two being a win for the defense. it usually is a win for the defense except when tony shoots it.
he’s not a proto-typical point guard for sure, but he MUST be the focal point for any team that wishes to stop the spurs. if not, we win. period. THAT is what makes him great more than anything else.
manu gets some slack because he’s not yet back in mid-seaosn form – but when he is – look out. last nights win over LA is exhibit A. he has not been his best at all so far. but he will ge tthere.
by bones on Jan 15, 2009 12:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Warning: Content from Tony Parker apologist contained within….
I defend Tony on this site quite a bit and with good reason. I think he’s a top 5 NBA point guard. I can’t think of many other guys I’d take over him. To me, and I think this is the point of ATS’ post, it’s not about Tony vs. Manu. It’s about both guys needing to play well for us to win. And the Laker game is the perfect example of that. Gino led with 27, Timmeh had 20, and TP had 20. If all three of those guys get to 20, we’ve got a pretty good chance to win against ANYONE in the league, even the Lakers, Celtics, Cavs tier of teams, because we have a bench this season. Last season we did not (I count Manu as a starter even when he comes off the bench because he is always in at the end of games).
Manu was obviously not recovered earlier in the season and is just now getting into form. Last night, he looked more Manu-esque than at any time since early in the Suns series last season. The great thing about Tony’s game last night was he did what was needed. Manu was on, so they let him run. I was a little surprised to see at the end of the game that Tony had 20 points.
Anyway, it’s not about one versus the other, it’s the fact that we need 3 all-star caliber players hitting on all cylinders to have a shot at a chip this year. And better defense….
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." – Aldous Huxley
by spurchief on Jan 15, 2009 3:09 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
It’s definitely not about one versus the other. ATS’s a crackpot. I should turn this into my sig:
You know what? Manu doens’t deserve to touch the ball more than he does.
AusTechSpur, January 2008
by LatinD on Jan 15, 2009 3:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, the numbers support that statement.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Jan 15, 2009 3:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Meh. You sound like an accountant. He not only deserves to touch the ball, we won’t win shit if he doesn’t.
by LatinD on Jan 15, 2009 3:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I hope you don’t design dams with that same attitude and disregard for numbers.
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Jan 15, 2009 3:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Numbers are for wusses. My dams stand strong on sheer faith.
by LatinD on Jan 15, 2009 4:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
lol
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what."
by Chilai on Jan 15, 2009 6:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
BANNED for Heresy on ATS
i don’t think its fair to judge Manu too harshly, especially with the time he had to take to recover from his ankle.
I didn’t look at all the numbers and stats because i spend half my day frying my brain in classes at my college, but spurschief pretty much said it in two sentences. We need better D, and we need our big 3 to be great. I personally give Tony the most crap because i still am not trusting of his jumpshot still, and because he’s french. but to quote his most favorite word, he is still “unbeeleevable”
What the Bowen giveth Horry taketh away. --LatinD (2008 Playoffs Round 2, Game 1)
the Spurs do not defeat you so much as they grind you into tiny shards of psychological wreckage.
-the Denver Post
by Hamer_SpursFan on Jan 15, 2009 3:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hamer, unbeeleevable… classic.
I agree we win when the Bg 3 (not 1 or 2), but all 3 of our Bigs play well.
Of course, there are exemptions to the rule… see 2007 Finals Series. ;-)
I am happy. I am proud. - Manu Ginobili
by bellasa on Jan 15, 2009 6:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Isn’t that the one where Tony was THE SHIT?
We specialize in misinformation around here. Facts and stats just get in the way.
by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Jan 15, 2009 8:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s the one where the Spurs played such good TEAM defense that LeBron was held in check
and Tony also had a pretty good series too
Seriously though, I’ve been prepping a new piece on Tony — I’ll have it out soon as I can
SPOILER ALERT: It’s NOT about trading him
I am calm, filling myself with patience - Manu Ginobili
by jollyrogerwilco on Jan 15, 2009 9:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So, you want to waive him outright?
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." – Aldous Huxley
by spurchief on Jan 15, 2009 9:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m that transparent? Man! I need to quit telegraphing my punches.
I am calm, filling myself with patience - Manu Ginobili
by jollyrogerwilco on Jan 15, 2009 10:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Until the 4th Quarter of Game 4
I’ll always remember that Tony was the Finals MVP, but when it came down to winning time in the deciding game, the ball went through Manu everytime. Manu owned the 4th quarters of just about every series that year.
by tandyman on Jan 16, 2009 3:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, I just re-read that and I wasn’t clear.
I guess my point is that we totally owned Cleveland even though not all the Bigs were playing great. (Tony however shined during this series). But we need our entire Big 3 to be playing well in order to get out of the Wester Conference.
I am happy. I am proud. - Manu Ginobili
by bellasa on Jan 17, 2009 7:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ahh statistics
Here’s one for you … Manu’s true shooting percentage is 58.8% and TP’s is 55.9%. And remember, Manu’s playing poorly right now so what’s that say about TP’s shooting? Also, for the season Manu has better +- and 82games.com’s Roland Rating has Manu the highest of any Spur with significant minutes. Of course, Manu’s not playing very well right now so the Spurs must suck.
Honestly, I agree Manu’s 3pt shooting needs to improve. Not shooting the ball will not help this. I also really like TP. However, in crunch time, he is not that great. Also, when TP is running the point Manu doesn’t get many touches. Which is stupid because even though he is having a down year he’s still very productive. Notice how all his points came with TP off the floor against the Laker’s. Manu was having a great night and TP needed to get him the ball.
by bduran on Jan 16, 2009 2:57 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
A man after my own rate. I noticed that Roland Ratings had Manu on top when I checked 82games.com, but honestly, I never understood how they work, so I didn’t feel comfortable bringing them up. Do you know? Care to explain a bit?
by LatinD on Jan 16, 2009 5:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It doesnt matter. Every statistic that supports Manu is absolutely 100% correct
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what."
by Chilai on Jan 16, 2009 11:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It used to be very similar to +-. You looked at the net point difference of the team with the player on the floor and add that too the net point difference of the team with the player on the bench (this is per 48 minutes). For example if we out score teams in general by 5 pts per 48 with Ginobili in, and by -3 pts with him out, he’d have a Roland Rating of 8. Recently they’ve added a production measure similar to Hollinger’s PER and factored that in somehow. They don’t seem to publish the exact method.
Oh, and yeah, I deliberately looked for stuff that supported my love of Manu and ignored stuff that didn’t.
by bduran on Jan 16, 2009 11:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ah, thanks. The usual obscure stat you’re supposed to accept at face value.
by LatinD on Jan 16, 2009 12:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How the heck did I type “rate” instead of “heart”? What does that say about me?
by LatinD on Jan 16, 2009 12:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That you should try drinking less....
Or not! It’s too bad your typo didn’t sound dirtier…I could’ve gotten off the hook. Hey, keep drinking and blogging—I’m bound to be redeemed eventually! ;)
Leave the gun; take the Ginobili.
by surfergirlsa on Jan 16, 2009 1:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
it’s says your spelling is otstanding.
I am happy. I am proud. - Manu Ginobili
by bellasa on Jan 17, 2009 7:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 
























