Pounding The Rock: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Fedor vs Rogers Results and Live Coverage

Quit Picking On My Buddy, You Dicks.

 

The following started out as a simple reply to a reply that PtR member Spurchief posited to AusTechSpur (Wayne) on Matthew’s last post. Follow all that? Good. As is my nature, my answer grew longer and longer, so I decided to make an entry out of it, partly to defend Matthew a bit (not that he needs defending for anything but his personal life) and partly because I’ve grown weary of seeing the same post headlining our sweet blog for a week.

Spurchief wrote to Wayne:

..but you have normally weighed in with rational viewpoints and this one is no exception. I don’t think this position is much different than Powell’s but he is much more indignant about the lack of moves by the FO than you (or I are). I choose to believe that the lack of progress by the FO is not the result of intent, but a lack of opportunities to improve given the parameters of:

1. Don’t exceed the cap
2. Find a guy who fits, chemistry-wise
3. Ability to defend is important
4. Defer to the Big 3 offensively
5. The team has to be contenders every year

Who in the last 3 years of free agency has fit that bill? And as for the draft, while I agree that RC’s rep is overblown in this regard (although a great season by Ian may change that), most rookies don’t make an impact and SA needed immediate impact (see #5 above).”

I never had pie-in-the-sky dreams for someone such as Maggette. All I wanted was Azuibuike and I think he would've fit in perfectly fine with conditions 1 thru 5 on your post. Anyway, it appears that's not happening now, and when the Clippers front office is more forward thinking than ours is (getting Camby for nothing? I mean, WTF?), it may indeed be a sign of the apocalypse.

So far all we know is that the Spurs drafted three young guys and signed another relatively young one in Roger Mason.

Now we have to play the waiting game. We'll have to be patient to find out if A) Pop and the FO drafted guys worth drafting in Hill, Gist and Hairston, B) if they have the guts to put a couple of second rounders (or maybe even an undrafted guy such as Powell or Tolliver) on the regular season roster and C) if Pop has the patience to ever play them (as well as Mahinmi) when the games count, instead of "proven" i.e. old and slow, veterans.

Past track record and all available evidence suggest that the answer to all three questions will be a big, huge, sloppy, NO.

I'm not sure if I'm on the same page with Matty, Wayne or the majority of PtR with their offseason wish-lists or battle plans. Obviously, some opinions matter more to me than others, but I haven't taken the time to research what everyone here thinks we should do and don't plan on doing so.

I think that Matthew's point in this post was that for some time now there has been a massive talent gap between the third best player on the roster and the fourth best and as our entire roster, especially the role players, continue to age, the gap continues to widen, which is not good, as I hope everyone would agree. The best chance for the Spurs to win a title in '08 and beyond is for the gap to narrow. Our fourth best player has to be able to hold Tony Parker's jockstrap, figuratively speaking (although if he literally wanted to do so, it would certainly create an interesting new angle on the team's locker room dynamic that would, I am certain, make the Spurs all of a sudden more "interesting" to ESPN and bloggers worldwide).

Anyway, the Spurs are going to stay under the cap. You know it, we know it, everyone knows it. To wish otherwise is akin to wishing for a bigger winky - grow up already, because it's just not going to happen. For the team to field a fourth (or fifth, or God help us, sixth) guy who can actually play he'll have to be young. Young players come cheap because they're not who they will be yet, known commodities, and with them you're just basically hoping and guessing. Veteran players who've proven themselves in the NBA are expensive. If you find yourself a cheap veteran player, like the Spurs have filled out their rosters with all these years, then guess what? It means, with the odd exception here or there, the guy sucks.

I don't think either Matthew or I are guilty of not having the proper respect and reverence for the past four titles. We're very thankful, believe me and personally, living in the Bay Area, I know it could be much, much worse. Here, people soil themselves just for making the playoffs and the Warriors have never been a legitimate contender in my two decades of following basketball.

I'm not going to cry or act like an asshole if the Spurs never win another one, but that doesn't mean I can't still root for them to win and criticize those responsible when I feel they're making mistakes. Pop's legacy is assured. For that matter so is Robert Horry's and Michael Finley's. Their lives will not be affected one way or another by me caring about their follies or foibles.

The point is, I have to care about their fuckups and call them on it. I have to. If I stop caring about it, then why be a fan in the first place? Why write about it? Blogging is no place for a "C'est la vie" attitude.

As Duncan and Manu continue to age, we need more help from the rest of the roster, not less. Barry had a good run as a Spur and Horry and Finley were serviceable. The time has come from new blood and the answer is youth, not experience. Our big three hid the weaknesses of the others by being young and in their prime. That luxury is gone forever and now a new formula is needed. Whoever will be the savior for the Spurs, if such a person exists, he will not be over 30 years old. For years now the big three have had to compensate for the lack of athleticism of their teammates, a task that has grown more difficult with their owned diminishing physical ability. I think they would welcome the chance and the opportunity for once to be the less athletic than their teammates and to instead compensate for their experience. You can teach people how to play team ball, you can't teach them how to run and jump.

While it appears that the Spurs have shown more commitment and willingness to give younger unknowns a chance this year, they haven't said they will do so definitively and the front office hasn't exactly established a track record of being honest with the press, especially the non-local press. Not that I blame them, as most of the non-local press are fucktards. Still, the only reason the Spurs now have all these roster openings this year for younger players is because not enough precautions were taken two years ago or last year during the off-season. The front office gambled with old, crappy players instead of mining for youth and exercising some patience, and two of the past three years, no matter how the losses transpired, the bottom line is they lost.

I'm not bitter about how 2008 ended the way I was about 2006. I'm convinced Pop blew that one with his Van Exel over Udrih foolishness, as well as his over reliance on Tinyball. 2008 was different, maybe less unavoidable, for a variety of circumstances. I just want to make sure that the front office has learned from past mistakes, that's all, and I think Matthew would tell you the same thing.

0 recs  |  Comment 23 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Oh for christ’s sake. I just finished 2 hours of blogging torture watching summer league game 4 and now I have to respond to this. Stampler, you will pay. I’m going to crack open a beer and commence to straightening you out.

by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Jul 17, 2008 10:18 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Anyway, the Spurs are going to stay under the cap. You know it, we know it, everyone knows it. To wish otherwise is akin to wishing for a bigger winky – grow up already, because it’s just not going to happen. For the team to field a fourth (or fifth, or God help us, sixth) guy who can actually play, he’ll have to be young. Young players come cheap because they’re not who they will be yet, known commodities, and with them you’re just basically hoping and guessing. Veteran players who’ve proven themselves in the NBA are expensive. If you find yourself a cheap veteran player, like the Spurs have filled out their rosters with all these years, then guess what? It means, with the odd exception here or there, the guy sucks.

I never had pie-in-the-sky dreams for someone such as Maggette.

For years now the big three have had to compensate for the lack of athleticism of their teammates, a task that has grown more difficult with their owned diminishing physical ability.

I’d like to single out the above three statements/paragraphs. I think they capture the essence of our respective points.

1. The Spurs will stay under the cap. Any fourth or fifth player will be cheap. That means veterans who can contribute with experience. Or gamble on a young player. I agree with this wholeheartedly. We WON’T do anything else. We won’t bring in a player at more than the mid-level exception. It just won’t happen.

2. Yeah, it is pie-in-the-sky but we can dream and it only has to happen just one year. The Spurs, because of their stinginess seem to always be in the mix for getting a deal on a player. That’s mostly a good thing.

3. This is the one I disagree with you on because of the implication of your statement that the front office has chosen experienced unathletic players over the opposite. I think the rather remarkable job the front office has done is that they haven’t just stuck with an M.O. They have changed it. That was the point I should have gotten across more clearly. The Spurs HAVE tried to get more athletic in the past. It’s just that they have done it in the context of your first point. The only year we didn’t was last year. So, if you want to say that the front office screwed the pooch THIS year. That’s cool. But this was the first year they did. The year before they exchanged Elson for Nestorovic. They brought in a YOUNG Jackie Butler. They kept James White around. Hedo, Stephen Jackson, Speedy, Rasho (when they signed him was young, not athletic), Beno, etc. They haven’t solely relied on youth OR age. Athleticism or expericence. Hell, they played Tony at 19 and drafted and played Malik. They gave Darius a shot, he failed. This was a year in which their mix didn’t work. That’s all. And by didn’t work we still got to the WCF. Hell, they brought in Bruce in the first place. They don’t get enough credit for that.

Going into next year I expect us to again have three studs and a bunch of suck. Well, a bunch of gambles really. Pop will gamble that the big 3 stay healthy. That Ian gets better. That George Hill can take The JV’s minutes. That Gist can be our young Dennis Rodman crashing the offensive glass nand providing energy. That KT, if he signes, can give us 15-20 minutes a game in the playoffs and that FinDog, if he signs, can knock down some shots. Until point #1 above changes, that’s what we get.

by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Jul 17, 2008 10:40 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

This is the team for better or worse

Is what I was going to post in the aftermath of the Camby deal and the pending Azubuike signing. Furthermore, the Camby deal likely means the Nuggets have the cash to resigh JR Smith now, so there goes another name bandied about here.

I really think Mahinmi can be a big, big help sooner rather than later, he just looks extremely athletic and comfortable in the paint, and both of those areas should improve, particularly the latter with more experience. My hope would be that he would be part of the regular rotation by new years, with Gist being the energy/rebound/hustle guy.

I know its only been three summer league games, but George Hill just doesnt seem like he will ever live up to 1st round status, meanwhile Donte Green is tearing it up so far and wouldve addressed many of the teams needs.

Not exactly sure what I was getting at, but your point about the drop off b/t the 3rd best and 4th best is quite glaring….to the FO credit they have tried to address this in the past; theyve called on Maggette in the past, had the JR trade fall through, Jackson left for more money in Atlanta etc etc.

The FO has done remarkably well filling out this roster based on your 5 parameters, but now is not the time to play it safe if theyre to capitalize on the Big 3s remaining peak years.

And, is it Gist or “Jist” ?

Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.

by bren on Jul 17, 2008 11:08 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

The PA guy in Vega pronounces it with a ‘G’ like girl.

Donte has played 2 games. One good, one bad. That is if you judge them by offense alone. I think he has potential, obviously, but he does have a long way to go.

by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Jul 17, 2008 11:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Meh

Hand-wringing over next season seems silly to me. Look to the future when only the three “studs” are on the books. Either gear up then, and a couple of the youngsters will come round by then, or find a new star to help replace timmy. Team is good enough to contend for title still, if all 3 are healthy, like you say. and in the future you’ll see them bring in guys that’ll make you forget about beno “i was mediocre for one season” udrih. but yes, a lotta old guys on the squad. still, the future is freakin bright.

by tkired on Jul 18, 2008 10:30 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I have to agree with ATS...

...in that the Spurs this last year decided to roll with their veteran team one more time, and it blew up in their faces. If you talked to Pop or RC privately, I’m sure they’d tell you they F*d up. But as ATS mentioned, all the championships were won with a different formula:

In 1999, they needed grit, defense, and shooting, so they bring in Mario Elie, Jerome Kersey, Jaren Jackson, and win that way.

In 2003, they need youth and athleticism, so they go with crazy-ass Stephen Jackson, 20-year old Frenchie, and wildly unpredictable Manu.

In 2005, the team was pretty much set, but bringing in Bones and Nazr were critical to the championship. They played Beno plenty, but he absolutely killed them in two games against Detroit, and rightfully lost the coaches’ trust. We criticize them for playing Van Exel, but imagine if Pop had just stuck with Beno and he had cratered again again in the playoffs. We’d be killing Pop for that, too; in the end, as fans, we criticize based on results, even if the strategy was sound.

In 2007, again, the team was set, and won a championship with basically the same team that lost to Dallas the year before. It was not unreasonable to think they could wring one more good year out of the vets before retooling. It just didn’t work out, and like we’ve been saying, “didn’t work out” means “losing in the conference finals.”

Pop basically came right out and said that George Hill was going to be their backup on day 1. The fact that they signed Mason, but didn’t retain Bones, and haven’t yet resigned Finley, or Horry, or even KT, speaks volumes about where their priorities are this year. With Timmy, Manu, and Tony, the team will be good regardless, so I’d love to see them play the youngsters a ton to get them ready.

Boston won their title largely based on their big three plus unexpected contributions from bit players, like Dickensian Street Urchin Leon Powe. I could see either Mahinmi or Gist coming up with that kind of a big 15 pt-15 rebound game off the bench in the playoffs, but it’s hard to imagine, say Fab or KT doing the same. They’d probably max out at something like 10 pts and 8 rebounds.

So, sorry Stampler, perhaps I’ll have to relinquish my status as your favorite poster. I think Pop (aka AMoL, for Autobot Matrix of Leadership) does try new things, learn lessons from it, and employ those lessons in the future. We dislike Tinyball, but you’d have to admit that’s a pretty big departure from Twin Towers. He’d never gone with Hack-a-Shaq, then out of nowhere he lays it on the Suns. He and the front office do try new things. That’s where I really disagreed with Powell and disagree with you.

Catch the Spurs Spirit! It's a Fast-breakin' Fiesta!

by tomasito on Jul 18, 2008 10:30 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice concise summary of the championship years. I still think that Udrih deserved a little more of a shot in 2006. Yes, he almost torpedoed the Spurs in 2005, but he was still a young player. There are ways to develop a player’s confidence and keeping him on the bench behind a player who could not shoot the rock at even 40% is not one of them.

Also, it is hard to fault the Spurs for free agency and drafts from 2006 and earlier (going back to 1997 for this discussion). Obviously the big 3 were great drafts, and probably only one of them was due to an inordinate amount of luck. They also picked up a guy who could develop into a productive frontcourt player (Ian), and a guy who is now a starter at his position (Udrih). Salmons is a decent SF that the Spurs could use, but they traded him to get a competent backup for Tony (Speedy). Barbosa was traded away for a pick that would later help the Spurs bring in Nazr.

In 2007 they gambled on Splitter and threw away a perfectly good pick on Marcus Williams. In hindsight, the Splitter gamble seems foolish, but maybe it wasn’t that obvious that he would command a large salary overseas. At this point Landry seems like he would have made a much better late first round pick, but maybe they deserve a pass on that. Regardless, Glen Davis was available when the Spurs picked Marcus “the blind gunner” Williams. He’s a guy who at the very least would have been a threat to make the roster.

I am sure I have already voiced my quibbles on the 2008 nba draft far too often in this forum. The results are not in yet, but I am still not convinced the Spurs made the right picks (other than grabbing Gist late).

In summary I am pretty satisfied with the front office’s performance overall, but in the last couple of drafts they have blown some chances to improve the Spurs in key areas, and of course there was also the Scola debacle. Interestingly enough, a division rival seems to have born the benefit of the majority of the Spurs front office blunders. Landry, Scola, and Donte Greene could all have donned black and silver had Buford and Pop so desired. Also, a potential finals foe has two players (Davis and Giddens) who the Spurs could have selected. Hopefully the failure to acquire these players (of course we couldn’t have had both Giddens AND Greene) won’t hurt the Spurs doubly with them torching the Spurs in the playoffs.

by VWolf on Jul 18, 2008 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

“Spurs front office blunders. Landry, Scola, and Donte Greene could all have donned black and silver had Buford and Pop so desired. Also, a potential finals foe has two players (Davis and Giddens) who the Spurs could have selected.”

Agree, Scola was a blunder. Landry on hindsight was a better pick than Williams. It’s still debateable if Greene is better than Hill. BTW, did you notice that all these 3 players are playing for the Rockets. Add insult to injury, they steal Barry!

Still, given what perennial late round options that the Spurs can pick from, they’ve done pretty good. We definitely are certainly spoiled when we expect a late 1st rounder like Hill to be a savior. Most late 1st rounder are busts and we for somehow have some godly power to make a pick much better than just about everyone else.

The league is also getting smarter, consider all the other teams that have benefited from acquiring Spurs personnel. The odds for us to continue our drafting magic is certainly dwindling.

We can all however take inspiration from Boston. With 3 players taking all the cap room, they’ve managed to build a formidable championship team from scrubs. That team consisted of reliable close to retirement players (Brown, Cassell), overlooked veterans that can reliably hit the 3 (Posey, House) and energetic young players who play defense and crash the boards (Rondo, Powe, Perkins).

Unfortunately, there aren’t any desirable near retirement players left. So we just have to stick to the other 2 options. Bowen types essentially… hit the 3 in offense, play tenacious defense and hopefully crash the boards.

by ceperez on Jul 20, 2008 8:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Something to consider

“There’s a wasted life in the difference between striving for perfection and accepting nothing less.”

Would that be the difference between Mike D’Antoni and Gregg Popovich?

by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Jul 18, 2008 11:32 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

If you told that to Pop, I still think he would tell you some variation of “Get off my lawn!”

by Gino20 on Jul 22, 2008 6:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess – since Stampler quoted me – that I might need to clarify my point. I did not intend to attack Matthew’s post. In fact, I think in principle, the viewpoints are somewhat the same: this offseason, in light of the available parties, has been a disappointment. Matthew expressed – I think – it was because the FO did not want any of the younger, athletic players out there. My point was that, given the 5 constraints I listed, they couldn’t have gotten any of those guys anyway. In some ways it’s irrevelant – we have who we have for 08-09 – but I have to believe that the FO looked to upgrade and did not find the right players / deals, because of price and long-term contracts. For example, I believe we could have gotten in the James Posey sweepstakes (sad, isn’t it, that James Posey gets a sweepstakes?) but he wanted a long deal and he’s not an upgrade offensively. Azuibake ended up getting about the same as Mason, so we could not fit both of them into the MLE and Mason was unrestricted, making him more of a sure thing. This is the NBA we love: a world where Keyon Dooling is insulted by the Magic’s bi-annual exception of 2.4 million/year for 2 years. Keyon Dooling? Really? We got who we could get.

Regardless, if I seemed like I was attacking Matthew’s position, I apologize. After being on several other boards to talk about the only sports team about which I am passionate, I appreciate the healthy and friendly discussion that occurs on this board.

"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." – Aldous Huxley

by spurchief on Jul 18, 2008 2:07 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

No need to apologize for maybe or maybe not attacking Matthew. Besides, Stampler called us dicks. :)

by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Jul 18, 2008 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I meant it in a good way. Dicks are cool. I happen to own one. If I was really upset, I’d have called y’all fucktards.

by Aaronstampler on Jul 18, 2008 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ditto – taken as intended.

"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." – Aldous Huxley

by spurchief on Jul 18, 2008 5:33 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

A few observations,

Those of who think Pop would say he “F’d up going with the veterans this season are nuts.

Pop is retired on active duty. He has his championships and his desire is gone.

His foolish behavior last season high fiving opponents and smacking them on the ass right after the Spurs experienced another gut wrenching loss should be a tip off.

Pop is now playing the elder venerable elder statesman role. He totally caved in announcing that “there was no foul of Fisher”. He is completely full of himself right now and wants to ride out the remaining Timmeh years on a yacht, then drop a steaming pile of shit into the next coache’s lap.

At least with the Spurs frugal ways, the next coach will not have any straight jacket long term contracts holding them back.

Pop and organization have blundered badly in the past. Pop went into comfort mode for a while after winning the 99 championship bringing in friendly vets like Terry Porter and Danny Ferry. Guys that he wouldn’t have to coach too much. He could just roll out the balls. These friendly vets helped bring us crushing defeats during the Shaq-Kobe years.

After years of getting lambasted, pride began to kick back in. The team made some bold moves drafting Manu, Tony and Beno. They brought in Bowens to stop us from getting torched by Kobe. Anyone remember when Pop had old man river Porter “D’ing up Kobe? He started his “nobody drives the middle” montra. Pop gave himself 20 different ulcers trying to develop the young guys and it payed off with a tremendous championship run.

Now, we are back to 2001.

I just don’t feel Pop has any pride left. He doesn’t want to go through another real “coaching” experience reigning in combative older players and wild younger players. He is on a river walk cruise for the rest of his career.

by Clintons Cigar on Jul 20, 2008 2:02 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Do you realize that you are basically just making assertions without any evidence or even an attempt to convince us? Are you Pop’s concubine or something, that we should simply take your insight into his mind as the gospel truth?

I’m certainly closer to the Popovich fans than his detractors, but I’m willing to listen and consider well-reasoned arguments. You’re just being silly.

I'm comfortable winning -- Emmanuel Ginobili

by pollackj on Jul 22, 2008 2:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I admire your dedication to nonsensical analysis.

by LatinD on Jul 22, 2008 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really liked Terry Porter as a Spur. He was not responsible for the defeats to the Lakers and the Spurs might have won it all this season with a reliable backup like TP.

Manu was drafted in 99 with the second to last pick. It is hard to tie that pick to an attempt restore order that began in 2002.

by VWolf on Jul 23, 2008 5:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

OK. Let me break it down some…

For the 1999-2000 season, the Spurs brought in…drum roll please…..dddddddd..

Terry Porter and Samaki Walker…oh yeah!

When I said drafting Ginobes, I meant bringing him in. Drafting him was not bold. He was a late second round gamble.

As for the awesome draft record we had…..

29 Leon Smith (King HS-Chicago) – Traded to Dallas
(a real knucklehead…what a pick)
#57 Emmanuel Ginobili (Italy)

2000
#54 Cory Hightower (Indian Hills Community College, Iowa) – Traded to Lakers
(If memory serves correct, he played some time at Carver High School under coach Reeves)

The Spurs made some aggressive moves after the brutal years of the Laker’s dynasty when Mr Potato Head, Speedy Claxton (my all time favorite Spurs back up PG), and Stephen Jackson (mad skills) were brought in.

So I guess your dismissing Pop’s foolish behavior last season? That little treasure slip your minds? I was his biggest fan when he was actually coaching. You know, doing those little things like calling time outs, ripping his players for not protecting the middle of the court, making legitimate substitutions, helping young guys learn the game. I didn’t see that this season. I saw him sitting on the bench looking disinterested.

You ever see Red Auerbach do what Pop did last season? John Wooden? Bob Knight? Pat Riley? Coach K? Come on, you have to be blind not to notice the guy’s work has fallen way off. Good grief.

Pop is a basketball genius and he makes moves, when he wants to, that the rest of us can only dream of. But, when Sean Elliot is out coaching him from the announcer booth, then something is way wrong.

by Clintons Cigar on Jul 23, 2008 9:36 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Random Comment

Just as an outsider note since I don’t really frequent this blog much:

You guys are talking about “not going over the cap” a lot, but the Spurs are already well over the salary cap. I think what you mean is the luxury tax threshold, which is about a 12M dollar difference.

Purchasing my Dragic jersey

by rosewood on Jul 31, 2008 3:27 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think we actually went over the cap until we signed Kurt Thomas. But you are right, we don’t differentiate between the two and they are quite different. Both in number and impact.

After we sign our rookies and whoever else I imagine we will be about halfway between the two.

Now back to BSotS with you and your Dragic worshiping self. Good luck with your Slovenian point guard. I hope he has a good year setting up Tiago for easy dunks and open jumpers.

by Wayne Vore (ATS) on Aug 1, 2008 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the San Antonio Spurs.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Spurs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Black_small
Ginobili vs. Dracula, Chapter 2
Gothicduncan_small
WatchSpurs
Spurromeo_small
George Hill: Tony Parker 0.99?
Black_small
Ginobili vs. Dracula, Part 1
Small
The importance of Tim Kness to the Spurs success in 2009-10

Recent FanPosts

Myspace2_small
Editorial: Why Tony Parker's Injury is Good for the Spurs
Ginobili_small
Spurs underperform in back-to-backs
Small
The view from the upper bowl of EnergySolutions Arena (game observations)
Sbn-avatar_small
NBA Live 10 Simulation: Week 3 POLL
Sbn-avatar_small
NBA Live 10 Simulation: Regular Season : San Antonio Spurs at Portland Trail Blazers
Bunnycookie_small
Sit Courtside at the Toros Game of Your Choice
Zoe_spurs1_small
Nov. 4th Other Games Thread

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Who has the best hair in the NBA?

  549 votes | Results

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Fatal Staples Center Collapse Brings Merciful Early End To Clippers Game (via TheOnion)

So damn good.
It's official.

(via Sam Amick)
BATMAN!!!!

Recent FanShots

ESPN> Iverson leaves Grizzlies for personal reasons
POW! Right in the kisser!
The Onion: "40,000 Revenge Seeking Bats Descend Upon Manu Ginobili"
40,000 Revenge Seeking Bats Descend on Manu Ginobili
ESPN> Don't forget Bobcats in Stephen Jackson sweepstakes
Shooting Rampage at Fort Hood, Texas
Free Beer... if you live in SA
TH: DeBeast 10 seconds away from being a Cav
Like School on Christmas
More Sandwich Stories From Matty

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Coach

Ats_big_small Wayne Vore (ATS)

Player

Supergino_small LatinD

Doas_small jollyrogerwilco

Bunnycookie_small Lauri

Oberto_fab_small silverandblack_davis

Myspace2_small Tim C.

4558041c970_main200_small CapHill

Announcer

Manucrazy_small Aaronstampler

Zoe_spurs1_small BlaseE

Small CECabrera21

Profile_5_small Fred Silva