Just What Exactly is Henry Abbott Implying?
Okay, I read this on Henry Abbott's Truehoop this morning.
Check it
In that same article, Quick writes about a shocking offer Pritchard reportedly got at the draft combine: "Sitting high in the stands at the Milk House arena where the marginal prospects scrimmaged -- far from the courtside seats Pritchard so preferred -- Pritchard that morning was approached by a general manager of a Western Conference power. With bright lights illuminating the court below, Pritchard sat in a darkened corner with the general manager. The general manager wanted the Blazers' No. 1 pick. And he was willing to offer a player that will be a first-ballot Hall of Famer." I have heard this story more than once too, and once again I think you can figure it out. "A Western Conference power?" What's that, like Dallas, Phoenix, and San Antonio? You know we're not talking about Steve Nash 'cause the Suns' whole system only works with him. And at this point I'd say it's a stretch to call Dirk Nowitzki a sure-fire first-ballot Hall of Famer. So ... you're a smart kid. You figure it out. If it's true, that's shocking, right? I heard this rumor more than once before the draft, but never in a way that makes me feel certain it's true. It could have been a rumor started in Portland to drive up the value of the top overall pick.
Is Abbott trying to suggest that Buford offered Tim Duncan for Oden? Unless Manu is the "1st ballot HOF" he was talking about, (I strongly doubt it) who else could it be?
He says it's a Western Conference power. That's three teams, us, Suns and Mavs. He says he doesn't consider Dirk a sure thing first ballot HOF. (FYI: I disagree). He says it can't be Nash because he runs the whole show. So it has to be Duncan, right?
Sorry, I think the story is either complete non-sense or Abbott isn't thinking properly. There is no way in hell we're trading Tim Duncan or even contemplating it. That would go against the very fabric of what this organization is about. It's a non-starter and not happening, ever. He is more untradeable than LeBron James and Dwyane Wade combined.
Either the author, Jason Quark is completely making it up, or it's a BS rumor. The only other possible explanation is that Abbott is mistaken and it was Dirk that they were discussing. Or that "Western Conference Power" was an exaggeration for Houston/Utah/Lakers etc. They were not offering Tim Duncan. I cannot accept it.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Just What Exactly is Henry Abbott Implying?
Here are the three most important details about this nonsense:
- "Western conference power"
- "First-ballot HOF-er"
- Oregonian newspaper rife with run-amok-ery during the most intoxicating time to be a Blazer fan since 1977.
Re: Just What Exactly is Henry Abbott Implying?
"All the while, Pritchard couldn't help but remember a conversation he had earlier that week with Gregg Popovich. Pritchard said the Spurs coach told him he was in a position to experience a twin-towers tandem unlike any other in NBA history. Sure, Popovich had David Robinson and Tim Duncan, who combined to win two championships. But Robinson, Popovich reminded Pritchard, retired five years after Duncan joined the Spurs.
Pritchard, meanwhile, could pair LaMarcus Aldridge, his budding big man who had just been named to the All-Rookie team, with Oden. The tandem could blossom and play together for 10 years -- and unlike Robinson and Duncan -- Aldridge and Oden could play together when both were in their prime."
Saying that someone could anchor the best front-line in NBA history is a great way to get a team to part with him!
Re: Just What Exactly is Henry Abbott Implying?
It's Allen Iverson stupid.
Not Kobe. Not Dirk. Not Timmy D.
Re: Just What Exactly is Henry Abbott Implying?
Re: Just What Exactly is Henry Abbott Implying?
Maybe you guys should just have a post where we all scout ourselves.
I could get along with Damon Stoudamire, Sheed, Zach Randolph, Derrick Coleman, Shawn Kemp, Josh Howard, etc. though. IfyaknowwhatImean...
Re: Just What Exactly is Henry Abbott Implying?
by massive boisson on Jul 3, 2007 6:21 AM CDT reply actions
Re: Just What Exactly is Henry Abbott Implying?
Re: Just What Exactly is Henry Abbott Implying?
I could see somebody thinking an Amare-for-Oden swap might make sense. It's swapping an athletic scorer for an athletic defender. On paper, it might look even - but anyone with half a brain would know that most of Amare's worth comes from playing with Nash, and Oden would likely do as well, with defense too.
I could see Steve Kerr offering Amare for the #1 pick tho - they'd benefit significantly if Portland was stupid enough to go for it.
Honestly tho, if I'm Kerr, I wouldn't mind offering Nash AND Amare for the #1, then take Durant instead of Oden. Nash is old, and he's got two seasons max left in him, if that. Amare is one of the most over-rated players in the league. Durant could do some serious damage in Phoenix's scheme, along with Barbosa, Diaw, and Marion.
If I'm Portland, I don't listen to trade offers involving the first pick - period.
Re: Just What Exactly is Henry Abbott Implying?
by Gros Membres on Jul 3, 2007 8:36 PM CDT up reply actions
Re: Just What Exactly is Henry Abbott Implying?
Re: Just What Exactly is Henry Abbott Implying?
BTW-Love the site.
"I am happy. I am proud." - Manu Ginobili
Re: Just What Exactly is Henry Abbott Implying?
by PapaSpurf on Jul 3, 2007 9:00 PM CDT reply actions
Re: Just What Exactly is Henry Abbott Implying?
do you read truehoop, its amazing and useful site written with love.
perhaps this was just a bad call.
and wtf am i doing defening henry mf abbotttttt
by massive boisson on Jul 4, 2007 8:11 AM CDT reply actions

by 


























